Distance Learning for fun and profit...

And Taylor's no Bonesaw, to just kidnap Skidmark, Squealer and Mush off the street to see what her Quantum Interference Inhibitor does to people.
On the other hand, if she'd mentionend that she could do such a thing, she'd be asked for a sample device and would get data at most a week later ...
 
On the other hand, hiding in a bunker isn't that effective against people with bunker busters...and I can think of a number of ways to screw over people inside an underground facility with gravity control.
There are ways to use radar to look through buildings and into the ground. If Taylor becomes valuable enough that the US government starts thinking she is indispensable they might actually start using some serious resources to map out any sort of unknown in the region she lives in so that nothing unexpected suddenly appears.

Local airstrip getting an upgraded radar system for "air traffic control", that coincidentally can track and target a couple of hundred tracks simultaneously and paint them for the upgraded "ac-units" mounted on every roof in town.

Every road into town suddenly having "weigh stations" set up and any way past these find themselves with these round metal plates embedded in the ground (self raising vehicle barriers).

We must also not forget that many local small businesses have been bought out by lots of fresh faced young men with a few grouchy older leader types who all seem to have very short and tight hairstyles. Or the many, many new offices being rented out to people in suits that don't actually seem to be making or selling anything but seem busy all the time anyway.

Coil may have a power that let's him do two things at once but the US government is a government. It can do a lot more than two things at once and when it focuses on anything with enough attention to ensure an outcome it gets really hard to do anything shady. Governments, after all, only have to play by the rules when they think they might get yelled at for breaking them, ain't nobody that's going to mourn a two bit bond villain getting "disappeared" enough to make noise.
 
Last edited:
I have this image of Coil splitting timelines before bed, then waking up with a certain red-haired government agent sitting on the end of his bed in both of them.
 
At some point she was going to make the Apollo mission look like it lacked ambition too…



"I'm sure that's a video signal," she mumbled, putting one hand on her left headphone cup and pressing it slightly. "But there's something weird about the modulation. Might be a multiphase digital carrier, but if it is it's really low bandwidth..." She made a few more notes, tapping the pencil on her lips while she thought, then shrugged. "I'll come back to that later."

Doesn't closed captioning work something like that - a monochrome bitmap image sent with every frame or some such? Is she missing closed captioning in the recordings? Seems I remember someone using that to put MST3K in the bottom of videos...

Einstein's famous gedankenexperiment proved that there was no way to tell, by experiment, whether you were in a gravitational field or being accelerated. This doesn't mean that there's no difference, just that you can't tell.

This means it's entirely plausible that gravity control does not equal inertial control. However, accelerating a volume via gravity control would not result in g-forces, but it very well might result in effective zero-gravity inside that volume.

And I've always had a problem with that particular thought-experiment. I can fairly easily determine (at least in principle) the difference between a gravity field and thrust. Thrust is linear, gravity radiates from a body in a more or less spherical manner.

Two pendulums. Are they parallel, save for the very minor effects of mutual gravitation to each other? Thrust. Are they very slightly angled, discounting the mutual attraction? Gravity field - the center of mass of the gravitating body is at the intersection of the two pendulum's lines, assuming they were extended.
 
Two pendulums. Are they parallel, save for the very minor effects of mutual gravitation to each other? Thrust. Are they very slightly angled, discounting the mutual attraction? Gravity field - the center of mass of the gravitating body is at the intersection of the two pendulum's lines, assuming they were extended.
What if the difference is too small to measure?
 
Two pendulums. Are they parallel, save for the very minor effects of mutual gravitation to each other? Thrust. Are they very slightly angled, discounting the mutual attraction? Gravity field - the center of mass of the gravitating body is at the intersection of the two pendulum's lines, assuming they were extended.
In the gravity field, they would be angled towards eachother at the bottom. \/
If they're slightly angled away from eachother at the bottom /\ , you're encountering centrifugal acceleration, and the convergence point is now the center of rotation.
What if the difference is too small to measure?
Then you're not using a long enough pair of pendulums.
 
And I've always had a problem with that particular thought-experiment. I can fairly easily determine (at least in principle) the difference between a gravity field and thrust. Thrust is linear, gravity radiates from a body in a more or less spherical manner.

Locally, you can't. That means you're looking right where YOU are, not over a distance wth long pendulums covering more distance in a different direction. If you're dropping a ball to watch its trajectory, you drop it right where you are, not in a variety of spots over a ballroom. Etc.

(See the "modern usage" section of Equivalence principle for details on this and why. Basically, locality means you're limited to using derivatives of the acceleration/gravity field of only a couple of orders, not the complete set you'd need to see what the field over THERE is like given its value and all its derivatives _here_.)

Dave. they're itching to test the weak equivalence principle with antimatter atoms, just in case
 
Just thinking about more possible military application. I just realized how much more mobile infantry will become. Powered exoskeleton and jump jets anyone?

Updated this again... LINK
 
Basically the thought experiment is for a uniform gravitational field. That the experiment fails in a nonuniform field isn't particularly relevant.
 
"Hmm. I'm in a box, thirty meters long, twelve wide and ten tall. No windows. Gravity is about 0.1 G THAT way, and I have two pendulums. Am I on another planet or in an accelerating spacecraft?"
Your available space not being large enough to fit a pendulum long enough for the test doesn't invalidate the fact that your pendulum isn't long enough to do the test. Either that, or you need more sensitive measuring equipment. Either way, you'll get no helpful answers from me.
 
Basically the thought experiment is for a uniform gravitational field. That the experiment fails in a nonuniform field isn't particularly relevant.
While true, I believe the point is no real gravitational field is uniform, so there is a slight give-away as to if it is a gravitational field or acceleration. It's one of the "assume a spherical cow" problems.
 
Yes, I am. I keep hoping that it will shock someone by presenting the upper limits of violent action.
I am also the only one who is getting dog-piled for suggesting non-violent alternatives
You did not get dog-piled for suggesting non-violent alternatives. You got dog-piled for suggesting alternatives that would not work and then acting like anyone who disagreed with you could only possibly be doing it because they were bloodthirsty or racist.


Doesn't closed captioning work something like that - a monochrome bitmap image sent with every frame or some such? Is she missing closed captioning in the recordings? Seems I remember someone using that to put MST3K in the bottom of videos...
It's encoded text, not a bitmapped image.

And I've always had a problem with that particular thought-experiment. I can fairly easily determine (at least in principle) the difference between a gravity field and thrust. Thrust is linear, gravity radiates from a body in a more or less spherical manner.

Two pendulums. Are they parallel, save for the very minor effects of mutual gravitation to each other? Thrust. Are they very slightly angled, discounting the mutual attraction? Gravity field - the center of mass of the gravitating body is at the intersection of the two pendulum's lines, assuming they were extended.
Only if you assume the gravitational field is from a spherical mass. Imagine taking a bunch of neutronium and shaping it into a disk 1cm thick and 1km in diameter. Now imagine walking around on the surface of this plate. No matter where you go, unless you get right up near the edge, the gravity will be seem to be equally strong and point straight down. While the gravity is not perfectly uniform, the deviation is a function of the ratio of how far you travel from the center of the disk vs. the diameter of the disk itself, so no matter how sensitive your instruments are, a large enough disk will produce a field indistinguishable from acceleration.
 
You did not get dog-piled for suggesting non-violent alternatives. You got dog-piled for suggesting alternatives that would not work and then acting like anyone who disagreed with you could only possibly be doing it because they were bloodthirsty or racist.

So it is all my fault for forgetting that one cannot solve any problem through non-violent means, that sometimes you just have to apply high speed lead to some problems. Am I understanding your point in the proper manner?
 
No, it's for insisting beyond the point of ridiculousness that because we don't think THIS PARTICULAR PROBLEM can't be solved without either violence or truly credible threat of violence that we're horrible bloodthirsty...forum-goers.
 
So it is all my fault for forgetting that one cannot solve any problem through non-violent means, that sometimes you just have to apply high speed lead to some problems. Am I understanding your point in the proper manner?
No, the particular solution you presented in this case would not work. If you had presented a different non-violent solution, one that actually was workable, then most people would have been happy to consider it. No one was complaining about your 'non-violent solution' because it wasn't violent; they were complaining that it wasn't a solution.

The part of this that is your fault is acting like the people who disagreed with you were attacking your pacifism, when in fact they were attacking your solution. This argument has gone like so:
Bobot-Man: They should just invite Lung to tea and then tell him to leave Taylor alone or else!
Everybody else: No, that wouldn't work. Lung wouldn't be willing to listen and even if he did he'd pick the 'or else' instead of backing down.
Bobot-Man: What, so non-violence is bad now? The Nazi get's a peaceful warning but the Asian guy gets a bullet; you must be racist! MAYBE WE SHOULD JUST NUKE THE WHOLE CITY; IS THAT VIOLENT ENOUGH FOR YOU?
 
If I may propose a non-violent solution?

The discussion of how the government might handle Lung, how that handling might differ from their handling of Kaiser, the appropriate methods for defeating Lung without parahuman powers, and discussion of the argument about the preceding and Bobot-Man's role in them appear to have run their course and exhausted novel contributions. I propose that such discussions be tabled until such a time as Lung makes an actual appearance in the story.
 
Lung: *examines the thread.* "I would prefer it if I just got left in my chair with the heat and massage. I have no use for gravity control..."

*considers it.*

"Unless it can make my chair more comfortable, then I would buy a unit, so I can get a service plan."
 
Lung: *examines the thread.* "I would prefer it if I just got left in my chair with the heat and massage. I have no use for gravity control..."

*considers it.*

"Unless it can make my chair more comfortable, then I would buy a unit, so I can get a service plan."
"We can also build an MRI in so it can see exactly where you are most tense and adjust the massage function to match. Interested?"
 
"That depends, what happens if i sit down while still having metallic scales? I seem to recall MRIs and metal not being a good combination."
"That's because the old things had such poor resolution they had to oversaturate the environment to get anything done. With our new patented MRI machines you'd need to have your entire skeleton coated in a ferrous material before experiencing even minor discomfort. We even gave that Logan fellow a full refund when he complained."

Edited to make the reference more obvious
 
Last edited:
If Zion noticed what Taylor is doing, it very well could be problematic. You know, due to taylor being able to detect the actual connection shards generate. Which in turn means possibly tracing the connection back to the shard it's self. The interludes describing the origin of Entities specifically mentions that when a host species manages to fend off them in the past, they pulled a final F you by destroying the world (to propel them elsewhere).
 
Back
Top