- Location
- US
- Pronouns
- He/Him
Who did you visit?
Who did you visit?
Why was that?
I'm an idiot.Looking back on the claiming, I agree it was a bad idea. If Onedine wasn't the one who really kicked things off, I would be voting for whoever it was. That being said, Meso's still weird, as he did kinda plant the idea in our minds that claiming was a good idea.
Totodile, though, claimed we had two fools with two different drawbacks. I did not see another fool claim, so I'm suspicious of them being mafia. I deliberately screwed with the exact wording of the ability I have, and if they're mafia and know all the role drawbacks, that might be why. As such, I'm voting on
[X] vote Totodileplayz
for now. Might change it if I hear an actually good reason to vote for someone besides 'everyone seems innocent, I'll just vote for someone I have a gut read on' because that's equally likely to be just some villager being paranoid/having a different playstyle than you.
...noooo? I said 'if'. I think Nictis also confirmed that they didn't start with them all later on. Also, if I knew all the drawbacks, Onedine said his drawback was different from Tykan, so why would I have chosen a drawback already known when I'd seen that the other two fools had different ones?
You didn't say "if Mafia knows" you said "if there Mafia and know all the role drawbacks" which to me parses as if you assume that Mafia will have that information and that Totadile, by indicating what drawbacks exist, has indicated they are scum....noooo? I said 'if'. I think Nictis also confirmed that they didn't start with them all later on. Also, if I knew all the drawbacks, Onedine said his drawback was different from Tykan, so why would I have chosen a drawback already known when I'd seen that the other two fools had different ones?
No, I'm town looking for evidence that you're scum. I mean it is you or Scia and Scia could have done a lot more damage a lot earlier. She could have killed Shadell and the voted with you to kill me today and it would be game over. That she didn't do that leaves me with very few other possibilities than you being scum, I just have to find a way to prove it that doesn't involve showing people my rolecard.Feels like you're a scum trying to search for any justification for lynching me here.
I promise I'll behave.Which is still banned btw.
Probably doesn't need to be said, but y'know... Cutting off that train early after rereading a previous game.
I felt so bad for everybody involved in that one.Which is still banned btw.
Probably doesn't need to be said, but y'know... Cutting off that train early after rereading a previous game.
That's a qualifying statement. 'If they are mafia and know all the role drawbacks' is different from 'if they are mafia and THEREFORE know all the role drawbacks'.
I mean, sure, but it's also highly unlikely I could have anticipated that. If I were scum and knew all the drawbacks, I would have seen every person had differing drawbacks (assuming IH didn't share Scia's drawback), and being the ONE PERSON that shared a drawback with someone else would make no sense as a claim.And picking Tykan's drawback is what got him killed, so I'd say it worked pretty well.
There was no reason to assume Mafia knew the drawbacks. Like it was not remotely hinted in anything Town has seen. But you suggested it, and wound up with the only identical drawback to anybody else.That's a qualifying statement. 'If they are mafia and know all the role drawbacks' is different from 'if they are mafia and THEREFORE know all the role drawbacks'.
I mean, sure, but it's also highly unlikely I could have anticipated that. If I were scum and knew all the drawbacks, I would have seen every person had differing drawbacks (assuming IH didn't share Scia's drawback), and being the ONE PERSON that shared a drawback with someone else would make no sense as a claim.
And you think a relative newbie would commit to a play that made NO sense, just because they exactly anticipated this course of events, AND were confident enough in their prediction to go through with it?So whether it made sense or not, it has served you really well.
No, I think a relatively inexperienced but talented player could make that error and then stick to it convincingly after the fact so that it benefits their team, though.And you think a relative newbie would commit to a play that made NO sense, just because they exactly anticipated this course of events, AND were confident enough in their prediction to go through with it?
I laid out my defense before. All I can add is that if I were scum I would have done something with this role. Cop is one of the unique roles, so nobody else could contradict me. I could have come up with a drawback that left me more effective, and made up some results more interesting than "roleblocked, town, town, town."
The existence of the scum Lawyer would give some room for plausible deniability. It is definitely the sort of thing I'd be tempted to try if I were scum.If you claimed to have spotted scum, we'd have voted them and, were they town, you'd have died shortly after. Outing scum very late into the game would just read as bussing, and would help you a bit, but wouldn't too much if they were already safe claims.
You could have done something like what Scia's done and just out scum very early for strong towncred, but that's a high risk play, and the safer scum play would be to mostly keep lowish profile and then claim pretty useless reads, so it's also not that disturbing when you don't become a high priority mark.
And why's that?I can see, arguably, stronger arguments for a Pyromancer vote.