Voting is open
I'm persuaded that a weaker Poland will not be willing to negotiate on the contested border claims -- and if we move to secure those by force or coercion, we will cause more resentment among the Poles and pushback from the Entente. That means if our priority is Silesia, Austria, the Sudentenland or the Corridor, or resolving final status of Klaipeda/Memel, we would prefer the guarantee of a stronger Poland that is in more of a mood to make concessions rather than a weaker Poland less able to resist German pressure.
The problem with this is the Polish won't ever make land concessions, and aren't in any position to help us in any way, nor are they inclined to. They hate us and would seize Silesia if they thought they could get away with. If they are weaker, we have a stronger position to renegotiate reparations or even limited rearmament and could even maybe seize some former German lands, like Danzig. I don't get why people think that a stronger Poland is good for us, if they are strong, why would they ever make concessions to us? Why would they hand us over Posen/Silesia or West Prussia? And how does that help us in negotiating with the allies? On the other hand, if they fall, the Soviet leadership is thrown into disarray and we'd have a threat to Central Europe we can point at to get relaxed restrictions.
Perhaps we can open some sort of alt-Kama Tank School in Posen as a gesture of mutual defence some time down the road?
We can't, we'd be under Versailles restrictions and the Polish would be the last country to want to help us bypass it. A strong Poland gives us nothing but a buffer state to the Soviet Union, and they'd have no reason to make concessions. I urge you to reconsider your change. The only way we could do any meaningful diplomacy with them was if we renounced our claims on their territory, and signed a non-aggression pact. Which is political suicide.
 
Last edited:
The problem with this is the Polish won't ever make land concessions, and aren't in any position to help us in any way, nor are they inclined to. They hate us and would seize Silesia if they thought they could get away with. If they are weaker, we have a stronger position to renegotiate reparations or even limited rearmament and could even maybe seize some former German lands, like Danzig. I don't get why people think that a stronger Poland is good for us, if they are strong, why would they ever make concessions to us? Why would they hand us over Posen/Silesia or West Prussia? And how does that help us in negotiating with the allies? On the other hand, if they fall, the Soviet leadership is thrown into disarray and we'd have a threat to Central Europe we can point at to get relaxed restrictions.

We can't, we'd be under Versailles restrictions and the Polish would be the last country to want to help us bypass it. A strong Poland gives us nothing but a buffer state to the Soviet Union, and they'd have no reason to make concessions. I urge you to reconsider your change. The only way we could do any meaningful diplomacy with them was if we renounced our claims on their territory, and signed a non-aggression pact. Which is political suicide.

Look at it from the Entente point of view.

A weak Poland needs to be propped up against Soviet pressure and German coercion -- a coercive, revanchist Germany, even if it is a Republic, must be opposed. Here, the interests of the Entente and the interests of Polish nationalists line up well -- Germany is strong, Poland is weak, and in order to maintain the balance of power on the European continent, German moves in the East need to be opposed.

A strong Poland, if it comes to some agreement with Germany, maintains the balance of power -- Germany can be checked by the Poles and French, and thus Washington and London see Germany as the wronged party in Versailles, and are more willing to pressure Paris to look away from Treaty revisions.

I agree that if we want to maintain German democracy through this period, we need to be very careful about militarism -- but I think that coercion to get what we want from Poland increases, rather than decreases, the influence of militarist factions.

As such, I think it is easier, and more in line with our values, to try and get Treaty revisions through cooperative diplomacy rather than through armed suasion. At the end of the day, reconciliation with Poland is the project of a lifetime, but we can at least start down that path, and secure our own political fortunes as well.


To be clear, this isn't a comment on the merits of weakening Soviet leadership -- this is specifically in response to the line of reasoning of why a strong Poland can be in our interest, especially since we know a rump Poland is likely to exist afterwards.
 
Last edited:
Ok. Congratulations, dear QM. I can't choose, because both lines can be argued with validitiy.

At the end, the deal(ing) with Poland runs down to a "Danzig for Guarantees" type of situation. The thing to discuss is, is this easier with a weaker or stronger (stronger doesn't mean "capable of resisting", its about self-perception) Poland? Would a weakend Poland be more willing to accept an offer of "move to the east" on the expense of Russia? Or would they rather behave like cornered rats? Would pressure on part of the Reich lead to Entente intervention? Can/should we frame/do it as friendly help for a brighter future?

Confusing thing.
 
A weak Poland needs to be propped up against Soviet pressure and German coercion -- a coercive, revanchist Germany, even if it is a Republic, must be opposed. Here, the interests of the Entente and the interests of Polish nationalists line up well -- Germany is strong, Poland is weak, and in order to maintain the balance of power on the European continent, German moves in the East need to be opposed.
The problem with this is that Germany IS weak in this case, arguably weaker than Poland even. And their worth as an ally in Central Europe plummets if they lose most of their industry, agriculture and manpower. Besides, the SPD isn't coercive or revanchist, and the chances of such a government emerging are slim to none, and the Entente know that. It would make a lot more sense to go softer on us to put a halt on communist expansionism than a dying Poland.
A strong Poland, if it comes to some agreement with Germany, maintains the balance of power -- Germany can be checked by the Poles and French, and thus Washington and London see Germany as the wronged party in Versailles, and are more willing to pressure Paris to look away from Treaty revisions.
The Soviets would serve that role much better, since it would make a less weak Germany much more attractive. This reasoning can be applied in "the Heir is Dead" much more effectively in my opinion.
At the end of the day, reconciliation with Poland is the project of a lifetime, but we can at least start down that path, and secure our own political fortunes as well.
Reconciliation with Poland won't happen unless we give up any claims on them, and that would lose all the tentative support the right has for the Republic. And as you say, it would be a project of a lifetime in any case, which means we could never see it happen anyway.
To be clear, this isn't a comment on the merits of weakening Soviet leadership -- this is specifically in response to the line of reasoning of why a strong Poland can be in our interest, especially since we know a rump Poland is likely to exist afterwards.
I'm sorry but I have to disagree on this, the only benefit a stronger Poland has is as a buffer towards the Soviets. I really doubt negotiations with them or the Entente will go any easier and they'd never give us concessions if they could avoid it. It is not worth it in my opinion.

In my view, we have two paths ahead that boil down to this in the end.
-One where rearmament and economic recovery is much more difficult since negotiations with the Entente would be very one-sided and dependent on the Anglo-Americans. But with the benefit we'd have to worry less about our neighbors potentially invading us or Central Europe.
-And two, where we have an external enemy threatening the balance of power, which we can leverage onto loosening restrictions. A Soviets Union with leadership problems but still relatively threatening and a more flexible rump Poland.

Like, I understand why the first option could be attractive to some people, but the second just sounds more interesting and gives us more room to wiggle around diplomatically, at the expense of a threatening neighbor.
 
Last edited:
Hm, so i just woke up and I have a small thought?

is it possible we can start producing arms for other countries that aren't under treaties to stimulate the economy?

Like hungry, Yugoslavia, Italy and so on?
 
Hm, so i just woke up and I have a small thought?

is it possible we can start producing arms for other countries that aren't under treaties to stimulate the economy?

Like hungry, Yugoslavia, Italy and so on?
We're actually already doing that! We sent our machinery to Vickers, which is a front for Sir Basil's arm trafficking, who shares the profits with us. We have also sent arms to Poland and Italy directly previously.
Hungry Hungary is under Triannon, so they unfortunately can't buy our arms.
 
Last edited:
[X]Eagle Unbowed


The problem with this is that Germany IS weak in this case, arguably weaker than Poland even. And their worth as an ally in Central Europe plummets if they lose most of their industry, agriculture and manpower. Besides, the SPD isn't coercive or revanchist, and the chances of such a government emerging are slim to none, and the Entente know that. It would make a lot more sense to go softer on us to put a halt on communist expansionism than a dying Poland.
If we are as weak as you say we are then that only makes me more reluctant to allow a Soviet Poland on our border.

The entire plan seems to be "Hope the Entente will save us when the Soviets come knocking" and leaves no provisions in place for if they don't.

And the SPD being in charge won't magically alter opinions all that much, ask the Austrian republicans who had their dreams shattered.
 
Last edited:
The Army: Units and Garrisons
Units and Garrisons

Where my Guards appear, there is no room for democracy.
-Wilhelm II to representatives of German political parties, 1917​

The Reichswehr forms at present a state within a state, as per the informal agreement negotiated between Friedrich Ebert and former Quartermaster-General Wilhelm Groener in 1919. The result is that the Reichswehr maintains a great deal of power over its own affairs and has a similar independence to that enjoyed by the Imperial German Army prior to 1918. This results in regular army formations often hosting heavily politicized elements, and the army in general taking a keen interest in politics. While the army is at present 'above regional politics' that does not mean that its garrisons will not intervene in the case of insurrection, and it remains the single largest force concentration in Germany.

The war may have ended, but the Reichswehr has made sure its guns are close at hand.


Map credit to @Mr. Sandman

Wehrkreis I (HQ Koenigsberg)

Commander: General Wilhelm Heye

Political Leaning:
No outspoken political leaning at present, and at present occupied with reorganizing the East Prussian headquarters to something more suited for peacetime and defending the East. General Heye is an anti-republican conservative monarchist, but his HQ has few if any who would attempt another putsch.

I Corps:
-1
st Infantry Division (Infantry, Veteran), Garrison: Koenigsberg
Wehrkreis II (HQ Stettin)

Commander: General Kurt von Hammerstein-Equord

Political Leaning:
Nationalist Conservative. General von Hammerstein-Equord has been an outspoken critic of the Weimar Republic since its inception in the November Revolution, but has sided with the government out of a distaste for the other factions and – in the case of the Kapp-Luttwitz-Ludendorff putschists – a personal dislike. The Stettin HQ is noted to have a substantial contingent of former veterans liaising with the 'Black Reichswehr' and is one of the openly more right-wing in Germany.

II Corps:
-2
nd Infantry Division (Infantry, Veteran), Garrison: Stettin
III Corps:
-3
rd Infantry Division 'Deutschland' (Infantry, Elite), Garrison: Stettin

Wehrkreis III (HQ Berlin)

Commander: General Gotthard Heinrici

Political Leaning:
General Heinrici has remained steadily silent about his political leanings, but with his wife being half-Jewish and his divisional command being the staunchly republican Wachtruppe 'Berlin' during the civil war, the general can be assumed to be relatively apolitical. The corps in Berlin is technically a treaty violation, however, and actions have to be taken to deal with that.


AN: The army remains a force in politics, and this informational is quest infrastructure that will update turn by turn. At present only 'active' Wehrkreise are shown in the accordions, and I cannot for the life of me find a map for Weimar Germany. All I have got was one for 1938, so there it is.
Votes remain open.
 
Last edited:
Last edited:
The Stettin HQ is noted to have a substantial contingent of former veterans liaising with the 'Black Reichswehr' and is one of the openly more right-wing in Germany.
mainly liaising with Stahlhelm and Black Reichswehr veterans and militiamen rather than regular army units
If we need to, we can mobilize these and expand our army in a emergency. It would be a treaty violation of course.
While the republic has managed to influence this funding stream during the civil war, we note that von Schleicher is attempting to redirect funds back towards antisemitic, far-right groups within the Stahlhelm veterans' organization. We also note that von Schleicher has been in talks with Gustav Krupp, and we do not know what those talks are about.
Sounds like a job for Oster. We might want to try to replace Von Seeckt with Rupprecht and his underling with a Bavarian officer. It would placate them and remove what could be a dangerous element in the Reichswehr...
 
Well, we can sell the heavy artillery to the Poles or the Baltic States.

The military seems to be 50-50 for and against the Republic. I am especially wary of the Black Reichswehr organizations that remain armed and organized. Sure, many of them died in the recent Civil War, but they can recruit new blood. Time also causes one to forget how bad the fighting was.

While the republic has managed to influence this funding stream during the civil war, we note that von Schleicher is attempting to redirect funds back towards antisemitic, far-right groups within the Stahlhelm veterans' organization. We also note that von Schleicher has been in talks with Gustav Krupp, and we do not know what those talks are about.

This is the real danger though. We need to see about putting this guy on a tight leash or sending our detectives on his trail to make sure nothing illegal is happening.
 
we need to consolidize with our democratic and ''apolitical'' elements

to ensure any purge of rigth wingers goes smooth
 
[X]The Detective
[X]The Merchant of Death
[X]The Soldier
[X]Eagle Unbowed
 
Last edited:
Paramilitaries:
Paramilitaries:

The erstwhile Weimar Republic was home to numerous highly active anti-state paramilitaries that in many cases were affiliated with existing political parties or espoused fringe views such as the establishment of a 'Thousand Year Reich'. Some of these organizations are nominally apolitical and are shown here due to their membership being highly politicized, and some of them are outright anti-government groups that seek to bring about some form of violent change of regime. The civil war has ended and Germany has dealt with the greatest threats to the republic, but in the shadows the knives remain.

I will, for the sake of simplicity, model only major paramilitary groups. Each one can be one or more of the following:
Umbrella Organizations: These are massive groups of hundreds of thousands that are not in and of themselves a danger to the state, but by the nature of their membership and leadership are able to act as a framework for other antigovernment groups to 'gestate', as it were. Some of them might be outspokenly anti-republic, some might not, but all of them have to be monitored simply due to their size. Most of these have overlaps of some sort or another.

Party Organizations: These are paramilitaries that are aligned with one party or another, or can indeed be from a group of parties and formed for a specific purpose. During the earlier civil war that resulted from the attempted Kapp-Luttwitz-Ludendorff coup, party paramilitaries formed a major source of recruitment for the republic, and they retain a certain degree of prominence in politics as a result of that. Regulation will be difficult.

Membership Numbers move from Low→Medium→Large→Massive. At 'Low' one might be no more than a few chapters in a city, at Medium one might be a party of a few thousand, at Large one is an organization of tens of thousands or hundreds of thousands, and at Massive one is an organization of a million or more.


Der Stahlhelm (Umbrella Organization)
Stated Aim: Nonpartisan veterans' organization, to 'maintain peace and order, and foster the comradeship that was formed in the battlefield'.

Membership: National, Massive

Status: Rapidly Growing

Overview:
The Stahlhelm is a nonpartisan-on-paper organization whose membership mainly consists of right-wing veterans and former Freikorps members, and is growing as the militias and paramilitaries that still exist on the eastern border use it for recruitment and networking. The organization promotes the stab-in-the-back myth and a pro-Imperial view of the republic, and considers the ruling coalition to be traitors to the Kaiser. Its newspaper is a major source of right-wing agitation and its organizational structure lends itself to incubation of paramilitary groups. A substantial chunk of the Stahlhelm are members of the Black Reichswehr in one form or another, either as militiamen who are on the rolls for callup or as members of paramilitaries that are local in scope – or as Stahlhelm chapters en masse.
Reichsbanner Schwarz-Rot-Gold (Umbrella Organization)
Stated Aim: Pro-republican nonpartisan paramilitary organization formed as a manpower pool/unit creation pool for the civil war of 1920.

Membership: National, Massive

Status: Declining Slowly

Overview:
The Reichsbanner was formed in May of 1920 to establish a chain of command and a central organization for the pro-republican paramilitaries who were pressed into service for the civil war. It was intended as a wartime measure and seen as a necessity for the defense of the republic, and thus drew support not just from the SPD but also from the Zentrum and – begrudgingly – the Bavarian People's Party. With the end of the war and the resumption of political infighting among the ruling coalition – not to mention the staunch condemnation of the SPD by the Bavarians – we see a steady drop in the membership of the Reichsbanner. We also note that the SPD membership proportions are increasing, and the Zentrum has been quietly avoiding its share of funding and membership enrollment – perhaps there will be a conservative Catholic paramilitary soon?
Black Reichswehr (Umbrella Organization)
Stated Aim: Covert reserve and anti-insurrection force maintained by the army in violation of the Treaty of Versailles, built up through liaising with Freikorps formations and umbrella organizations such as the Stahlhelm.

Membership: National, Large, Highly Organized, Substantial Berlin Contingent

Status: Steady, Well-Equipped

Overview:
The Black Reichswehr are a force of Freikorps, former officers and in some cases chapters drawn from the Stahlhelm and Reichsbanner that are organized into 'disarmed labor battalions' and barracked at Kuestrin in divisional strength. They are armed as a light infantry force and consist mainly of decorated former soldiers, and are also noted to be staunchly nationalist, hard-right and militarist. There are rumors that the army high command also intend to use them as saboteurs and strike units to sow havoc in Silesia, Poland and other disputed territories, and they have already been used to suppress uprisings in Silesia. They are nominally a government force. For now.

Organization Consul
Stated Aims:
"Spiritual aims:
The cultivation and dissemination of nationalist thinking; warfare against all anti-nationalists and internationalists; warfare against Jewry, Social Democracy and Leftist-radicalism; fomentation of internal unrest in order to attain the overthrow of the anti-nationalist Weimar constitution...

Material aims:
The organization of determined, nationalist-minded men...local shock troops for breaking up meetings of an anti-nationalist nature; maintenance of arms and the preservation of military ability; the education of youth in the use of arms."


Membership: National, Medium, Eastern Cells Growing Rapidly, Western Cells Depleted

Status: Growing, Cell-Structure, Fanatical

Overview:
The Organization Consul is an ultranationalist, antisemitic and anticommunist terror organization that was formed by members of the Freikorps unit Marinebrigade Erhardt at the end of the civil war, building on the dissolution of Freikorps units at war's end to recruit more radicalized former soldiers to their cause. From what we know, the founders use Freikorps contacts to recruit people known personally to them, and to their local chapter leadership. It is organized into district commands across Germany, each of them stashing arms stolen from their parent armies in the civil war and capable of planning and executing complex small-unit actions. They are a major threat, and their cell structure means that they will be difficult to unravel.
Freikorps Oberland
Stated Aim: Far-right paramilitary organization formed to combat 'Communist' and Polish subversion of Germany and to act in defense of the German right.

Membership: Northern Germany, Medium

Status: Declining

Overview:
Freikorps Oberland formed part of the Triumvirate's armies as the 9th​ Infantry Division's 29th​ Infantry Regiment, and is at present yet to dissolve. A substantial chunk of its membership are part of the Black Reichswehr, and they are able to use that as a cover to remain an organized entity. The Freikorps Oberland has also been drawing funding from German nationalists in Silesia and appears to be responsible for multiple atrocities in Silesia – however, they have also acted on behalf of German interests in the disputed Silesian zone. It has recently come under fire from SiPo units assigned to police Silesia due to the questionable nature of its actions, and has therefore drifted a little towards border control.
Bund Bayern und Reich
Stated Aim: Formed from civil militia groups, the Bund is intended to promote a return to the borders of the Second Reich, Catholic and Christian traditionalism, and a Wittelsbach restoration in Bavaria. It is noted to have the tacit support of Minister-President Gustav von Kahr.

Membership: Bavarian, Large

Status: Steady, Well-Equipped

Overview:
The Bund are one of the largest and a relatively moderate 'Fatherland society' formed out of the civil militia groups that sprang up postwar. Command is held by Dr. Otto Pittinger, who runs the civil and the military branches of the organization. The military units organized under Bayern und Reich command are nominally the largest in Bavaria: six infantry regiments, ten signal troops, twenty infantry battalions, sixty-five infantry companies, and the same number of "cadre" units. The organization also has the largest number of arms and weaponry of all regional groups, with over 65,000 rifles and 1200 machine guns. Its leaders and local membership tend to be wealthy or well-established and skew older than most paramilitaries, and draws much of its rank and file from the peasantry rather than the cities of Bavaria.
Red Front Fighters' League
Stated Aim: The overthrow of the Weimar Republic and the installation of a communist state that seeks to transfer the ownership of the means of production to the proletariat.

Membership: National, Large

Status: Growing, Cell Structure, Excellent Agitators

Overview:
Formed from disbanded militias and insurrectionists who rose up against the Republic on the side of the KPD during the civil war of 1920. the Red Front Righters' League is an organization made up of Communist veterans and organizers who are explicitly armed and planning another rising - they are drawing on the unions and proletarian organizations such as the civilian KPD for a support base, but they are far more violent. They are organized on a cell-structure basis and have long experience in evading policing forces, and have a substantial sympathetic population in western Germany thanks in part to KPD propaganda painting the Republic as the maker of starvation (the Republic was responsible for purchasing most of the Danish harvest and thus denied it to the KPD's territories). We note that several excellent agitators have stayed behind despite being wanted for treason, such as Ernst Thalmann - the KPD remains a force in Germany.
 
Last edited:
Adhoc vote count started by FlyingMonkey on Mar 14, 2021 at 3:59 PM, finished with 192 posts and 54 votes.
 
Units and Garrisons

Where my Guards appear, there is no room for democracy.
-Wilhelm II to representatives of German political parties, 1917​

The Reichswehr forms at present a state within a state, as per the informal agreement negotiated between Friedrich Ebert and former Quartermaster-General Wilhelm Groener in 1919. The result is that the Reichswehr maintains a great deal of power over its own affairs and has a similar independence to that enjoyed by the Imperial German Army prior to 1918. This results in regular army formations often hosting heavily politicized elements, and the army in general taking a keen interest in politics. While the army is at present 'above regional politics' that does not mean that its garrisons will not intervene in the case of insurrection, and it remains the single largest force concentration in Germany.
Err...talk about timing. Two thought which occured to me (unrelated to the whole Poland or the Soviets discussion:
1) OTL, Anna, Hans, Georg and Maria had a nasty time, but they still did the dirty and Alfons, Bernhard, Celcil, Dominik and their siblings came into existence. Who where around 19 in 1939, ready to be conscripted (or work in the munitions plants.
ITL, Hans shot Georg, Maria starved, Hans got blown up by his own weapon and Anna decided that men caused too much grief by dying. Which means the (wo)manpower crunch which hit Germany after WW2 will hit us earlier, but not as hard. This gives us an opportunity to push through maternity leave and other socialists policies (like a reduced workweek) in order to alleviate this (and yes, incentivize reproduction, this is 1920, after all). But then, the crunch will hit us. To alleviate it, we could engage in:
Automation! Do more with less work. Every hour that is saved is an hour which can be spent on other things. And yes, we can sell that to the army as "moar shells". More Automation. Better guns, less manpower in the field. This is the country of Zuse, after all. Which means we need the germonies for R&D. Which means the reparation portions of the ToV need to go.
New people! People are out there. We just have to convince them to become germans. The former colonies, Poland, Russia. Get them, integrate them, and we can smoothen out the bump. Of course, we need to do that carefully(and integrate them thouroughly) and need to have clamped down on the far-rightists first.
2) We must get rid of the army limitations of the ToV. The post by @mouli is coincidence, but the black reichswehr must be disbanded or folded into the proper Reichswehr. This kind of outside-of-official-command caused lots of damage in Weimar. Even if the civil war rid us of the worst parts (because the went with the stooges), this is playing with fire. And right now, we can't disband them. Why? Because the ToV isn't an encompassing arms-reduction-treaty or includes a provision saying "Germany must disarm, but everyone who fights them will be stomped on hard by the other signatories". There is a hard limit on Germany without providing security. So, in this day and age, this means we must have a shadow army. And no, that sentiment isn't limited to diehard militarists or nationalists. This is the common consensus. So, we need to get the army limitation lifted. Sacrifice the navy if that makes Washington and London happy.
 
Have we already given up our Czech guns?

On a side note, we really ought to promote the Reichsbanner as much as possible. It's a good ally for our cause and a check on other, less savory orgs.
 
Last edited:
Finishes reading the Militias List.

Loosens collar.


You know. I feel like I just bought a house that was marketed as 'a bit of a fixer-upper,' only to walk into the basement and find a colony, nay, a megapolis of termites.

And then one of them puts on a stalhelm, Sieg Heils and welcomes me to their Thousand Year Reich.

I am rather concerned.
 
Finishes reading the Militias List.

Loosens collar.


You know. I feel like I just bought a house that was marketed as 'a bit of a fixer-upper,' only to walk into the basement and find a colony, nay, a megapolis of termites.

And then one of them puts on a stalhelm, Sieg Heils and welcomes me to their Thousand Year Reich.

I am rather concerned.
And in the background, a man is inciting your renevation workers while the real estate agent mutters about the Jews in low tones.
 
Looks like Hans Oster is doing God's work for us in keeping track of the power structures in Germany! Really glad we didn't burn our assets with the Ratlines, since it probably means we have some assets in the various right wing organizations and the Red Front Fighters' League.
Have we already given up our Czech guns?
Nope, they're in Berlin! I'm hoping we can do a deal with Sir Basil and the Czechs when "dismantling" the "scrap metal". Maybe we can sell it to the Turks, Greeks or Poles.
On a side note, we really ought to promote the Reichsbanner as much as possible. It's a good ally for our cause and a check on other, less savory orgs.
Yeah, them and the Bund Bayern und Reich seem to be the forces of sanity in here. We should try to merge the two if possible. Maybe by doing some political horse trading with Ruprecht when we inevitably have to replace Von Seekt.
 
Voting is open
Back
Top