@ShyGuy Just to let you know, I'll answer not all of your post, since I don't feel entitled to argue other peoples position and/or was just trying to answer your question, not making a point ("why are people against exploration?" "this might be why" (and not "this is why I'm against it")).
The warming charm addressing the concern about exploring in the current weather.
Which helps with temperature, yes. And I guess the shoes will help with not getting stuck in snow etc.
But snow/rain coming down or early darkness due to short days (which, yes,
lumos, but we don't know if anything/-body is going to notice)...goes back to the point below - how much preparation is included in the three actions?
Basically, we go in, and if/when we encounter an obstacle we can't overcome, we go back to Hogwarts, research the problem and go back. That is how you explore. We can't research a problem we don't know about.
We know in which direction we're gonna go (even if it's as vague as "the mountains north of the Forrest"). That is definitely enough to look up on a map and/or check books for. I'm just not sure what all is included in the three actions... *shrugs*
Are actions like "check library for information on the Great Lake" something that could be done (under "Do something!") or can we assume those kind of things would be part of the exploration action itself?
Yes, don't be afraid of taking these options. Like the Hogwarts exploration, they too are just the first step in either path.
All in all...yes, exploration is nice, but exploration outside in these conditions is more complicated than it needs to be, in my opinion.
I'm fine with spending one month cooped up in the castle. It's not like we'll only have training-montage chapters from here on out, anyway.
Next month we'll be fine with Rune Club stuff again, I hope.
And I've got no idea on Scottish Winters or the schoolwork schedule, but maybe we can either spend March exploring, or April (do we get Easter Holidays?).
edit: Since
@Tabula Rasa is already tagge due to the quote: Can you clarify on that quote? I asked a question with an "or", and you answered yes - was that an intentional, logic answer ("one or both of the sentences connected with the 'or' are true") or am I tripping over some language barrier?