It only seemed like a year ago that Hunger was nothing but a crippled murderhobo in over his head. Now look at him, a supreme and incontestable tyrant. How quickly they grow…
 
More nonsense posts so that the page advances!
 
How many dead babies do you need at your feet before you agree that what you're doing is a bad idea? Billions? Trillions?
not-strong-enough.jpg

youre-not-that-guy-pal.mp3

i wonder if writing too many memes.filetype memes will help us page
 
Really, there are quite a few ways all human ingenuity and free will can be extinguished, 'skynet uses its satellite network to stop all crime and cure all cancer but otherwise doesn't force people to do things they don't consider unfair' is pretty great.
 
I've been looping sseas khan's heart theme long enough that I question its nature as music, send help
 
At times she had flagged, resolve faltering in the face of her enemy's apparent invincibility, not at all helped by the capable governance of his regime.

No matter who this turns out to be, I'm gonna feel like an idiot for not guessing. That said, I respect the dedication to the ideals of freedom, even if it's likely to come at a grevious cost. Perhaps the Artifice domain could maintain our Law effects even in our absence, so as to let this universe retain the benefits that we bring even in our absence or death.
 
precommitting to vote for the most prudent option might actually constrain my choices so i'm gonna be upfront about how im definitely just voting for the shiniest option
 
Hmm, is this Catherine's musings on Hunger's tyranny? I sense a 'but' coming.

...wait. Don't tell me she was the one to provoke an Apocryphal proc again. Caaatheeerine!
 
Nor would most object to the primacy of that writ, for each and every law was composed with a keenness and discerning eye well into the realm of the superhuman, and meticulously fair with only a few tolerable exceptions.

I'm mostly curious about where our laws happen to be unfair, even in a tolerable way. Bias towards our friends?
 
Back
Top