I will agree that in the context of the story that Merlin probably deserves the least flack of the four. Morgana probably manipulated events if he's Mordred's father. I'll also say in this context that Lorelei and Gwynn are equally shits. It takes two to tango after all, and they BOTH went off during their putative daughter's greatest moment to boink and broke Camelot as a result. I view that situation as slightly more on Lorelei as she actually raised the girl and should thus know what that night meant to Gala, but both were responsible for their actions and thus less than admirable at that moment.But seriously, in the context of this story as I think it happened, Lorelei and Merlin deserve flack the least. I don't remember them marrying to someone else. They always knew what they wanted, and the fault lies with people who thought it would be a good idea to let them hope they can have it.
Hmm, and you'd think Arthura herself could clear up the issue, unless she had reason to doubt.Artura's inner circle was unable to confirm that Mordred was indeed the son of King Gwynn, but for the people to learn otherwise would mean the end of Camelot. And so the issue of legitimacy was ignored, at least officially.
Don't forget that Lorelei and her liege-lady, Artura, are presented as near-BFFs.
This hole family is bloody crazy!Hmm, and you'd think Arthura herself could clear up the issue, unless she had reason to doubt.
Actually, from the subtext, I got the impression that Arthura knew all along, and was tacitly approving or at least not objecting of it. It's why the original banishment was only for two years. If Mordred went to his mother instead of one of the knights, it might have been covered up.
Arthura was married to Gwyn, but had no love for him.
Arthura may have had her own lover on the side, one who would render tracing his lineage complicated.
Gwyn was banging and presumably in love with Lorelei.
Given Mordred's name and the original legend then, Arthura was in her own illicit relationship with Morgan(?), using Gwyn as the public cover. Being siblings, trying to trace the lineage magically would just say "Yep he's a Pendragon!" with silence on anything else.
Not following this one. What is 'the original banishment'? I have only seen 5 years mentioned, but I assume Gally altered it later.
And yet:
So at least there was something at the beginning. But the timeline is all over the place.By the time she was fifteen, Artura had grown into a beautiful woman and a ferocious warrior. She attended a Christmas ball in Vere, a peaceful Kingdom ruled by Leodegrance, where she fell head over heels in love with the young Prince Gwynn after glimpsing him from afar. Though they would not meet that night, the party inspired Artura to participate in a tournament being held in honor of Gwynn's birthday, as a way to gain his favor.
Oh please. She isn't entirely without fault for the 'shoot first, think later' attitude, even though it is understandable. You could say with equal justification that knocking out a spell wand or whatever that bone is is a physical assault. Is that much better?Not a fan of the "shut her with your lips" write-in, I must say. That's not accidental kiss. That's harassment.
Equipment room? @Gally when we're throwing her to the side, can we aim for mats or something to soften the landing?Still, it's powerful enough to follow past a gymnasium and into an equipment room.
Dunno how much I trust the official story. Sure, there may have been something. Or maybe the whole thing was romanticized for common folks because "she knew an heir to a prosperous kingdom would make for a great addition to her power base" isn't very palatable could even be both, I suppose.So at least there was something at the beginning. But the timeline is all over the place.
Do you have a plan to hide the body of the girl in the school we've never been to?[X] Knock the finger bone out of her hand (Athletics 4d6, 2 successes needed)
-[X] This, punch to the center (can't chant if you can't breath), grab and knee in center, break her jaw, concussion... there's a lot of ways to interrupt someone casting really. Well, as long as they need a focus and chanting anyway.
Meh.Do you have a plan to hide the body of the girl in the school we've never been to?
Walkin' man disagrees.We're not killing her. If anything bad happens to her we can take her to any teacher or adult in this building and say we found her trying to break the seal to other dimensions. Or we say we found her messing with the wards at least.
Besides, your plan is to carry the student that we've just assaulted to a teacher and claim she was trying to break the magical barriers of the school?
Arthurian myth. Where Arthur was himself the product of a Merlin assisted rape(disguising as someone's husband for the event counts I think), and Mordred was the incestous bastard of Arthur and his half sister.Well okay - *Morgana/Artura*
... No. Noooo. No.
Nope. Where did that come from?!
Its a school for magicals.Besides, your plan is to carry the student that we've just assaulted to a teacher and claim she was trying to break the magical barriers of the school
Its what happened in type-moon. Where they were both woman. ...Merlin's a dick and he gave Arturia one.*reada The Silver Age*
Oh Mordred
*Sees discussion of parentage*
Well okay - *Morgana/Artura*
... No. Noooo. No.
It's a school where there are a lot of magicals. This might be effectively the same, perhaps the head teacher advertised in some changeling newspaper. However remember that Annabelle thought her experiences were unusual, I think there is at least some degree of separation between the magical and the mundane.
Yes, but it was implied they specifically kept the Knights ignorant. Possibly another part of their mental blocks.It's a school where there are a lot of magicals. This might be effectively the same, perhaps the head teacher advertised in some changeling newspaper. However remember that Annabelle thought her experiences were unusual, I think there is at least some degree of separation between the magical and the mundane.
Well, we know Terri who's aware of shenanigans, and Knights who are not. Hard to say for sure what the actual school policy is, and if Knights ' mental block that relates to Camelot is in play here.Yes, but it was implied they specifically kept the Knights ignorant. Possibly another part of their mental blocks.
I.E. Annabelle and the others are not a good example to use.
Yes, but it was implied they specifically kept the Knights ignorant. Possibly another part of their mental blocks.
I.E. Annabelle and the others are not a good example to use.
It seems strange that the school would conspire to keep just the knights ignorant. More likely that as a member of the 'Masquerade' Terri is just better at recognising that events aren't isolated incidents. Whereas the knights experience is stopping threats and they don't look closely at things that aren't destroying the school.Well, we know Terri who's aware of shenanigans, and Knights who are not. Hard to say for sure what the actual school policy is, and if Knights ' mental block that relates to Camelot is in play here.