Storm Trooper Mafia

So like I get that this is most certainly a vanilla heavy game, but even fake bleeding statements like "I had a night message that nothing happened" is potentially just giving scum more bullet points to successfully target whatever few power-roles we have. I find it actively unlikely that such statements can lead to town finding town, while it can lead to scum finding town power roles. So I don't think such conversations are positively productive.
 
Vanillas want to look and sound like power roles to be shields for the real power roles. Lets just hope Technician isn't our cop, I don't know how it could be a cop, but I also don't know what its power could be to be completely honest, its a tech guy so mind goes to Jailer (locking people in rooms or something) but I'm sure there are plenty of other possible powers but that could work, that's just the only one that comes to mind.
 
Hmm. This makes me townread Meso and Comi a bit. Meso was the first to actually say something, so if he was scum it was a serious risk than an actual VT would call him out, which at D2 seems like a big risk to take when there isn't a wagon on him.

Comi because he is right that this is dangerous for whatever Town power roles we have left. Which while common sense seems poor for scum to point out while people are still doing it.

The question was if anyone was told they were roleblocked, because I want to know Scum's power set. It will be useful if we have a cop and we already know scum have three powers - it's unlikely a godfather is getting a second power in a power light game like this one seems to be.

If they don't have a RB they probably have a Strongman, assuming Town has protective roles, which seems to be typical. Either way that scum member, if they exist, is priority one baring any knowledge of which individuals are scum. Particularly after watching town get butchered last game in part because the RB shut them down so thoroughly.
 
But I will say based on the PM Happerry is doing things a bit differently than the standard according to the wiki, so we should probably watch for the unexpected.
 
Then why didn't you give that as your reasoning beforehand?
You know what? I was actually kind of annoyed when I went to get the quote.
Best drove-by voted in 754 with no justification at all. That's getting questioned.
Thank you for this.

(...)

You know, I remember that "This person arguing against me's getting me real mad so fuck'em" from last game, when you were scum. It's not really a reason that indicates you as town.
But considering this is what I got, yeah, that's fairly obtuse. You can see the line there if you're looking for it, but a cursory readthrough ain't gonna.

Can you explain why you thought they were on the same team to begin with? I confess I saw no signs of such an association.
This, on the other hand?
Oh boy, let's bring up the quotes!

Right, for some reason, quotes and spoilers don't always mix for me. The little click to expand doesn't happen. So uh. Sorry for the wall, but I know I wouldn't like to be unable to read this. Gonna try to spoil sections that don't have long quotes, but.



So this post is almost exactly 24 hours after day start. Rather early.

Then Rosen comes in to defend the person he's already said he townreads based on the questions responses you yourself called suspicious earlier.

Rosen keeps poking this, while 1K keeps saying that they have a bias against them due to how they typically play, not a noteworthy read. Meanwhile, Rosen keeps treating it as a noteworthy read, up and including voting them when they don't provide reasons from this game as to why that have that bias.
Then BB comes in, asking him for his reads again despite nothing having changed. The results are entirely predictable.

So she says she townreads Rosen again, then is rather confused at 1K's lack of townreading them, then asks for reads again, after the literal things she's responding to here being "I don't have actual reads yet." Reminder that this is after 27 hours of the game. We're not even halfway done with D1.

This post specifically is something she mentioned later as thoughts and impressions are totally different from reads, but I only accept that in a technical sense. If it affects the game, it's a read of some sort, and there's no reason to seek out information not affecting the game.
MEANWHILE

Rosen comes back, notably more aggressive than the person he's defending if you'd notice :V
Seriously. This fucking quote.

You're asking the same question, getting the same answer with stress that it's not an actual read and shouldn't be followed, but it's the best answer she can give you, and you're treating it like it's 1K that's making the big push here. This is just bad.


Oh but it's fine because after saying that, it's not what's happening now. It's just that what's happening now is on this path and is probably going to devolve into it.
That was sarcasm.


So after 1K calls him out on this, he just kinda doubles down on it.
Also calls 1K actually saying what little she has when asked suspicious and shading again. It's kind of getting old at this point.

Now, then. BB pivots here. Does not want to address this whole argument, let's leave it at that. She's disengaged without bothering to disengage.

Aaaand Rosen follows right onto Daw.
Though it seems I've misremembered, as they go back to 1K a bit after this before starting the Daw push in earnest. Thought this was just the end of it.
Rosen keeps doing the Rosen thing while BB actually changes her reasons here. Reason from her here's definitely better than it was before.

Then 1K comes back in, it's been a good 9 hours I think since the argument started, and comes up with a few itsy reads. Notably, there's a slight nudge towards Daw and again arguing the reads got from Rosen's questions were bad.

Oof, not all of this is relevant but I'm not sure what to cut.

Anyways, some more townreading of Rosen, backing off of 1K firmly (Yeah, I was just wrong about her not posting and disengaging with words), and a couple posts about Byzantine being good and Daw being not-that. For reference, this is the post she didn't see a newbie scum making.

Okay, but why? Why would a newbie scum not make this, but a newbie town would? Feels more like buddying than an actual good argument.



And final argument from BB.

Anyways, after that it settles down. Rosen keeps arguing with 1K, but it's more on his methods and today's questions, which doesn't really read AI to me. BB stays out of that unless I missed something.


This quote's interesting. Basically the one thing BB says about Rosen that isn't visibly townreading him. But in the end, it's just asking someone who's scumreading Rosen who, as far as I can tell, never responds to this question who they'd think was scum with Rosen. Feels like easy setup to a "Hm, but I don't think that's likely because X or Y".

Anyways, and then Daw responds and fuck these walls of posts I have no idea how I'd make that argument readable. Let's at least call this post here.
It occurs to me that both of these posts use a lot of quotes, not just the first, so you probably want to follow the link to the second one too.

And fuck it, let's add new material too. Haven't edited notes since... Well, for days. Replaced mentions of BB with Nictis and Daw with Ossha when I found the replacements, but didn't edit the contents then, and haven't done anything during the night.

@Nictis
Rating: Somewhat sus

Very good player, cannot tell alignment from posts.

With Rosen, made an issue on how having no reads on D1 but posting a lot is suspicious, target 1K. You should not have defined reads yet at this point, but the pressure is possibly aiming to convince people to solidify reads... which would put the two talkers directing town as town.

Oddly confident Byzantine/Dawuisz aren't both maf from a small spat during the first day of D1.

With town control, a large scum target. If neither Rosen nor Nictis have died by D3, point out reads.

Pokes holes in scenarios that have Rosen as a scum member.

Reasonably likely to not be scum with Meso/Daw slot (Probably Ossha?)
@-Rosen
Rating: Somewhat sus

Give him slack D1, he's had some unfortunate games. However, good player. Do not forget.

Big talker. Feels like trying to control town with combination of posts and aggressiveness.

With Broken Base, made an issue on how having no reads on D1 but posting a lot is suspicious, target 1K. You should not have defined reads yet at this point, but the pressure is possibly aiming to convince people to solidify reads... which would put the two talkers directing town as town.

With town control, a large scum target. If neither Rosen nor Nictis have died by D3, point out reads.

Rosen/Nictis (BB): Very in-synch, controlling town's dialogue to a great extent. If the team is the case, they are absolutely a threat that can't be discounted, much less ignored. Once it was pointed out that they coordinated, BB replaced, and Rosen went silent for a bit through unrelated reasons. They seem to be separating now, which is almost more suspicious, if anything.

Predicted future actions: Arguing against each other lightly, possibly throwing some shade. However, the two could push for two different people who aren't either of them, getting in an appearance of conflict while being fine with whoever's argument wins.

Anyways, now that we're done with that a bit for a while:
Who voted to lynch Rosen and their stated reasoning why:

Nictis - Didn't like Rosen's playstyle due to it being scummy in nature.
Me - Didn't like Rosen's playstyle due to it being scummy in nature.
1K - Didn't like Rosen's playstyle due to it being scummy in nature.
QT - Didn't like Rosen's playstyle due to it being scummy in nature.
Comi - Avoid a tie as those are bad for town.
Hobo - Avoiding a tie as those are bad for town.

Two thirds due to their scummy actions and two to avoid a tie near the end of the day.
This here is why I think Rosen's behaviour is definitely anti-town. By playing scummy as town, they let other people to vote for them over their scummy behaviour and because they are town who are getting valid reasons to lynch them, it lets scum get away with a town excuse to lynch a townie. At least Rosen isn't able to help scum hide via providing false positives anymore.

I kind of want to lynch Meso at this point, but that would only be helpful if they are scum as that would tell us if scum would have a reason to back a Rosen lynch over a Meso lynch, indicating at that at least some people who voted for Rosen did so to get a town lynch over a scum lynch. If Meso does flip scum, I would want to look at Nictis and Comi, maybe Hobo.

That said, if Meso is town and it was a choice between lynching two townies, I could see scum backing a Meso lynch over a Rosen lynch so Rosen could keep acting scummy as town.

Uh, it is late and I'm tired. I'll try and come up with some ideas or leads tomorrow if no one else gets some over night.
This reads like you're trying to create a chain of falsely lynching town to me.
Also, people's stated reasons all being legitimate does not mean that the play that lead there is definitely anti-town. All D1 and D2 and D3, etc lynches will have people going on about their town reasons for being on the wagon, even if they were wrong. Some'll be legitimate, some might not. That's just every game.
 
Alright. Time to build a timeline.

Slight color coding included. Purple is personal note, Red is wagon level, Green is time or page gaps.

Day 1 Starts. Page 4.
1K makes a near immediate comment about not being aligned with Cyricubed.
Hobo claims that Byzantine scumslipped in the pre-game based on a jokepost and Stormtroopers being armed.
-Broken Base (My Slot) lightly pushes for more info on this.
-Broken Base (BB) then states that Hobo and Byzantine are unlikely to be aligned scum.
ComiTurtle (Comi) memevotes Dawiusz [1] and casts doubt on BB.
-BB explains thought in response and questions Hobo on the lack of vote.
-Hobo votes Byzantine. [1]
Tykan memevotes Meso. [1]
1K gives thoughts on the last game.
Byzantine claims to not be Scum or in a Quick Topic. (Not!Scum=/=Town)
Dawiusz (Daw) memevotes Comi. [1]
Nanimani (Nani) memevotes Cyricubed. [1]

Page 5.
Daw lightly suspects Byzantine's response to scumslip mention. (Unlikely to be allied, potentially a light case of shading?)
-Byzantine explains intended tone.
-BB casts doubt by saying that the tone didn't read like that. (Noting mostly because people tried to tie BB to Byzantine, need to see what's with that.)
-BB then votes Byzantine [2] for what is claimed to be tone but feels like disengaging. (Why you gotta do the suspicious things BB? This pressure feels bad to me T.T)
Rosen enters with another case of RQS.
Daw presses X to doubt Byzantine and claims Hobo as probably Town. Also expresses concern of getting hammered.
BB responds to Rosen's questions by giving a decent answer, an explanation for the lack of answer, and info on how she plays as scum. (If I had replaced Daw instead this would probably be who I would vote)
BB questions Daw on the lack of vote.
-Rosen claims to be watching Daw and the conversation.
BB pushes Tykan to flesh out their memevote on Meso. (I don't get this one)
Tykan responds to Rosen and unvotes Meso from BB comment. [0]
Daw explains basic new player vote conservativeness. Doesn't want to vote too early basically.
-BB and Daw butt heads over game ideology. I'm mostly going to ignore this from here on out to save space. (I will say that I personally agree with both sides here. Wagons form pressure and gather reactions, but sometimes the subtler touch is better)
1K and Byzantine give serious answers to Rosen's question.
Daw unvotes Comi. [0]
Byzantine votes Daw for shading them. [2] (I think this is where people decided that BB and Byzantine were connected, but it just looks like Byzantine piggybacking off of a line by BB that was prefaced with "I'm not sure that this is scummy")

Page 6.
(Post 127) BB pushes on Daw for playstyle. (I'm unsure if this is a matter of ideology or not. She's not here so I can't exactly ask. I can start to see why people were linking BB and Byzantine though.)
Hobo memevotes Rosen [1] and answers questions questionably.
LDJ and Comi respond to Rosen's questions shortly.
-Rosen pushes LDJ for answers, gets a response from LDJ explaining the answers, and immediately votes LDJ. (For what is frankly bullshit.) [1]
-1K calls Rosen on the bullshit and compares the LDJ answer to the BB answer. Rosen responds by claiming BB as his biggest Town read and LDJ as his biggest Scum Read.

Page 7.
Byzantine remarks that 1K is putting an odd amount of effort into defending LDJ. (NAI I say)
-Rosen meanwhile is making a complete mockery of himself from last game.
-LDJ gives IRL explanation for short answer. (Combination of a lack of interest in the questions, and not having a proper keyboard. I sympathize)

Page 8.
Nani responds to Rosen's questions while explicitly calling it nice as a fun question rather than a game move.
Byzantine questions the likelihood of a Gunsmith (Probably doesn't mean much, noting in case if I see more of this later)
Byzantine mentions that Nictis controlled the conversations last game and was scum... And hints that the lurkers should get more attention.
Rosen questions Nani for thoughts
Meso and QT give explanations for lack of activity and an intent to post more later.

Page 9.
BB asks 1K about reads on BB and Rosen, also states null to slight town read on LDJ (Matches my own thoughts at this point)
1K acknowledges bias towards/against Town Leader types, Rosen nitpicks 1K over bias ideology (is that even a thing? Not sure how else to phrase it)
-Rosen votes unvotes LDJ [0] and votes 1K [1] for letting her bias influence her reads. (Gotta say, I didn't see this when I voted Rosen Day 1. It's not making me regret it though.)
BB is townreading Rosen and not reading 1K. Seems to imply that she knows 1K's scumrange. (I am curious about this, since 1K's only scum game had her acting basically the same and fooled me completely)

Page 10.
For the list's and my own sake, I'm going to ignore the argument between 1K and Rosen in this. Some people comment in defense of 1K, Rosen continues to try and impress his view of things on the thread. Most of the page is wasted on this.
BB unvotes Byzantine [0] and pressure votes Daw [3]
Tykan and Hobo question Rosen for a Comi read and question the LDJ read from Rosen's response.

Page 11.
BB is paranoid about 1K.
Hobo unvotes Rosen [0] and votes Byzantine [1] because " I still think Byzantine has the best odds of being scum. " (Seems to be for the pre-game scumslip?) Also questions BB on Daw vote.
-BB provides quote and explanation.
BB is still paranoid about 1K and asks others to help go over her.
-Rosen responds by explaining that he's suspicious of 1K for not having a serious scum read on BB. Also that if 1K flips as scum to pressure LDJ. (Rosen seems to have forgotten 1K defending other players in every other game.)
Byzantine is lightly townreading Hobo and scumreading Daw.
BB likes Byzantine read post
Hobo suspects Byzantine (Slip) then BB (Distancing from Hobo with very quick switch to Daw... Many pages and a full day later) then Daw (general thread suspicion?) followed by Rosen (Bad behavior, but identical so not really suspicious to Hobo)


Huh, thought I was on Page 14. That might have been when I got distracted just reading the thread and then fell asleep though.

That's kinda annoying. Will mention that for any other Rosen stuff, the only other thing I had really seen during Day 1 from him was him calling our basic courtesy towards new players stupid. For reasons I don't have time to explain at the moment (Will be explaining post game anyways, since Rosen doesn't seem to keep reading after dying) I disagree, and decided that if they didn't care for the new player courtesy I wouldn't bother extending the 'Don't lynch repeatedly' courtesy. Rosen doing the exact same shit after claiming that he would stop doing it because it gets him lynched is going to get him lynched if we're not extending the courtesies of 'This is just how he plays' and 'We lynched him last game.'

Sorry, when rereading Rosen has gotten even more aggravating to me. I do not regret lynching him.
I'm a bit sleepy to be reading through a big infopost like that right now, so I guess I'll stop reading tonight. (Sorry, I'll be honest. Checking on the game completely slipped my mind today. Didn't have anything more important, I just forgot.) What do the red numbers in brackets mean? It'll help when I actually do, you know?
 
I'm a bit sleepy to be reading through a big infopost like that right now, so I guess I'll stop reading tonight. (Sorry, I'll be honest. Checking on the game completely slipped my mind today. Didn't have anything more important, I just forgot.) What do the red numbers in brackets mean? It'll help when I actually do, you know?
Votes to Lynch the person in question. It took me a minute to figure it out at first too.
 
I got a PM saying nothing interesting happened to me. Did everyone else get the same message?

Also, sorry for being offline most of the day. It's been crazy. I'll try to be here more tomorrow.
Same. Was a bit odd, I was not expecting a pm for the end of the night if nothing happened to me, but I'm guessing that's just how this one is being hosted.
Narrator: "And then the Rebels killed the cop, because everyone else decided to say they weren't roleblocked."
 
Narrator: "And then the Rebels killed the cop, because everyone else decided to say they weren't roleblocked."
I mean, like I said when I asked the actual question Meso didn't answer as I expected - being RBed does not require a role that can be blocked. Unless Happerry is operating under even more nonstandard rules.
 
Wait, I don't follow that. Wouldn't succesfully roleblocking the cop imply the Rebels already know who the cop is?
 
...Also, I would hope the cop would be smart enough to fucking lie and agree they got the message. The way Meso said it made it useless for identifying scum since it's so easy to say "yes."

Wait, I don't follow that. Wouldn't succesfully roleblocking the cop imply the Rebels already know who the cop is?
No. It would mean they got lucky and roleblocked someone who happened to be the cops. RBs are not traditionally told if they blocked anything, or if they did what it was.

...though if even VT are getting a "Nothing Interesting Happened" then a RB is probably being told if they blocked something or didn't. Shit. Okay, if you got RBed we really need to know.
 
Wait, I don't follow that. Wouldn't succesfully roleblocking the cop imply the Rebels already know who the cop is?

A roleblocker that investigates their target is a very rare and powerful role, most roleblockers just get "you're ability succeeded", "you are confident your target could do nothing during the night", or something along those lines, not something like "you stopped their night action", or "you stopped your target's doctor action".
 
I am still quite baffled as to how saying who got roleblocked gives away who is cop.
If the rebels already know who cop is, obviously nothing is learned.
If rebels do not know who cop is, then the person they tried to roleblock claiming to have been roleblocked tells them... insofar as I can tell, nothing.
 
Anyways, I'm temporarily satisfied re:Nanimani.
Gonna join the "QT do something" vote until I can work up the motivation to examine someone in depth.

[X] Lynch QTesseract
 
I suspect it's more likely that they get a "you performed your night action" PM, which is how I run RBers in my games.
That's less concerning, then.

Yeah this, somehow excluded the simple line in my above post saying, such a role that would cause such fear is insanely unlikely.
I'm mostly worried Happerry may not have considered the implications in a minor oversight, thinking it wasn't a big deal without considering doing so for scum powers has serious advantages. But that's probably not giving him enough credit and me just being a paranoid noob.
 
... People did not take that the way I was expecting.

With the thread being very quiet and nearly half of the game claiming to have not had any events in the previous night, there can be an assumption that nobody got particularly actionable info. A lookout didn't see the murder, a Cop didn't find someone trustable or scum, etc. People are usually willing to confirm that they got roleblocked just to let everyone know that there is a Roleblocker, because it doesn't actually say anything about your own role or alignment.

Half of the thread stepping up and saying "Nah, nothing here" tells scum something. Getting roleblocked and claiming to have not been roleblocked can lead to the Roleblocker revealing in order to call you out for lying, so people usually don't lie about it. This in combination with the thread being incredibly quiet and a decent portion into the Day really helps narrow targets for them.

Like, five people claimed to have had a quiet night. If we assume that those are all Town, and that the earlier number of three scum is accurate, that knocks down scum's target selection to three people. It's not a guarantee, since there might not be any roles that would give those messages to begin with. It could be that there is no Roleblocker or Jailer. But it still helps them pick out a more likely power role.

One or two people volunteering information isn't too bad, half of the thread deciding to tell everyone what didn't happen isn't helpful to Town.
 
I'm basically back to the start in terms of my thoughts. I know I'm town, so I'm having to take everything Rosen said with some serious pinches of salt, because he was barking up at least one wrong tree. Meso seems to have town-slipped earlier (is that a thing?) and otherwise seems too prone to minor errors that have all called him as town.

With the thread being very quiet and nearly half of the game claiming to have not had any events in the previous night, there can be an assumption that nobody got particularly actionable info. A lookout didn't see the murder, a Cop didn't find someone trustable or scum, etc. People are usually willing to confirm that they got roleblocked just to let everyone know that there is a Roleblocker, because it doesn't actually say anything about your own role or alignment.
Which is why I asked. I was hoping we would know at least one of scum's powers today.

Unfortunately Meso took it the wrong way and I was wierded out enough by the message I brought it up after he did unthinkingly.
 
I was just mentioning it because I assumed meso just wasn't used to that. I would also suggest that, if I was a power role that got information back on night actions, I would definitely lie about it. Don't take it as a claim.
 
Also doesn't account for a potential vig/1shot type role, so not too bad of a communal slip.
 
Back
Top