I have to say, I utterly despise Never Better. Too see that particular vision, and see that as something to be emulated, is the act of a madman.
I must remind you all of the Accursed's Admonishment. "Take care that you do not become that which you despise." The Forebear is someone who has utterly rejected the idea of compromise, the path of anything except cutting through. Cutting through is an acceptable solution in many scenarios, but it is in many situations not the right choice or the best choice.
Read that Forebear interlude, and tell me: do you honestly want to become that? Do you want Hunger to become that? If the answer to either of those questions is "no," then why the hell would you vote for "Never Better?"
Furthermore, think of our companions. Would they want Hunger to be more like the Forebear? If Gisena, Letrizia, Aeira Aobaru and Adorie were to read these options, what would they think was best, and worst?
I see a lot of blind "PRAXIS" votes, and it's nice that you like Praxis, but consider that you're trading mental contamination for that Praxis. Imagine your mind and soul being permeated and changed into something else, and understand that you're saying "It's perfectly fine to have my mind be invaded and changed by a foreign, uncompromising force in exchange for power." Is that the attitude you want Hunger to take? Aren't the Curses he's already suffering from enough without adding more of his own making, that aren't even necessary? We do have options besides 4Bear Mental Contamination advancements. We could use them.
Honestly, given how vehemently I dislike Never Better, I'm going Just A Moment for now out of sheer spite, despite the rational part of me saying that "Fine" is probably more in line with my own views.
[X] "Just a moment."
And another thing: people were sad that we had to kill Vanreir, imagine how many potentially sympathetic opponents Hunger would Cut Down without mercy if he was more like the Forebear? The Forebear only faced opponents that were so morally reprehensible that killing them was not in the slightest big morally ambiguous - Hunger does not have that, perhaps for the better. Hunger does not have an endless procession of universes where he can be completely justified no matter what he does. A vote for "Never Better" is, quite literally, a vote for Murder - the Forebear's Cut is explicitly a tool of murder after all. And while every problem the Forebear faced could be resolved with murder without regret, Hunger will not always face such problems.
The Forebear was in an entirely different and much worse situation then Hunger, and sacrificed a great deal to survive that situation. Are we to make the same sacrifices, when said sacrifices are completely unnecessary? We have other ways to achieve great power.