- Pronouns
- He
Everyone here will know about the stone regardless. We have to use our Stone to transform. Hiding the Stone stopped being an option when this turned into a big group working together instead of a sorta kidnapping.
I'm not expecting her to get pickpocketed right now, I'm just illustrating that Ryza is vulnerable in this matter and that these people are not friends of ours. We have no reason to believe that Belle and Co will keep it secret, and that the people they tell won't act on it.If the stone gets pickpocketed it'd be immediately noticed, since presumably Ryza would half-shift and fly away shortly after making the oath.
And in all likelihood, the stone won't be recognized as religious at all.If we are concerned about the stone oath being unfamiliar, then the weaker oath won't help. If Im recalling correctly humans don't worship The Mother nor does she seem to be mentioned in their doctrine at all. If they ever did include her, it was lost with the Manakete.
The oath to Mother can be recognized as something religious, but not a faith they have context for.
The way I see it, this is the equivalent of someone saying "I swear to God" or "I swear on my family name." They have no reason to expect that Ryza puts any real stock in what she says here. Definitely not more than the stone oath. Not to be too meta about it but the way the stone oath vote is worded the con doesn't seem to be that believability is the problem; it's that we would be borderline hard committing to delivering Sypha home, come what may.Worst-case scenario with the oath to the Mother is that the humans go "I have no idea who'd enforce this oath, but this girl clearly expects someone to."
Only if we let them watch it happen, and take no steps to hide it. A crappy tent made of a cloak tossed over a branch with Robin standing at the front end would solve this problem.The stone will be seen during our shift. It's not being kept secret.
Here's the thing: Unless I am badly misremembering, no one alive knows this, just like no one knew that "Dragons" were sapient until Ryza woke up and explained Manaketes to Artemis.
This is why I linked that article about oaths multiple times, because this argument is about as wrong as it's possible to me. First off, swearing by your family name is an absurdly weak oath; at best, it's asking a higher power to revoke your family name if you forswear. By contrast "I swear to God" is a very effective oath, for anyone who believes that both God and oaths are a thing. And, to quote Devereaux, "people in the past generally believed their own religion" (bold in original). I would go so far as to apply that to people in most fantasy worlds, until proved otherwise.The way I see it, this is the equivalent of someone saying "I swear to God" or "I swear on my family name." They have no reason to expect that Ryza puts any real stock in what she says here.
Article: You swear an oath because your own word isn't good enough, either because no one trusts you, or because the matter is so serious that the extra assurance is required. That assurance comes from the presumption that the oath will be enforced by the divine third party. The god is called – literally – to witness the oath and to lay down the appropriate curses if the oath is violated. Knowing that horrible divine punishment awaits forswearing, the oath-taker, it is assumed, is less likely to make the oath.
The problem isn't that swearing on an object is something that would be foreign to them. The problem is that they have no reason to think a dragonstone is in any way equivalent the The Fire Emblem.Its not like swearing an oath upon an object as a focus/stand in is an unknown idea. They were JUST talking about how one of them would swear on The Emblem. I really don't see any reason for them to wave off or think Ill of the Stone Oath.
That's better.Also, recall that Rysa is not actually that devout. Its outright stated in the options that they might pick up on that. "Well, she clearly expects someone to enforce It" is the response they would have to the Stone Oath. Because Rysa herself knows how big of a deal it is and that WILL show through.
So from what I'm getting, a more interesting vote would not at all include the stone and would actually be this:Unless I'm wildly off-base on something, I don't think anything about the Stone Oath would add additional legitimacy to the oath in the eyes of Mantrae's men.
Problem 1 with this good idea is that Ryza has almost a century of experience with the Mother's religious practice, but probably hasn't seen a single religious ritual dedicated to the Sentinel. But we could offer to swear an oath by the Sentinel, with someone here familiar with appropriate oaths (probably anyone except Belle, Kelton, and maybe Robin) teaching Ryza the proper way to swear.So from what I'm getting, a more interesting vote would not at all include the stone and would actually be this:
Do we swear our oath by The Mother, about whom we actually give a crap but Mantrae's people have no knowledge of?
OR
Do we swear our oath by The Sentinel, about whom we give no craps but Mantrae's people believe in?
This is most of what Ryza knows: though she also gets the feeling he seems more aligned with Black magic. However, that comes mostly from his apparent domain over prophecy and the fact that the most devout-seeming Sentinalite who's talked to her was a shaman.@SoaringHawk218 What is known about The Sentinel?
From what I've been able to observe, the following are culturally attributed to The Sentinel within the Kingdoms: watch over the living, grant fortune and providence, gift certain people with some form of prophecy, and take the dead.
Oath to the Mother was in the lead the whole time. I certainly don't mind; I got half of what I wanted and I wasn't even that strongly in favor of Stone Oath. I just wanted it slightly more than the Mother Oath.Win some, lose some. I'll happily put up with Bernie, Lord of Entitlement in exchange for avoiding the Stone Oath. I'll admit it's a pleasant surprise; I was pretty sure we'd end up with the Stone.