Remove ads

Game, Set, [MAFIA]

Do people like pointless polls with their mafia?

  • Yes.

    Votes: 7 24.1%

  • No.

    Votes: 2 6.9%

  • I didn't answer this.

    Votes: 7 24.1%

  • Wynaut?

    Votes: 13 44.8%
  • Total voters
    29
Reader mode
Rereading the thread I just realized those people who bleed their roles early to be the most suspicious. Wouldn't be surprised if at least one of them is a scum. Maybe I should change my vote?
 
I'm down with a little pressure, @Shadell.

[x] vote Qtesseract

Give us all your lunch money!

I mean tell us your secrets. Shadell is right you are quiet.
 
Shadell said:
I'm suspect of how quickly Deviljho built votes, but Deviljho is also a vet and was doing things that read as pretty suspicious (bleeding info, sheeping) so I don't think it's that strange.
Click to expand...
Click to shrink...
I object to the insinuation that sharing an opinion with someone is "sheeping".

Anyway, popping in to let y'all know I won't be available for a few hours.
 
ondine said:
I don't get the Shadell suspicion. And it rubs me the wrong way. I also don't like Cyri's response to Shadell's question. Refusal to actually give a read and then saying no kill me? Feels like a very wolfy thing to do. Tell them you're not afraid to die at all! As though you can put off suspicion by being overly relaxed with the idea.
Click to expand...
Click to shrink...

I don't like this...you didn't really read my post did you?

Cyricubed said:
None. Shoot me first, I don't fear death, I fear being wrong.
Click to expand...
Click to shrink...

This was my response to a question...between LDJ, IH, and Meso who would I vote. I think that all 3 are wrong answers and thus wouldn't vote any of them. I'm not going to throw my vote aroundwhen I don't think there is proper justification for it. That is wolfy. And what suspicion am I putting off here as well? I wasn't under any scrutiny and went to generate discussion as well as produce a read...and you voted me for this in a very OMGUS way.


ondine said:
Honestly two of my suspects are Toto and LDJ as well, but I don't feel great about voting for either as Toto is basically a newbie and LDJ is back after a long absense.
Click to expand...
Click to shrink...

Someones 3rd game is time enough to remove kid gloves. I was killed N1 my 3rd game as example. LDJ however I understand although I could have sworn they played a game within the last four.
 
Shadell said:
Presuming this was my goal, it isn't, why would it likely be a scum play?
Click to expand...
Click to shrink...

It tends to lead to people overthinking their role, believing that the info they could obtain is now more precious than the info they have obtained. Sometimes simply reducing the field of who done it is just enough to change a game. Lets put an example. You are a watcher who one night sees two people visit one person. Someone else dies that night. The info of those two people NOT visiting a killed target becomes more valuable the more time goes on...HOWEVER, holding onto that information for too long makes it risky and in some cases worse for not revealing at a better time. In example: In the same scottish play game there was an Omni watcher for 1 night, he managed to see whom everyone visited, which included them seeing terrabrand visit a nightkill alone. If they had started their arguments around such they would have been able to probably swing the game around since it was a hard pivot point of win or lose for town. Instead they asked obtuse question and took too long in the day. In the end Terrabrand took the eventual reveal, poked holes into the reasonings for not revealing right away, and managed to win it for scum.
 
Young Pyromancer said:
Not providing a context for your vote is generally something people view as suspicious. I know you don't know that, but please at least try to explain yourself.
Click to expand...
Click to shrink...

Forgot adding justification, but of all people who bleed their roles early Deviljho seemed to be the most suspect as it was unwarranted. Telling people "I am a good but relatively unimportant townie" wheb nobody asked sounds suspect to me. At least it's a better excuse compared to the one I had for my previous vote, namely gut feeling.
 
Sorry for being absent. No internet at work today.

I am torn between voting for @LostDeviljho or @Shadell .

LDJ is bleeding a lot of info in really unnecessary ways. It seems performative.

Shadell is doing a lot to direct people to particular votes in a way that feels very aggressive. Asking people to choose between three people to justify a vote, while not quite telling them to vote for one of those people is still pretty powerful suggestion, especially against new players.
 
And now to immediately unvote because I think Swarming is a newb and I'm not gonna D1 lynch a newb.

[x] Null
 
So devil and QT are tied. Still feel like Totadile with the whole 'kill me if u want but I have a role that's useful' thing seems suspicious, but I would also like to hear why Shadell thinks I'm suspicious. You can't just say 'I find you suspicious' and just leave! :)
 
Inserted tally
Adhoc vote count started by InterstellarHobo on May 22, 2020 at 7:47 PM, finished with 85 posts and 8 votes.
Click to expand...
 
So I just botched the 'insert tally', but we can make it work.

That's the tally from the start of the day, up until this post:
Shadell said:
I'm suspect of how quickly Deviljho built votes, but Deviljho is also a vet and was doing things that read as pretty suspicious (bleeding info, sheeping) so I don't think it's that strange.
Click to expand...
Click to shrink...
So I was hoping Shadell would turn up to explain this, but there's only three hours left.
You'll notice that Deviljho only has one vote on them.
If you check the thread, Deviljho only ever had one vote on them.

[X] Vote Shadell
 
Reader mode
You must login or register to reply here.
Remove ads
Back
Top