Okay, so, that battle was good television but in military history terms it was rather silly. Like, we all know the things that were silly about it, in aggregate as a group; so I don't feel the need to go through it or belabour the points further. Indeed I scrolled through just now, rather than reading your posts (which I'm sure are lovely), because I just watched the episode and wanted to put down my thoughts before I go to sleep.

My three main thoughts were these.

For all that there were a lot of things about the battle that were dumb, it was still really satisfying when the cavalry arrived. That's testament to the fact that the the showrunners are pretty good filmakers even if they aren't great military historians by SV standards, I think. The fact that it could've been exactly as satisfying with a less silly lead-up does not detract from the fact that it was still very satisfying, I think.

Sansa, not Jon, in the end, was the one who won the Battle of Snows, for all that Jon's efforts were instrumental in her victory. I think that's fitting and appropriate, it was clearly foreshadowed and I didn't dislike it at all. She's clearly learning how to play the game of thrones, and I like it. I wonder who she'll choose as a husband; I imagine that may become a plot point next season, although they've given themselves so little fucking time to wrap up the main plot that perhaps not.

I also really liked the point Sansa made to Ramsay about how his hounds were loyal to him, before he starved them for a week. That's a metaphor for his whole diseased style of rulership, and the faults in ruling through fear and acts of blatant terrorism. I also like how the show also demonstrated this in the battle- oh wait they fucking didn't. This is more egregious because Jon mentioned it, and then it didn't fucking go anywhere. The Manderleys showing up and reinforcing the Stark forces, the Umbers turning midway (where were they by the way? there were only Bolton banners in evidence), fucking something to ram that point home. The small number of small Northern houses who sided with the good guys and the Glovers and Manderleys apparently staying neutral wasn't nearly enough. But this is getting into the territory of stuff we all probably agree on, and has presumably already been said at length, so I digress.

There were no main character deaths, I liked that and honestly found it to be really effective. If you make your audience honestly, genuinely scared that any character can die, and make them believe it's entirely possible, which this show certainly has, then it can actually be more satisfying to let them all live through something terrible once in a while. The fact they they felt the need to kill Wun-Wun at the end was genuinely sad and moving, but also felt kind of obligatory and going-through-the-motions, a bit like an orgasm in a failing and lifeless marriage. It also felt a bit like they didn't have the stones to kill an actual main character, on reflection, slightly cheapening the whole thing. But again, I'm sure this is something you guys discussed.

Apparently Dany could handle that fleet fine just by herself! Interesting that all three Dragons listen to her, or maybe they just felt like burning shit lol. Anyway, if they whip out Dragonbinder next season, that could add some genuine tension. Although honestly, they may struggle for time. Dany had to get home and do compelling stuff to secure here throne there before going northwards, and she needs screen time to do that. Euron frankly can't be more than a midseason speedbump without taking up far too much time, and to be honest even that would be pushing it, really. It may seem a bit cheap but I actually hope they give a fairly swift and potentially unsatisfying resolution to his plotline; it's absoluetely necessary for the sake of the main one with the remaining time available.

The compact between the Iron Islands and the Queen of fukken long speeches was cool, although I felt the time constraints weighing on the scene a bit. I dunno what Dany was smoking thinking that 1) making the Iron Islands their own independent nation 2) asking them not to raid the mainland is a workable long-term deal lol. I think she may have been a hankering for a lick of her own Salt Queen, though, so I can forgive her. I imagine the actual final settlement worked out by Tyrion and probably Theon will be a bit more sensible, in the end. Presuming they're both alive at that point.

Wow, that was six points! Looks like I can't count when I'm drunk lol
 
That's testament to the fact that the the showrunners are pretty good filmakers even if they aren't great military historians by SV standards, I think. The fact that it could've been exactly as satisfying with a less silly lead-up does not detract from the fact that it was still very satisfying, I think.
I don't even really care, honestly. It's television. I just wished television would draw from more battles than just Cannae since I swear to god they've described the encirclement thing before. I might be thinking Redwall though tbh. :V

It may not have felt historical but it DID feel a lot like Mount and Blade, right down to Jon losing his horse and having to fight like a total scrub and charging your archers in when they're out of arrows. Only thing that would have made it 100% Mount and Blade is if he died from a lance from behind for 1200 damage.
 
The compact between the Iron Islands and the Queen of fukken long speeches was cool, although I felt the time constraints weighing on the scene a bit. I dunno what Dany was smoking thinking that 1) making the Iron Islands their own independent nation 2) asking them not to raid the mainland is a workable long-term deal lol. .
I think Yara's Going to be a Queen in name only. Something like what Renly Offered Robb in season two "You can call yourself king but you still answer to me."

I think she may have been a hankering for a lick of her own Salt Queen, though, so I can forgive her.
The eye fuck game between them was pretty strong I must admit.
 
I don't even really care, honestly.

This is why the cool History & Military kids talk smack about you when they smoke menthols 'round the back of the school by the wheely bins. :p

It's television. I just wished television would draw from more battles than just Cannae since I swear to god they've described the encirclement thing before. I might be thinking Redwall though tbh. :V

A phalanx of intelligent and good-natured forest animals armed with medieval weapons entering the battle on the side of the Starks would honestly have been a pretty cool twist actually, GOOD POINT.


It may not have felt historical but it DID feel a lot like Mount and Blade, right down to Jon losing his horse and having to fight like a total scrub and charging your archers in when they're out of arrows. Only thing that would have made it 100% Mount and Blade is if he died from a lance from behind for 1200 damage.

I don't care about Mount and Blade, I do care (somewhat) about battle scenes that don't actively jarr on a low-key level in my mind as being stupid whilst I'm watching them. That's probably testament to the fact that we've consumed different stuff and have different tics, which is totally cool. Regardless, I agree that it was good television, so I think we're essentially haggling over details here.

I think Yara's Going to be a Queen in name only. Something like what Renly Offered Robb in season two "You can call yourself king but you still answer to me."

Yeah that sounds plausible.

Unlike Robb she was intelligent enough not to turn it down lol

The eye fuck game between them was pretty strong I must admit.

Inorite?

INB4 Dany asks her if she'd like a dragon ride and Dario is like "she never asked me to ride her dragon >: (".

...And a thousand miles away, on his quest, Jorah grins to himself and then doesn't know why. :D
 
Last edited:
I don't care about Mount and Blade, I do care (somewhat) about battle scenes that don't actively jarr in my mind as being stupid whilst I'm watching them. That's probably testament to the fact that we've consumed different stuff and have different tics. Regardless, I agree that it was still good television, so I think we're essentially haggling over details here.
Is... this you trying to turn my not caring about the military accuracy back on me? It's a joke lol

In any case, I think it may not portray military tactics of the time period in an accurate way but it seemed to spend a lot of lingering on the consequences -- for all the WTF of where they came from and how they got so huge, the body piles were a pretty effective horror element, and I don't know many shows that actively make it look like one of the most popular characters is about to be crushed to death by his own troops. Which is totally a legit thing that could happen in a battle like that, as well as reinforcing a theme of the show/books that the rich and powerful can die in the mud like us all. Ultimately there's room for discussion on how much realism you can get in your show and how much it needs, but I think the final battle hit the marks and felt real enough that it didn't need to be 'correct', if that's even possible in visual media (particularly on television).

I mean shit dude, I enjoy House of Cards. You think that stuff's accurate to anything I studied? Does it make me a lesser political science major I'm not "jarred" by it?


This is why the cool History & Military kids talk smack about you when they smoke 'round the back of the school by the wheely bins. :p
Flat-up: considering that's a fear of mine (well not literally behind the school but YOU KNOW) I don't really find this funny.
 
Last edited:
Is... this you trying to turn my not caring about the military accuracy back on me? It's a joke lol

In any case, I think it may not portray military tactics of the time period in an accurate way but it seemed to spend a lot of lingering on the consequences -- for all the WTF of where they came from and how they got so huge, the body piles were a pretty effective horror element, and I don't know many shows that actively make it look like one of the most popular characters is about to be crushed to death by his own troops. Which is totally a legit thing that could happen in a battle like that, as well as reinforcing a theme of the show/books that the rich and powerful can die in the mud like us all. Ultimately there's room for discussion on how much realism you can get in your show and how much it needs, but I think the final battle hit the marks and felt real enough that it didn't need to be 'correct', if that's even possible in visual media (particularly on television).

I mean shit dude, I enjoy House of Cards. You think that stuff's accurate to anything I studied? Does it make me a lesser political science major I'm not "jarred" by it?

I wasn't trying to turn it back on you man (honestly don't quite get what you mean here, but let's not dwell on it), I'm just saying, we clearly have different things that raise flags to us when we're watching something. There's nothing wrong with that and there could be any number of reasons for it; it takes all sorts to take a world. I didn't mean that to raise your hackles; I was actually trying to be conciliatory. Sorry if I fucked that up lol! Since we both agree it was decent television (like House of Cards which is also incredibly silly), I'm legitimately not even sure what we're arguing about here, if we're even arguing about anything at all.

The pile of bodies just felt farcical to me, honestly. It was like they were trying to make it into the frikkin' Battle of the Somme, but it was just really silly in the context it was presented in. Like a lot of deaths attributable to Ramsay Bolton, it was actually too over the top to take that seriously.

Flat-up: considering that's a fear of mine I don't really find this funny.

I'm sorry to hear that. :sad:
 
The pile of bodies just felt farcical to me, honestly. It was like they were trying to make it into the frikkin' Battle of the Somme, but it was just really silly in the context it was presented in. Like a lot of deaths attributable to Ramsay Bolton, it was actually too over the top to take that seriously.
As um, not 'cool' but I guess 'interesting' as it was to see the body piles, I admit I was like "where the fuck did these huge piles, nay hills of bodies come from, is that even... possible?"

I guess this is where you can see mostly clearly the limitation of the medium though, because despite the fact we only see maybe 100 people in a shot, this is a battle with ~9000 total combatants that has been deliberately confined into a small space through the magic of trenches, and where most of them die. In that context, the piles are less inexplicable although still clearly exaggerated.
 
The compact between the Iron Islands and the Queen of fukken long speeches was cool, although I felt the time constraints weighing on the scene a bit. I dunno what Dany was smoking thinking that 1) making the Iron Islands their own independent nation 2) asking them not to raid the mainland is a workable long-term deal lol.
I mean it worked sort of before. Other than the independence thing the Iron Islands did avoid open raids after Aegon took power. Letting them rule themselves is largely meaningless as they lack anything the Iron Throne needs and could be crushed if they act up.
 
The compact between the Iron Islands and the Queen of fukken long speeches was cool, although I felt the time constraints weighing on the scene a bit. I dunno what Dany was smoking thinking that 1) making the Iron Islands their own independent nation 2) asking them not to raid the mainland is a workable long-term deal lol. I think she may have been a hankering for a lick of her own Salt Queen, though, so I can forgive her. I imagine the actual final settlement worked out by Tyrion and probably Theon will be a bit more sensible, in the end. Presuming they're both alive at that point.

Wow, that was six points! Looks like I can't count when I'm drunk lol
I don't thing she agreed to make them independant, I think its closer to the deal Renly was willing to make with Robb, where they'll call themselves kings or queens or whatever, but still pay tribute to the IT and respect her authority over them, and she'll give them the seat over Euron. They'll just be Lords Paramounts of the Iron Islands with a better deal, like Dorne.
 
the Umbers turning midway (where were they by the way? there were only Bolton banners in evidence)

There were plenty of Bolton and Karstark banners in attendance, in lots of shots. The best one is here:



(there were also obvious Umber troops with identifying shields and similar outfits to those worn by Smalljon *spits* good riddance, and the Karstark white sunburst was seen on shields too)
 
For the people miffed by the presence of Hollywood tactics/"lack of accuracy" going on here...well, how would you have portrayed the battle differently? Here on SV we've got plenty of great quests about warfare that seem to scratch the right itch for tactical portrayals (at least, I've never seen complaining to the contrary) but that's not in a visual medium with finite time. I don't see how the battle as given would be more satisfying or enjoyable with a narrator giving constant reassurances about the soundness of the strategies portrayed or whatever seems to have been expected.

I'm not sure how fantasy warfare tactics are any more "jarring" and "farcical" during the scene than the giant roaming around the background, though maybe if I took studies in the culture and behavior patterns of giants for my classes I'd feel differently ("ha! Giants are pacifists, they wouldn't tear that guy in half!").
 
I'm not sure how fantasy warfare tactics are any more "jarring" and "farcical" during the scene than the giant roaming around the background, though maybe if I took studies in the culture and behavior patterns of giants for my classes I'd feel differently ("ha! Giants are pacifists, they wouldn't tear that guy in half!").
Mmmmmm

I fucking hate this false equivalency argument that the mere presence of one unrealistic element justifies the presence of another unrealistic element without thought to the fact that there are different types of unrealistic elements. The existence of giants doesn't automatically excuse Hollywood tactics. You might as well say that because dragons exist every person in Westeros sees no problem with shitting on the floor. It's fantasy, it doesn't have to be realistic!

That's why John Bradley-West can sit down and shut the fuck up about "lolrealism". His critics are right, Sam should've fucking slimmed down from spending a few years up in the world's frosty taint without access to the kind of rich food that made him fat in the first place. Unless the White Walkers came down and prevented the human race from being able to metabolise fat at some point in the Lore.
 
Mmmmmm

I fucking hate this false equivalency argument that the mere presence of one unrealistic element justifies the presence of another unrealistic element
Good for you. You didn't actually do anything to answer the questions posed. And you might've noted that I acknowledged people with better knowledge of the topic in question than I would probably have reason to critique the portrayal of battlefield tactics more than I, a layman.

If you'd read the whole post before rushing to complain about your pet peeve, anyway.
 
(SB crosspost) So I've been thinking about the missteps of the Season in evaluation Season 6 as a whole.

- Dorne: it seems like an age ago now, but who can forget that Episode 1 was marred by two scenes so patently absurd, so entirely opposed to pretty much all story telling logic and reason, so entirely offensive to the talented actor who was shuffled off, that GOT fans will be howling about the awfulness of GOT's Dorne plot from now until the end of time. Worse, the murder of Princess Myrcella has had no consequence at all - Cersei is not planning war on Dorne, and Jaime has done nothing.

- Arya: Arya's Faceless Men tangent came to a somewhat unsatisfying conclusion. While everyone knew that Arya would never be an FM, given that she hid Needle rather than tossing it in the sea, the execution was lacking. Great build-up in the mid-game is wasted in Arya's odd and oblivious behavior prior to the encounter with the Waif, her incredibly-survivable stabbing, and Lady Crane's implausible surgical skills. Further, Jaquen just lets her go for reasons that are unclear. His comment that she is finally "no one" doesn't make sense, either.

- Re-introducing characters just to quickly kill them off: Blackfish, Osha and Rickon, anyone? Related:

- The North Doesn't Remember Shit: Apart from Lyanna Mormont, we see virtually nothing of the Northern houses rallying to the Stark cause. Sure, the Hornwoods and the Mazins did, but we didn't see it, and no one else bothered.

Further, the character assassination of House Umber remains hard to bear - was this created simply to piss fans off? Greatjon Umber was one of the show's most memorable characters, they even take care to remind us of the Umber's famous loyalty to the Starks, Smalljon refuses to swear an oath, Shaggydog's head is too small - but no, all the theorising about the Smalljon pulling a con on Ramsay is for naught - he's just a raving imbecile and a monster who'll give over an innocent young boy to the bastard son of the murderer of his rightful King - who killed who knows how many Umber men at the Twins - for totally spurious reasons that make no fucking sense at all, whether on a political or sentimental basis.

- Jaime's Arrested Development: Jaime spun his wheels for the majority of this season - doing nothing but being Cersei's shadow. Only at Riverrun was there a hint of Season 3 / early Season 4 Jaime. Unlikely that he'll do anything significant in Episode 10.

- Ramsay: ugh. So much has been said about him being a one-note, hyper competent villain who we hate rather than love to hate, I think I don't need to add much more. Shit simply falls into his lap all season, and almost everything he does works until it doesn't. Refer also to "the North Doesn't Remember Shit".

This is intended to be a somewhat evolving post which I'll add to in subsequent iterations, based on other's thoughts / contributions / things I've forgotten.
 
Good for you. You didn't actually do anything to answer the questions posed. And you might've noted that I acknowledged people with better knowledge of the topic in question than I would probably have reason to critique the portrayal of battlefield tactics more than I, a layman.

If you'd read the whole post before rushing to complain about your pet peeve, anyway.
He directly answered the part he quoted.

"I'm not sure how a giant is any more unrealistic than trained soldiers acting like morons" was answered with "there are different kinds of unrealistic elements and different kinds of suspension of disbelief". This is perfectly accurate, especially since Game of Thrones (rightly or wrongly) prides itself on being a fantasy with a 'realistic and gritty' human element powering its plot. Obviously bone-headed political moves ("I will moon the king in front of his court, thus gaining his trust") are not justified by dragons existing in the next scene. The same applies to military tactics – especially if they work out.

As for your first question, and apparently your "actual" one, the answer is to look at other, better scenes of historical battles and emulate them while accounting for giants – rather than taking cues from the same school of screen battles as Lord of the Rings, where lightly-armoured horsemen repeatedly charge into formations of pikemen, or from 300, where the Spartans talk at great length about the importance of formation and then scatter into individual slo-mo murder montages after the first sequence.
 
Last edited:
Good for you. You didn't actually do anything to answer the questions posed. And you might've noted that I acknowledged people with better knowledge of the topic in question than I would probably have reason to critique the portrayal of battlefield tactics more than I, a layman.

If you'd read the whole post before rushing to complain about your pet peeve, anyway.
Ac-
He directly answered the part he quoted.

"I'm not sure how a giant is any more unrealistic than trained soldiers acting like morons" was answered with "there are different kinds of unrealistic elements and different kinds of suspension of disbelief". This is perfectly accurate, especially since Game of Thrones (rightly or wrongly) prides itself on being a fantasy with a 'realistic and gritty' human element powering its plot. Obviously bone-headed political moves ("I will moon the king in front of his court, thus gaining his trust") are not justified by dragons existing in the next scene. The same applies to military tactics.

As for your first question, and apparently your "actual" one, the answer is to look at other, better scenes of historical battles and emulate them while accounting for giants – rather than taking cues from Lord of the Rings, where lightly-armoured horsemen repeatedly charge into formations of pikemen, or from 300, where the Spartans talk at great length about the importance of formation and then scatter into individual slo-mo murder montages after the first sequence.
Revlid's Twenty Good Posts beat me to it.
 
(SB crosspost) So I've been thinking about the missteps of the Season in evaluation Season 6 as a whole.

- Dorne: it seems like an age ago now, but who can forget that Episode 1 was marred by two scenes so patently absurd, so entirely opposed to pretty much all story telling logic and reason, so entirely offensive to the talented actor who was shuffled off, that GOT fans will be howling about the awfulness of GOT's Dorne plot from now until the end of time. Worse, the murder of Princess Myrcella has had no consequence at all - Cersei is not planning war on Dorne, and Jaime has done nothing.

- Arya: Arya's Faceless Men tangent came to a somewhat unsatisfying conclusion. While everyone knew that Arya would never be an FM, given that she hid Needle rather than tossing it in the sea, the execution was lacking. Great build-up in the mid-game is wasted in Arya's odd and oblivious behavior prior to the encounter with the Waif, her incredibly-survivable stabbing, and Lady Crane's implausible surgical skills. Further, Jaquen just lets her go for reasons that are unclear. His comment that she is finally "no one" doesn't make sense, either.

- Re-introducing characters just to quickly kill them off: Blackfish, Osha and Rickon, anyone? Related:

- The North Doesn't Remember Shit: Apart from Lyanna Mormont, we see virtually nothing of the Northern houses rallying to the Stark cause. Sure, the Hornwoods and the Mazins did, but we didn't see it, and no one else bothered.

Further, the character assassination of House Umber remains hard to bear - was this created simply to piss fans off? Greatjon Umber was one of the show's most memorable characters, they even take care to remind us of the Umber's famous loyalty to the Starks, Smalljon refuses to swear an oath, Shaggydog's head is too small - but no, all the theorising about the Smalljon pulling a con on Ramsay is for naught - he's just a raving imbecile and a monster who'll give over an innocent young boy to the bastard son of the murderer of his rightful King - who killed who knows how many Umber men at the Twins - for totally spurious reasons that make no fucking sense at all, whether on a political or sentimental basis.

- Jaime's Arrested Development: Jaime spun his wheels for the majority of this season - doing nothing but being Cersei's shadow. Only at Riverrun was there a hint of Season 3 / early Season 4 Jaime. Unlikely that he'll do anything significant in Episode 10.

- Ramsay: ugh. So much has been said about him being a one-note, hyper competent villain who we hate rather than love to hate, I think I don't need to add much more. Shit simply falls into his lap all season, and almost everything he does works until it doesn't. Refer also to "the North Doesn't Remember Shit".

This is intended to be a somewhat evolving post which I'll add to in subsequent iterations, based on other's thoughts / contributions / things I've forgotten.

I think the line once said by Benioff when they had Tyrion meets Dany sums up season six in a way for me, "Creatively it made sense to us because we wanted it to happen". This is really I think how the writers approach the series for the most part. They focus on getting plot, characters etc. from a to b, to where they want it to be. It was kind of there in earlier seasons as well I would say.

But this was balanced with more building up being done and great character scenes like say Yoren about his brother, Robert and Cersei, Tywin and Arya, Olenna and everyone in season 3.

Last two seasons has seen this balance disrupted and I think to a number of viewers has left a number of the plotlines and characters jumping over a canyon than just a bridge.

And often leaving some characters like Jaime and Brienne, Tyrion for me in the last two seasons just being there and not getting much or to some people any development.

Of course adapting AFOC and ADOD was always going to require some major streamlining in places to stop the show feeling like it's dragging on with no purpose.

Visually and cinematically the show is still top notch and I think can't be disrupted for the most part. The acting is still strong in most scenes, but the rest is where for many a broken base has emerged and differencing voices have grown louder as the show continues it diverge from the books.
 
Last edited:
He directly answered the part he quoted.
Fair enough.

You mentioned other, better scenes of warfare. Do you have any examples you could link for reference? As I said before, there's a lot of talking about how the show's battles are lacking on that front but very little to explain why that is or contrasting against other works that have hit the mark. Since I'm not much of a history buff and thus an anomaly in the forum, there's not much for me to go on other than "this sucks because...someone else says so?"
 
Fair enough.

You mentioned other, better scenes of warfare. Do you have any examples you could link for reference? As I said before, there's a lot of talking about how the show's battles are lacking on that front but very little to explain why that is or contrasting against other works that have hit the mark. Since I'm not much of a history buff and thus an anomaly in the forum, there's not much for me to go on other than "this sucks because...someone else says so?"
The tactics that would "realistically" be employed in a battle change depending on the situation, the era, the resources and troops available, the battlefield, and even factors like politics or cultural expectations. As a result, it's difficult to pick out a specific battle scene and say "this is better than that" because it's hard to find 1:1 equivalencies of that sort. Especially since this is a fictional battle, rather than a depiction of something that really happened and might have been adapted in multiple different places.

What I can do is refer you to some movies that actually do depict reasonably accurate tactics in the pre-modern era. Ironically enough, older movies tend to be better (no promises), perhaps because only the good ones really survive, or perhaps because they don't have the technology to become overly concerned with emotional close-ups and bullet time swordplay, so the ebb and flow of battle has room to be shown.

TV shows also tend to be better for this – I can absolutely recommend the Hannibal series that aired on the BBC a few years ago. It included the Battle of Cannae, which is reasonably relevant for this particular battle we're discussing.

Kingdom of Heaven isn't totally accurate, but as a modern Hollywood blockbuster it's leagues away from most of its competition, especially the Director's Cut. Oliver Stone's Alexander also has some good stuff, though it takes license in places. Spartacus has some decent depictions of Roman battles – and even a more modern depiction like Gladiator is broad-strokes accurate in its opening scene (too much fire and too much brawling, but the basic advance is there because Ridley Scott is a huge nerd). I've heard good things about The War Lord, though I've never got around to watching it. Heaven and Earth is Japanese, rather than European, but great.

You'll find all sorts of books about pre-modern military tactics, Hollywood warfare, and both. Hell, there are blogs that touch on similar stuff.
 
A few random thoughts now that I've had time to digest:

On rewatch, I noticed that the episode opened on Mereen, and featured most particularly Dany's dragons doing a lot of burning. Right after that is the parley between Ramsay and Jon in a frosty field. It's been a clear contast for a lot of the season but it seemed particularly obvious that here's our songs of ice and fire -- and forshadowing, I think, where our major plots are going to come from.

Also something I realized on rewatch is that Davos finding that burned Stag -- which it surviving at all, really, is incredible -- is pretty convenient. He idly kicks at some mysterious wood and literally the first log he kicks over exposes the stag. The Red God at work? Or is it the God of pacing?

(it's the god of pacing, I don't think we really need to watch Davos dig though some shady ashes for five minutes like this is CSI: Winterfell)

Also, on the Blackfish: I'm like, not sure he's dead. Or, I think he might soon be undead, taking the place of Lady Stoneheart. If so, I wouldn't expect Edmure to be around too much longer.

Also RE: Jon Snow nearly being buried under a pile of bodies and trampled by his own troops, wasn't there a historical king/general/leader that died that way?
 
Last edited:
Also something I realized on rewatch is that Stannis finding that burned Stag -- which it surviving at all, really, is incredible -- is pretty convenient. He idly kicks at some mysterious wood and literally the first log he kicks over exposes the stag. The Red God at work? Or is it the God of pacing?

(it's the god of pacing, I don't think we really need to watch Stannis dig though some shady ashes for five minutes like this is CSI: Winterfell)
Its Davos, not Stannis.
 
Back
Top