Who knows? Perhaps Willas is possessed by some demon and Demon!Willas killed Mace? Anything could be possible.
How about this: Oberyn was sent here to somehow combine a marriage between Margaery and f!Aegon to gain the Reach army; he visits Willas (who had/has a relationship with him, Droman can confirm) to know what Mace plans to do and after hearing that he kills him with poison. Willas acts oddly because he suspects his lover's involvement even though he has no proof.
lol, there's tons of things that can be done to ensure the Lannisters don't feel overly isolated. Don't worry about that.Ah hell, going for Margaery will not entail screwing Tyrion out of his inheritance.
Fuck, can we give the Lannisters something else to ensure better relations?
Damn this guilt-trip!
Is that such a bad idea?lol, there's tons of things that can be done to ensure the Lannisters don't feel overly isolated. Don't worry about that.
It depends what you want really. Tywin can be made to feel isolated (though even then he would be incredibly unlikely to rebel) and he can be made to feel like he hasn't lost everything and still has a way back.Is that such a bad idea?
An isolated Tywin is a desperate Tywin who might rebel so we can crush him, get lots of money from Casterly Rock, send wards to ensure CK will be inherited by loyalist families.
An isolated Tywin is less likely to rebel. He's not stupid, and he's not going to throw everything away just because the Rock has fewer allies.Is that such a bad idea?
An isolated Tywin is a desperate Tywin who might rebel so we can crush him, get lots of money from Casterly Rock, send wards to ensure CK will be inherited by loyalist families.
Removing the Lannister's ambitions from Westeros would do wonders for the future.
And why would he rebel if the marriages he wanted actually happen?An isolated Tywin is less likely to rebel. He's not stupid, and he's not going to throw everything away just because the Rock has fewer allies.
He won't rebel either way.And why would he rebel if the marriages he wanted actually happen?
He's wholly unlikely to rebel as things stand. The only way I see him rebelling is if fAegon/Martells/Tyrells* reach out to him to join in their plot, and we know that won't ever happen.And why would he rebel if the marriages he wanted actually happen?
There's multiple issues, but the crusades weren't militia's for one thing
Then you're vastly overestimating yourself. Even weakened like that, there is a quality in quantity.
Ah hell, going for Margaery better not entail screwing Tyrion out of his inheritance.
Levies were a standard of many medieval armies of the time, so it wasn't just the crusades.Never said it like that, but the crusades also recruited common man who were not soldiers up until that but went & signed up because, the church told them that this was gods will & thats what I mean, the faith militia doesn't have many qualities, but is has quantity as a quality in itself
Even levies aren't going to be onesidedly wrecked by them due to most Westerosi lsoldiers actually wearing armor.Not talking about knight, hedge knights or some kind of noble, but I am talking here about honest to god seconds sons of farmers and smiths who just want to make a living and thus sign up when their lord comes around & recruits some soldiers for a garrision, I am talking about infantery dude because thats what unsullied are, & in that they are the best you can get
Do you remember how much shit it took to finally turn him against his family in canon?
We do not work to his benefit, we only work towards our own, and if need be, the stability of the realm.
Nope. This is way to obvious.
And everybody called a Sand Snake being the whore that killed Joffrey. Nymeria, not Tyene though.
Can you give a quote for this? One that isn't from rolz, preferably.How about this: Oberyn was sent here to somehow combine a marriage between Margaery and f!Aegon to gain the Reach army; he visits Willas (who had/has a relationship with him, Droman can confirm)
Didn't say we should care, I said I care. I like Tyrion as a character, and IC Jon seems to as well.And we should care because...?
No, really, I'm curious. Because if you're not getting this, let me make it simple: Tyrion is dangerous. He is not to be trusted, not to be considered a friend or an ally. Do you remember how much shit it took to finally turn him against his family in canon?
We do not work to his benefit, we only work towards our own, and if need be, the stability of the realm. Should those benefits happen to coincide, well, fine by me, but otherwise I see no point in trying to help Tyrion out with anything, save pushing him towards an early grave.
Levies were a standard of many medieval armies of the time, so it wasn't just the crusades.
Even levies aren't going to be onesidedly wrecked by them due to most Westerosi lsoldiers actually wearing armor.
Sadly all the relative quotes are from Rolz (said in a not-trollish way to boot) but sure, let's ask him here:Can you give a quote for this? One that isn't from rolz, preferably.