What about full grown Rexy with there tire chew toy.I am foreseeing adorable home videos of a Rex Puppy playing with a chew toy
Nah, not a tire
PR says no. The focus group reacted badly when the Kong toy started oozing blood.Nah, not a tire
A Rex Sized KONG toy! , with a haunch of beef tucked inside
He likes the squeek because it sounds like the deathrattle of a small animal. So cute!Squakey toy for baby years, giant bone shaped chew toy for adult years.
Some of them shown outside her exhibit.I am foreseeing adorable home videos of a Rex Puppy playing with a chew toy
Bad idea, while underwater tunnels between 10-12 km and up to 300 meters deep are perfectly feasible, we are in a very geologically active area, which is really bad for tunnels...You know..... With the Sheltered Island being a Transport Hub..... We could have Tunnels linking the Islands?
Both for moving Goods and Livestock, as well as emergency Tunnels.
What could also be fun, is Transparent Tunnels like in Aquariums that give amazing views of all the sealife like Corals and Fish etc.
This should be considered an important priority for our park.Some of them shown outside her exhibit.
Show off how cute she was, and now how she is.
Does this mean we're not going to be able to eventually build habitats for formerly extinct aquatic animals down the line?But yeah, given that the geological instability of the island was one of Elliot's main points of pushback against the lagoon, the tunnels would be an even worse idea.
No, you'll be able to build habitats for aquatic animals eventually. Just not ones that have a direct line to the ocean, and whose barriers could theoretically break down upon the event of an eruption or earthquake.Does this mean we're not going to be able to eventually build habitats for formerly extinct aquatic animals down the line?
I can understand why it's a terrible idea to bring back the giant mosasaurs, pliosaurs and sharks and put them on display in a park environment. But it would be a real pity if it's not possible to bring back and exhibit the smaller marine animals (Plesiosaurus, Ichthyosaurus, Attenborosaurus, various Ammonites, etc.) or even the semi-aquatic spinosaurs (Baryonyx and Spinosaurus).
In Nublar, or it would be in another island?No, you'll be able to build habitats for aquatic animals eventually. Just not ones that have a direct line to the ocean, and whose barriers could theoretically break down upon the event of an eruption or earthquake.
Spinosaurus and Baronyx are both certainly possible since they're not oceanic in the first place. But something like a Deinosuchus is right the hell out.
Could always go with Kaprosuchus instead!
Ehhhh
Plioplatecarpus has a seal look to it..Ehhhh
There are more reasonably sized mosasaurs then Tylosaurus (the big one from World)
Something like Plioplatecarpus would be manageable. Icthys would be cool too for dolphin lovers!
Depending on their temperament you might even be able to swim with some of the smaller mosas.
-Edit-
There are also smaller Freshwater Mosasaurs like this guy-
Who would be perfectly happy in a nice Lake
The problem here is that the audience clearly wants to see the sea giant. To present a promoted animal is beneficial for business.There are more reasonably sized mosasaurs then Tylosaurus (the big one from World)