- Location
- National Capital Region, USA
For a moment I thought that said '750 kg', and was a bit O_O.
....speaking legible Portuguese.
So... Deadpool-style little narration boxes?
ISWYDT!
For a moment I thought that said '750 kg', and was a bit O_O.
....speaking legible Portuguese.
ISWYDT!
A design quest! I love these.
Let's get a real cannon on this thing eh?
[x] Hispano-Suiza 12N
[X] Pilot/Loader Design
Pardon the intrusion, but the banner has mislead you.
So it looks like our personal knowledge has helped pay-off on gyros, but it looks like our guy has an average understanding on weapons systems. Meaning, Niel has to guide us through this.The eventual Hotchkiss-Foucault 1500rpm gyroscope was chosen since it had the lowest power draw to stabilization, and you were actually inordinately proud when Workshop 1 sent a formal request to use a copy of the design.
I don't think inaccuracy is that big an issue. If you look back at the data book thenNow inaccuracy is a problem but since we are going to have to design an aiming system and modify the mortar anyways it's not much a big deal.
M.1918 Lièvre
-10 tons
-2x Hotchkiss Portative machine guns
-Crew: Pilot, Gunner
Notes: A light reconnaissance mecha, the Lièvre was the first dedicated artillery spotting platform designed and built as a motorized unit. While not incredibly dangerous like her big brother, the French obsession with terrain crossing is visable here as this mech can cross any broken country with ease.
France already has a dedicated artillery spotting machine. This older model combined with the Fourmi we made, means an artillery focused mech is going to have quite a bit of support as it walks up with the main army.
I actually feel like French designers over designed this system because they really didn't want to admit the Soviet model was nice. They overcompensated and had this rocket too heavy, and weight is a concern since we have less stability being a bipedal model.Really tempted to just grab the new rocket and try to make something that works with it. Because it looks like if we can get it to work, we'll have something that we know all about that will be used for the next decade or so I want to say? Probably score some decent brownie points with High Command as well.
The problem with accuracy for a mortar is the lofting and dropping which was noted in the update. As for the missiles the reason I didn't go with them is this reload time, safety and weight. With the mortar or the cannons reloading is much faster and safer with weight varying but I belive lesser then the rocket system.I don't think inaccuracy is that big an issue. If you look back at the data book then
France already has a dedicated artillery spotting machine. This older model combined with the Fourmi we made, means an artillery focused mech is going to have quite a bit of support as it walks up with the main army.
The issue lies in that is this a direction we want to go? I think the Soviet Rocket Rack is a contender. We get two on the shoulder or the sides, and then we're in business.
Yeah that concerns me about the mortar. We're building infantry support, not artillery.The issue lies in that is this a direction we want to go? I think the Soviet Rocket Rack is a contender. We get two on the shoulder or the sides, and then we're in business.
So it looks like our personal knowledge has helped pay-off on gyros, but it looks like our guy has an average understanding on weapons systems. Meaning, Niel has to guide us through this.
So went with the 1926 as even though it's drum fed it's from what I can tell lighter then the other options so weight and more ammo while I went with the mortar for the same reasons including the fact that it's has great punch to weight ratio. Now inaccuracy is a problem but since we are going to have to design an aiming system and modify the mortar anyways it's not much a big deal.
Honestly, no idea. But these seem good choices for a mech that walks alongside infantry and mixes it up. Almost all our heavy weapon choices are either subpar or will need extensive modifications - wish we had someone with Weapons knowledge but too late now.
I actually feel like French designers over designed this system because they really didn't want to admit the Soviet model was nice. They overcompensated and had this rocket too heavy, and weight is a concern since we have less stability being a bipedal model.
You've also said there's no data on it because it's that new, and that the motivating force wasno. What they designed was a rocket that's capable of beating the shit out of a mecha in a single shot, and has enough explosive fill so that it can engage a machine gun nest or anti-mecha gun with an unfavorable degree of accuracy. Payload covereth a multitude of sins, and when you're firing without a dedicated gunner, the sin of inacuracy will come and bite a lot of pilots in the ass
what appears to be nationalism. Not faulting them as nobody's perfect, but it sounds like there flaws that nobody has accounted for to be used on a mech.people couldn't stand the concept of a Soviet weapons system, and had taken pains to Frankify it.
So actually a mortar makes sense for a infantry support mech while yes it's an artillery piece if you look at real world inter-war, WW2 infantry support armored vehicles alot of them mostly had artillery pieces for main weapons.Yeah that concerns me about the mortar. We're building infantry support, not artillery.
I don't like the rocket pod because if we choose it, why did we get a loader?
Eh all I can really say is hopefully we can place the gun where the drum mags won't be a problem and accuracy is a we'll burn that bridge when we get to it.The Riebel is lighter, yes, but it is kneecapped in the fact it uses drum mags. If the guns aren't accessable easily, this can mean guns running dry in a fight. As for accuracy... well... you'll quickly learn about accuracy.
You've also said there's no data on it because it's that new, and that the motivating force was
what appears to be nationalism. Not faulting them as nobody's perfect, but it sounds like there flaws that nobody has accounted for to be used on a mech.
The mountain gun was labeled as trivial to mount, would it be possible to use it and one of the rocket packs?
Eh all I can really say is hopefully we can place the gun where the drum mags won't be a problem and accuracy is a we'll burn that bridge when we get to it.
That makes it tricky to charge into good firing ranges even if the loader can help set up a fresh rack quicker. If we want rockets the new rocket system may be a better bet.