One thing to ask the thread: Do you want a state of the world post (it'll be long, covering continent by continent) before we begin? If not, I can try to start putting Turn 1 together, and fold the IC knowledge into the turn options. Else you can see what the fallout has been from a brief civil war in Germany and suspension for five months of reparations payments.
Let me know within a couple hours and I can start putting it together.
I'd rather wait and see them naturally IC, it will make things flow easier imo. It's fine either way, but I prefer it.Do you want a state of the world post (it'll be long, covering continent by continent) before we begin? If not, I can try to start putting Turn 1 together, and fold the IC knowledge into the turn options.
They're likely to swing in favor of new states, provided the SPD and Zentrum back that option. Partly on account of the populace not being great friends of Prussia, partly because the rural and low-density urban areas were Zentrum strongholds in the Rhineland, partly because there was a substantial chunk of SPD in the area. KPD stronghold does not really imply absolute control.@mouli do we (SPD, Zentrum elected officials) believe the referendums will go in our favour if we ignore the possibility of voter intimidation? I could definitely see it, since several of the potential future states seemingly were KPD strongholds after all, no love lost between them and the old Prussian system.
I see, good to know, and yeah, the KPD probably didnt have the backing of the majority of the population where they rose up, which is better for us. Knowing them a bunch of em probably would vote for staying with Prussia purely as an accelerationist vote lmao.They're likely to swing in favor of new states, provided the SPD and Zentrum back that option. Partly on account of the populace not being great friends of Prussia, partly because the rural and low-density urban areas were Zentrum strongholds in the Rhineland, partly because there was a substantial chunk of SPD in the area. KPD stronghold does not really imply absolute control.
Also, if things are presented during the turns, as flavour text in the options or in the POV's, it will keep us guessing more and thus create more engagement, which seems more dynamic to me.
It won't be exhaustive, mind. The state of the world post will be framed in character and colored by those biases. So you do have to peer into it a bit, as it were.
Not as much as spreading it out though, since it the engagement would probably last as long as the period between posts.On the other hand, finding out what sort of ripple effects we have created would also generate engagement as people discuss the changes, trying to figure out the implications of them and how they will effect us.
I doubt the QM would screw us over and not give us information pertinent to the options at hand. Like, if we get a choice regarding the Entente, we'll probably be given the information relative to it. It's just it won't be as much as an infodump and will be sprinkled in organically.I would also rather make an informed choice with information that we should know rather than try to guess stuff that we shouldn't be trying to guess as we should already know.
They'll still give us the info, but limit it so as to not make a huge turn. We'll probably get the most immediately relevant information first and later on find out more, less impactful and not immediately relevant news. Am I somewhat correct in assuming this @mouli?(seriously, I am actually changing over to it, I could see us doing some big foreign plans that could have a wrench thrown into them if we don't know something suddenly having changed in the UK or the US, for example. @mouli )
Pretty much, yes. But that still means less information coming in than your character would know. It's a question of information firehose, I suppose, at what point is enough? Since most here prefer to have it rather than not, I can post a brief state-of-the-world and then shape options in a manner similar to the way I would in its absence.They'll still give us the info, but limit it so as to not make a huge turn. We'll probably get the most immediately relevant information first and later on find out more, less impactful and more distant news. Am I somewhat correct in assuming this @mouli?
I still prefer it to be sprinkled in the turns, even if it means we'll find out a bit less for now. Leaving us guessing a bit is fun, but if the thread prefers a state-of-the-world so as to find out more stuff immediately that is fine as well.Pretty much, yes. But that still means less information coming in than your character would know. It's a question of information firehose, I suppose, at what point is enough? Since most here prefer to have it rather than not, I can post a brief state-of-the-world and then shape options in a manner similar to the way I would in its absence.
I doubt the QM would screw us over and not give us information pertinent to the options at hand. Like, if we get a choice regarding the Entente, we'll probably be given the information relative to it. It's just it won't be as much as an infodump and will be sprinkled in organically.
They'll still give us the info, but limit it so as to not make a huge turn. We'll probably get the most immediately relevant information first and later on find out more, less impactful and not immediately relevant news. Am I somewhat correct in assuming this @mouli?
I still prefer it to be sprinkled in the turns, even if it means we'll find out a bit less for now. Leaving us guessing a bit is fun, but if the thread prefers a state-of-the-world so as to find out more stuff immediately that is fine as well.
This is 1920 and we just came out of the civil war, whatever information we have is going to be limited because the telegraph network would have been stressed and we probably lost some of our foreign service to the Triad.We should know more than what is immediately relevant and there is no logical reason in-universe that we shouldn't know at least the basics of what is going on in places like the British Isles or North America or Russia.
No it's not, the government doesn't magically know everything at all times, because inter-service communication is often limited and we just came out of a civil war. It would make more sense for things to be a mess and us not know everything immediately than otherwise. And it's not limiting our information since we'd find it out eventually.We will already be guessing enough without imposing an artificial handicap. Things are already going to be hard enough without deliberately shooting ourselves in the foot by having the Germany government decide to stick their heads in the sand and ignore the wider world until something happens to make our pay attention to different parts of it. What you want is not sprinkling in organically, it is artificially limiting information that we ought to already have.
Difference is, the Reichswehr doesn't want to run the country. A lot of the tension we have is due to that this is the sort of tanks we are allowed (pic is from 1932, so this is the advanced version where the cardboard is mounted to cars, and not carried by the soldiers I had a picture in my school history book - a bit of pars pro toto), while this is what the Freikorps get. This is the police variant. Who are both allowed armored cars. Which means the army is out-tanked by the police (insert militarized police joke here).
I mentioned above that equating the Zentrum with the USA-Republicans is a bad, bad idea. The Zentrum is a wierd beast, to the point that they are monarchist, pro-welfare, christian, centralist, nationalist and rather sympathetic to minorities.also I expect zentrum to be more unreasonable but honestly they are being really sensible in what they want.
The vote is secret. Not something for the secret police.Something else I just thought of regarding my preference for the Australian system over the modified Weimar system. Because all of the orders of preference for the votes are all publicly visible, we will get early warning of when the far right and far left are beginning to gain traction again as they start rising into the third and second choices category before they actually make huge electoral gains. This would be a very useful early warning system rather than just having to guess at how voter demographics will go in the future.
Anyway, I was just stating my preference, I'm not very interested in having to debate over this too much, since it's not even a proper vote. As I said, I think it would be more fun and engaging. Besides making some sense and not delaying the first turn, which are valid reasons as far as I'm concerned. If you want it to be the other way, there are valid reasons to do so as well, I'm not saying there aren't.