- Location
- Tarn-Vedra
[X] Plan CM 1.0
Let's get this over with. Tally?
Let's get this over with. Tally?
I've just read through the arguments.
The Main ones are.
- Possibly Free Hostage! Although it's listed as an exchange.
- Save Myrcella! Despite the fact it is more trouble than it's worth and will cause more long term issues.
- Screw Sansa! Some want to throw Sansa out of the way and exchange her for a better character.
- Keeping the Lannisters Word! Which makes little sense as we will still have Tywin and several other Lords such as Leo Lefford and Lord Brax for insurance and we can counter their moves via Robbs army and a garrison and Harrenhall
@Charcolt
Will we have to worry about what Cersei might do to Ser Barristan if we don't negotiate for his safe passage? Or has he already left King's Landing?
Anyway, it seems to me that with the hostage issue clarified, plan spudman and plan CM are essentially identical, except for two things plan spudman does which plan CM does not:
I'm honestly undecided if I want those things or not. Both seem narratively interesting, but arguably neither is in House Stark's best interest, at least IMHO.
- Gets Robert's bastards out of King's Landing
- Possibly gets Myrcella as a hostage
It would probably be IC for Ned to want them anyway though. At least saving the bastards is very much the right thing to do and while we don't really need Myrcella as a hostage, Ned has spent enough time in Lannister dungeons to consider them a bigger threat than their current strategical position warrants.
[x] Plan spudman
Actually it doesn't address my concern about the future problems having Myrcella could cause, Stannis and Renly aren't going to just let her go, and keeping her could hurt us quite a bit, furthermore hiding her or letting her slip away would cause massive damage to our relations with the king just when winter is rolling in alongside a Horde of tens of thousands of Wildlings and a possible Ironborm invasion. Not to mention any possible food shortages for the really long winter coming will require us to go south for aid, which will cause some issues as they might make sure the price of grain is jacked up or something.
Ser Barristan Selmy has already left the city. He knew that the Starks were no longer in imminent danger, and at the time nobody thought/dared to stop him.
Ned will default to certain things even if they aren't mentioned directly in a plan, because he's a bit more set in his ways than Robb. That includes protecting Robert's children.
I do hate spaghetti posting, so I'm gonna address everything at the bottom.
It's already been clarified by the GM that hostage exchange would involve exchanging Tyrion, Kevan's sons, and/or the lesser Lannister nobility Robb captured, not leaving Stark people in Cersei's clutches.The Main ones are.
- Possibly Free Hostage! Although it's listed as an exchange.
- Save Myrcella! Despite the fact it is more trouble than it's worth and will cause more long term issues.
- Screw Sansa! Some want to throw Sansa out of the way and exchange her for a better character.
- Keeping the Lannisters Word! Which makes little sense as we will still have Tywin and several other Lords such as Leo Lefford and Lord Brax for insurance and we can counter their moves via Robbs army and a garrison and Harrenhall
Actually it doesn't address my concern about the future problems having Myrcella could cause, Stannis and Renly aren't going to just let her go, and keeping her could hurt us quite a bit, furthermore hiding her or letting her slip away would cause massive damage to our relations with the king just when winter is rolling in alongside a Horde of tens of thousands of Wildlings and a possible Ironborm invasion. Not to mention any possible food shortages for the really long winter coming will require us to go south for aid, which will cause some issues as they might make sure the price of grain is jacked up or something.
Edit: never mind, you won
We could offer to take Myrcella out of harms way. We could even dye her hair and pretend she's Arya so that the Baratheons don't know we have her. It's up to Cersei whether she accepts or not either way, but maybe phrasing it this way might make her more receptive to the plan?
I imagine that it'd work out the same way the Targs would have done it, since the legitimacy of Robert's claim to the throne was due to his grandmother being a Targ. But she probably would have been expected to marry into another family for political purposes before pressing a claim for the throne herself, so she probably wouldn't end up in the running in the first place, outside very unusual circumstances.@Charcolt Were would Myrcella be in the line of succession had she not been a bastard actually? Behind her brothers or behind Stannis and Renly? Because after the Dance, women in line for the Iron Throne might have been placed behind all men in line, but that was for the Targs so....
Or is the law too muddled to offer a precise answer to this?
@Charcolt Where would Myrcella be in the line of succession had she not been a bastard actually? Behind her brothers or behind Stannis and Renly? Because after the Dance, women in line for the Iron Throne might have been placed behind all men in line, but that was for the Targs so....
Or is the law too muddled to offer a precise answer to this?
Thank god. Spudman was making me really worried there.There are zero circumstances in which Ned would leave Sansa behind. I'd veto any plan which I felt suggested it. None that are winning have.
Any hostage exchange rolls would relate to releasing the hostages House Stark has taken, not to surrendering one of their own.
Possibly. But I suspect Cersei doesn't really understand that even House Lannister's wealth is limited. She'll consider any demand for monetary reparations a trifling issue to be solved by throwing some of her House's supposedly infinite reserve of gold at it.You know...the part of both my and CM's plans that I think Cersei is more likely to haggle on is actually the reparations. That's probably expensive as hell and the Lannisters will need every ounce of gold they can hang onto to fight against the Baratheons.
Or it could blow up in our face because Cersei refuses to part with Myrcella? You're acting like this has no risks attached and that if the roll to get Myrcella fails everything will be completely fine with the rest of the negotiations.You're a bit behind in the discussion...if getting Myrcella requires a hostage (it may not! we may get her for free if Cersei thinks she's safer with honorable to a fault Ned Stark than in King's Landing), it'll be giving one of the hostages we already have. Even then it would be part of the haggling. So not set in stone.