No, just download and unpack it. The source code is also in the folder (written in delphi, because, yes, that's what I learned way back in school, and I plain don't have time to learn C of any variation like a respectable person), but you don't need it.@Yog Does it work for this quest only or could you run it for another quest for me? Also do I have to install it?
Well, they have some sort of "dark energy" scanner / detector, even handheld ones (you hear about 'dark energy readings" in mass effect 2). So I assume there's some sort of detectable feedback. Now, how quick "dark energy" signals propagate and how they behave is a question, and whether they can be used for FTL sensors or not is a question too.Another thought by way of the possibility of FTL Sensors.
Eezo when exposed to electric current allows the raising or lowering of mass of an object or the creation of gravitational fields for other uses.
So what happens to Eezo exposed to changing gravity, both natural and that generated with other Eezo nodules?
Another thought by way of the possibility of FTL Sensors.
Eezo when exposed to electric current allows the raising or lowering of mass of an object or the creation of gravitational fields for other uses.
So what happens to Eezo exposed to changing gravity, both natural and that generated with other Eezo nodules?
Well, they have some sort of "dark energy" scanner / detector, even handheld ones (you hear about 'dark energy readings" in mass effect 2). So I assume there's some sort of detectable feedback. Now, how quick "dark energy" signals propagate and how they behave is a question, and whether they can be used for FTL sensors or not is a question too.
From thew wiki:
"Element Zero, also known as "eezo", is a rare material that, when subjected to an electrical current, releases dark energy which can be manipulated into a mass effect field, raising or lowering the mass of all objects within that field."
Eezo it self does not effect gravity in any way other then being a mass. Eezo generates dark energy which is what you use to mess with mass/gravity/kinetic energy.
See wiki
We don't know that. It might be that creating wormholes (Achieving space metric necessary) isn't possible with eezo. It might be that calculations required for aiming said wormholes are too complex for available computers or that it's impossible to control the fields precisely enough to create and aim traversable wormhole of macroscopic size over interstellar distances.Which makes me wonder....why is it they don't use that dark energy for creating a wormhole instead? Wouldn't using it that way be more effective for FTL travel?
Yup, rotating black holes can be traversable. But the space-time you exit into is not the same as the one you entered from.I've heard that taking a black hole and getting it to rotate at a large percentage of c would have the mass inside the hole "move" towards the hole's edges, which would expose the singularity and reduce lethal tidal effects, resulting in possibly a traversable wormhole if you could get it to work right.
In theory, though. Haven't read anything on this that supports the idea, but it does sound cool.
As far as I understand, yeah. Ring singularities. There's also a possiblity of toroidal black holes existing (they haven't been ruled out as impossible; all other shapes but spherical have been, from what I understand).I've heard that taking a black hole and getting it to rotate at a large percentage of c would have the mass inside the hole "move" towards the hole's edges, which would expose the singularity and reduce lethal tidal effects, resulting in possibly a traversable wormhole if you could get it to work right.
In theory, though. Haven't read anything on this that supports the idea, but it does sound cool.
Speaking of, I promised more ideas.
As I have mentioned before, while establishing that yes, there's pretty much no setting I can't blow up if given sufficient time and motivation, it was mathematically proven that no black holes of any shapes other than spherical and toroidal are unstable. It's currently unknown if toroidal black holes can exist, but apparently ring singularities (singularities shaped like rings) might be possible for rotating black holes and might work as wormholes, perhaps event traversable ones. So... Let's make some an study them. The technology would be relatively simple. Make a ring out of eezo and suspend it in vacuum (do it in orbit / deep space for simplicity - mass effect spacetravel is cheap). Position several ion and electron guns tangentially to the ring, so the beams, when hitting it, will spin it (also add several on top and on bottom for stabilization and possibly making it rotate around the axis lying in the ring's plane). First accelerate it as much as possible with electron guns (lowering its mass so it gets accelerated easier), then switch to ions (positive charge) so it gets heavier, until it gets heavy enough (we'll need lots of ion guns with high fluxes - yay for Arc reactors) that an event horizon around the ring forms. Then keep feeding the event horizon itself particles so it gets stable-ish. Study the results.
Aside from possibly traversable wormholes and pure science, it might be useful as shielding technology. A ring of sufficient size would have its focus (center) relatively free of tidal forces. Thus, placing something in the center, then making a spinning (around the axis lying in the ring's plane) toroidal blackhole as a shield would provide an essentially impervious shield. Also some very screwy space metrics.
Link broken.Oh, and on the subject of rotating black holes, you may want to consider the Penrose Process.
Which makes me wonder....why is it they don't use that dark energy for creating a wormhole instead? Wouldn't using it that way be more effective for FTL travel?
The question is, can that massless corridor be used as a weapon?
Rather, what happens to the objects between the two relays?
I know very little of it, but I don't see how your conclusion (torodial black holes don't exist) follows from the fact that stationary black holes must be rotating and possibly charged. Couldn't such rotating (charged) black holes be toroidal?It's hard to prove things about about real world objects, but for "stationary" (in this context that means "equilibrium," that is unchanging in time) black holes, the Carter-Robinson theorem (as improved by Hawking and Wald) states that it will always belong to the Kerr family; that is be a rotating (and possibly charged) black hole. Thus, toroidal black holes cannot exist. Note that this proof depends crucially on the number of space dimensions, so in higher dimensional theories, you can imagine (generalized) toroidal black holes and even weirder things.
What this essentially means is that comm buoys are tightbeam communicators, and for such things to work, a beam emitted by one buoy would have to hit another buoy. That's absolutely required, otherwise tightbeam communication wouldn't work.Comm buoys are maintained in patterns built outward from each mass relay. The buoys are little more than a cluster of primitive, miniature mass relays. Each individual buoy is connected to a partner on another buoy in the network, forming a corridor of low-mass space. Tightbeam communications lasers are piped through these "tubes" of FTL space, allowing virtually instantaneous communication to anywhere on the network. The networks connect across regions by communications lasers through the mass relays.
With this system, the only delay is the light lag between the source or destination and the closest buoy. So long as all parties remain within half a light-second (150,000 km) of buoys, seamless real time communications are possible. Since buoys are maintained in all traveled areas, most enjoy unlimited instant communications. Ships only suffer communications lag when operating off established deep space routes, around uninhabited outer system gas giants, and other unsettled areas.
Yeah, but how do you keep them pointed at each other? Unless there's some actual force that links the buoys (possible, actually, as electromagnetic force would be transmitted through the channels, so, in principle, you could use (electro)magnets to at least somewhat stabilize the buoys), you still face a problem of relative speeds and drifts over interstellar distances.I wonder if they can use the corridor as a means of keeping the buoys pointed at each other.
That way you only have to do the initial connection, which likely takes forever, it's simply a matter of ensuring that the connection between the two buoys doesn't drop for any reason because then you'd have to reorient them.
Yeah, but how do you keep them pointed at each other? Unless there's some actual force that links the buoys (possible, actually, as electromagnetic force would be transmitted through the channels, so, in principle, you could use (electro)magnets to at least somewhat stabilize the buoys), you still face a problem of relative speeds and drifts over interstellar distances.
Thats because I was vague. They must be described by the Kerr metric, and the Kerr metric corresonds to a (mostly) spherical BH.I know very little of it, but I don't see how your conclusion (torodial black holes don't exist) follows from the fact that stationary black holes must be rotating and possibly charged. Couldn't such rotating (charged) black holes be toroidal?