This is a good point.also putting a conditional to get the actual fun part of might alone.
[X] Plan Neon Genesis
-[X] If our BP is insufficient, take Plan: To Might Alone…
-[X] If taking Might Alone, get Might of the Slayer instead of Master of Systems.
There, since our BP gen has been brought up so frequently, a conditional. We've done this before for our plans, and this removes the possibility of us dying from picking neon genesis.
Edit: also putting a conditional to get the actual fun part of might alone.
Hm, looks like Might Alone and Neon Genesis are tied. The latter expends a concerning amount of BP, which we're still 1.8 short of despite the multiplier as of last night. What happens if we go into debt, with all the accompanying debuffs, forcing us to refuse the secret boss? Birdsie could delay the update to allow for additional generation, but that both relies on his largesse and further slows pacing - already a problem for Neon Genesis, since we'll have to vote on the Supreme Decision and XP spending if it wins. Wouldn't it be simpler to save that 5 BP difference for the secret boss' (likely considerable) rewards?
Am I just bad at reading the tally, or is Rihaku not counted as voting for Unit 02 as well as Might Alone?
I don't think so.It occurs to me that, in some interpretations, 'Bring Justice to the untouchable' means 'hurt everyone, the more innocent the better'. How, you ask? simple. If you're the strongest person in the world and decide who lives and dies, then people who you don't think need to die are 'untouchable', because nobody can hurt them, and everyone else is very touchable, because you can make that so. Once this becomes an established state of affairs, all the bad people are irrelevant and no longer need to be justiced because they aren't untouchable. Only people you don't want to kill need to be justiced, and the more you don't want to kill them the more untouchable they are. And the untouchable must receive justice. this doesn't go quite as far as 'kill them' necessarily, because if they've only done one tiny bad thing ever death isn't 'just', I think, maybe (I can't be sure. I don't do SupMan durgs), but it still becomes very stupid.
that depends on how you define ability and untouchable. I infer that Justice's 'untouchable' descriptor means 'untouchable to not-Justice', because otherwise Justice would literally never have succeeded at what it's trying to do, and wouldn't be able to bring justice to the 'untouchable' of other worlds because they wouldn't have anything untouchable which Justice can bring to justice; I also consider something [the singleton is making sure does not happen and would not, without the influence of Justice, ever choose to allow] as [impossible]- there is no Justice-aside scenario where that event happens. So if Koji, strongly influenced by Justice but not literally the incarnation of justice, takes over all of Aincrad(including beating Kayaba or whatever), and makes sure bad things only happen to bad people and not good people, then bad things happening to good people because impossible and good people become untouchable, but for the followup influence of Justice.Innocents do not become untouchable, only untouched, as the highest power (Justice in this case?) COULD destroy them, just doesnt.
Uh, why exactly do you think this?because otherwise Justice would literally never have succeeded at what it's trying to do, and wouldn't be able to bring justice to the 'untouchable' of other worlds because they wouldn't have anything untouchable which Justice can bring to justice;
Then you end up with the same conclusion as before, just for the scenario of 'Koji takes over a world he's not from'... like Aincrad. Any Aincrad Native hypothetical worldruler!Koji doesn't want to be hurt is untouchable to everyone of their own world, ergo...
But why would Justice fall into some sort of strange logic trap (where I don't even think the logic is valid but for arguments sake.)?Then you end up with the same conclusion as before, just for the scenario of 'Koji takes over a world he's not from'... like Aincrad. Any Aincrad Native hypothetical worldruler!Koji doesn't want to be hurt is untouchable to everyone of their own world, ergo...
because Justice isn't trying to capture a segment of human values, it's fulfilling an Oath of "to bring Justice to the Untouchable". Its actions don't have to make sense from our perspective in the same way that human art doesn't have to make sense from the perspective of hypothetical aliens which see a different visual spectrum. it's not something that optimises to accomplish an endstate where 'there are as few untouchable beings which have not recieved Justice as possible' or even to 'perform actions which reduce the number of untouchable beings which have not recieved Justice as much and as quickly as possible', it's trying to [Bring Justice to the Untouchable].But why would Justice fall into some sort of strange logic trap (where I don't even think the logic is valid but for arguments sake.)?
Justice explicitly includes itself as a potential target for Justice, if memory serves.You can just not count Justice's own actions and their results into whether something is untouchable, which makes much more sense.
This is true. The untouchable good people who have done exactly 0 things wrong ever don't need to have Justice brought to them. the ones which have done exactly 1 minor wrong thing ever do, however, need some amount of Justice brought to them- maybe not death, maybe yes death, I'm not [Justice] so I don't know how much punishment it thinks is proportional. But even not killing, it's a silly situation, because the ones who do a lot of wrong aren't untouchable and then don't have to get punished at all.If the Untouchables somehow naturally acted justly, or Justice doesn't require punishment as there is nothing to punish...then thats that?