Yes, because the Organization will never fall. That it will always maintain the status quo because you decreed it to be so.
Because a government that has survived pretty much undisturbed for, oh, about 2,500 or so years is clearly unstable and has enough of a chance to collapse and be replaced by a hostile regime that we need to act like paranoid xenophobes for our own protection.
Limiting the Arc Tech is perfectly within our rights as the developer of the tech. The fact that we developed the Arc Tech means we can and should set limits for it instead of throwing it out and moving on to a better one, relying on new tech to always maintain that competitive edge.
1. They're going to get their hands on it, sooner or later.
This is established fact by the GM himself.
2. Moving on to a better one to maintain a competitive edge is
exactly how things work. That is literally the
very essence of how the industry we're a part of functions.
Ignoring the fact that all organizations are made from people that when if sufficient amounts of people are convinced the organization as a whole can be moved.
Unless the rest of the Citadel has their own anti-Cerberus trying to whip them into a rabid anti-human frenzy, not f*cking likely.
Escalating actions. One rogue agent could lead to more which can snowball into a disaster. The odds are low but it can happen, and preparing for that in case it happens is the smart thing to do.
Yes, that is very true. Until your precautions actually
increase the chances of the very situation you're preparing for to occur, in which case it becomes stupid and counterproductive.
Also, you clearly missed the point where proof had to be provided, and even then the proof came in the form of extremely contrived circumstances. All it would take would be Tali to be killed and poof, you have 1 person starting a war despite all you fancy talk about business and people being motivated by greed.
There was no indication that either the Alliance or the Council was going to go to war over what happened on Eden Prime even if the Council didn't declare Saren an outlaw. Further, that was just the proof necessary to tell the Council that yes, Saren was indeed behind Eden Prime. If they hadn't proved it then, there would have been all kinds of other chances to prove that Saren was working with the geth.
You're severely underestimating the damage a fanatic can do and are perfectly willing to arm them because Greed.
You're forgetting that:
1.
He'll find ways to get arc reactors anyway because the Council will figure out how to make them. We've gone over this many,
many times.
2. We're willing to sell to the Council because we're neither xenophobes nor paranoid conspiracy theorists who think this is 40K.
Not my point.
What i was saying is that because we have to sell reactors to maintain the patent, Arms Companies can get their hands on them and use it to develop power armor in the style pioneered by us and sell it to anyone who is willing to pay for it.
Because we're being forced to sell the reactors, we do not know where they will end up and what they will be used for.
Limiting the power it can produced means that if by some bad luck we end up facing it over the battlefield, we will have the advantage because our Arc Reactor will generate more power then theirs, so our shields at least will last longer.
Bringing that back to the suits we sell to the SA, it ensures that said suits will always be better then the knockoffs because of the extra power it has.
F*ck it. You know what, just f*ck it. I'm done. I'm sick of trying to convince you, because you've made it very clear that I'm just screaming at a brick wall. I'm not arguing this anymore. Call it your win if you must (and I'm sure you will), I'm done wasting time responding to this crap.
