A Second Sunrise: Taiwan of 2020 Sent Back to 1911

What would be a good name for the rewrite?

  • Children of Heaven

    Votes: 3 30.0%
  • A Hundred Years' Difference

    Votes: 6 60.0%
  • Sun and Stars

    Votes: 1 10.0%
  • The Second Sunrise

    Votes: 3 30.0%
  • (Just call it Second Sunrise but make sure nobody refers to it as "SS")

    Votes: 0 0.0%

  • Total voters
    10
  • Poll closed .
I meant someone from the Congo trying to assassinate the entire Belgian Royal Family. 1908 (Three years before POD) is when the last of Leopold II's atrocities took place. Imagine being a kid whose parents lose their hands while his cousins starved or were whipped to death. Plenty of photos were taken, the blank faces of the victims is something I and anyone else that seen them will never forget.

I bet there are many Catholic and ex-Catholic parents that are willing to kill the Pope for the horrible things done to their kids and protecting the abusers. Collateral damage be damn, a few would consider blowing up the Vatican.

(Real Life Popes have been assassinated or had attempts on their lives for far less horrible things)
 
Speaking of Religion, I wonder if the Iglesia ni Cristo in the Philippines would still be founded given they wwre founded around 1914?

It would be fun to see Manalo's reaction to how his church grew and seeing the controversies it faced in Uptime.

This is merely a curiousity and a question to my fellow Filipinos reading this fix, not asking the OP to write a snippet about it.
 
Speaking of Religion, I wonder if the Iglesia ni Cristo in the Philippines would still be founded given they wwre founded around 1914?

It would be fun to see Manalo's reaction to how his church grew and seeing the controversies it faced in Uptime.

This is merely a curiousity and a question to my fellow Filipinos reading this fix, not asking the OP to write a snippet about it.

He's a dead man walking. A good chance one of the ancestors of the church's many, MANY victims kills him with a knife or machete, before 1914. Kidnappings and murders make him look like Bin Laden or Hitler. His Conservative cult doesn't exist in this Alternate Timeline, thankfully

The Catholic Church loses its stranglehold on my homeland which is another good thing. Family planning, safe sex, Chinese support and using the brain instead of dangerous superstitious beliefs means the Philippines quickly reduces poverty and corruption

Chinese and Ottoman money help the Philippines modernize the Muslim southern areas hopefully nipping the Moro conflicts in the bud

Another blessing this Alternate Earth has is that the Moonies never come to be. Korea is going to be much more secular, prosperous, enlighten and progressive this time around

Even the Mormon and Jehovah cults take huge hits though they probably survive as fringe groups. American gun nut cult culture doesn't infest the country like a cancer. Three mass shootings a day, sometimes racist, is something downtimers will prevent with extreme measures

A lot of cults wouldn't exist in this Alternate Earth
 
Almost forgot, but they have been.

Like, the Magdalene Laundries in Ireland are (in-story) being torn apart, and churches across Europe are under a lot of scrutiny.

Will it cause the destruction of the Catholic Church? No.

At most, you'll see some people leave, others become lapsed, and a general sense of secularist sentiment since the Church just lost a whole lot of its Sacred Cow status. You'll see governments seize property, but the Church will still exist.

Will it give the reformists a lot of power in the Church? Yes, and that's been happening for over ten years in the story.

Will major religions lose their tax-exempt status in the States? I don't recall if you mentioned that.
 
One way Taiwan can make A LOT of money and influence the downtime youth is recreate popular bands like Mettalica, Nirvana, Slipknot, Falling in Reverse, Linkin Park, Bring me the Horizon, Rise Against, Bad Religion and Gemini Syndrome. Translate their songs and get young fans everywhere that will be Liberal and Irreligious
 
One way Taiwan can make A LOT of money and influence the downtime youth is recreate popular bands like Mettalica, Nirvana, Slipknot, Falling in Reverse, Linkin Park, Bring me the Horizon, Rise Against, Bad Religion and Gemini Syndrome. Translate their songs and get young fans everywhere that will be Liberal and Irreligious
Yeah... that's kinda already happening. The bands' music is in the public domain, so you have tribute bands and derivative genres.

Is it part of a counterculture? Sure.

Is it going to get people to stop believing in God? Probably not. Maybe secular at best.

Another problem is that this kind of music is a bit of a "Culture Shock" to a lot of Downtimers, and more-familiar genres like country and folk (at least in the US) that use more-familiar instruments (acoustic guitar and vocals) might have more of an appeal.
 
Yeah... that's kinda already happening. The bands' music is in the public domain, so you have tribute bands and derivative genres.

Is it part of a counterculture? Sure.

Is it going to get people to stop believing in God? Probably not. Maybe secular at best.

Another problem is that this kind of music is a bit of a "Culture Shock" to a lot of Downtimers, and more-familiar genres like country and folk (at least in the US) that use more-familiar instruments (acoustic guitar and vocals) might have more of an appeal.

Depends on the songs. The ones that have the biggest anti-religious kicks are:

Make it Stop, Violence, Life Less Frightening, Survive and Endgame by Rise Against

Popular Monster by Falling in Reverse

Unsainted and The Dying Song by Slipknot

What are we Standing for by Bad Religion

Kids will dig modern music, especially Nu-Metal. So would WW1 vets, especially those that fought China and survived

EDIT: Female lead bands like Halestorm, Icon for Hire and Evanescene would greatly influence young girls
 
Last edited:
I love the writing, the POVs, the fact that all of these people with radically different beliefs are all portrayed in a sensitive manner.

I feel on the whole the progress of anti-racism is a bit too optimistic. Especially that there isn't any of the big infighting it has today, not sure why it wouldn't have. I am really puzzled about how the whole Waishengren/Hoklo and Hakka/Indigenous cultural divide disappears or how all the Taiwan independence movement and the culture war on Chinese identity just completely vanishes. Seems also like just like real life, a whole lot of indigenous people throughout the world are going to be screwed over just as in real life. And that many environmentally terrible projects like the dams in Colorado are going to be done anyway, even though people would be better off just not trying to do mass-scale agriculture there in the first place.
Also feel like there should be some kind of outcry to the revelations of all the people that were killed by Germany and Russia because of what they did in another lifetime. Yes, even about Hitler.

As an Israeli, I am very curious as to what happens with the Ottoman Empire. The real life democratisation movements there generally wanted democracy only in Anatolia and the capital. The uptime knowledge would make them want to focus on developing some other areas more, but I feel like there will still be a lot of neglect for places like the Berber villages in Libya or Palestine. Which brings me to another point: at this point in real life, the local Arab population is not really happy about the Ottoman government due to their neglect of the province combined with corruption, tax farming and absentee landlords. Antisemitism won't disappear because of uptime knowledge (and in fact a lot of uptimers themselves may hold left-wing antisemitic beliefs and spread them), and despite reforms of Wrangel and the Radical-Socialists, Jews in Europe will still likely be treated worse than their downtime American counterparts (in which the Gentleman's Agreement is still very much alive, as it is not technically against the law of the time and not violent). Regardless of what people on the this forum's beliefs on Israel are, the fact is that Zionism would still be seen as a necessity by many Jews of this period (mostly European ones, Zionism was initially unpopular among American Jews until Louis Brandeis came out in favour of it, and most likely he never becomes as influential in the first place after the POD). The good news for the Ottoman Empire is that at this point what Zionism actually means is very much in flux. Independence might not be necessary to fulfill Zionist ambitions. And luckily for the lives of many Jews and Arabs, a younger Ben-Gurion can read up on what was the result of his other-self legacy and learn from OTL Israel's mistakes. I feel he would renounce the idea of the Jews setting up Jewish-only labour unions in Palestine and instead try to incorporate cooperation with Arabs on all levels of the movement and on all policies; he did not like anti-Arab racism in Israel in OTL even though he kind of was one himself without knowing it, and he was one of the first to see in OTL that Israel's policy in the West Bank could be the downfall of the country. In his younger, less stubborn and more tolerant of Arabs period he would do what he can to make sure that the Zionist movement would stay on the Progressive and Socialist side of history.
 
I had forgotten in the previous post about the Mizrahi and Ethiopian Jews. I feel most Ethiopian Jews would love to escape living the hate and persecution and legacy of peasantry in Ethiopia for the Aliyah. If they are thanks to uptime knowledge better known among Ashkenazi Jews, they'd make a lot more reliable converts to Zionism than the political mess that Eastern European Jewish politics was in OTL and would still be in ATL. Similar if they appeal to the Yemeni Jews. Throughout the Ottoman Empire as well, there are Jewish communities used to centuries of humiliating religious laws against them, laws that I would think Liberal Union cannot repeal due to being too dangerous political-capital wise - the Muslim majority would like to retain an enshrined superiority, and much of the legitimacy of the state is based on religious grounds. Perhaps the Ashkenazi dominance of Jewish politics in Israel/Palestine never emerges in the first place?

On the other hand, in French Algeria, relations between Muslims and the local Jews were pretty positive back before Arab nationalism and Islamism and WW2 broadcasts against Jews by Nazi-sympathisers. They are after all, in it together in their suffering under French colonial law. With the Radical-Socialists bringing modernisation throughout Algeria and not just the Three Departments, perhaps many French Jews flee racism in Europe to settle in religiously tolerant Algeria? A delicious irony considering how it played the other way around in real life.

This brings me to another point I forgot: The acceptance of the horrors of colonialism abroad leaves the countries of Europe and the Americas with another difficult problem that has never really been satisfactorily solved uptime either: the legacy of internal colonisation. The wholesale destruction of languages and ethnic identities was still at its height at the time: the Vergonha, the Welsh Not, the state-backed persecution of Romani that's still going on in our world into the 2020s, the slow death of Gaelic and the repression of Scots, the gradual fading away of regional German, the persecution of indigenous peoples throughout the Americas and the ongoing state-backed thefts of land that governments had earlier pledged to guarantee for the natives, the fact that many of the newly available resources are on their lands and they aren't willing to let development ruin their environment (and *any* fossil fuel extraction or mining will do that no matter how respectful or green they try to be). There's even such a question for Africa, as decolonisation in OTL had also seen ethnic repression, people abandoning their local village's languages for big lingua francas like Swahili and major religious tensions between Christians, Muslims, traditional African religions, new African religious movements and the irreligious. Thankfully this is all before the extremely hypermasculine African nationalist literature was written, so hopefully MIB can make sure that toxic masculinity and rampant homophobia doesn't dominate the anti-colonial discourse this time.
 
Oh and I forgot the most important issue of all: how are all of these uptimers have no communication problems with downtime Chinese who speak a myriad of mutually unintelligible dialects and aren't educated in "Standard Chinese" (not to mention that Nanjing Mandarin is very different in pronunciation from Beijing Mandarin or the Taiwanese koiné based of the former).
 
I get the feeling English and Chinese will be spoken by a much greater percentage of the population

The movie Inglourious Basterds will be very popular amongst minorities and Liberals. Also gives a major warning to Far-right groups as to what will happen when they act out of line

Secular Humanism is needed to prevent Africa and the Middle-east from going nuts like in OTL. It helps in breaking down cultural and religious tension as well as promote democracy.

Rise Against, Twilight Zone and Mister Rogers would also promote peace and social progress in Africa and the Middle-east. Even in the vilest corners of the internet (4chan) the lowest of the low still love Mr. Rogers and will go berserk at anyone that insults him.

Conservative/Right-wing parties are screwed. The Church scandals plus their own politicians outed as scum would cause many parties to dissolved
 
It would be interesting if later on there is another ISOT in your story

1966 in the Second Sunrise Earth. An area much smaller than Taiwan is ISOT to the year 1191 due to an experiment

A much smaller population but with much higher tech base, with a few descendants of the Uptimers. Temujin isn't Khan yet and the Infamous Fourth Crusade hasn't occured. Sounds easy right?

Well, a very small minority are agents working for the Far-right and move to France to recreate the Third Reich. War never changes
 
I love the writing, the POVs, the fact that all of these people with radically different beliefs are all portrayed in a sensitive manner.

Thanks!

I feel on the whole the progress of anti-racism is a bit too optimistic. Especially that there isn't any of the big infighting it has today, not sure why it wouldn't have. I am really puzzled about how the whole Waishengren/Hoklo and Hakka/Indigenous cultural divide disappears or how all the Taiwan independence movement and the culture war on Chinese identity just completely vanishes. Seems also like just like real life, a whole lot of indigenous people throughout the world are going to be screwed over just as in real life. And that many environmentally terrible projects like the dams in Colorado are going to be done anyway, even though people would be better off just not trying to do mass-scale agriculture there in the first place.

Culture isn't something I've focused too much on, but the presence of the DPP in this big-tent Kuomintang coalition has allowed for more minority rights in China. There are prejudices, particularly when it comes to concepts seen as "Backwards," but the general idea is that if you want to learn codified Standard Mandarin, pay your taxes, and you aren't hurting anyone, the government isn't going to care.

Of course, there's always the issue of internal migration, and the Han Chinese are likely to displace the Mongolians and Manchus due to sheer weight of numbers. This might lead to a passive-Sinification of both Mongolia and Manchuria.

In the rest of the world, America had the Klan try to kill the President, so anti-black racism is on the decline, and the existence of a modern "civilized" non-White state agreeable to Western values has led to the concept of "Americanization," in the sense that anyone can be American if they integrate and embrace American values."

Russia's stop to Russification can be boiled down to "Dear God, this is a waste of resources, and Diterikhs is a lunatic." That, and the reliance of regional Ukrainian and Finnish coalition members has led to several concessions on languages.

France, for their part, is a bit weird. They genuinely believe in the brotherhood of all peoples as equals, but they're not above suppressing values they see as "Backwards" or "Counter-Revolutionary." Don't get me wrong, they'll go out of their way to incorporate socialism into local values (even if it's to spread their ideology), but they'll still take a sledgehammer to hierarchies and gender roles.

As for the indigenous peoples, it varies. China is undergoing a phase of "Two Languages, One Country," while Russia is easing itself off of Russification. Meanwhile, New Zealand is undergoing significant reforms with the Maori, while Australia is doing more outreach for the Aborigines.

America, on the other hand... is mostly just horrified at the Residential Schools, but there are still issues about Native American disenfranchisement that will need to be addressed. That, and just how poor a lot of American Indians are.

Projects like the Hoover Dam will likely see more environmental protections, now that they have future knowledge, but it's not as if the US government at the time is too focused on environmentalism.

In contrast, China's building of nuclear reactors all over the place has butterflied the Three Gorges Dam from being built. Sure, there's the environmental issues that make it unpalatable, but the big one is that they just produce so much energy they don't need to build the dam in the first place.

Also feel like there should be some kind of outcry to the revelations of all the people that were killed by Germany and Russia because of what they did in another lifetime. Yes, even about Hitler.

Oh there was. People like Hitler were assassinated by the Kaiser's orders in Germany, while the Russian Junta tried to hunt down and kill basically everyone who was involved in the Russian Revolution. Granted, the latter were murdered because Diterikhs saw them as a threat to his Junta, so you ended up with things like the Okhrana killing a child Lavrentiy Beria.

Then there's the whole thing with the Saudis, where the Director of the MIB greenlit an op to murder the Saudi family with the Ottomans' blessing to prevent the spread of Wahhabism.

Yeah... one of our heroes gave the order to kill children, and part of his mind still feels guilty about it.

As an Israeli, I am very curious as to what happens with the Ottoman Empire. The real life democratisation movements there generally wanted democracy only in Anatolia and the capital. The uptime knowledge would make them want to focus on developing some other areas more, but I feel like there will still be a lot of neglect for places like the Berber villages in Libya or Palestine. Which brings me to another point: at this point in real life, the local Arab population is not really happy about the Ottoman government due to their neglect of the province combined with corruption, tax farming and absentee landlords.

The Liberal Union has been in a coalition with several Arab regional parties, and part of the deal was that a fixed percentage of oil revenues has to be reinvested into the Arab communities through business loans, infrastructure, education, and other public works.

Constantinople wants that oil revenue, while the Arabs want a higher quality-of-life. So long as they don't waste it on stupid ego projects, they should see both.

Antisemitism won't disappear because of uptime knowledge (and in fact a lot of uptimers themselves may hold left-wing antisemitic beliefs and spread them), and despite reforms of Wrangel and the Radical-Socialists, Jews in Europe will still likely be treated worse than their downtime American counterparts (in which the Gentleman's Agreement is still very much alive, as it is not technically against the law of the time and not violent). Regardless of what people on the this forum's beliefs on Israel are, the fact is that Zionism would still be seen as a necessity by many Jews of this period (mostly European ones, Zionism was initially unpopular among American Jews until Louis Brandeis came out in favour of it, and most likely he never becomes as influential in the first place after the POD).

As mentioned in a previous chapter, Europe being Europe and the Ottomans being... wary of Zionism, to say the least, has led to a larger migration of Jews to America and China, given the presence of diaspora communities on the East Coast and Manchuria, respectively.

You'll still see some European Jews immigrate to Palestine, but it'll be a reduced number for as long as the government is wary of Zionism.

The good news for the Ottoman Empire is that at this point what Zionism actually means is very much in flux. Independence might not be necessary to fulfill Zionist ambitions. And luckily for the lives of many Jews and Arabs, a younger Ben-Gurion can read up on what was the result of his other-self legacy and learn from OTL Israel's mistakes. I feel he would renounce the idea of the Jews setting up Jewish-only labour unions in Palestine and instead try to incorporate cooperation with Arabs on all levels of the movement and on all policies; he did not like anti-Arab racism in Israel in OTL even though he kind of was one himself without knowing it, and he was one of the first to see in OTL that Israel's policy in the West Bank could be the downfall of the country. In his younger, less stubborn and more tolerant of Arabs period he would do what he can to make sure that the Zionist movement would stay on the Progressive and Socialist side of history.

That's kind of where I am right now with how Zionism would play out. Since the Ottomans are opposed to Lost History Zionism (since they want to hold onto the Levant), people like Ben-Gurion would go back to the drawing board and see what they can do differently to achieve these goals.

It'd be a hard sell, but I think an approach that you described would be agreeable to the Liberal Union and the Arab parties. Cooperation with the latter would definitely smooth things over, but everyone would be wary first.

I had forgotten in the previous post about the Mizrahi and Ethiopian Jews. I feel most Ethiopian Jews would love to escape living the hate and persecution and legacy of peasantry in Ethiopia for the Aliyah. If they are thanks to uptime knowledge better known among Ashkenazi Jews, they'd make a lot more reliable converts to Zionism than the political mess that Eastern European Jewish politics was in OTL and would still be in ATL. Similar if they appeal to the Yemeni Jews. Throughout the Ottoman Empire as well, there are Jewish communities used to centuries of humiliating religious laws against them, laws that I would think Liberal Union cannot repeal due to being too dangerous political-capital wise - the Muslim majority would like to retain an enshrined superiority, and much of the legitimacy of the state is based on religious grounds. Perhaps the Ashkenazi dominance of Jewish politics in Israel/Palestine never emerges in the first place?

Oddly enough, they're probably the ones who are the most-receptive to the Aliyah, as while European Jews are more-likely to immigrate to America or China, I'm fairly certain that the Ottoman Empire is more-palatable for the Mizrahi and Ethiopian Jews despite the local prejudices, especially if Ben-Gurion can work out an agreement between the Arabs and Constantinople.

While Israel probably won't exist in this timeline, the Jewish community in the region will, and they will likely be less-Ashkenazi.

On the other hand, in French Algeria, relations between Muslims and the local Jews were pretty positive back before Arab nationalism and Islamism and WW2 broadcasts against Jews by Nazi-sympathisers. They are after all, in it together in their suffering under French colonial law. With the Radical-Socialists bringing modernisation throughout Algeria and not just the Three Departments, perhaps many French Jews flee racism in Europe to settle in religiously tolerant Algeria? A delicious irony considering how it played the other way around in real life.

Yeah, I could see that. Algerian Kibbutzim would definitely be something, but it could work.

Actually, the French socialists might actually sponsor the projects due to the socialistic elements, so long as Ben-Gurion tells them he wants to build a bunch of communes in Algeria.

Oh and I forgot the most important issue of all: how are all of these uptimers have no communication problems with downtime Chinese who speak a myriad of mutually unintelligible dialects and aren't educated in "Standard Chinese" (not to mention that Nanjing Mandarin is very different in pronunciation from Beijing Mandarin or the Taiwanese koiné based of the former).

There's a push for a standard language (as in OTL) in addition to regional dialects, but the main way they go about this is translators.

Lots of translators.

As in, the United Kuomintang's approach was to recruit or utilize local leaders and members to smooth the transition to Republicanism, as the local leaders and members would be able to "sell" the ideas better. Those local leaders would basically be the go-between for the locals and Nanjing when it comes to ideas, administration, or communication. Quite literally when it comes to the latter.
 
How is the tech acceleration occurring worldwide? It was mentioned in Chapter 71 that public TV was now a thing in the US.

TVs have reached the Nanjing Accord and the Americas through trade, and twenty years of electrification (and a bunch of really-happy Chinese electronics companies) has led to the TV being almost as commonplace as the radio over there.

Personal computers are still catching on, so web cafes and libraries are still a thing. Basically, we're looking at the late 1990s to early 2000s dynamic where every house has a TV and radio, but PCs are mainly for middle-class and tech enthusiasts.

Cell phones are mixed. In Asia, you're looking at a lot of smartphones, but the further you get from Asia, the less-complex the phone is. Flip phones are still a thing in much of the Americas and Europe due to the lower cost. Think the early to mid 2000s, but with better tech.

In terms of software and hardware advancement, the average computer or smart phone is probably 10-15 years ahead of what we have today. There was a lull in development in the early 1910s, when China was focused on pumping out as many electronic devices as they could. Once that happened, we start seeing advancements in products at a similar pace to OTL, though adoption takes time.

Oh, and AndroidOS reigns supreme. This is in part due to HTC being based in Taiwan and partially due to me being mad at Apple making it hard to put my games on the App Store.
 
What is the situation regarding indian and Chinese border disputes? Situation of muslims in india?

In a de-facto sense, China basically took these places over when they chased the British out.

Legally speaking, the McMahon Line would be butterflied away, and China and India had a postwar conference to delineate the border at the Karakoram Mountains.

As for Muslims in India, they have Freedom of Religion enshrined in the Constitution. Practically speaking, both Ghadar and Congress are supportive of their rights, while the conservative One Bharat Party pushes Hindutva.

Ghadar and Congress dominate the nation though, while One Bharat is their common enemy.
 
TVs have reached the Nanjing Accord and the Americas through trade, and twenty years of electrification (and a bunch of really-happy Chinese electronics companies) has led to the TV being almost as commonplace as the radio over there.

Personal computers are still catching on, so web cafes and libraries are still a thing. Basically, we're looking at the late 1990s to early 2000s dynamic where every house has a TV and radio, but PCs are mainly for middle-class and tech enthusiasts.

Cell phones are mixed. In Asia, you're looking at a lot of smartphones, but the further you get from Asia, the less-complex the phone is. Flip phones are still a thing in much of the Americas and Europe due to the lower cost. Think the early to mid 2000s, but with better tech.

In terms of software and hardware advancement, the average computer or smart phone is probably 10-15 years ahead of what we have today. There was a lull in development in the early 1910s, when China was focused on pumping out as many electronic devices as they could. Once that happened, we start seeing advancements in products at a similar pace to OTL, though adoption takes time.

Oh, and AndroidOS reigns supreme. This is in part due to HTC being based in Taiwan and partially due to me being mad at Apple making it hard to put my games on the App Store.

So there is more modern infrastructure. How is the internet hooked up? Wi-fi, cable/dsl or Fiber optic?

How about electronic industries outside of China? I'm assuming the Americas and the Nanjing Accord is building their local tech industries.

How about tech outside of TVs and Computers, like kitchen appliances?
 
What are the most recent medical developments so far?

Anyone trying to make lab-grown meat in bulk? (Hindus and Muslims would love that)

I am assuming China's MiB is trying to reduce the number of close-relative, underage arranged marriages right?

One would think the WW1 veterans that fought the Chinese Alliance would be much less religious. Kinda hard to believe in an all-powerful deity when a bunch of agnostics and atheists curbstomp your people and overthrew your leaders AND change your very way of life. Militarism is dead in this timeline

The Switch should be making a lot of profit and influence kids to be Secular
 
TVs have reached the Nanjing Accord and the Americas through trade, and twenty years of electrification (and a bunch of really-happy Chinese electronics companies) has led to the TV being almost as commonplace as the radio over there.

Personal computers are still catching on, so web cafes and libraries are still a thing. Basically, we're looking at the late 1990s to early 2000s dynamic where every house has a TV and radio, but PCs are mainly for middle-class and tech enthusiasts.

I would guess evolved RaspberryPi-rival SBCs provide for the majority of the personal and business desktop computing needs downtime. More cost-efficient to produce and distribute and sufficient for all practical requirements.

Hmmm... do SmartTVs make a comeback, providing homes with a mediacentre and basic internet access?

Cell phones are mixed. In Asia, you're looking at a lot of smartphones, but the further you get from Asia, the less-complex the phone is. Flip phones are still a thing in much of the Americas and Europe due to the lower cost.
So the Blackberry reigns sureme once again.

Oh, and AndroidOS reigns supreme. This is in part due to HTC being based in Taiwan and partially due to me being mad at Apple making it hard to put my games on the App Store.
IT also makes sense from a practical point. Taiwan probably doesn't want a fractured OS market that makes it more expensive to support the computing needs of the rest of the world. Plus, maintaining Windows or macOS without access to the sources in Redmond and Cupertino is not really feasible.
So there is more modern infrastructure. How is the internet hooked up? Wi-fi, cable/dsl or Fiber optic?
LTE. A wired solution is economically not feasible on the scale required.
 
I've always found it odd how you make it out to be just one priest in all of Taiwan, so I went to look it up.
There's also a large number of Catholic clergy in downtime China at this point, but they are mostly French and not really caring for their Chinese followers that much (which lead to the foundation of a Catholic university in Beijing in 1925 OTL to train more clergy from the local population)
 
What is relationship of India with France and middle east?
Kindred spirits on Radical sentiment and anti-monarchism, and Ghadar does like some of the econ proposals for France.

Middle East is basically just Iran and the Ottomans, and they're all party to the treaty negotiations. Good chance you see many Indians traveling into the Middle East for work, but treaty requirements will... well, require significant worker protections to prevent OTL abuses.
 
Back
Top