This repeated refrain throughout the thread that Hades was the sole exclusively moral Olympian is incredibly weird. Hades has fairly few surviving myths, I'm partial to him as a character too insomuch as he has any characterization, and he's not the literal Christian devil, but it's pretty damn absurd to just paper over how the one well known myth he features in has him as a kidnapper and rapist who is personally responsible for the existence of Winter. Is he better than his brothers in a strictly relative sense? Sure, but that isn't exactly a high bar to clear. Is he, as depicted in surviving classical Greek texts, 'moral' by anything resembling a modern Western standard? Depends on where you fall on the morality of rape, starvation and frostbite, I guess. Alternate interpretations where Persephone went willingly are all well and good - though the specific argument for it in this thread is pretty damn problematic - but at that point you're creating your own headcanon and we aren't discussing the same character at all. I can interpret every sexual encounter Zeus had as either consensual or pro-cthonic propaganda but that doesn't change that in the source material we have, he's a serial rapist whose sister married him because he held her downa and penetrated her by force and she was obligated to in order to preserve her honor.
As for the smaller argument about the legitimacy of Ovid and Romans as a whole as sources about how contemporaries actually viewed the gods and how the classical Greeks were different...has anyone making that claim actually read much classical Greek literature? Euripides seemed to view the Olympians pretty similarly to the way we do today. "The gods are self-absorbed, monstrous children" was a minority view then, but it was one people were evidently comfortable expressing in public twenty four hundred years ago.
What you said.