The thing is, they know we're growing in capability fast enough that we annihilated the second Tribute Fleet and have capabilities that could credibly annihilate this Regular Fleet. We're getting tougher very quickly, and will become very powerful in a very short time, possibly faster than they know or CAN know..I don't see this triggering a factional split. That's not the intent whatsoever.
We know full well that these guys belong to the nastiest gang in the galaxy. We're not being stupid, either.
My intent behind proposing Diplomacy is a matter of information control. They know we have Practice now. We know that something about our exercise of Practice fundamentally offends them. There is no way we're going to prevent that information getting back to Shiplord Command at this point; Mir's Spoken word put a halt to any chance of a massive offensive strike.
If we can convince the Regular Fleet that we aren't an immediate threat, that we're not hyperaggressive warmongers or whatever it is they're afraid of losing control over, that we're capable of being reasoned with instead of requiring immediate escalation... we may be able to talk them into NOT immediately summoning the nearest War Fleet.
Because if they leave right now... that's what's going to happen. No two ways about it.
We just asserted Peace on a massive scale. We can follow through on that.
1)The guys who render down planetary populations for Soylent Green milkshakes at First Contact .I don't see this triggering a factional split. That's not the intent whatsoever.
We know full well that these guys belong to the nastiest gang in the galaxy. We're not being stupid, either.
My intent behind proposing Diplomacy is a matter of information control. They know we have Practice now. We know that something about our exercise of Practice fundamentally offends them. There is no way we're going to prevent that information getting back to Shiplord Command at this point; Mir's Spoken word put a halt to any chance of a massive offensive strike.
If we can convince the Regular Fleet that we aren't an immediate threat, that we're not warlike hyperaggressive expansionists or whatever it is they're afraid of losing control over, that we're capable of being reasoned with instead of requiring immediate escalation... we may be able to talk them into NOT immediately summoning the nearest War Fleet.
Because if they leave right now... that's what's going to happen. No two ways about it.
We already have done the thing that would doom us.Okay, so... I acknowledge what you guys are saying, but look at it this way: If you're right, then it doesn't matter what we do and we're screwed either way. We already did the thing that would doom us all. Given what we've heard from the post-Tributary races we've been in contact with, what we've done here will have earned our freedom from the Tribute Cycle. What remains to be seen is if we've given casus belli for a retributive strike, and we should do everything in our power to ensure that it isn't seen that way.
Why? We don't know, and looking risks a second Nightfalls, it's that tightly linked into the Secrets.@Simon_Jester as this, for the most part. The Regular Fleet sent out here was sent out to check on you, but you were already aware that they'd judge you in violation due to Practice. Why? Unknown at present, and Insight wasn't willing to risk a second Nightfalls going looking.
When you make the rules, the interpretation is up to you.In the end, though, most of what you were looking at you could explain in terms you could understand. Vastly accelerated development wasn't something unknown, it just usually went too far too fast and ended up dead to a War Fleet. The real problem was something else, which only the Winter Moon and her sisters' sensors could detect.
1)Trying to establish an armistice CAN backfire.Trying to establish an armistice can't backfire. If we demonstrate that we can act rationally, the worst case scenario is that they don't believe us and the status quo is maintained. Acting with an eye towards peace isn't going to make them more upset. But as I said when I proposed the write-in, we already know that the Shiplords do have some notion of diplomatic communication with post-Tributary races. We may be able to broker some sort of actual agreement.
Counterpoint 1: We just unleashed TWO weapons of unimaginable power, and their sensors are going to show that we still have ammunition. They know very well even if we don't say anything that we COULD have ended this already. We are coming into this not from a place of weakness, but from a place of strength, and we already have the most powerful weapon in the galaxy locked and loaded so it's not like we could develop something BIGGER.If the enemy think you are weak at this time and thus vulnerable. If they think you are attempting to buy time to get something new into deployment. If you give insult, intentionally or otherwise.
Case in point: Unlike them, not only are we not willing to die, we are willing to not die, and we've already rubbed that in their faces.
When did I ever say anything about humanity disarming itself? Diplomacy isn't saying "sorry sorry sorry we won't do it again spare us spare us". We wouldn't be begging. We would be demonstrating that our objectives don't have to run contrary to theirs. We would be negotiating terms, establishing lines that each party agrees not to cross. Not kowtowing to a one-sided edict like we did after First Tribute, but demonstrating that we can be rational. We know the Shiplords don't like hyperaggressive polities, and we know they don't like weakling pacifists. We're walking a higher path -- strong enough to protect, but not wantonly destructive. We already know that the Tribute Cycle doesn't exist for the purposes of mass genocide; they clearly have a bigger goal, and we can show them that we can live and prosper as a species without causing whatever it is they're trying to prevent.2)The Shiplords have never relied on the goodwill of the conquered to enforce their rules; they've embedded subverted cybernetic and human agents and sabotaged social and industrial development and more. I can't see Humanity 2.0 effectively disarming itself by agreeing to any of that in order to keep the SLs happy. Even if the casus belli of Practice didnt exist.
When you defeat a Tribute Fleet and stop being a tributary.1. At what point are Tributaries allowed to use the 1st Secret in the manner of exploring beyond their star again?
You may be on the right track with theory 1, but perhaps it's not banned because it's too easy, but because it's soul manipulation.Theory: Practice is banned in the same line of 2nd Secret - Because it is too easy. 2nd Secret basically lets you tell life what to do and Practice basically lets you get whatever.
Thoery 2: Practice draws from the Void, or is similar to such conceptually or mechanically. So it is banned as a thing of the Void.
1. At what point are Tributaries allowed to use the 1st Secret in the manner of exploring beyond their star again?
-Counter-Counterpoint One:Counterpoint 1: We just unleashed TWO weapons of unimaginable power, and their sensors are going to show that we still have ammunition. They know very well even if we don't say anything that we COULD have ended this already. We are coming into this not from a place of weakness, but from a place of strength, and we already have the most powerful weapon in the galaxy locked and loaded so it's not like we could develop something BIGGER.
Counterpoint 2: I'm pretty sure we already delivered the most grave insult possible -- we just doubled down on "how dare you profane that gift and persist?" in an exceptionally dramatic fashion. In light of that, we can't really make it worse, and but we might be able to mitigate it by demonstrating a legitimate interest in understanding what makes it so profane.
So are they.Case in point: Unlike them, not only are we not willing to die, we are willing to not die, and we've already rubbed that in their faces.
-These are the Shiplords. The guys who have genocided every race they have made first contact with for millions of years, and have maintained the societal commitment for that campaign over that period of time. Who still have people still volunteering to go out and die for their cause.When did I ever say anything about humanity disarming itself? Diplomacy isn't saying "sorry sorry sorry we won't do it again spare us spare us". We wouldn't be begging. We would be demonstrating that our objectives don't have to run contrary to theirs. We would be negotiating terms, establishing lines that each party agrees not to cross. Not kowtowing to a one-sided edict like we did after First Tribute, but demonstrating that we can be rational. We know the Shiplords don't like hyperaggressive polities, and we know they don't like weakling pacifists. We're walking a higher path -- strong enough to protect, but not wantonly destructive. We already know that the Tribute Cycle doesn't exist for the purposes of mass genocide; they clearly have a bigger goal, and we can show them that we can live and prosper as a species without causing whatever it is they're trying to prevent.
I find it particularly bizarre that Amanda doesn't have the highest clearence level. I mean, she has lead humanity for longer than anyone else, is the leading expert on Practice itself, and one of the key R&D personnel humanity has.Essentially this:
You got the right to move beyond your star when you killed the Tribute Fleet fifteen years ago.
Now, re: the Diplomacy/Why choice, there are some things I should probably clarify. The main point here is that whilst Diplomacy offers a dialogue of sorts, it's in the context of a race having declared war upon the current system. This doesn't mean that the offer won't matter, there's a reason I gave it a note as for the long game. But this is pretty much humanity's shot across the bow of the Shiplords, that has been planned to coincide with mass uprisings from the G6.
The exact details of that are beyond Amanda's clearance, but she can make a good guess. The greatest advantage of the Shiplords in orchestrating a galactic scale campaign is their communications network. Given that, the first target of any uprising seems obvious: break the relay chains.
You already know that the Shiplords can't deal with the entire galaxy rising up against them, but they do have weapons that can annihilate single points of resistance - at least, for now. Humanity was always preparing for a War Fleet to the face following the Regular Fleet, this is why so much effort was being poured into your countermeasure. And if you're fighting a foe you aren't sure you can block, the most efficient thing to do is blind them. That buys you time. And humanity is already most of the way to learning to block.
I find it particularly bizarre that Amanda doesn't have the highest clearence level. I mean, she has lead humanity for longer than anyone else, is the leading expert on Practice itself, and one of the key R&D personnel humanity has.
Ex-US presidents don't have the highest clearance levels either.I find it particularly bizarre that Amanda doesn't have the highest clearence level. I mean, she has lead humanity for longer than anyone else, is the leading expert on Practice itself, and one of the key R&D personnel humanity has.
Void Crystal: Even now neither you nor Mary are sure how you created this, or what it's meant to do. A seemingly featureless black-body crystal, its remained completely impervious to analysis, classification, or physical damage. Mary kept it ever since you created it with her after your first decade as a Restorer, now it's yours.
Strike the Void: 25 + 48 (Martial) + 45 (Unison Wings) + 40 (Harmonics) + 66 (Power of Practice) – 50 (Soultear) vs 76 + 45 (Martial) + 20 (Synchronisation) + 20 (First Traditions) + 50 (Void Weaponry) = 174 vs 211. Solid Failure.
Catching Shadow: 88 + 106 (Practice) + 80 (Unisonbound Ace) + 50 (Mender's Soul) - 86 (Soultear) vs 82 + 45 (Martial) + 30 (Essence Disruption) + 50 (Void Weaponry) = 238 vs 207. Success.
Interesting similarities, don't you think? I'm beginning to believe @Baughn has a point when he asserts that there are no coincidences in this questWords in the Night: 39 + 106 (Practice) + 80 (Unisonbound Ace) + 50 (Mender's Soul) - 86 (Soultear) vs 82 + 45 (Martial) + 30 (Essence Disruption) + 50 (Void Weaponry) = 189 vs 207. Failure.
Um... No, when I say "genocide" I actually mean it. I mean an actual extermination campaign aimed at eliminating the target race. The Shiplords notably do not make a habit of doing this. Their modus operandi suggests they in fact would prefer not to, and in general they only do so when they consider a given polity to be a lost cause. This means something.-These are the Shiplords. The guys who have genocided every race they have made first contact with for millions of years, and have maintained the societal commitment for that campaign over that period of time. Who still have people still volunteering to go out and die for their cause.
What exactly do you expect their minimum requirements for restraint would be?
To risk giving other Tribute races the impression they can get away with acting up?
And why would they be obliged to negotiate in good faith?
This has been stated to be factually false. Tributes after the first one don't demand the same toll and sometimes they don't take anything at all.-We don't know that.
Every race that survives the Tribute Cycle goes through multiple genocide cycles during which they are harvested for construction materials.
That the Shiplords have a goal/goals other than genocide does not preclude the genocide itself being a goal in itself.
Don't even think this required Insight, I think our 1S research determined that the range limit is inherent to the technique, and long-distance travel speed is a function of drive recharge times rather than jump distance.2. Has Insight ever given any indication as to the 'upper' range limit 'per' teleport for a War Fleet, Regular Fleet, and so on, and compared to our own 1st Secret Drives? Are they similar or same?
We know it's not limited to full sapients but I don't know just how far up the tree of life you have to go to find the common ancestor of all soul-bearing Earth life. (There's a reasonable speculation that the existence of souls explains why intelligent alien life is so much more common in this universe than in our own.)5. On Souls, are they limited to Sapients, Sentients, or such? (Do plants have souls? Hamsters? Rats? Spiders? Apes?)
We know that the society has to show meaningful technological development, which they must demonstrate through warfare. I think it's more of a qualitative thing than a quantitative thing, a demonstration of effort instead of a calculus of damage inflicted.8. Is there a 'minimum' of Tribute fleet vessels that a species must damage or destroy every Appraisal?
From what we've seen so far, they tune the frequency of appraisals based on the civilization's observed rebuilding efforts and technological progress. This strongly suggests that they're trying to drive progress instead of being senselessly punitive.9. What is the frequency of Appraisal cycles past the 1st/Second? What pattern does it follow, if can be determined at all?
Now, ironically, Snowfire's latest post makes me wonder if maybe I should change my vote... because we'd be negotiating in bad faith. It was never my intent to open a dialogue as a distraction. I've got to think about this...
@Snowfire
1. What's the population and population growth of Sol, after the culling of humanity down to 3 Billion?
1st Secret
2. Has Insight ever given any indication as to the 'upper' range limit 'per' teleport for a War Fleet, Regular Fleet, and so on, and compared to our own 1st Secret Drives? Are they similar or same?
2nd Secret
3. Has there been any investigations by pre-Tribute Humanity with regards to 2nd Secret and the Soul?
4. As far as pre-Tribute Humanity was aware, could 2nd Secret be used to create or modify non-carbon-based lifeforms? Silicoids for example?
Souls
5. On Souls, are they limited to Sapients, Sentients, or such? (Do plants have souls? Hamsters? Rats? Spiders? Apes?)
Neural Back-Engineering for Memories?
6. Even with a dead Shiplord, why can't Practice deduce knowledge of SL culture and such via examination of their Neurons and reverse-guessing?
Tribute Fleet
7. Are Shiplord crew numbers for Tribute Fleets unusually large/small?
8. Is there a 'minimum' of Tribute fleet vessels that a species must damage or destroy every Appraisal?
9. What is the frequency of Appraisal cycles past the 1st/Second? What pattern does it follow, if can be determined at all?
Ex-US presidents don't have the highest clearance levels either.
Interesting similarities, don't you think? I'm beginning to believe @Baughn has a point when he asserts that there are no coincidences in this quest
I swear I'm going to beg favors if necessary to crack that thing's secrets next turn.
So you're saying that the circumstances with the rest of the G6 just aren't going to play into the discussion one way or the other? Okay, then, my vote remains where it is.That's not really the intent. Diplomacy/Chastisement/etc kinda merge together in Amanda's head to form a consensus that is willing to talk, but is also absolutely unwilling ot accept certain realities of the Shiplord system. She's suggesting that there could be middle ground, but not with certain things as they are. Likely to be useful here and now? Not so much, but the Shiplord reply (if they give one) could be pretty interesting.
Essentially, Diplomacy is the offered hand, beside an example of singular power that would have obliterated the entire Regular Fleet if they'd come in as one massive force. It's not so much that it wiped out 40% of the fleet. It's that the energy output was high enough to have wiped out all of it. And humanity was able to contain it with what appeared to be relative ease.
So you're saying that the circumstances with the rest of the G6 just aren't going to play into the discussion one way or the other? Okay, then, my vote remains where it is.
I mean, "willing to be diplomatic with Shiplords" after what they've done to everybody in the galaxy translates as something like:That's not really the intent. Diplomacy/Chastisement/etc kinda merge together in Amanda's head to form a consensus that is willing to talk, but is also absolutely unwilling to accept certain realities of the Shiplord system. She's suggesting that there could be middle ground, but not with certain things as they are. Likely to be useful here and now? Not so much, but the Shiplord reply (if they give one) could be pretty interesting.
Essentially, Diplomacy is the offered hand, beside an example of singular power that would have obliterated the entire Regular Fleet if they'd come in as one massive force. It's not so much that it wiped out 40% of the fleet. It's that the energy output was high enough to have wiped out all of it. And humanity was able to contain it with what appeared to be relative ease.