- Location
- Kansas City area
Heh I had pasted over the first one I put down.
But then. The Warfleet play of nuking the star outright to doom the race to extinction by heat-death...
Please understand that this is from the perspective of someone with immense respect for your efforts and skill.Given the nature of the Secrets' Crusade, I was never going to give you the truth here,
So, there is definitely a Galactic scale threat out there and these poor fellows are trying desperately to get the rest of the Galaxy into the mindset required to combat it.
The vote that won was one of the explicitly offered voting options, not a write-in, so it couldn't really be claimed to be invalid. Not being offered as a vote at all might have been reasonable, but I think that it was still meaningful -- it framed the response and colored the interaction. (It does make me curious about what the other options might have resulted in.)My gripe is that in that case, you should have just said from the beginning exactly what I quoted above. Just said that it was not a valid vote for Doylist reasons. And definitely should NOT have made it an explicit voting option this time around.
andThe only way I can read that response was gotten is that they really didn't get that they aren't the heroes in this piece. (If they are our QM has to find a big rabbit and a bigger hat to start practicing for that magic trick)
[...]
It's slightly more sympathetic
The thing is, I don't buy the "burden of command" bit at all. Sure, I'll grant that a few of the Shiplords, especially the older and more responsible ones, likely feel this way: the ones that have been around for millions of years and actually probably did try a bunch of other methods before settling on the Tribute system almost certainly do. But the casual disregard the Shiplords have shown for their own methods, the arrogance and lack of proper decorum we see from their practices, their basic flaws of how they execute their general strategy belies the graveness with which the true believers appear to hold the situation.Honestly, that last line there has me a good bit worried. It almost seems plaintive, a plea for release from a duty that they have performed for however long it has been. The question then is, Just what are the Ship Lords trying to prevent? That first line, "in death and war", makes it sound like there is a species or antagonist of some sort that comes, maybe in cycles or in response to the Secrets themselves.
I mean, you had to know we weren't going to really get much from the "Why" vote. It was pretty much the same question, asked from the same position, thematically, as when we did it during the Second Battle of Sol: we had surprised the Shiplords and temporarily reversed and incapacitated them, but were still demanding answers without having the position of strength required to compel them to be honest and complete. There was never going to be that much more we got from "Why", if we got anything at all.Please understand that this is from the perspective of someone with immense respect for your efforts and skill.
But this has made that respect somewhat decrease. This is the second time the playerbase has spent an utterly priceless opportunity trying to get the same information only to have that wasted because the railroad of the plot demands that it not be revealed.
And I totally get and understand and even agree with concealing the information if it being hidden is that central to the plot.
My gripe is that in that case, you should have just said from the beginning exactly what I quoted above. Just said that it was not a valid vote for Doylist reasons. And definitely should NOT have made it an explicit voting option this time around.