The Mk. 1.5 was meant to compete with high-end hardsuits. The Mk. II is a step above that - $1 million apiece should be fine given the targeted consumers.Regarding price in general, for the purpose of this quest, a cheap hardsuit can cost as little as 50,000 credits, but a nice one is more likely to be in the neighborhood of 250K, with really high end ones being 500K+. Bleeding edge tech, the stuff you see on Spectres and the like are sometimes as expensive as a million credits, but not always.
So Only members of the N ranks, and whatever spectre commissions one from us are likely to get it, and perhaps some other units.The Mk. II can definitely be sold for more than $625k. From the original thread:
The Mk. 1.5 was meant to compete with high-end hardsuits. The Mk. II is a step above that - $1 million apiece should be fine given the targeted consumers.
Yup, that was what was proposed. The 6-Quarter timeline puts us ready to research the Mk. III, so we can do that and release the Mk. II.Dunno if we should sell the Mk. II, at least until we've got a Mk. III. We want Revy to have a large step up from possible opponents.
You know, I wonder how the Alliance will react if Paragon Industries builds a cruiser that can trounce a dreadnought via having fuck off energy weapons and super strong shields.![]()
Which is why it wouldn't be a competing product.Our deal with HK is still going. While they wouldn't do anything to us, they still would be quite angry if we make competing and far more effective armor to the markets.
Our deal with HK is still going. While they wouldn't do anything to us, they still would be quite angry if we make competing and far more effective armor to the markets.
Ah, apologies. I thought you were saying we should be selling them before the contract ended. No, you're right. the second that the contract runs out we should be cranking out as many as we can and they can go get fucked for all I care.No? No it wouldn't? That is exactly why I said we wait for a while, because releasing the Mk. II right now would be a dick move - let them keep producing the Mk. 1.5. Six quarters from now, three years into their deal? A new model coming out by then isn't unexpected, and they have had a solid monopoly for long enough to be rolling in dough.
Releasing the Mk. II then wouldn't be a "terrible business practice" in the slightest.
If you insist on seeing nonsense where there isn't any, you could say holding them over the barrel and making them buy the rights to a new suit before the deal for the old one ended is just as fucked up as selling the new suit ourselves.
Well, the contract was exclusive rights to the Mk. 1.5 for five years - and we have production orders for them for more than that. I figured we could release the Mk. II at a different price point (so not as a competitor) three years into the contract without any harsh feelings given how much they have made at that point (over $60 billion), especially if we throw some more stuff their way, like the Transforming Guns...but I'm not opposed to waiting either if Esbilon implies they will be really pissed.Ah, apologies. I thought you were saying we should be selling them before the contract ended. No, you're right. the second that the contract runs out we should be cranking out as many as we can and they can go get fucked for all I care.
Even at a different price point they'd be going from the absolute best armor in the galaxy to distant runner up. We'd still be undercutting their business. I agree that extending their license after five years for the 1.5 is a good idea, but not to cutting into their market them while it's still active.Well, the contract was exclusive rights to the Mk. 1.5 for five years - and we have production orders for them for more than that. I figured we could release the Mk. II at a different price point (so not as a competitor) three years into the contract without any harsh feelings given how much they have made at that point (over $60 billion), especially if we throw some more stuff their way, like the Transforming Guns...but I'm not opposed to waiting either if Esbilon implies they will be really pissed.
The way I see it, we want to phase out pre-PI hardsuits. We need a cheap suit for the masses - the Mk. 1.5 is it. They should be making those for the next decade, because the bottom line is that not everyone can afford to buy the Mk. 2 and above.
HK can be the Elkoss Combine to our Armax Arsenal.
Yes, as I said we could probably get away with it legally. It would just cost us a lot of reputation with HK, and with most of the other weapon/armor manufacturers to a lesser degree. Trust is damn valuable in the business world, I'd rather not burn our stock of it unless we have to.I don't think it works like that...and we didn't sign a non-competition clause with them the way we did with Cord-Hislop, so I really don't think this is going to be a big deal. We gave the exclusive rights, and they retain those.
The part where we're undercutting them by bumping them from best stuff on the market to distant second place. Even selling at a higher price it's still going to seriously impact their sales.
Exactlywhich PMC do you find reputable?Edit: @ Esbilon: How much would it cost us to hire a reputable PMC to provide a few ships to watch our Shipyards until our first frigates come out (In 6 or so quarters)?
We voted to prepare the groundwork for establishing our own this last turn.
Buy them, sure.We voted to prepare the groundwork for establishing our own this last turn.
@Esbilon...is there anything stopping us from buying a few Gladius fighters from CH if people are that worried about an attack in the interim? If so, could we use our own facilities to upgrade them from the "A" design to the "B" one that used repulsors as long as we didn't sell them? Or would that be too massive a refit to make?