A Regiment at War: A American Civil War Quest

Yates has really come a long way from just leading a Regiment to a full army on a campaign. Yates improved his organization and logistics skills from building up his army, learning how it works and making sure he has what he needs. Tactical learning how Regiments and going higher through the ranks helped learned tactics on.a bigger scale. And finally Strategically from this campaign look at where all the pieces are and all the moving pieces having a objective. Funnily enough Yates strategies go along with how Yates trained his first Regiment. By marching quickly and pulling off great maneuvers.
Funny enough how that worked out huh? One day I will reread the whole quest and prolly go "wow did we really get this far and how this worked out?"

So far the biggest "OMG" moment for me was the second day at Antietam and just how close that vote was. Absolutely would have changed how the quest would have shaped out and gone. So far my favorite part has got to be the Three Day Campaign, I just really really enjoyed that one immensely.
 
So far the biggest "OMG" moment for me was the second day at Antietam and just how close that vote was.
Just finished rereading through the quest yet again, and I still can't fathom how close we(I wasn't here yet) were to being overrun by McLaws.

Many movies can't do stakes and suspense that well, and they usually have better proofreading! :V

Not dragging you down for it or anything, Skrevski, I know you do this for fun and I respect and love you for it. It's just amazing how good this quest is even without the good grammar and stuff. I'm usually turned away from stuff that has grammar issues, but this keeps me coming back over and over. :)
 
Last edited:
I can't help but think that in-quest post war there's going to be a lot of discussion of how Yate fought his campaign's and what can be incorporated into the army at large.
Off the top of my head, something that immediately comes to mind is the Gatling Guns. Yates is an unabashed technophile, in noted contrast to the Union army at large, but the fact he immediately seized upon the value of these proto-machine guns is absolutely to his credit, and paid off in an incredibly major way. History will likely consider Hill's attempted flanking attack a fit of hubris that doomed the Confederates in North Carolina - but he honestly wasn't making that much larger a gamble than some other Southern generals got away with (although he really should've stalled until Beuragard arrived regardless, and was likely motivated by a desire to avenge his brutal defeat at Petersburg which doomed Richmond to fall ...). It was the Gatling Guns that blunted the momentum he needed to get away with the attack, and even just two (2) of them have continued to provide noticeable utility against the Confederates, who don't seem to have derived a counter strategy get. Later on we're likely to see sharpshooter crews hunting the gun crews, who have to get dangerously close to the front.

The implications of this are massive to military strategy of the era, and the fact we spoke to a Prussian observer almost immediately after helps push that in. OTL people didn't really get the value of machine guns right up until WWI, with horrifically bloody results (stuff like the French Mille Guns being misused in the Franco-Prussian war helped further this misconception). Now, I suspect European nations will be looking into purchasing or producing Gatling Guns of their own, which will have commensurate effects on the viability of mass-infantry pushes.
So far the biggest "OMG" moment for me was the second day at Antietam and just how close that vote was.
Christ, don't remind me. Although you've expressed disappointment at how the discussion isn't as fierce as before, I lose hair even thinking about how close some of those votes were and how nearly we flirted with disaster.
Just finished rereading through the quest yet again, and I still can't fathom how close we(I wasn't here yet) were to being overrun by McLaws.
I'll say this, on that day I learned the importance of never second-guessing myself. I should've known putting Franklin in charge would cause issues, but people kept fretting about "risk" - ugh. That being said, I also learned to cover my damn flank, which rather paid off to the dismay of poor Hill, who might've thought he could pull off the same trick McLaws did.
 
Last edited:
Just finished rereading through the quest yet again, and I still can't fathom how close we(I wasn't here yet) were to being overrun by McLaws.

Many movies can't do stakes and suspense that well, and they usually have better proofreading! :V

Not dragging you down for it or anything, Skrevski, I know you do this for fun and I respect and love you for it. It's just amazing how good this quest is even without the good grammar and stuff. I'm usually turned away from stuff that has grammar issues, but this keeps me coming back over and over. :)
Oh the beginning of the quest is hot garbage writing and grammar wise haha, I feel I have gotten a little better at least (Not a lot I know!) but woobooy the start was bad. I do want to go back and rewrite some of it later, just not anytime soon lol.

Least it is still engaging and bringing people back! I should give it to my brother (who might be getting his first book published here soon! Woohoo!) and have him edit stuff haha.

Glad you guys enjoy the quest though, really means a lot.

Also yes I have seen the "Winter" show up MUCHLY from you of late when I log on hahaha.

I'm about to start rereading the quest cause this discussion makes me want to go back and see/read how far we've come.

Read for the content not the grammar!!
 
McLaws flanking attack was scary but I'm kinda grateful for it. Made Yates go "Never again" and he has been covering his flanks.

Which Yates and Beauregard share weirdly enough. The learning from their mistakes and improving themselves throughout the war part. I don't doubt Beauregard is very much learning something from this campaign and is getting better as a general for it. So I'm gonna feel bad for any other Union general that has to face Beauregard in the future.
 
Christ, don't remind me. Although you've expressed disappointment at how the discussion isn't as fierce as before, I lose hair even thinking about how close some of those votes were and how nearly we flirted with disaster.

Honestly the convos of that last week have made up for it A LOT! Been wonderful discussing this stuff with you all.
This will definitely be something historians will talk about as one of the big "What-If's", if Yates hadn't been so eager and accepting of new technology and how that would have changed the future of the New Union Army.

"New Union Army" hrm... I should add this somewhere...
 
McLaws flanking attack was scary but I'm kinda grateful for it. Made Yates go "Never again" and he has been covering his flanks.

Which Yates and Beauregard share weirdly enough. The learning from their mistakes and improving themselves throughout the war part. I don't doubt Beauregard is very much learning something from this campaign and is getting better as a general for it. So I'm gonna feel bad for any other Union general that has to face Beauregard in the future.

Yeah Beauregard has A LOT more experience here than he did in OTL now from all the fighting. Interesting to see how things play out for sure.
 
Oh the beginning of the quest is hot garbage writing and grammar wise haha, I feel I have gotten a little better at least (Not a lot I know!) but woobooy the start was bad. I do want to go back and rewrite some of it later, just not anytime soon lol.
I have valiantly resisted the urge to ask you what exactly you think the word "smirked" means, I shall admit.

On a more serious note, I'm more than willing to help edit up the quest. I've written a fair bit myself and have a reasonably commanding grasp of the English language, so I could not only help fix up the more egregious errors in grammar and spelling, but also perhaps improve the flow of the prose, if you're willing to take suggestions.
 
Read for the content not the grammar!!
I shall now read for the grammar lol(goes off for my 4th reread)!
Off the top of my head, something that immediately comes to mind is the Gatling Guns.
That's the first thing that came to my head as well his incredibly effective use of Gatling Guns as you said post-war there going to have a far different reputation then OTL because Yates used them effectively and having spoken to the Prussian that knowledge will spread. Honestly his successful use of them will very much accelerate the development and use of Machine guns across modern army's and most importantly I think doctrine involving the use of machine guns will be far more developed come WWI on how to use and counter them which would definitely have wide reaching effects.
 
I have valiantly resisted the urge to ask you what exactly you think the word "smirked" means, I shall admit.

On a more serious note, I'm more than willing to help edit up the quest. I've written a fair bit myself and have a reasonably commanding grasp of the English language, so I could not only help fix up the more egregious errors in grammar and spelling, but also perhaps improve the flow of the prose, if you're willing to take suggestions.
Oh boy I don't wanna answer now!

I have no issue when people ask and offer to help, so yep I am up for it. Its when it is given without asking if it is wanted and just gets done (as some have done in the past). I mostly just write for enjoyment and know I am not a terrific writer but still is fun none the less!

(Also I guess Grammarly fails me a lot huh?)
 
Last edited:
(Also I guess Grammarly fails me a lot huh?)
I find that Grammarly is more useful as a guideline than as a grammar rulebook, due to how it can miss context at times. :V

Also, I'd like to point out that another point in favor of Sebastian, at least to later historians and such, is his very modern view, not just in technology and strategy but in race relations. I won't get too political, but unlike the vast majority of Americans at the time, Yates views black people as actual humans with the same human rights as white people.

Also, I do genuinely hope we get to see a sooner end to the war, just so that Yates can lead a hypothetical expedition into Mexico to kick the French out. :lol: Or maybe Cuba to kick the Spanish out, who knows?
 
I find that Grammarly is more useful as a guideline than as a grammar rulebook, due to how it can miss context at times. :V

Also, I'd like to point out that another point in favor of Sebastian, at least to later historians and such, is his very modern view, not just in technology and strategy but in race relations. I won't get too political, but unlike the vast majority of Americans at the time, Yates views black people as actual humans with the same human rights as white people.

Also, I do genuinely hope we get to see a sooner end to the war, just so that Yates can lead a hypothetical expedition into Mexico to kick the French out. :lol: Or maybe Cuba to kick the Spanish out, who knows?
Yeah.. sometimes I need to go off my instinct more, also doesn't help I suffer heavily from dyslexia. Why I just write for fun!

Yeah hoping we get there sooner than later, things are moving though so that is good! And still hope to get at least two-three updates up before I have to go fully back to work on Tuesday.

Edit: Also really want to use the book I got about a year ago on a certain subject! Won't say what!
 
Off the top of my head, something that immediately comes to mind is the Gatling Guns.


Ah ham, Gatling gun on a left spring suspension cart. US tachanka.


It solve the mobility and Smoke problem to a large extend :V. Tho I'm more envisioning it as a tool for repositioning away from excessive smoke.
But hit and run tactic also work :>
 
Last edited:
Something else to consider is the heavy use of artillery in support of the infantry assaulting a position. Yes its been done quite a few times in quest but its also been noted how the artillery gap in this portion of the campaign heavily worked to the Union's favor.

There's been a slight shift in priority when it comes to ammo shortage worrying Yates. After his promotion Yates would worry if the ammo the infantry got would be enough for the engagement, now the focus has shifted to how equipped the artillery are to keep firing on confederate positions. The train cargo situation comes to mind as well.
 
Something else to consider is the heavy use of artillery in support of the infantry assaulting a position. Yes its been done quite a few times in quest but its also been noted how the artillery gap in this portion of the campaign heavily worked to the Union's favor.

There's been a slight shift in priority when it comes to ammo shortage worrying Yates. After his promotion Yates would worry if the ammo the infantry got would be enough for the engagement, now the focus has shifted to how equipped the artillery are to keep firing on confederate positions. The train cargo situation comes to mind as well.

One of my goal if yate have power in the military. Refined fully, the superior firepower doctrines, and make the process of innovation and Technology proliferation in the military way better. I have some idea, firstly all technology will have a files, that is easily findable in bureaucracy file management, that explains what it's does and maybe some comment from tester and industrialist. Than create Technology refinement process, where promising tech will undergo overview from soldier who are going to use it, general, industrialist, accountant, engineer.this would be a industries wide event, where any of the above can come and test the technology, from recent engineer graduate, to Old bone general. And the result of this process would be list and paragraphs of possible improvements in design, ease of production, ergonomic, and potential usage in the army of that technology. For the designer and other people to mual over.
 
Last edited:
I have also been thinking that we have been the war horse of Lincoln, that is, we are public friends and we have almost complete support for anything we ask for, an Antonio Marco for a Caesar in Rome
More of an Agrippa to his Octavian, honestly. Although hopefully without also exchanging "being assassinated" for "overthrowing the republic".
 
Last edited:
One of my goal if yate have power in the military. Refined fully, the superior firepower doctrines, and make the process of innovation and Technology proliferation in the military way better. I have some idea, firstly all technology will have a files, that is easily findable in bureaucracy file management, that explains what it's does and maybe some comment from tester and industrialist. Than create Technology refinement process, where promising tech will undergo overview from soldier who are going to use it, general, industrialist, accountant, engineer.this would be a industries wide event, where any of the above can come and test the technology, from recent engineer graduate, to Old bone general. And the result of this process would be list and paragraphs of possible improvements in design, ease of production, ergonomic, and potential usage in the army of that technology. For the designer and other people to mual over.
This is a WAYYYYY too modern take on things and won't happen for a long time. Not even in Yate's wheelhouse at all.
 
Can yate at least implant this in the military? "never to send a Man to do a job that a bullet or bomb could do better."
You are talking about something that might take place after MAYBE WW1/Interwar but most likely WW2. As said this is VERY Modern thinking and I really don't think Yates would even think of this at all. So no, it won't be happening within the timeframe of the Civil War or after it.
 
Back
Top