- Location
- Between dreams and reality
Thought this might be relivent. Supervillain in the DCU CK2 quest Superhero
Last edited:
Go away, meta-bigot. Your moral panic is not welcome here.(see's @The Name of Love,) YOOOUUUUU!!!
I knew it!
For everyone else I've run into this guy before. And yeah he is every bit as hateful as his stated belifes would suggest. Supervillain in the DCU CK2 quest Superhero
I believe that the Manga/Anime may become a sort of mirror image of the kind of "woke" Marvel comics, where the quality of the stories declines while a political message is pushed in ham-fisted way
Particularly given that this is a thread about the leftist leanings of early anime.Oh God, we have an unironic "go woke, go broke" take here about anime and manga. That's hilarious.
No, I don't believe in "go woke, go broke." The Left is winning, after all.Oh God, we have an unironic "go woke, go broke" take here about anime and manga. That's hilarious.
What would you rather I pretend to be?The only people who would say this are.... questionable. You could stop showing your true colors.
Um... first of all, I never said you guys were racists, just that some of you are meta-bigots. I posted an entire article on it. I don't believe Leftists can be racist, just as a socialist can't be a capitalist. It's a contradiction in definition.Not going to say about that the playing the classic 'AcTuAlLy yOu'Re ThE ReAl rAcIstS' card, except lol.
Your mistake is drawing a false equivalency between political messaging and something being corporate.
True, most Marvel films end up feeling bland and corporate to some degree, it's because they're made by a massive corporation attempting to make sure each installment makes as much money as possible. The most genuine feeling Marvel movies also happen to be the ones with the most obvious and non-subtle political messages, like Thor Ragnarok. And I don't think that's a coincidence.
And frankly, media pushing militarist, nationalist narratives tend to end up sucking on their own. Such worldviews near always end up having to push against the greater human condition, and end up feeling quite soulless as a result.
Not in Japan, they're not. Or did you not read the orginal thread.No, I don't believe in "go woke, go broke." The Left is winning, after all.
Well, yes. I did read the original thread. The Left failed in Japan because they didn't abandon Marxism to adopt a new strategy, unlike it did in the West.Not in Japan, they're not. Or did you not read the orginal thread.
First of all, of course leftists can be racists. We're people, people are illogical, contradictory things, not perfect dictionary definitions. The real way to avoid being racist and other forms of being a bigot is to maintain a sense of self-reflection and to be willing to always listen to and accept criticism from the minority groups you claim to care about.Um... first of all, I never said you guys were racists, just that some of you are meta-bigots. I posted an entire article on it. I don't believe Leftists can be racist, just as a socialist can't be a capitalist. It's a contradiction in definition.
As for corporations, I believe that they cynically proclaim the political message of whoever's in power or whoever will give them power in order to curry favor with them.
We both have a different definition of racist, then. I define "racism" as "anything a Leftist deems to be evil or bad," essentially.First of all, of course leftists can be racists. We're people, people are illogical, contradictory things, not perfect dictionary definitions. The real way to avoid being racist and other forms of being a bigot is to maintain a sense of self-reflection and to be willing to always listen to and accept criticism from the minority groups you claim to care about.
Before you try to turn this back on me, trying to claim that, actually, you're the one who is being persecuted is a pretty classic rhetorical trick by far right people.
That is a very bizarre definition of racism. I suppose you consider yourself a racist, then?We both have a different definition of racist, then. I define "racism" as "anything a Leftist deems to be evil or bad," essentially.
Saying that you're being persecuted is a classic rhetorical trick by the left too. Whether it's a "rhetorical trick" has no bearing on whether it's true or not, right?
That said, I'm not really persecuted right now. I'm just kind of annoyed.
I'd like to create an AMA to answer these questions because, again, I think I accidentally derailed things. If you're so curious how I came to such conclusions, take a look at this article.That is a very bizarre definition of racism. I suppose you consider yourself a racist, then?
Stop throwing articles at people and use your own words.I'd like to create an AMA to answer these questions because, again, I think I accidentally derailed things. If you're so curious how I came to such conclusions, take a look at this article.
AMA?I'd like to create an AMA to answer these questions because, again, I think I accidentally derailed things
Wow, a group that actually still thinks "Christendom" is a thing.I'd like to create an AMA to answer these questions because, again, I think I accidentally derailed things. If you're so curious how I came to such conclusions, take a look at this article.
Ask Me Anything. I'd like to make one on this website because I think I'm derailing this thread on accident.
Thats probily a good Idea.Ask Me Anything. I'd like to make one on this website because I think I'm derailing this thread on accident.
Based on the essay that is that is the focal point of this thread and current animanga sphere trends, why do you think this?I believe that the Manga/Anime may become a sort of mirror image of the kind of "woke" Marvel comics, where the quality of the stories declines while a political message is pushed in ham-fisted ways
I actually don't think that is the case, but I've given the argument a lot of thought. Is there a decline in the quality of anime/manga?Based on the essay that is that is the focal point of this thread and current animanga sphere trends, why do you think this?
"Incel baiting" is a funny term.It doesn't track to me. Things like GATE are part of the expanded market, not the thing taking over the industry. Fans still want their more traditional and structured stories. Manga as an industry is still chasing the old ghost of Dragon Ball. Consumer appeal for isekai and isekai accessories is high yes, but this is much like the "basketball is dead because 7 footers can shoot threes now" argument; lacking in evidence, dipped in nostalgia, and ignorant of the actual changes in the world. I pointed out in another thread that the sort of "incel baiting" shows we see getting play pale in comparison to series that will be seen as iconic in a few years time, and which don't have the same elements.
Is it though? The thing about there being more content than ever is accurate, and with that comes more mediocrity and low quality content. But fans of anime could point out to shows each year that stand out in some way. I think part of the issue that people have is that because of the way we can acquire anime today, it's not curated like it was in the past. Discourse used to center what was on VHS tapes and rare dubs, then later what was on Toonami and Adult Swim. Looking at the essay again, the cultural shift was still happening during the 1990s, unironically called the golden age of anime by those in the West as it contained the "empty" Evangelion.If you want my honest opinion, I'd say that what's killing anime is the constant rate and amount with which they churn out new material. There's something new capturing the community every season, and that prevents anything from being recognized as a modern classic.
Hm... the author did mention anime is going from being a niche thing to being a mainstream thing. Something similar happened to nerd culture in America. At first, the nerd was the underdog. Next thing you know, you have famous celebrities talking about how they like D&D. Computer nerds used to be geeky losers until Silicon Valley showed us how powerful these geeky losers really were. Do you think that this represents a shift in power, in which the nerd has risen up the food chain? Or do think this is the powerful co-opting niche things because they see a chance to make a profit?Is it though? The thing about there being more content than ever is accurate, and with that comes more mediocrity and low quality content. But fans of anime could point out to shows each year that stand out in some way. I think part of the issue that people have is that because of the way we can acquire anime today, it's not curated like it was in the past. Discourse used to center what was on VHS tapes and rare dubs, then later what was on Toonami and Adult Swim. Looking at the essay again, the cultural shift was still happening during the 1990s, unironically called the golden age of anime by those in the West as it contained the "empty" Evangelion.
It suggests that response to the "decline" of anime is driven by a dislike of what people are seeing now, the actual scope of the anime market. Little quirky and niche things that were supposedly the domain of extreme otaku suddenly weren't. That's not to contradict the OP's material; there is consumer driven change but it looks like there's a dispute over what that change is.
Definitely about the money and getting into an "untapped" market with potential for growth. Accessibility to the public (not necessarily accessibility for those disadvantaged) is also key so the parts of nerd culture tapped are the more palatable ones, and the ones that blend into mainstream culture. Nerd culture meanwhile gets a few excuses, but underneath the media adoration is being exposed as having many problematic and outright toxic elements. There are strides made as always to include parts of "nerddom" that are positive and resonate with the "normals" but the power is still definitely in the hands of the industry and corporations.Do you think that this represents a shift in power, in which the nerd has risen up the food chain? Or do think this is the powerful co-opting niche things because they see a chance to make a profit?
A lot of the "problematic and outright toxic elements" were always there, but were overlooked so long as nerds were kept out of the mainstream. Now that a lot of the things they like have mainstream acceptance, there are a few nerds that followed the "boomer capitalist blueprint" and rose to the top of the hierarchy, and they need to sort of purge the more socially unacceptable elements of their past now that they're in the "in" crowd, if that makes sense.Definitely about the money and getting into an "untapped" market with potential for growth. Accessibility to the public (not necessarily accessibility for those disadvantaged) is also key so the parts of nerd culture tapped are the more palatable ones, and the ones that blend into mainstream culture. Nerd culture meanwhile gets a few excuses, but underneath the media adoration is being exposed as having many problematic and outright toxic elements. There are strides made as always to include parts of "nerddom" that are positive and resonate with the "normals" but the power is still definitely in the hands of the industry and corporations.
Outside of entertainment, the so called nerdy guys who got big are just following the boomer capitalist blueprint. It's a new looking group of people in this space but with the same sensibilities as the generation before them, like exploiting the lags in regulation of new technologies and industries or playing shell games with investors and public money. As for celebrities, I think most of them are being honest about their likes, but obviously image and acceptance has a lot to do with what they express in public. Since being an eccentric doesn't work for everyone, nerd stuff being "in" helped a lot with casual talk about those sorts of hobbies. They're human so they have those.
100%. The need for a cleaner image and continued social mobility is key so there is a need to discard things that might dull any of that. Things that are seen as "quirky" might be played up or left alone if the public is receptive to it, or if it ultimately doesn't affect too much. Basically exploiting what they can exploit. It doesn't mean there aren't people who actually are passionate about their crafts and technologies, but they're usually not at the front of their companies driving change.A lot of the "problematic and outright toxic elements" were always there, but were overlooked so long as nerds were kept out of the mainstream. Now that a lot of the things they like have mainstream acceptance, there are a few nerds that followed the "boomer capitalist blueprint" and rose to the top of the hierarchy, and they need to sort of purge the more socially unacceptable elements of their past now that they're in the "in" crowd, if that makes sense.