Alright, since I am doing this again, I will lay it out here.
First flaw of reasoning here. "The injector came from behind her and she was shocked, how would she react to something she doesn t know is there." This is actually false. Unless we presume the thing literally has no weight, she should absolutely have noticed it. But lets presume that. We can very much clearly see her becoming aware of it before it actually inject shit. This is what we can very much clearly see.
Presuming that she was literally not aware of it at all until it was fully injected is not.... unreasonable, but at the same time, about as founded in reality as saying that the feat was just someone talking shit.
"we already honkai energy messes with space time, why wouldn t be able to mess with physics"
Again, no. Actually, double no. The serum was specifically made against honkai infection. Why the hell would it use honkai to introduce the serum into a system ? Like, no. Do recall that the injector was not intended for a Herrscher. It was intended for a Valkyrie. Did they have some magical anti Herrscher injectors around that they put the serum in ?
This... is an acceptable argument. The liquid has been shown to have a strongly adverse affect on Honkai, thus it does make sense that it could screw up the durability. That is a not an unreasonable interference from what we know.
Doesn´t solve the issue though.
First off, Honkai at no point had conceptual effects and hopefully it never will. Fate and it´s bullshit can go off and die in a corner like the trash it is. Secondly, Honkai is pseudo Esoteric. It is not treated as such.
As for the IRL PHysics. Blame the writers then, because they made these feats, they made it so that IRL physics can be applied without if or buts because Honkai is not mythical something, but has been noted to be affected by the fundamental forces of the universe two times. This being the EM Spectrum and gravity.
Regardless of that, I would actually agree. Allow me to show you the cycle of bullshit specific claims.
Writer makes a claim that allows people to get scientific data from it.
This can be done also in picture form.
They don´t know the actual science behind it because they are not scientists and it sounds awesome.
|
V
People take the feat literally and actually get the hard numbers.
|
V
The writers do a scene where the given feat causes a narrative issue due to them not being aware of that feat, or the consequences of that feat
|
V
People will bitch about it.
Now, there are usually three solutions to that issue.
Option 1: One side is absurd enough to be discarded as being hyperbole.
Option 2: The writers perk up and explain it away. People can theorize it naturally, but the people are not the writers.
Option 3: Somebody brings up the line of "Well, IRL physics don´t need to apply"
This is objectively the worst version. Here is why. because if the response to the physics issue raised by the bullshit claim is "Well, it doesn´t need to follow IRL Physics" that makes the feat meaningless, and everybody is unhappy.
Conclusion: There is no point in arguing it because frankly, nobody will be happy about the outcome. Preferably don´t make pseudo scientific bullshit claims that simply don´t fucking work and don´t require a rewrite of basic rules of reality for your setting.
Like, seriously, saying that it is possible because it doesn´t work on conventional physics is just kinda... Well, what is the point in making the claim then.