You picked the wrong book to worry about spoilers. "Frankenstein" was written almost 200 years ago. It's so embedded into our culture, you already know most of it through osmosis.
Actually, you don't get to disagree with me.
I felt the same way. And it's interesting to see how the two groups presented the same material so differently.
Sherlock Holmes is very easy to dip in and out of as it's essentially a collection of short stories. I mean you can try CLudeo your was through it but i find it more fun to be surprised the first time and try to piece things together using the information avalable to that point later on.
Huh. I haven't continued it for a while because the first part, A Study in Scarlet, turned into some NTR-looking side-story partway. I like that the Holmes here seems to be decent if a bit awkward person though, unlike the more modern portrayals of him.
That's nice, I might buy it after all since as I recall the book is pretty cheap. It's nice that the classic books are sold really cheap, even by Indonesian standards.
I am Almost afraid to ask but what did they do
Golf clap. Well played Nasu Well played.
That. Although to be fair, Berserker is, along with Assassin, the "anything goes" class, just that anyone in that class is slapped with Madness buff/penalty. Not that it does much for Fran since she's just a pretty shit-tier Servant only good for sex appeal.
Nah, he specifically set out to play God instead, deciding to specifically create an Adam and an Eve. He just decided to start with an Eve first because that way she can birth the Adam which is really eww the more you think about it.
Personally I find the 1994 movie to be more on track with the spirit of the book, even if it's heavily inspired by bride of Frankenstein and the like
