wkz
Probably on the other side of the world from you
I would like to point out that if the above argument is a legit and valid argument to anything...While I don't necessarily disagree with the concept (as I understand it Marijuana was made illegal both because after prohibition the people hunting down alcohol wanted something to do with their lives and they hated Mexicans who used it a lot) I should point out that "quote" was published after Ehrlichman died, when he could no longer dispute it, so it really should be taken with a grain of salt.
... then we might as well abandon recordkeeping and throw the "freedom of information" act out the window.
This is simply because any and all recorded quotes can easily become a "invalid quote", and cannot be used as historical fact. Especially if it is locked up (classified, private memoirs, stuff said after the fact, saved only in private servers, etc) and released only after someone dies.
We might as well burn all history books that state anything other than dry, dry fact too. Any analysis is invalid, because we cannot assume the text of what long dead people said/wrote are attributed correctly, let alone their motives or meanings of said quotes. We cannot say the contents of private meetups are valid, even if those are interviews meant to be revealed to the world, because a guy is dead and he may have meant something else; only publicly released statements can have zero ambiguity in meanings.
Half of the quotes from the founding fathers of America can now be removed from textbooks, because a large chunk of those are most likely said in ambiguous situations during unknown meetups, even if recorded properly for prosperity, and thus cannot be disputed or supported by long dead guys.
So... yeah. Kinda... yeah.
Last edited: