Shepard Quest Mk V, Base of Operations (ME/MCU)

@Yog Does it work for this quest only or could you run it for another quest for me? Also do I have to install it?
No, just download and unpack it. The source code is also in the folder (written in delphi, because, yes, that's what I learned way back in school, and I plain don't have time to learn C of any variation like a respectable person), but you don't need it.

It would work for any quest, of course, the only specific thing about it is the overflow which automatically goes into the last scheduled project. I'll add "don't use overflow" switch in the morning. Too tired and want to sleep now (and yes, I know that it's literally two clicks of a mouse and one line of code). You could add a dummy project there if you want to ignore it.

What the program does is caclulate a probability of success of a number of projects, each of which gets assigned a number of dice from the dice pool.
 
Another thought by way of the possibility of FTL Sensors.

Eezo when exposed to electric current allows the raising or lowering of mass of an object or the creation of gravitational fields for other uses.

So what happens to Eezo exposed to changing gravity, both natural and that generated with other Eezo nodules?
 
Another thought by way of the possibility of FTL Sensors.

Eezo when exposed to electric current allows the raising or lowering of mass of an object or the creation of gravitational fields for other uses.

So what happens to Eezo exposed to changing gravity, both natural and that generated with other Eezo nodules?
Well, they have some sort of "dark energy" scanner / detector, even handheld ones (you hear about 'dark energy readings" in mass effect 2). So I assume there's some sort of detectable feedback. Now, how quick "dark energy" signals propagate and how they behave is a question, and whether they can be used for FTL sensors or not is a question too.

In principle, a comm buoy might be modified into an active FTL scanner, possibly, if a super-fast computer and super-sensitive sensors are added to it, and if it can work without a paired comm buoy on the other end I'll talk about comm buoys in the morning, but by my calculations, they are complete BS.
 
Another thought by way of the possibility of FTL Sensors.

Eezo when exposed to electric current allows the raising or lowering of mass of an object or the creation of gravitational fields for other uses.

So what happens to Eezo exposed to changing gravity, both natural and that generated with other Eezo nodules?

From thew wiki:

"Element Zero, also known as "eezo", is a rare material that, when subjected to an electrical current, releases dark energy which can be manipulated into a mass effect field, raising or lowering the mass of all objects within that field."

Eezo it self does not effect gravity in any way other then being a mass. Eezo generates dark energy which is what you use to mess with mass/gravity/kinetic energy.

See wiki
 
Well, they have some sort of "dark energy" scanner / detector, even handheld ones (you hear about 'dark energy readings" in mass effect 2). So I assume there's some sort of detectable feedback. Now, how quick "dark energy" signals propagate and how they behave is a question, and whether they can be used for FTL sensors or not is a question too.

My thought was more how the dark energy propagates is less important than how powerful a gravitation effect has to be to cause such a sympathetic reaction in the Eezo.
 
From thew wiki:

"Element Zero, also known as "eezo", is a rare material that, when subjected to an electrical current, releases dark energy which can be manipulated into a mass effect field, raising or lowering the mass of all objects within that field."

Eezo it self does not effect gravity in any way other then being a mass. Eezo generates dark energy which is what you use to mess with mass/gravity/kinetic energy.

See wiki

Which makes me wonder....why is it they don't use that dark energy for creating a wormhole instead? Wouldn't using it that way be more effective for FTL travel?
 
Which makes me wonder....why is it they don't use that dark energy for creating a wormhole instead? Wouldn't using it that way be more effective for FTL travel?
We don't know that. It might be that creating wormholes (Achieving space metric necessary) isn't possible with eezo. It might be that calculations required for aiming said wormholes are too complex for available computers or that it's impossible to control the fields precisely enough to create and aim traversable wormhole of macroscopic size over interstellar distances.

I have proposed study of ring singularities as one of the scientific projects, though. It's somewhere above in the thread.
 
I've heard that taking a black hole and getting it to rotate at a large percentage of c would have the mass inside the hole "move" towards the hole's edges, which would expose the singularity and reduce lethal tidal effects, resulting in possibly a traversable wormhole if you could get it to work right.

In theory, though. Haven't read anything on this that supports the idea, but it does sound cool.
 
I've heard that taking a black hole and getting it to rotate at a large percentage of c would have the mass inside the hole "move" towards the hole's edges, which would expose the singularity and reduce lethal tidal effects, resulting in possibly a traversable wormhole if you could get it to work right.

In theory, though. Haven't read anything on this that supports the idea, but it does sound cool.
Yup, rotating black holes can be traversable. But the space-time you exit into is not the same as the one you entered from.

It is also closely related to the ring singularities Yog mentioned.
 
I've heard that taking a black hole and getting it to rotate at a large percentage of c would have the mass inside the hole "move" towards the hole's edges, which would expose the singularity and reduce lethal tidal effects, resulting in possibly a traversable wormhole if you could get it to work right.

In theory, though. Haven't read anything on this that supports the idea, but it does sound cool.
As far as I understand, yeah. Ring singularities. There's also a possiblity of toroidal black holes existing (they haven't been ruled out as impossible; all other shapes but spherical have been, from what I understand).
Speaking of, with eezo we might not need "near c" thing, just rotation (maybe):
Speaking of, I promised more ideas.

As I have mentioned before, while establishing that yes, there's pretty much no setting I can't blow up if given sufficient time and motivation, it was mathematically proven that no black holes of any shapes other than spherical and toroidal are unstable. It's currently unknown if toroidal black holes can exist, but apparently ring singularities (singularities shaped like rings) might be possible for rotating black holes and might work as wormholes, perhaps event traversable ones. So... Let's make some an study them. The technology would be relatively simple. Make a ring out of eezo and suspend it in vacuum (do it in orbit / deep space for simplicity - mass effect spacetravel is cheap). Position several ion and electron guns tangentially to the ring, so the beams, when hitting it, will spin it (also add several on top and on bottom for stabilization and possibly making it rotate around the axis lying in the ring's plane). First accelerate it as much as possible with electron guns (lowering its mass so it gets accelerated easier), then switch to ions (positive charge) so it gets heavier, until it gets heavy enough (we'll need lots of ion guns with high fluxes - yay for Arc reactors) that an event horizon around the ring forms. Then keep feeding the event horizon itself particles so it gets stable-ish. Study the results.

Aside from possibly traversable wormholes and pure science, it might be useful as shielding technology. A ring of sufficient size would have its focus (center) relatively free of tidal forces. Thus, placing something in the center, then making a spinning (around the axis lying in the ring's plane) toroidal blackhole as a shield would provide an essentially impervious shield. Also some very screwy space metrics.
 
It's hard to prove things about about real world objects, but for "stationary" (in this context that means "equilibrium," that is unchanging in time) black holes, the Carter-Robinson theorem (as improved by Hawking and Wald) states that it will always belong to the Kerr family; that is be a rotating (and possibly charged) black hole. Thus, toroidal black holes cannot exist. Note that this proof depends crucially on the number of space dimensions, so in higher dimensional theories, you can imagine (generalized) toroidal black holes and even weirder things.
 
Which makes me wonder....why is it they don't use that dark energy for creating a wormhole instead? Wouldn't using it that way be more effective for FTL travel?

While a few items in ME use the term singularity or blackhole, using it actively is hard and tends to break the device see the reaper blackstar weapon.

The blackstorm is a extremely pathetic "singularity" by comparison. It would seem that the more powerful the singularity effect the more wear and tear on the components of the device. I imagine that wormholes are just as hard if not harder.

Though I wonder what the massless corridor of an active relay pair would be called in science terms. Part of me wants to ask if that isn't sorta like a wormhole, esp as one can ignore the masses between the two relays, or so the use of the conduit in ME1 leads me to conclude.
 
The question is, can that massless corridor be used as a weapon?

Rather, what happens to the objects between the two relays?
 
The question is, can that massless corridor be used as a weapon?

Rather, what happens to the objects between the two relays?

Nothing? When you use the conduit your quite literally going though the presidium ring and it and you are just fine. You also get to go though the roof of the bunker on Ilos. There might be a small amount of micro/nano damage from passing though the other masses because its not quite perfectly massless but that'd be unnoticeable/irreverent.

So no, If you were really good you could stop the transit with a mass part way though and cause explosions if it intersected an object or what ever happens when two masses try to exist in the same space. But that takes absurd levels of timing as relay transit is basically instant. And you'd need a relay on each side of the object.
 
It's hard to prove things about about real world objects, but for "stationary" (in this context that means "equilibrium," that is unchanging in time) black holes, the Carter-Robinson theorem (as improved by Hawking and Wald) states that it will always belong to the Kerr family; that is be a rotating (and possibly charged) black hole. Thus, toroidal black holes cannot exist. Note that this proof depends crucially on the number of space dimensions, so in higher dimensional theories, you can imagine (generalized) toroidal black holes and even weirder things.
I know very little of it, but I don't see how your conclusion (torodial black holes don't exist) follows from the fact that stationary black holes must be rotating and possibly charged. Couldn't such rotating (charged) black holes be toroidal?
 
Anyway, I promised some ranting about comm buoys. Well, here it is:

How do comm buoys work? They are describedlike this:
Comm buoys are maintained in patterns built outward from each mass relay. The buoys are little more than a cluster of primitive, miniature mass relays. Each individual buoy is connected to a partner on another buoy in the network, forming a corridor of low-mass space. Tightbeam communications lasers are piped through these "tubes" of FTL space, allowing virtually instantaneous communication to anywhere on the network. The networks connect across regions by communications lasers through the mass relays.
With this system, the only delay is the light lag between the source or destination and the closest buoy. So long as all parties remain within half a light-second (150,000 km) of buoys, seamless real time communications are possible. Since buoys are maintained in all traveled areas, most enjoy unlimited instant communications. Ships only suffer communications lag when operating off established deep space routes, around uninhabited outer system gas giants, and other unsettled areas.
What this essentially means is that comm buoys are tightbeam communicators, and for such things to work, a beam emitted by one buoy would have to hit another buoy. That's absolutely required, otherwise tightbeam communication wouldn't work.

Let's say that a comm buoy is a whopping one kilometer in diameter (i.e. the area you have to hit has the cross-section of pi/4 square kilometers). Let's say that the distance between the comm buoys is only one light hour. Just one light hour, which would necessitate over forty thousand buoys to link us with Alpha Centauri, much less anything more distant. The solid angle would be (pi/4*10^6)/(4*pi*(3600*3*10^8)^2)=10^6/16/(3600*3*10^8)^2=5*10^-20.

From a mile (1.6 kilometers) away, you'll see an object with a mean diameter of 1.4 micrometers with the same solid angle. Less than a diameter human hair.

That's what it would be an analogue of - hitting an end of human hair with a laser pointer, while on water, from a mile away, and keeping the laser pointed at that hair, continuously. And that's the best case scenario.

The problem is with aiming and maintaining the connection. The shift of less than one atto-degree would mean that the massless corridor completely misses the target. And once it misses - you don't know where to return to, because the target could have shifted in respect to the emitter. You have to scan the area to reestablish the connection. And you have to do it very slowly, because the correct position can pretty much be described via the delta function. Assuming picosecond reaction times for the equipment, you have to scan with the rate of 5*10^-20/10^-12=5*10^-8 steradian per second. That's very slow. Basically the fact that the things work at all (i.e. one buoy can aim at the other and maintain that aiming) is a miracle and requires Citadel races to have ridiculous aiming and stabilization technologies, for all their STL sensors.
 
I wonder if they can use the corridor as a means of keeping the buoys pointed at each other.

That way you only have to do the initial connection, which likely takes forever, it's simply a matter of ensuring that the connection between the two buoys doesn't drop for any reason because then you'd have to reorient them.
 
I wonder if they can use the corridor as a means of keeping the buoys pointed at each other.

That way you only have to do the initial connection, which likely takes forever, it's simply a matter of ensuring that the connection between the two buoys doesn't drop for any reason because then you'd have to reorient them.
Yeah, but how do you keep them pointed at each other? Unless there's some actual force that links the buoys (possible, actually, as electromagnetic force would be transmitted through the channels, so, in principle, you could use (electro)magnets to at least somewhat stabilize the buoys), you still face a problem of relative speeds and drifts over interstellar distances.
 
Yeah, but how do you keep them pointed at each other? Unless there's some actual force that links the buoys (possible, actually, as electromagnetic force would be transmitted through the channels, so, in principle, you could use (electro)magnets to at least somewhat stabilize the buoys), you still face a problem of relative speeds and drifts over interstellar distances.

I think the question we need answer is how do these mass-less tunnels work?

Going by the codex and the instantaneous transmission, which sinks up with how Relays work, and how we've seen Relays allow you to travel from point A to point B without hitting anything between them I think* the simplest explanation is that they are basically wormholes.

If so and the relative distance between the two is small enough, which everything traveling instantly seems to imply, then you very well might be able to use magnets to keep them oriented.

*Or it might just be my lack of sleep talking. A very real possibility.
 
I was thinking about how you guys could really break the Asari's stranglehold on the Galaxy without resorting to outright assassinations of their leadership. The only idea I could come up with is creating a method to artificially generate/replicate/create Element Zero, in massive amounts and much more cheaply then getting it from mining.
 
I know very little of it, but I don't see how your conclusion (torodial black holes don't exist) follows from the fact that stationary black holes must be rotating and possibly charged. Couldn't such rotating (charged) black holes be toroidal?
Thats because I was vague. They must be described by the Kerr metric, and the Kerr metric corresonds to a (mostly) spherical BH.
 
Back
Top