- Location
- Australia
They're the same thing.
They're the same thing.
How is the power supposed to know something dangerous is about to happen without precog?
How is the power supposed to know something dangerous is about to happen without precog?
[X] Projenitor, I thought you weren't trying to be a troll. It could work just as well with a post-cognitive effect and a database.
- [X] Even if that doesn't work, powers have been shown to be conceptual. A 'safety' detection power would also be fine.
We don't need precog, and a power with access to historical records based off of a thought interface could be perfectly fine, and serve the same purpose, if less useful for combat. The mechanism isn't very important, and he seems find with the request in a non-logistical sense.
[X] A post-cognitive effect and a probability database on common object usage.
-[X] Something for how to use things in common ways without injury.
[X] +You don't need to be confrontational about this. Projenitor is being fairly reasonable.
Yeah, I was probably a bit pushy there.
Well if it's really basic stuff like "Can I bring a fork to my mouth?" we're worried about her not knowing...
... We could just ask for that knowledge?
A "common sense/common knowledge" type database of stuff.
Progenitor offered to provideThe intent was to help her not freak out about forks and staying up late to watch TV and laughing (or not laughing) at jokes.
I don't like the idea of rewriting memories like that but we can
[X] Make more arguments in support of the postcog.[] Move ahead and focus on the IOU.
[] Make more arguments in support of the postcog.
-[] Write-in
[] Add abilities to your mental shopping list.
-[] Write-in
[] Write-in
To be fair to Skye here forks can be pretty dangerous things to stick in your mouth. In fact I was actually pretty concerned about forks in my teenage years. Admittedly I was on anti-asthma drugs that caused random muscle spasms, I've since switched to new better ones, so sticking a fork in my mouth was a legitimately dangerous activity but it's not an entirely irrational fear."Or even to figure out how to use basic things like forks. She's afraid of forks, Progenitor. Something is badly wrong with this picture."
Adding.-[] Briefly explain that Skye isn't scared of just physical damage or restraint. Is there something else he can suggest?
Would something like that be useful? I can't see how it would do any harm, if nothing else? Should be pretty quick.
...Reasoning?
Whoops, thank you for the reminder.
Yep, I think so - With a good enough search function, 15:1 is enough for her to find and skim an explanation for an unusual term or in-joke in the space between sentences. So that leaves the IOU as the next most important thing.
You're both missing the the point. Skye's uncertainty was manifesting as fear; she needed something that approximated the help you'd give to someone with an anxiety problem. The "safety sense" wasn't there to be used for actual danger. It was there to give her a button she could hammer on as an anchor during her equivalent of a panic attack, something that'd go "You're safe" and "It won't hurt you" and "Everything will be fine" over and over in almost any imaginable circumstance. The intent was never to give her a way to see danger everywhere - and the framing absolutely does matter in this context - nor was it to give her a tool that'd be useful in combat. The intent was to help her not freak out about forks and staying up late to watch TV and laughing (or not laughing) at jokes.
edit: This is also why invulnerability may not suffice as a replacement. There are plenty of things that Skye can worry about in this vein that invulnerability wouldn't help with - paperwork, all sorts of social anxiety, social faux pas, choosing which classes to attend, that kind of thing.
Huh? What did I miss?-[X] Briefly explain that Skye isn't scared of just physical damage or restraint. Is there something else he can suggest?
-[X] Skye lost a lot of brainpower in her incarnation. We want that back. She shouldn't have to be crippled forever for her freedom.
This entire sequence is absolutely hilarious. They've blown past 'genre savvy' into blatant genre manipulation. I love it."I keep telling her she should go for it just to get the bonuses from Comedic Chronic Backstabbing Disorder."
"Too risky. Anyone with so much as a smidgen of intelligence could easily turn me into the foolish girl who tried to infiltrate a group beyond her capabilities."
"And then you go full-fledged chessmaster 'everything according to keikaku' and are perfectly K."
Ayna rubs at her forehead with one hand.
"No. Villains aren't dumb and you have a bad habit of underestimating them. Just stick with dating me. The risks are easy enough to mitigate as long as we keep our heads."
"See? You don't have to insert 'technically' in there. Especially since it might classify me as a stalker with…"
Julia trails off and narrows her eyes.
"Waaait a second. Are you trying to be identified as a tsundere? Because this is how magic decides you're a tsundere. Have we even had classes on them yet?"
Ayna's mouth opens slightly as she stares blankly at her partner.
"...No," she manages eventually. "That's stupid. You're stupid. So stupid, in fact, that everyone here just got a little dumber from hearing that. Apologize."