HanEmpire
Delicious
@PoptartProdigy how many Quarians were there, on the ships that made it through the Relay?
Hundreds of thousands. Why?@PoptartProdigy how many Quarians were there, on the ships that made it through the Relay?
He's talking about the battle roll against the rachni to save the quarian fleet from the last post.
He's talking about the battle roll against the rachni to save the quarian fleet from the last post.
No. They have ten Dreadnoughts.
I just wanted to get an idea of the scale. I see we're going to have a lot of trouble feeding them.
still a hour and half till we vote.I may not be able to vote later, but I trust in Uju's wisdom so...
[X] Uju32
I agree with this!In the end, I'm inclined to either do a bare-minimum SCREEN to cover a Hammer Down and pull out, or to go all in for either a Smash and Grab or Mission Unchanged.
He's talking about the battle roll against the rachni to save the quarian fleet from the last post.
I see. You dusted up with a fleet containing six dreadnoughts and lost none of your battlecruisers, and only one of the dreadnoughts that spent a significant amount of time fighting while heavily damaged and outnumbered before you arrived to the fight. And you lost it recoverably. That is...a very good result.They one earlier were we rolled well on successfully reaching the quarian fleet. Which still got us a completely wrecked fleet needing further good rolls to save what hulls could be.
All I am saying is the former roll were to decide how well the Virmireans managed to do in reaching the Quarians. It felt more like a bare success, only a salvageable action if we rolled well on this.
FTL computers won't plot a solution if there's an obstruction. Impact at FTL is a mutual kill for everybody involved. So using your screen to block approach corridors means the Rachni have to close to engage or jump around, far enough away that your blockers can't pick them up in enough time to block them again, vent heat, and then jump to your fleet or the relay. Either way, your ships will block the jump. A fail there means that the Rachni decide to go through rather than around, and your screen fails to hold the distance. Theoretically, you could go all-in on delaying and salvaging, and on a success, lose no ships due to denying the Rachni any kind of engagement while securing everything.So it looks like we get to roll for a delay. On success we get the specified delay, on failure we get some kind of catastrophe.
Does a successful delay lose the screening force that's used to foul the FTL lane? IOW, are we sacrificing people to buy time or is there a chance the delaying force also gets away?
I agree that the choice is either Hammer Down or Smash and Grab. The question is, do you feel lucky?
Am I correct in assuming that what differentiates the latter is that we would attempt to tow even more Quarians ships back to AB? Or, is there something else we would try to achieve?[ ][SALVAGE] Smash and grab. Get the sailors out, and then launch torpedoes. Bombard everything. Take the time to destroy anything without life signs attached. Will need a significant delay.
[ ][SALVAGE] Mission unchanged. Continue as you have. Go all-in on delaying the rachni or else you're fighting another fleet action today.
The latter is that your mission is unchanged; as described in the winning vote, you try to retrieve, rather than destroy, everything. Down to the floating scrap.Am I correct in assuming that what differentiates the latter is that we would attempt to tow even more Quarians ships back to AB? Or, is there something else we would try to achieve?
I think anything but fleeing immediately is going to invoke luck. From what I've seen the situation is something like:It's not about luck but how much we are willing to pay for the Quriarans. Of course my muse would be different if my roll was higher.
The smaller ships we can make in bulk and sailors are replenishing in sufficient numbers. So using those renewable to get the non-renewable Quriaran good will and political capital is good business.
Look, I get that it is eminently practical, but it is cold as all fuck and won't engender good relations. Yes, their admiral and politicians will understand the logic of it, but it is still 56k quarians that died from our guns.I say go with Hammer Down. It's a shame, but it's the safe choice. At least this way we'll be able to save some of the quarians.