If you're reading in to Preach that the smoothing isn't lasting or genuine, I'm reading in to Expose as present them with an ultimatum. They'll have a chance to repent, we should be prepared that what happens next may not be pretty especially if they don't bend.Which is not the text of the vote? It says "offer them option to repent in front of peers", not "execute on spot".
If you're reading in to Preach that the smoothing isn't lasting or genuine, I'm reading in to Expose as present them with an ultimatum. They'll have a chance to repent, we should be prepared that what happens next may not be pretty especially if they don't bend.
Unpleasant though it might sound in the grim-dark future of the 40,000th Millienium, I really do think that we're going to need to extend something of an open hand out first.
You might be right but...But that's literally the Expose vote! It's not the Cardinal coming out swinging it's him extending a hand of forgiveness If They Want To Take It. And if they don't then- well then they don't and we go from there.
It's not an open hand when that last bit is tacked on. Its hunting down our enemies to repent their crimes against us in public.But that's literally the Expose vote! It's not the Cardinal coming out swinging it's him extending a hand of forgiveness If They Want To Take It. And if they don't then- well then they don't and we go from there.
It's not an open hand when that last bit is tacked on. Its hunting down our enemies to repent their crimes against us in public.
Again, we need to be ready for what happens when they either don't, or that repentance isn't good enough for the masses.
You know... the more I think about it, the less I understand why Expose the Guilty and Ignite the Soul are two separate options. The priority of "I am harbinger of divine" and the priority of "I came here to root out injustice" go hand in hand, I think, and putting one over the other feels wrong.
Tally:
The way I see it?You know... the more I think about it, the less I understand why Expose the Guilty and Ignite the Soul are two separate options. The priority of "I am harbinger of divine" and the priority of "I came here to root out injustice" go hand in hand, I think, and putting one over the other feels wrong.
Tally:
I've been thinking of that as the Vandire option. I'm not sure people that already thought Ignatius was heretical will change that estimation when he declares himself a living saint or whatever.This basically means anyone who acted against us is going to jump up as if their chair turned into magma to throw themselves on our mercy.
I'm probably reading 'smooth over the divisions that led to the Hereticus being called' more charitably than you, and vice versa, because all my connotations with expose, and guilty, and enemies, and repenting before their peers screams auto-da-fe.That's kinda my problem with Ignite and Preach I think, in that both sort of bury the problem/kick the can down the road.
Worth remembering,I'm probably reading 'smooth over the divisions that led to the Hereticus being called' more charitably than you, and vice versa, because all my connotations with expose, and guilty, and enemies, and repenting before their peers screams auto-da-fe.
The impression I get is that the options given do not have an innate flavour. How we discuss them decides that. If the mood of those voting Expose is, "bring forth the guilty that we might forgive them their trespasses, and thereby make clear the division between ourselves and the Imperium," then... that's what it means.The general discussion is on what you plan to do next, assuming that this action succeeds. Not just in terms of 'who do we try to sway next', but what it is that you intend to do with that loyalty. What are your goals for Sanguis and its people, for the Imperium as a whole? I don't require unanimity, but a broad consensus will help me work out which direction people want to see the story go, enabling Ignatius to be more proactive instead of simply reacting to outside events.
So the Expose consensus is that they come forth, have the chance to repent and are forgiven regardless or...Worth remembering,The impression I get is that the options given do not have an innate flavour. How we discuss them decides that. If the mood of those voting Expose is, "bring forth the guilty that we might forgive them their trespasses, and thereby make clear the division between ourselves and the Imperium," then... that's what it means.
That's a difficult question to answer sight-unseen - it greatly depends on how they act. We might end up hashing things out in a lively (Exalted) debate, but assuming they're obstinate and we're left with no recourse but punishment, I'd err on the side of mercy. Execution should be kept off the table, for example, never mind the many and varied fates worse than death the Imperium has up its sleeves. Exile, maybe? Consignment to some minor abbey? Simple demotion? Heck, maybe we just forgive them regardless and allow some heterodox beliefs among our clergy, assuming they don't seem like they're liable to call mass murderers down on our flock again.The discussion should assume the action succeeds, but success for Expose doesn't force them to repent. We'd find them and give them the chance. So, what happens next? What do we do with those that repent and those that don't?