[Mafia] Scarlet Hand Finale

Okay, so to answer @-Rosen's request, lemme take the last ten minutes of D2 in painful detail and hopefully get something out of it, omitting only posts I think are pure noise no matter how you look at it.

WALLLLS]

7:51
Ondine puts pressure on Pawn here, and suggests QT disclose. We know now that this is town. QT still refuses to disclose, which may be a conversation worth revisiting near EoD today?

7:52
-Rosen mentions waiting for a vote to see if Pawn responds. I don't like pushing it even later in general, since there's no real time at this point to reevaluate even if Pawn does respond, and all this does is make for a more panicked EoD, but I'll get back to this a bit later.

Something to remember is that D1 ended 2 minutes early (afaict), and the precedent that sets makes all the last minute play even worse.

7:53
Narcotic seconds this, but also suggests that no better option is likely to appear. Looks slightly towny.
Nictis puts a vote on Pawn, putting more pressure.

Pawn finally responds, notably pretty late despite having lurked for a while. I'm not sure if this is partially intentional to confuse things or scrape by in a last minute panic by offering some defense however thin, or just actual timing on a phone at EoD. Regardless, we know Pawn was scum, and we know Ondine and Nictis are town, so the only real fodder here is the description on Byzantine. If anything, Pawn's distancing from Byzantine here. There's many reasons why Pawn might do this, but I think it favors a scummy Byzantine at least slightly.

7:54
QT hammers in the time left being short. Mostly NAI, plausibly meant to be posted before Pawn responded given how close these were.
Pyrros posts to note that there's no time to respond to an earlier claim from Wiadi, again. Said request is answered later here so I think this is mostly NAI, though it does avoid the need to comment on Pawn either way which might be intentional.
Pawn posts to emphasize the difficulty of defending oneself on a phone. Both a bit sad and probably an appeal to emotions to scrape by.
Nictis complains about D1 ending nearly 2m early. This is important, since people should be aware of the possibility if they've seen this post, so indecision hardcore favors scum at this point.

7:55
This is where things start to get really messy.
-Rosen follows by noting that Itz/1K and/or anyone else is his preferred alternative if we ignore Pawn. Scummy imo, since casting confusion at the last second really serves the goal of a no lynch over anything. But also plausibly just actual panic.
Nictis swaps to no lynch, a very very bad play, out of a dislike of the options available due to UM being away and little read on me.

7:56
Byzantine freaks out about a tie, emphasizing the probability and that it's bad. This also fosters panic, and Byzantine is still on Nictis which is DOA at this point, so scummy because Byzantine could actually be doing something here to avert this instead of bolstering panic.
-Rosen posts offering plausible support for the no lynch. My first thought is scummy here, since it looks to lend support to the worst option on the table bar none while also not committing to anything with 4m on the table. Speaking of which, @-Rosen, would you explain your thinking in 1,714 a bit?

7:57
Nictis reinforces no lynch
Wiadi sheeps Nictis' no lynch vote. Scummy.
-Rosen again offers confusion and distraction, it's still scummy since evidence suggests there may be literally seconds on the clock at this point.
But then Ondine notes no lynch is bad in response to Nictis.
-Rosen then shifts to a gutread on Pawn. Plausibly towny, though given earlier performance and Ondine's post immediately above, maybe bussing.

7:58
Wiadi notes a preference for UM that won't be enacted and really does not much
InterstellerHobo makes, what is, I think the core post of this sequence, pointing out the soul mechanic and inactivity as huge counterarguments to no lynching. Hard town. since, while Pawn or someone else might have made the call in a QT to bus at this point, it was still as likely than not that Pawn could be saved just by feigning confusion or doing nothing. Nictis' certainty here is also helpful.
Byzantine points out Nictis wasn't voting yesterday (still while voting for Nictis which isn't great).
Tykan swaps to Pawn, IH made a knock-down argument that nixes most anything else here I think.

7:59: Remember, based on D1 holding out until now would have led to a non-counted vote.
Nictis Swaps to Pawn
Pawn swaps to Underling as a self-save.
Pyrros swaps to Pawn, but it's already probably a lock at this point.

7:59-30s per Nictis
Wiadi swaps
Narcotic swaps
Meso swaps
8PM exactly, also hammer.

So, what do I get from that excessive exercise?

IH and Ondine look good. Everyone else looks scummy AF, except Pawn whose actions are consistent, but, well, we know Pawn's scum. In particular, -Rosen mostly acted to build confusion in a tense moment and very few worked against this. Given that D1's ending very slightly early was specifically invoked, the buzzer beater here is simply unforgivable. Everyone who didn't vote at all looks doubly suspicious, though mostly those who also didn't vote D1.

If I had to think of someone that looks to be hurting town, while also striking a balance without losing town cred, that's -Rosen far more than Meso who wasn't very active until literally the last seconds, when past experience taught us the day may already have ended and this kind of last second cred ploy would just flop and probably draw ire if day had ended early. Second place would be Narcotic I don't think wanting a Pawn response is unusual given the phone bit.

But really, my inclination is less that this was a plan and more that everyone was mostly just actually panicked and confused, which I think makes sense if at least some scum are just doing literally nothing.

Like, even if these players aren't scum, Nictis almost flipped the last game from an insanely bad position just based on leaving incredibly inactive players as shields until the end and then pushing them all as scum.
 
I explained that 1714 earlier when Nictis asked; I'll quote it when I'm back at my dorm to do so.
 
Also if your conclusion is that everyone except for IH and ondine acted scummy then this reads as largely inconclusive to me, which leads me to a big question mark about what your goal in reading EoD in context actually is. @Nictis @QTesseract What do you guys make of this?
 
Also if your conclusion is that everyone except for IH and ondine acted scummy then this reads as largely inconclusive to me, which leads me to a big question mark about what your goal in reading EoD in context actually is. @Nictis @QTesseract What do you guys make of this?

My motivation for doing this:

How do you interpret everybody's posts in this context then? Give me some reads on people's individual EoD based on the context you're talking about.

Also, found the post: [Mafia] Scarlet Hand Finale so you're set there.
 
My motivation for doing this:



Also, found the post: [Mafia] Scarlet Hand Finale so you're set there.
Yeah I get the motivation as such, but I'm confused as to what your end goal is in trying to paint your vision of EoD in this image. To me it still feels like a "meso was scummy, but everyone else was also scummy it doesn't really matter" kind of thing that you've got here, but in a way that doesn't even touch on meso as much as it does the people who were actually posting in the last ten minutes. Like, among active players I think it's important to look at people who are active and posting in EoD, as compared to those who are active and aren't posting in EoD. I'm only seeing the former here.
 
Ultimately something to be concerned about is that if we leave the inactive players until last, then the players who are going to have the final call are going to be inactive town, and all our souls will be inactive players toward the end.
Yeah I get the motivation as such, but I'm confused as to what your end goal is in trying to paint your vision of EoD in this image. To me it still feels like a "meso was scummy, but everyone else was also scummy it doesn't really matter" kind of thing that you've got here, but in a way that doesn't even touch on meso as much as it does the people who were actually posting in the last ten minutes. Like, among active players I think it's important to look at people who are active and posting in EoD, as compared to those who are active and aren't posting in EoD. I'm only seeing the former here.

I think the presumption that I have an "end goal" in interpreting an interaction beyond identifying what is and isn't suspicious is, itself, a kinda scummy move. You presume motivated reasoning on my part here here, when that's intrinsically scummy. Like, I stated how it looked to me and why I favored not emphasizing it in the interest of identifying the current game state. You asked me to explain. I did. There's nothing more to it, and the presumption that there is seems like a way of persuading the room something's scummy without actually having to argue the point.

Beyond which, I think I've made INACTIVITY SHOULD BE OUR PROBLEM a very very clear stance here at any variety, at EoD or otherwise, but if we're looking to why people might not be very active EoD, I honestly think posting "I'm not sure" given the situation we had is dramatically worse than posting nothing whatsoever as it accomplished very little, regardless of intent, beyond helping make a no lynch more likely. Like, there's activity that's meaningful or progresses toward an end and vaciliating back and forth performatively. The latter of which is mostly actively unhelpful to town who has the interest of making sure town is helping lock in a lynch for town motives, particularly in a game where 6 minutes might actually mean 4.

On gut, I'm scumreading you, Byzantine, Underling Master, Deathvon and Happerry atm. (I'm neutral to suspicious of 1K, Meso Tykan) of which some are obviously going to be wrong just based on numbers. I'd much much rather be wrong about Deathvon or Happerry given how they've played so far and have them not be one of the last souls we have to carry town home than I would you or Byzantine (or Meso more specifically). I'd also much rather we be pushing them to contribute more, not to slack off, but because in particular, souls responding rather than leading actively helps us gather more info in a game where "I dunno, I'm not getting much" has been a consistent huge problem
 
Let me reword with a question then:

What do you make of meso in that EoD specifically, in hindsight looking at the things he's posted to justify himself Today?

This is the biggest thing I'm concerned with in your post since it literally does not address the meso situation we've been working on, treating it as just another pile vote in your read of EoD without looking at the new justifications that have come up for it.
 
Which I mean, looking at it again, might have been what you were going for.

I'd still like to see where you stand on meso, though.
 
Devil's advocate: these goals should actually be more clear because an inactive trying to win a game for scum will have to REALLY haul ass in order to force Town misplays. I don't think the smaller sample size matters as much because of that.

False assumption. You're saying that inactives are somehow being forced to play optimally by picking up slack and must work towards their faction's goal in the small amount of time they do play for. This is not the case. One who plays little can do correspondingly less to advance the needs of their faction.
 
A couple of things to point out
Pyrros posts to note that there's no time to respond to an earlier claim from Wiadi, again. Said request is answered later here so I think this is mostly NAI, though it does avoid the need to comment on Pawn either way which might be intentional.
I don't know why you say "again" because that was the first and only time I had told Wiadi I wouldn't have the time. Also, Pawn's post had been a few seconds before I had made my post and I wasn't following the latest posts in the thread until I conceded I wouldn't be able to finish Wiadi's post by end of Day. Before that point, I had about 4 tabs open focused on typing, reading Rosen's past posts, reading Byzantine's past posts, and one to keep retallying the vote counter every few seconds to keep track of it as the Day came to an end. I didn't even see Pawn's post before then and after that point I was more concerned with how the tally kept fluctuating and some people seeming intent on making last second switches despite how dangerous that is.

I always focus on trying to get my promises done as quickly as I can, and that includes putting in the work continuously rather than splitting my attention too heavily by getting involved in multiple discussions.

Finally, I did comment on Pawn, albeit before Pawn's post. When asked my view over Pawn, Byzantine, and Rosen, I had said, "From memory, he seems to be lurking and interjecting only to control or guide the vote but I don't remember anything specific that indicates he is scum" being effectively a judgement of "shady behavior but null overall" similar to what I had given Nictis, and the other two I noted that I was busy going through their posts at that time to comment on them yet.
Pyrros swaps to Pawn, but it's already probably a lock at this point.
A bit nitpicky but I hadn't swapped, because that was my first and only vote of this game and of that Day.

That's all I really have to correct.
 
False assumption. You're saying that inactives are somehow being forced to play optimally by picking up slack and must work towards their faction's goal in the small amount of time they do play for. This is not the case. One who plays little can do correspondingly less to advance the needs of their faction.
But what about in a situation where inactives are pressed in endgame? Surely you would have to do SOMETHING so that you don't just throw the game away.
 
But what about in a situation where inactives are pressed in endgame? Surely you would have to do SOMETHING so that you don't just throw the game away.

So far most of our deaths have been on active players (NANOOK, ondine, Nictis), with the last one being a player who could be reasonably expected to become active in short order (QTesseract). If the trend continues, I would not be surprised to see a pile of three or four relatively-inactive players still alive in the lategame for Scum to hide among. Especially if they're pursuing this as a deliberate strategy.
 
People were weird and panicked EoD. I buy someone did a thing that was a bit silly and explained it honestly.

I voted to hammer Pawn because I was afraid the day would end without a majority otherwise. (It turns out my vote did nothing because if that had happened it would have gone to whoever had a plurality of the votes, which was still Pawn.) I voted at like 7:59 on my clock. I wanted to give Pawn a chance to reply, but he hadn't so I put my vote in. I already had it typed up, but I didn't want to lynch without giving him a chance to reply unless there was no time left.

I also buy IRL distractions for a few minutes leading to some inactivity as plausible.

My main reason for silence was mostly that I was in the middle of a bunch of real life stuff when EoD. I checked in periodically to see if pawn had responded, and I didn't see his response. (I actually didn't realize he had ever replied to QT until you pointed it out today.) When I say I prepared a post, I mean a few minutes before EoD I types out "[Not putting the X to avoid messing with vote tally] Lynch Pawn Lelouch" and refreshed the screen every 30 or 40 seconds to see if some kind of response popped up. And when it didn't happen in a few minutes I hit send.

I should have realized we didn't need a majority to kill. Otherwise, all days would have to end with a hammer or no lynch, which clearly isn't the case. But I was multitasking and was sort of thinking about the last game we played where "No vote" could win the lynch. (I haven't played that many games where hammer was an option). I was fairly convinced of Pawn's scumminess (no offense, Pawn) and I am of the opinion town should lynch every day, I just didn't want to deny him a chance to reply by dropping the hammer too early.

So inactivity makes sense and a silly mistake about mechanics is plausible. The better argument against Meso IMO is @UnderlingMaster's: [Mafia] Scarlet Hand Finale which is a point Nictis has also raised that's a bit broader and more credible I think.
 
Alrighty. So.
7:51
Ondine puts pressure on Pawn here, and suggests QT disclose. We know now that this is town. QT still refuses to disclose, which may be a conversation worth revisiting near EoD today?

QT refuses to disclose, claiming that there is utility in not stating the role.
7:52
-Rosen mentions waiting for a vote to see if Pawn responds. I don't like pushing it even later in general, since there's no real time at this point to reevaluate even if Pawn does respond, and all this does is make for a more panicked EoD, but I'll get back to this a bit later.

Rosen mentions wanting to see Pawn respond, because Pawn is in the thread. Rosen has also previously said that they would likely vote Pawn if Pawn did not respond, or potentially even if he did. This is only a few posts above the first ondine post mentioned, and on the same page as well.
Something to remember is that D1 ended 2 minutes early (afaict), and the precedent that sets makes all the last minute play even worse.

This is very much not objective, and the completely arbitrary start point that just conveniently cuts off the initial response to the Pawn pressure is suspect.

Preview Edit: 7:52 shows Rosen claiming to want to see Pawn respond. Not waiting to vote, and Rosen has previously stated that they were going to vote Pawn if he didn't respond and was likely to vote Pawn even if he did.
7:53
Narcotic seconds this, but also suggests that no better option is likely to appear. Looks slightly towny.
Nictis puts a vote on Pawn, putting more pressure.

Narcotic states that they don't want to vote Pawn without him responding. Narcotic does not say that a better option is unlikely to appear, but that they don't see any better options at the time of.
Nictis puts a vote on Pawn because UM is not available, and mentions that Pawn is likely to be on his phone.
Pawn finally responds, notably pretty late despite having lurked for a while. I'm not sure if this is partially intentional to confuse things or scrape by in a last minute panic by offering some defense however thin, or just actual timing on a phone at EoD. Regardless, we know Pawn was scum, and we know Ondine and Nictis are town, so the only real fodder here is the description on Byzantine. If anything, Pawn's distancing from Byzantine here. There's many reasons why Pawn might do this, but I think it favors a scummy Byzantine at least slightly.

Pawn responds to QT's post, stating that activity/inactivity is NAI for him.
7:54
QT hammers in the time left being short. Mostly NAI, plausibly meant to be posted before Pawn responded given how close these were.
Pyrros posts to note that there's no time to respond to an earlier claim from Wiadi, again. Said request is answered later here so I think this is mostly NAI, though it does avoid the need to comment on Pawn either way which might be intentional.
Pawn posts to emphasize the difficulty of defending oneself on a phone. Both a bit sad and probably an appeal to emotions to scrape by.
Nictis complains about D1 ending nearly 2m early. This is important, since people should be aware of the possibility if they've seen this post, so indecision hardcore favors scum at this point.

QT mentions time limit while tagging Pawn.
Pyrros mentions that he doesn't have time to finish the post he was asked for.
Pawn mentions that phoneposting is a pain.
Nictis mentions that the Day had ended early previously.
7:55
This is where things start to get really messy.
-Rosen follows by noting that Itz/1K and/or anyone else is his preferred alternative if we ignore Pawn. Scummy imo, since casting confusion at the last second really serves the goal of a no lynch over anything. But also plausibly just actual panic.
Nictis swaps to no lynch, a very very bad play, out of a dislike of the options available due to UM being away and little read on me.

Rosen questions Nictis on who Nictis would prefer to lynch.
Nictis states a dislike for the current lynches and switches to No Lynch. Nictis has previously stated that the options were either Pawn, or someone who is not available (Underling Master). Shadell is not mentioned during this post.
7:56
Byzantine freaks out about a tie, emphasizing the probability and that it's bad. This also fosters panic, and Byzantine is still on Nictis which is DOA at this point, so scummy because Byzantine could actually be doing something here to avert this instead of bolstering panic.
-Rosen posts offering plausible support for the no lynch. My first thought is scummy here, since it looks to lend support to the worst option on the table bar none while also not committing to anything with 4m on the table. Speaking of which, @-Rosen, would you explain your thinking in 1,714 a bit?

Byzantine complains about a tie. There is no emphasis placed. At this point there is a three way tie, with the Nictis vote having three people on it.
Rosen questions Nictis about how much they want to push for No Lynch. It is only later that Rosen really claims to have been considering supporting it.
Nictis asks if anyone wants to join the No Lynch wagon, because Nictis doesn't like either of the two wagons. Shadell is not mentioned at this point.
QTesseract offers to join the No Lynch if the alternative wagon is a Nictis lynch.
7:57
Nictis reinforces no lynch
Wiadi sheeps Nictis' no lynch vote. Scummy.
-Rosen again offers confusion and distraction, it's still scummy since evidence suggests there may be literally seconds on the clock at this point.
But then Ondine notes no lynch is bad in response to Nictis.
-Rosen then shifts to a gutread on Pawn. Plausibly towny, though given earlier performance and Ondine's post immediately above, maybe bussing.

Nictis states a preference to No Lynching over lynching Pawn, but that Nictis would lynch UM over No Lynch if UM was active.
Wiadi votes No Lynch, stating that they found Pawn's defense to be valid.
Rosen mentions that they're looking in too many different directions. Not offering confusion or trying to sow chaos.
ondine calls Nictis out for not voting to lynch anyone two days in a row.
Rosen continues with previous post mentioning that they would probably vote Pawn by voting Pawn, stating that they read Pawn's post. This is the tiebreaker that puts Pawn over Nictis and UM. There is no relevance to the ondine post, and not enough time for it to be related to the ondine post.
7:58
Wiadi notes a preference for UM that won't be enacted and really does not much
InterstellerHobo makes, what is, I think the core post of this sequence, pointing out the soul mechanic and inactivity as huge counterarguments to no lynching. Hard town. since, while Pawn or someone else might have made the call in a QT to bus at this point, it was still as likely than not that Pawn could be saved just by feigning confusion or doing nothing. Nictis' certainty here is also helpful.
Byzantine points out Nictis wasn't voting yesterday (still while voting for Nictis which isn't great).
Tykan swaps to Pawn, IH made a knock-down argument that nixes most anything else here I think.

Wiadi notes a preference for lynching UM but doesn't vote UM because they are absent. Alternative is Pawn's lynch. Towny.
Hobo points out that No Lynching in a game with Inactives and a Soul Mechanic that helps make lynching Town less painful is not preferred.
Byzantine explains ondine's post as that Nictis was not voting Day 1.
Tykan switches to Pawn, claiming to hope to get more out of it than they would out of UM.
7:59: Remember, based on D1 holding out until now would have led to a non-counted vote.
Nictis Swaps to Pawn
Pawn swaps to Underling as a self-save.
Pyrros swaps to Pawn, but it's already probably a lock at this point.

Nictis votes Pawn because Tie+Soul Mechanic.
Pawn votes Underling.
Pyrros votes Pawn to avoid a tie.
7:59-30s per Nictis
Wiadi swaps
Narcotic swaps
Meso swaps
8PM exactly, also hammer.

Wiadi votes Pawn, referring to Soul Mechanic.
Narcotic votes Pawn, claiming gut but also that something about the situation (ie: The swing onto Pawn) feels off.
Meso votes Pawn, no reasoning provided. States that they wanted to give Pawn a chance to respond.
Shadell is dying. The details that go missing here, the bits that are misrepresented, the conveniently chosen starting point of this... I strongly dislike this.

[x] Lynch Shadell

Shadell is going very hard on pushing the idea that Rosen was attempting to sow confusion and discord during that.
 
Do you think a meso/Shadell contingency is required for both to be scum here? Or do you think that on the chance Shadell flips Town we should still be looking into meso independent of Shadell's stuff?
Shadell is adding and removing details in their review in order to paint you, Byzantine, and Wiadi as more suspicious than you really are in comparison to a Meso lynch, while also attempting to 'forgive' unusual behaviors because things were manic. Notably townreading Narcotic for the same reasons they are scumreading you.

Shadell, Meso and Narcotic are my current main suspicions. If Shadell is Town then I'm going to throw in the book and forget about ever finding scum from behavior.

Also: Shadell adds in bits where I apparently state a dislike for lynching Shadell where I don't make that mention. I can't see Town wanting to add that kind of thing in.
 
Shadell is adding and removing details in their review in order to paint you, Byzantine, and Wiadi as more suspicious than you really are in comparison to a Meso lynch, while also attempting to 'forgive' unusual behaviors because things were manic. Notably townreading Narcotic for the same reasons they are scumreading you.
The bold in conjunction with the timing part you mentioned in the last post is pretty much exactly the issue I had with the wall initially -- it felt to me like it was deliberately set up to ignore the meso stuff we've talked about so far to try and paint some other picture, mainly what you've outlined in your counter-wall.

That being said, do you have any individual thoughts on Byzantine and Wiadi since we're on the topic?
 
The list of people I need to go back and look at keep going up... need to stop having low energy days blegh. Doing better this time was what skipping the last game was supposed to help but reality is not cooperating.

Someone ask me a question so I can actually do something useful please?
 
I've been busy or asleep, and will more or less continue in that vein until EoD.
I will say that it is premature to assume the soul disappear in a FIFO manner.
 
The list of people I need to go back and look at keep going up... need to stop having low energy days blegh. Doing better this time was what skipping the last game was supposed to help but reality is not cooperating.

Someone ask me a question so I can actually do something useful please?

Okay, let's be topical. What are your thoughts on EoD2 & Shadell's recent analysis thereof?
 
QT refuses to disclose, claiming that there is utility in not stating the role.

Hence not saying QT should disclose today but suggesting we revisit it, that is, that we should make sure to revisit this point to see how QT feels on this near EoD today. Most of the rest is, as you've been doing to me this fucking game, misinterpreting things or exaggerating pretty attenuated statements.

A post where I ask you a fairly explicit question and suggest you don't do something earns a response where you exhaustively explain why asking you to do the thing I just asked you not to do is awful and clearly means I'm scum and you ignore the actual request. This has happened repeatedly to the extent that I actively don't want to engage with you because of how fundamentally and consistently you seem to misread everything I say.

Like, I could go through here and point out how absolutely bonkers a lot of the 'errors' you point to are either actual arguments against what you suggest that you're just not engaging with or, well, complaining about slight differences in word choice that more actively illustrate what I took from the post (for example, the distinction you draw between me suggesting that one of Narcotic's posts amounts to noting "better options are unlikely to appear" and Narcotic actually saying they see no better option is actively painful to see argued as anything meaningful at all), but it's honestly not even worth the energy because you've just raised a dozen low quality gotchas, literally while complaining that I'm doing that.

And, like, more broadly here, you've taken a post where I give an account of what happened layered with obvious interpretation and complain that it's not objective. My conclusion here has been that we shouldn't over-interpret EoD2 and build strong reads out of it given the panic and confusion. And yet, somehow the post became an attempt to discredit -Rosen and Wiadi on the exactly those grounds. I have other issues with your reaction here, but they're pretty strongly not a direct part of the game and should probably be discussed in post-game if anything, where we're already in for a fun time.

Additionally, somehow a post I've made when requested to explain in more detail the read I have where I mostly ignore the Meso stuff (except, you know, the rest of the read which I've repeatedly agreed looks worse, but let's forget that again), I showed a read of the context which mostly ignores the Meso stuff in favor of things I've said are more suspicious (because, again, I'm explaining why I thought other things were more suspicious) and I'm now suspicious for mostly ignoring the Meso stuff.

I've been busy or asleep, and will more or less continue in that vein until EoD.
I will say that it is premature to assume the soul disappear in a FIFO manner.

This is a fair point and does change the logic somewhat. OTOH, FIFO or "X phases" is probably the simplest plausible option atm. I'm willing to defer to @QTesseract here, but if nothing's been gleaned from this yet by EoD today, I'd definitely like to know, particularly if it makes the set-up on the whole clearer.

Someone ask me a question so I can actually do something useful please?

How likely do you think it is that at least 1-2 of the least active players are using it to hide scum, and if you had to pick who would you pick?
 
@Shadell Maybe I can't read you. Maybe I have trouble figuring out what you're saying when you post things like this.
I think the presumption that I have an "end goal" in interpreting an interaction beyond identifying what is and isn't suspicious is, itself, a kinda scummy move. You presume motivated reasoning on my part here here, when that's intrinsically scummy. Like, I stated how it looked to me and why I favored not emphasizing it in the interest of identifying the current game state. You asked me to explain. I did. There's nothing more to it, and the presumption that there is seems like a way of persuading the room something's scummy without actually having to argue the point.
Maybe I'm missing things. Maybe I'm just crazy.

Or maybe I'm going to be doubtful of what you suggest is pure noise, when you exclude things that seem relevant. Maybe I'm just not going to agree when you're trying to tell me to just... ignore my scumreads.

You picked an incredibly arbitrary starting point, "Ten minutes before EoD" which only served to conveniently cut out the initial response to the Pawn push, and Rosen stating that they would probably be voting Pawn if he did respond and definitely if he didn't.

You say that Rosen looks scummy for wanting to see Pawn respond before voting, because that is making the Day more panicked. You say that Narcotic looks Towny for wanting to see Pawn respond before voting.

You turn Byzantine's single line complaint into him emphasizing the probability of a tie and that ties are bad. You say that Byzantine is scummy for not changing his vote off me and onto one of the other two players, because the vote on me is useless and not going to do anything. If you had emphasized that he didn't seem to have much reason to be voting me I'd have been agreeing, but saying that one of the top three wagons is dead I have to disagree.

You point out that Pyrros might have intentionally avoided giving word as to what he was feeling in regards to Pawn, but don't mention that for anyone else.

You mention Rosen bringing up 1K and Narcotic, but skip the context. If anything, it looks like the context was removed. You say that Rosen was casting confusion into things, and that it was helping the No Lynch cause... Before No Lynch is raised as a possibility.

You place strong emphasis on how No Lynch is a bad play, and that Wiadi is scummy for joining it. You skip Wiadi's stated reasoning and QT suggesting that he'd go for it if I was on the block. You also say that Rosen seems scummy for giving an idea that he might go for it when Rosen had just asked how much I was willing to push it, and state that Rosen is avoiding committing to anything while ignoring Rosen's previous statements of being likely to lynch Pawn.

Rosen posts saying that they are looking in too many directions, which you push as scummy because Day 1 ended early.

When Rosen does vote Pawn, acting as the tie breaker, you suggest that maybe it's bussing because ondine told Nictis not to No Lynch. With all the previous emphasis on how the Day could end early at any second and that Rosen wasn't committing to anything I'd have expected a bit more than "Plausibly Townie, but maybe it's bussing" over being the first vote to break the tie in favor of lynching Pawn, instead of saying that he bought Pawn's defense and voting to lynch either me or Underling.

You want me to just... Ignore you when you make something that seems pretty heavily slanted. It'd be really nice if I just didn't respond to or point out my scumreads.
 
Back
Top