- Location
- The left-wing of the impossible
I think the John Brown piece has been my favorite so far. There's something macabre about learning about your place as a hallowed martyr in a future that will now never happen.
is he actually wrong tho"As far as I'm concerned," Said Secretary of the Navy William Alexander Graham. "This… this bloated institution has far outgrown the role it was intended for! In what sane world would these United States need a second, entirely redundant army for?"
I thought the IWW was a vestigial husk of it's former self. There aren't more modern labour organizations that would do the job instead?I expect an awful lot of californian union organizers to be making their way to the manufacturing centers of the east.
I'm half considering writing up an apocryphal segment about the IWW seizing the oppurtunity (or at least trying to)
I thought the IWW was a vestigial husk of it's former self. There aren't more modern labour organizations that would do the job instead?
They are, albiet one experiencing a bit of a renisance. Which is why I included the parenthetical "or at least try too"
I can't imagine that the AFL-CIO unions wouldn't be trying the same thing, and have more resources to so with, I suspect though, that the IWW might have a bit of a philosophical leg up for organizing in an environment with essentially no labor laws, but it'll be a huge culture shock for everybody.
Better the black book, than a Little Red Book...Let's not have a derail about the black book of communism right now, okay?
The thing is, without getting too deraily, is that a lot of things that helped bring communism about can be headed off at the pass--at least by those who will listen. Minimum wage, working hours, a rapidly growing economy that sees a lot of money flowing into the system--all those are things that would eliminate mch of the support for communism. Hell, powerful unions would do that--what worker is going to go to ze wall! when he already has a nine hour day and a union rep who will jump all over management.
It's not so much fighting communism as it is ensuring that all of the talking points are already seized.
Needless to say, there will be a lot of resistance--let's not forget how savagely a lot of people fought the idea that workers should be anything other than a disposable commodity, but even there, 1850 is a great time to be, because it predates the worst of the gilded age and the robber barons.
And fior me, a little bit of a snippet.
Sam Houston sat, looking at the people who had come to speak to him about fighting the abolitionists.
"We cannot," he finally said. "I believe in states rights, but the state of California, that single state outnumbers our entire nation. Not just the South, Gentlemen, the entire nation." He smiled, a death's head expression. "I have read what the future me said about the North, and now? We would not be defeated in war--because that implies that there would be a war to begin with. We would be as small children assaulting a grown soldier--a matter for laughter, not concern."
"Sir, I believe you underestimate the bravery--" Houston cut the speaker off. "Sir, if I may show you something?" He reached under his desk and brought forth one of the miraculous "tablets" that had been provided to the Senate. After several aborted attempts, he called up a "file" that he had asked for.
"What is this?"
"It is Afghanistan." Sam said. The screen showed a greenish tinge, small people moving back and forth. "The green is because of their technology for seeing even in the blackest night." They waited and suddenly the screen whited out, returning to the greenish tinge, showing bodies, a burning building and little else.
"What happened Senator?"
"A... Flying device, needing no human in it, was looking down from four miles in the sky. It launched a smaller projectile, as different from one of our rockets as our best revolvers were different from the matchlocks carried by the conquistadores." He looked at the men surrounding him. "Those... Taliban it is said, are also brave fighters--or will be. It did them no good. They did not hear their executioner. They did not see their executioner." He shook his head and looked at the men surrounding him. "Gentlemen, as a Texan patriot, I implore you. The Californian's have many laws regarding war, and a reluctance to fight that some may take as weakness. But that reluctance is borne from the horror of war in the future, not from any weakness. For the sake of our nation, of our people do not mistake reluctance for weakness. If the South should ever take the action it took in our lost future, it will motivate them to a fearful anger."
The men looked at the tablet, then back to Houston. The room was silent for some time after.
AN: It's just that downtimers aren't idiots. They may not know how its done but "Flying murderbots that can see you in the middle o fhte night and kill you before you can see or hear them," Is going to make quite an impression.
Which might be enough to change the dynamic of the Civil War considerably. OTL pretty much all of the secession conventions actively barred Unionists from participating, in most cases were dubiously legal (from the sense of having any approval from the legislature or meeting any sort of democratic norms) and every seceding state had substantial numbers of Unionists, anti-Confederate resistance and with the exception of South Carolina contributed at least one regiment of volunteers to the Union Army.
With information on Californian technology becoming more widespread and visibly obvious that might push a lot of fence-sitting Southerners into the arms of the Unionists and put steel in the spine of Southern Unionists. Put all that together and you're less likely to have the Civil War as we know it and more an internal civil war across the South between secessionists and unionists with the unionists getting substantial support from outside of the South.
The question is how many are so emotionally (and/or financially) wedded to The Particular Institution that they find negroes running free and thinking themselves even potentially equal to White Men even scarier than this. I admit that some will bite the bullet and try to finesse a way to cut the slaves loose... but I fear many would not.AN: It's just that downtimers aren't idiots. They may not know how its done but "Flying murderbots that can see you in the middle o fhte night and kill you before you can see or hear them," Is going to make quite an impression.
The counterargument that the supposedly ex-slaveowners were violently stomping on the rights of freedmen and the North acquiesced on a Devil's Bargain to let it happen is one that will be rapidly presented.How about a Great Protest that's technically trying to put off the formal abolition of slavery... by complaining that the institutions to make blacks actually free are clearly not present and will not be present for many years. "You say you want to liberate them from us. Seeing future documentation you clearly failed pretty badly to do so for yet another century and more. Do you have any plans whatsoever to avoid such problems for good? Sudden radical changes didn't work out in that history in decolonization. What makes you think it'll work in the here and now?" Technically it's a stalling tactic while the former slaveowners are frantically re-gearing to be no longer dependent on slaves, but these are reasonably valid points to make people stop and think for a bit.
The question is how many are so emotionally (and/or financially) wedded to The Particular Institution that they find negroes running free and thinking themselves even potentially equal to White Men even scarier than this. I admit that some will bite the bullet and try to finesse a way to cut the slaves loose... but I fear many would not.
The counterargument that the supposedly ex-slaveowners were violently stomping on the rights of freedmen and the North acquiesced on a Devil's Bargain to let it happen is one that will be rapidly presented.
How many Northerners are looking at what opposing slavery leads to and having second thoughts?
Plenty of northern states had anti-miscegenation laws, some until the 1960s. And I imagine that there are plenty of people in the north who don't care about slavery, regard Negroes as inferior but want to preserve the union. Except now the group trying to break up the union are anti-slavery and racially mixed, and I don't imagine that that is being favourably received by everyone."We won, and will win if needed." Is generally enough to convince people that a war was/is a good idea to put down these revolting assholes.
Plenty of northern states had anti-miscegenation laws, some until the 1960s. And I imagine that there are plenty of people in the north who don't care about slavery, regard Negroes as inferior but want to preserve the union. Except now the group trying to break up the union are anti-slavery and racially mixed, and I don't imagine that that is being favourably received by everyone.
That lasts until California starts striking deals with East Coast and European merchants while waiting for construction on the Panama Canal to kick off.Right now, even if Cali can sell textiles in America to lower CSA income, that still leaves them the ability to sell cotton in Europe, South America and Africa.
Like how reverse racism doesn't exist, there's no such thing as reverse apartheid. The word literally means 'separateness'.I'm starting to think that the only safe way to keep the former slaves safe from abuse, end ensure that they can work fairly, would be to enforce a reverse apartheid, with a few counties only for them...
I was referring her to the laws and period of time in the Republic of South Africa. You are correct of course.Like how reverse racism doesn't exist, there's no such thing as reverse apartheid. The word literally means 'separateness'.
Cali will be always bottle-necked on the East-West railroad for transporting its goods, to sell to Europe.That lasts until California starts striking deals with East Coast and European merchants while waiting for construction on the Panama Canal to kick off.
Cali will be always bottle-necked on the East-West railroad for transporting its goods, to sell to Europe.
Right now it might even be possible that New Granada will not give out a concession to build the canal at all, especially if European powers decide to support the revolt taking place (who support slavery/ or one of the numerous revolts that will take place soon after). If they get the CSA to support them as well, they will win blocking Cali from doing anything. And the conflicts that occur there can be exploited to stop the construction of the cross Panama railway that enabled them to build the canal in the first place.
And Europe has the power to embargo Cali.
Which would result in a complete ban on selling their goods in most of the countries on Earth.
Just because GBR outlawed slavery doesn't mean they will not support those still using it. Just like the many states that were under British rule, but governed by local dynasties, that still used slavery.1. Britain has already outlawed Slavery
2. Britain was THE world superpower at this time in OTL
3. Britain would throw everyone else under a bus so fast they would think a time machine was involved to get at future technology, as soon as the rest of Europe even decides to seriously thinks about embargoing California.
4. Therefore, getting Europe to unite in embargoing California is IMPOSSIBLE.
Preventing the raise of a stronger state would be priority number one for them