most fix fics is just "exactly as in canon but plus therapy which somehow still magically helps".

The key here is that it's not "exactly as in canon but plus therapy," it's "exactly as in fix-fic but plus therapy."

So you have a fanfic where the horrible person with really serious issues spontaneously wakes up one day, puts on leather pants, and decides to be a better love interest person.
Then they change it to a story where the horrible person with serious issues goes to therapy, puts on leather pants, and decides to be a better love interest person.

They aren't writing a story about a character with issues and exploring what that actually means in their life.
They're writing a story where they handwave the issues and play around with the character.

It's not great, and it's not realistic, but there isn't a realistic way to play around with the character the way they want.
It could be argued that they shouldn't use the problematic characters this way, but that would just mean they don't use the problematic characters at all.
 
Last edited:
Indeed.

One way I see this over and over again is - well, therapy is there to help you solve your issues. To overcome or deal with whatever is causing you trouble. But you still gotta do it. You can change your life with the help of therapy, but if nothing actually does change in your life and in your surroundings, despite the help from therapy, then it won't do you any good at all.

And yet, meanwhile, most fix fics is just "exactly as in canon but plus therapy which somehow still magically helps".
The Sopranos shows this amazingly. Tony does not improve so therapy can't help him.

I think that changing the material conditions that caused mental stress is much more helpful then therapy.

Like if the characters feel mental anguish because they have to fight against an alien invasion. Therapy wouldn't help as much as dealing with the alien invasion.

Therapy can be helpful but it should be combined with changing the material conditions that cause mental health issues in the first place.

That's if it's possible as sometimes mentally taxing environments can't be changed or fixed where in that case therapy is useful.

The Wildbrow Parahuman setting is a great example.

In the broadest terms the Parahuman setting power system is trauma. Parahumans get their powers from being in a traumatic experience, their powers are related somehow to their trauma, their powers work best if they are in situations related to their trauma, the powers are made to encourage conflict.

You can't just change the material conditions that lead to the trauma. That's how the world works.

But on the other side therapy can only do so much when your powers work on trauma. Therapy can't fix it
 
On Shipping: I find the quest among many fandoms for "Intensity" "Excitement" "Drama" etc. for romance... odd.

Nearly a generation we had the Kataang (girl goes for friend that makes her laugh and helps her fulfill her dreams) vs Zutara (girl should be going for clearly wants the battle-scarred conflicted prince of the realm that is genociding her people) in A:tLA fandom.

Now having gotten into Hazbin Hotel I notice people thinking Charlie and Vaggie do not seem like a romantic couple and trying to hook the former up with Alastor.

Why?
 
On Shipping: I find the quest among many fandoms for "Intensity" "Excitement" "Drama" etc. for romance... odd.

Nearly a generation we had the Kataang (girl goes for friend that makes her laugh and helps her fulfill her dreams) vs Zutara (girl should be going for clearly wants the battle-scarred conflicted prince of the realm that is genociding her people) in A:tLA fandom.

Now having gotten into Hazbin Hotel I notice people thinking Charlie and Vaggie do not seem like a romantic couple and trying to hook the former up with Alastor.

Why?
This true and accurate documentary about sums it up:

View: https://youtu.be/eGoXyXiwOBg?si=efdhAn-A2VRI95B5&t=40
 
Part of it might be the author's preferences.
They like a character, so they set that as the main ship for the fic.
Disregarding any question of if they connect well with the MC.

Alongside that, there's a certain amount of "the squeaky wheel gets the grease."
The dramatic, angsty character has their feelings and personality clearly shown specifically because the story drags you through it sideways.
The happier and more laid-back character can come across as being more shallow or unformed because they gloss over issues.

So when they say "how would this character react to X romantic gesture," they can easily imagine some strong emotional response from the edgelord, but only a very shallow deflection from the flowerchild.
 
When it comes to the weird trend of shipping the female lead with the villain, I feel like it's probably a mix of wish fulfillment (fangirls that are attracted to the handsome asshole and just projecting themselves onto the most convenient female protagonist) and previous works of fiction that idealized toxic relationships (looking at you, Twilight) giving a lot of young women some very unhealthy ideas about romance.
 
There's also probably a decent frequency of "I can fix him (or her)"-syndrome. I have an aunt who's first marriage was not healthy (no, it wasn't dangerous, abusive, or anything like that, but it was at least slightly toxic and not a good relationship), and my parents are pretty sure she married him because she thought she could make him a better person.
Given that they got divorced, it obviously didn't work.
NOTE: do NOT go into or pursue a relationship with that kind of goal! The closest a good, healthy relationship should ever be to that is one were both of you want to be a better person for the other one. (On the 'personal relationship' side of things, at least. On the 'professional relationship' side, "my therapist can help me fix myself" is a good thing.)
 
I really dislike it when you're reading something and getting into it only for sexual content to be added like you took a wrong turn and are now reading the transcript of an ecchi anime, it's not how the story was advertised to me and really messes with my immersion as a result.
 
You can choose "Exclude -> Ratings -> Explicit -> Sort and Filter" on search results to remove any works labeled as Explicit, generally.

Sadly "Exclude" only exists if you're browsing via tags, it's not a feature of the actual search bar or advanced search for some reason.

You would think "exclude porn" would be a default search feature but NOPE.
 
When it comes to the weird trend of shipping the female lead with the villain, I feel like it's probably a mix of wish fulfillment (fangirls that are attracted to the handsome asshole and just projecting themselves onto the most convenient female protagonist) and previous works of fiction that idealized toxic relationships (looking at you, Twilight) giving a lot of young women some very unhealthy ideas about romance.
I also think a part of this is that, historically speaking, female villains have a much higher rate of canonically crushing on the male protagonist and/or getting redeemed.

This means that a large subset of the people who would ship the hot lady villain with the audience surrogate just because they're hot and evil -with or without any basis in canon- fly under the radar.
 
I also think a part of this is that, historically speaking, female villains have a much higher rate of canonically crushing on the male protagonist and/or getting redeemed.

This means that a large subset of the people who would ship the hot lady villain with the audience surrogate just because they're hot and evil -with or without any basis in canon- fly under the radar.
Yeah, you're not wrong. There's a long history of heroes seducing the henchwoman. As minions they're usually not the ones who've done the worst things, but there are exceptions.

Traditional gender roles are a factor in both versions of the trope, I think.
 
Pet Peeve: Teleporting to Conclusions

Some things are tricky to show in a visual medium.
Especially when the POV character specifically can't see it.

So for example, if you have a character dropping a smoke bomb and sneaking around to attack from behind, they might just show the cloud of smoke and the attack the next frame, skipping over the time they spend sneaking.
Or if you have a character moving faster than the eye can see, they might show some speed lines and have them appear elsewhere.
Or if you have an illusion breaking, they might have some flashy visual and then having the character disappear.

Or if you have a character teleport, they might have a cloud of smoke, or speed lines, or a flashy visual and appear elsewhere.

So there's some ambiguity there.


It's pretty normal to have various stealth or speed related vanishing early in a story.
It's a good way to show that the underdog is in over his head without needing to actually hit him with an attack.
If he can't even follow what's going on, then obviously he can't win.

So you have a lot of stories where enemies and allies will be zipping around, vanishing with all sorts of effects, and no explanation at all because the POV character doesn't know what's going on.

Teleportation on the other hand is a really problematic power.
It's so game-breaking that it is generally explained in detail, with all sorts of major limitations.
It is often used really effectively once, then every antagonist in existence spontaneously decides to implement anti-teleportation measures for no reason at all.
So it often only appears late in the story, or in a very limited capacity off-screen.

So if I see a character, early in the story, vanishing freely and whimsically, and they aren't some kind of deity, I will generally assume it's some form of stealth or illusion and not jump straight to teleportation as the explanation.
When Batman disappears from a locked room mid-conversation, I assume it's because he's just that good.


Fanfic authors may disagree with me.

It's possible that they just assumed it was teleportation for whatever reason.

But another possibility is because it's convenient for the story.
If you have some regression Peggy Sue fanfic, teleportation can seem like an easy tool.
It lets the 5-year-old sneak out to the Black Market for his cunning plan!
And it lets them fight off an adult with skill and technique to make up for their lack of muscle!


This annoys me for two reasons.

I admit, the first is just a knee-jerk, head-canon, nerd-rage.
When I've been assuming something was done with what I consider the common-sense explanation, and they pull out teleportation, it can blindside me.

"And then he teleports. Just like volume 1!"
"They showed him stepping out of a taxi. He spent the entire story whining about it and demanding compensation. It wasn't teleportation."
"And he uses the teleportation to appear on her balcony in a totally romantic scene!"
😑


The other reason is that I can see it creating difficulties for the author.
They use teleportation once to handwave some scenario, with no explanation or limitations given, then they never use it again because it would hurt the story.
After all, they can't have that dramatic last stand if they could just teleport away.

Don't add in powers if you don't want the characters to use those powers.
 
Last edited:
"The public doesn't know about trigger events!" No shit, sherlock! But if you had paid any kind of attention to what got you complaining you would have noticed that the post that set you off talked about triggers, not trigger events. It talked about the point in time where a person suddenly manifests parahuman powers, not the cause behind it. And I can guarantee you that even the public noticed and knows that parahumans don't manifest their powers from birth but that there will be a point in time where it appears when before it has not, a point when the power is triggered on.
 
Reasonably speaking trigger events should be common knowledge, because a fraction of people process trauma by telling everyone about it. Constantly. And it only takes a few of those for the lid to very clearly be off the box. It seems like the kind of thing that would be politely not asked about because it's obviously not something they want to talk about (unless they are, in which case standard advice goes out the window)
 
Last edited:
Reasonably speaking trigger events should be common knowledge, because a fraction of people process trauma by telling everyone about it. Constantly. And it only takes a few of those for the lid to very clearly be off the box. It seems like the kind of thing that would be politely not asked about because it's obviously not something they want to talk about (unless they are, in which case standard advice goes out the window)
Yeah I mean I know trigger events are traumatic but I agree there should be like a half dozen parahumans who never shut up about it.

Think of all the parents who, upon their children dying, get up in front of a microphone and demand justice. Now make them all automatically local celebrities. Everyone would start noticing trauma=superpowers.
 
IIRC the PRT (and probably Cauldron so you can slap a big ol "Do Not Poke The Plothole Contessa Fixed It Honest" on there) does some PR work to obsfucate the fact of "Triggers = Trauma = Superpowers". Partially to avoid the obvious dumbassery of some people going out and intentionally putting themselves in suicidal situations because "I'll totally get powers if I do it bro", but also they'll play up things to be more... heroic? Like if you have Tom Strongman who can lift twenty tons, they'll say "ah yes he got powers in a desperate moment of needing to lift a bus off of a bunch of school children!" and just pay Tommy to go along with that, because letting everyone know that triggers come from trauma also makes it more obvious that all the cool costumed heroes who are supposed to be protecting you are... not really that heroic, they're just a bunch of traumatized people who won the trauma lottery and got superpowers out of it.
 
Reasonably speaking trigger events should be common knowledge, because a fraction of people process trauma by telling everyone about it. Constantly. And it only takes a few of those for the lid to very clearly be off the box. It seems like the kind of thing that would be politely not asked about because it's obviously not something they want to talk about (unless they are, in which case standard advice goes out the window)

On the other hand, you also have brain tumors poking the brain to influence behaviors and probably promoting secrecy, and/or selecting people for specific purposes, so it's actually possible that no parahuman is publicly yelling about their trigger event over and over.
 
One common one is trauma porn. Where characters with no defined backstory are written to have a severely traumatic one filled with child abuse. With characters with cannonicly bad childhoods gets theirs exaggerated to absurd levels.

See Harry Potter fics where the Dursley's treat Harry like Genie the feral child.
the PRT (and probably Cauldron so you can slap a big ol "Do Not Poke The Plothole Contessa Fixed It Honest" on there) does some PR work to obsfucate the fact of "Triggers = Trauma = Superpowers". Partially to avoid the obvious dumbassery of some people going out and intentionally putting themselves in suicidal situations because "I'll totally get powers if I do it bro", but also they'll play up things to be more... heroic? Like if you have Tom Strongman who can lift twenty tons, they'll say "ah yes he got powers in a desperate moment of needing to lift a bus off of a bunch of school children!" and just pay Tommy to go along with that, because letting everyone know that triggers come from trauma also makes it more obvious that all the cool costumed heroes who are supposed to be protecting you are... not really that heroic, they're just a bunch of traumatized people who won the trauma lottery and got superpowers out of it.
Yep.

I want to write a Worm/South Park fan fiction where Cartmen finds out that people get superpowers from traumatic experiences and so sets out deliberately traumatizing his "friends" tell they get their Fractured but Whole superpowers. But Cartmen can't get superpowers despite the trauma he puts himself through so he teams up with the Endbringers
 
Hmm... An author I've been following for a long while posted a new story yesterday, about 14 years after they last posted anything. Today, they've posted a new chapter to a story that's been dormant for even longer. Now, I know I've absolutely no right to any information they don't want to share and I am hyped that they are updating again, but I'd be lying if I said that no part of me wanted to hear at least a bit more than "Yes, it is [Character Name]. Also, hi!" In the AN before the new story. 😅
 
I'll admit to sometimes being amazed how much personal stuff about themselves people on AO3 will share in the author's notes.
 
Author's note on AO3 are either someone coming back after 14 hours and saying "Sorry for the late update, I got married, my dad had a heart attack, my mother got cancer, my dog ate my hard drive, I got divorced, my sister married my ex-husband and then I had to move across the country. I'll try to have the next update out by Thursday" or someone coming back after 14 years and saying
"Yes, it is [Character Name]. Also, hi!"
There is no in-between.
 
Back
Top