The problem with this is the Polish won't ever make land concessions, and aren't in any position to help us in any way, nor are they inclined to. They hate us and would seize Silesia if they thought they could get away with. If they are weaker, we have a stronger position to renegotiate reparations or even limited rearmament and could even maybe seize some former German lands, like Danzig. I don't get why people think that a stronger Poland is good for us, if they are strong, why would they ever make concessions to us? Why would they hand us over Posen/Silesia or West Prussia? And how does that help us in negotiating with the allies? On the other hand, if they fall, the Soviet leadership is thrown into disarray and we'd have a threat to Central Europe we can point at to get relaxed restrictions.I'm persuaded that a weaker Poland will not be willing to negotiate on the contested border claims -- and if we move to secure those by force or coercion, we will cause more resentment among the Poles and pushback from the Entente. That means if our priority is Silesia, Austria, the Sudentenland or the Corridor, or resolving final status of Klaipeda/Memel, we would prefer the guarantee of a stronger Poland that is in more of a mood to make concessions rather than a weaker Poland less able to resist German pressure.
We can't, we'd be under Versailles restrictions and the Polish would be the last country to want to help us bypass it. A strong Poland gives us nothing but a buffer state to the Soviet Union, and they'd have no reason to make concessions. I urge you to reconsider your change. The only way we could do any meaningful diplomacy with them was if we renounced our claims on their territory, and signed a non-aggression pact. Which is political suicide.Perhaps we can open some sort of alt-Kama Tank School in Posen as a gesture of mutual defence some time down the road?
The problem with this is the Polish won't ever make land concessions, and aren't in any position to help us in any way, nor are they inclined to. They hate us and would seize Silesia if they thought they could get away with. If they are weaker, we have a stronger position to renegotiate reparations or even limited rearmament and could even maybe seize some former German lands, like Danzig. I don't get why people think that a stronger Poland is good for us, if they are strong, why would they ever make concessions to us? Why would they hand us over Posen/Silesia or West Prussia? And how does that help us in negotiating with the allies? On the other hand, if they fall, the Soviet leadership is thrown into disarray and we'd have a threat to Central Europe we can point at to get relaxed restrictions.
We can't, we'd be under Versailles restrictions and the Polish would be the last country to want to help us bypass it. A strong Poland gives us nothing but a buffer state to the Soviet Union, and they'd have no reason to make concessions. I urge you to reconsider your change. The only way we could do any meaningful diplomacy with them was if we renounced our claims on their territory, and signed a non-aggression pact. Which is political suicide.
The problem with this is that Germany IS weak in this case, arguably weaker than Poland even. And their worth as an ally in Central Europe plummets if they lose most of their industry, agriculture and manpower. Besides, the SPD isn't coercive or revanchist, and the chances of such a government emerging are slim to none, and the Entente know that. It would make a lot more sense to go softer on us to put a halt on communist expansionism than a dying Poland.A weak Poland needs to be propped up against Soviet pressure and German coercion -- a coercive, revanchist Germany, even if it is a Republic, must be opposed. Here, the interests of the Entente and the interests of Polish nationalists line up well -- Germany is strong, Poland is weak, and in order to maintain the balance of power on the European continent, German moves in the East need to be opposed.
The Soviets would serve that role much better, since it would make a less weak Germany much more attractive. This reasoning can be applied in "the Heir is Dead" much more effectively in my opinion.A strong Poland, if it comes to some agreement with Germany, maintains the balance of power -- Germany can be checked by the Poles and French, and thus Washington and London see Germany as the wronged party in Versailles, and are more willing to pressure Paris to look away from Treaty revisions.
Reconciliation with Poland won't happen unless we give up any claims on them, and that would lose all the tentative support the right has for the Republic. And as you say, it would be a project of a lifetime in any case, which means we could never see it happen anyway.At the end of the day, reconciliation with Poland is the project of a lifetime, but we can at least start down that path, and secure our own political fortunes as well.
I'm sorry but I have to disagree on this, the only benefit a stronger Poland has is as a buffer towards the Soviets. I really doubt negotiations with them or the Entente will go any easier and they'd never give us concessions if they could avoid it. It is not worth it in my opinion.To be clear, this isn't a comment on the merits of weakening Soviet leadership -- this is specifically in response to the line of reasoning of why a strong Poland can be in our interest, especially since we know a rump Poland is likely to exist afterwards.
I think our deal with the merchant of death already kind of has us doing that.Hm, so i just woke up and I have a small thought?
is it possible we can start producing arms for other countries that aren't under treaties to stimulate the economy?
Like hungry, Yugoslavia, Italy and so on?
We're actually already doing that! We sent our machinery to Vickers, which is a front for Sir Basil's arm trafficking, who shares the profits with us. We have also sent arms to Poland and Italy directly previously.Hm, so i just woke up and I have a small thought?
is it possible we can start producing arms for other countries that aren't under treaties to stimulate the economy?
Like hungry, Yugoslavia, Italy and so on?
Hungry Hungary is under Triannon, so they unfortunately can't buy our arms.
If we are as weak as you say we are then that only makes me more reluctant to allow a Soviet Poland on our border.The problem with this is that Germany IS weak in this case, arguably weaker than Poland even. And their worth as an ally in Central Europe plummets if they lose most of their industry, agriculture and manpower. Besides, the SPD isn't coercive or revanchist, and the chances of such a government emerging are slim to none, and the Entente know that. It would make a lot more sense to go softer on us to put a halt on communist expansionism than a dying Poland.
Roughly 100.000 men I think.
If the Poles fall, we can sell it to them, since they'd hardly be a threat to us. We'll have to see with Sir Basil.-440. Heavy Artillery Regiment (Siege Artillery, Treaty Violation), Garrison: Berlin
-433. Heavy Artillery Regiment (Siege Artillery, Treaty Violation), Garrison: Berlin
Around the 100k required by treaty, if one counts support arms and staff.
The Stettin HQ is noted to have a substantial contingent of former veterans liaising with the 'Black Reichswehr' and is one of the openly more right-wing in Germany.
If we need to, we can mobilize these and expand our army in a emergency. It would be a treaty violation of course.mainly liaising with Stahlhelm and Black Reichswehr veterans and militiamen rather than regular army units
Sounds like a job for Oster. We might want to try to replace Von Seeckt with Rupprecht and his underling with a Bavarian officer. It would placate them and remove what could be a dangerous element in the Reichswehr...While the republic has managed to influence this funding stream during the civil war, we note that von Schleicher is attempting to redirect funds back towards antisemitic, far-right groups within the Stahlhelm veterans' organization. We also note that von Schleicher has been in talks with Gustav Krupp, and we do not know what those talks are about.
While the republic has managed to influence this funding stream during the civil war, we note that von Schleicher is attempting to redirect funds back towards antisemitic, far-right groups within the Stahlhelm veterans' organization. We also note that von Schleicher has been in talks with Gustav Krupp, and we do not know what those talks are about.
One of those regiments has to go back to the Czechs for dismantling due to treaty obligations.If the Poles fall, we can sell it to them, since they'd hardly be a threat to us. We'll have to see with Sir Basil.
Err...talk about timing. Two thought which occured to me (unrelated to the whole Poland or the Soviets discussion:Units and Garrisons
Where my Guards appear, there is no room for democracy.
-Wilhelm II to representatives of German political parties, 1917
The Reichswehr forms at present a state within a state, as per the informal agreement negotiated between Friedrich Ebert and former Quartermaster-General Wilhelm Groener in 1919. The result is that the Reichswehr maintains a great deal of power over its own affairs and has a similar independence to that enjoyed by the Imperial German Army prior to 1918. This results in regular army formations often hosting heavily politicized elements, and the army in general taking a keen interest in politics. While the army is at present 'above regional politics' that does not mean that its garrisons will not intervene in the case of insurrection, and it remains the single largest force concentration in Germany.
And in the background, a man is inciting your renevation workers while the real estate agent mutters about the Jews in low tones.Finishes reading the Militias List.
Loosens collar.
You know. I feel like I just bought a house that was marketed as 'a bit of a fixer-upper,' only to walk into the basement and find a colony, nay, a megapolis of termites.
And then one of them puts on a stalhelm, Sieg Heils and welcomes me to their Thousand Year Reich.
I am rather concerned.
Nope, they're in Berlin! I'm hoping we can do a deal with Sir Basil and the Czechs when "dismantling" the "scrap metal". Maybe we can sell it to the Turks, Greeks or Poles.
Yeah, them and the Bund Bayern und Reich seem to be the forces of sanity in here. We should try to merge the two if possible. Maybe by doing some political horse trading with Ruprecht when we inevitably have to replace Von Seekt.On a side note, we really ought to promote the Reichsbanner as much as possible. It's a good ally for our cause and a check on other, less savory orgs.