What is the general opinion of the fans about Disparate Alliance in Mage?
Mine can be summarised up with mockinglaughter.jpg
They're Brucato's pet babby - and, worse, they pass over a good chance to rework the Traditions into a group that isn't just hammered into the "Nine Traditions to cover all non-Westernised non-neoliberal viewpoints". Rather than make his snowflakes a group that has literally no real distinguishing features from the Traditions - just look at how many of those Crafts were Tradition members in Revised - they could have actually restructured the Traditions so they weren't just limited to 9 Traditions but could instead be the UN of the non-Technocracy. Without things being forced into 9 big Traditions, they could actually have got over forcing all the monotheists to share the Celestial Chorus and rather than cramming everyone into the Dreamspeakers, that can instead effectively become a block that tends to vote together in the (incredibly raucous) grand meetings of the Council of the Traditions.
But barring that, the Revised solution - ie, "You know, there really is no good reason that these African ritualised ceremonial magicians and these Chinese ritualised ceremonial magicians aren't with the other ritualised ceromonial magicians in the Hermetics" - is a much better solution.
Since
@MJ12 Commando, didn't feel like responding to my question, would you mind if I asked you as to how changing gravitational constants work within the frame of a Technocratic consensus/paradigm.
Well, it's possible with the spheres. It might not be possible within one's personal paradigm.
But if I had to spew out some Technobabble, presumably they're contorting the Weyl tensor of local spacetime into different metrics via applied high energy physics as to simulate the gravitational curvature of a different universe where G is different.
(This likely requires very expensive specialised equipment, and thus VE crews get rather pissy when they see SoEs do it by bouncing a graviton beam off the main deflector dish)
Okay so the technocracy has lost battles against things we find totally unsympathetic?
Tell me, why does the Technocracy support the scientific consensus on global warming?
Because - and this has come up several times and you keep on ignoring it -
people believe their own paradigm. You can't just choose to change your paradigm easily, unless you're Arete 6+ - which most of the Technocracy is not.
Human-made climate change is an unfortunate byproduct of several things already established in the Technocratic paradigm:
- Combustion produces carbon dioxide.
- Hydrocarbons are an excellent source of portable, safe energy.
- Industrial civilisation needs a lot of energy.
- Carbon dioxide absorbs and emits electromagnetic radiation in the infrared wavelength
None of these things are problematic in their own right. Unfortunately, the combination of these things has an unfortunate emergent byproduct. And - and I'm going to repeat myself here - people believe their own paradigms. The Technocracy didn't
plan for global warming, but it's a byproduct of things they did want and then they have to run around flailing their arms as the science conventions and the Syndicate argue over how much priority should be given to stopping it and Iteration X shouts about how they need to step up the goal of getting fusion out so they can phase out hydrocarbons and the Progenitors shout about geoengineering and the use of the rainforest and life to trap carbon emissions and the NWO talks about global agreements and tries to use it to push international cooperation and then the Syndicate asks them if they're starting something, pal, and the Void Engineers say that they've screwed up the planet, that's why we need more funding for space and everyone tells the Void Engineers to shut up.
(Also, note that that global warming starts becoming a big deal post 1999, which suggests that once the Arete 6+ people were out the way their efforts to stop people making a big fuss about it so they could quietly deal with it stopped having an effect. Which meant that the junior Technocrats who saw a major problem and didn't know about Consensus were the ones running the show, and that meant that the Technocracy's response was being determined by people who believed in their paradigm fully)