- Location
- PA
Alright fair enough I did not read it.Counter-argument. We're still in the first days of activity. I'd rather defer the test (which is technically not even what my persuasion aims for, so I wonder if you've had a chance to read it) to a point after we've secured our local position in as close to an unassailable way as possible first.
My arguement was more about establishing my position then countermanding yours.
SO!
You seem to be arguing, if I understand this right, and I don't think I do- for the Sister to weigh our years of service as proof instead of the one incident. Good argument, I think. I'm not swayed, if only because on a meta-level, your write-in is under the 'Persuade' path, and thus by that metric is an attempt to bypass the test entirely on prior good behavior.
It's something I'd almost want to put under a Comply variant.
My problem is with that meta-notion of Persuade...What does the Sister do if she agrees though? Some sort of abbreviated or 'condensed' test? Forgo it entirely and say she did? Something else entirely?