I'm not actually indignant. Just mildly irritated by the continued pointless digression. But, yeah, no, I don't actually agree that Immaculates don't give a shit about the peasants. Certainly some don't, but plenty do just care about people, because caring about the welfare of your inferiors is, in fact, a foundational part of the Immaculate Texts. This overfocus on cynical real politic and making everyone in the setting a heartless asshole because of an overfocus on certain cynical bits of text is one of the most tiring parts of discussing Exalted.Darn, and after I thanked you not to put words in my mouth. Feel free to keep escalating though, righteous indignation can produce a wonderful endorphin rush.
No, what I saw was this:
As I pointed out, no one in setting uses rights talk, because no one wrote those books. So no, that is not the kind of monster the Immaculates say you are, because that isn't why they are calling you a monster.
Besides the cynical realpolitik premptive demonization of potential geopolitical rivals, the Immaculates dislike the mind control because it brings people away from the teachings of the Dragons and obedience to the DB dominated natural order. They don't, for the most part, care about the peasants as people but think that the highest moral good is something like the extinction of choice at a time of total obedience to the dragons and their representatives. You are a monster because you make people a you-serving robot rather than a dragons-serving robot. And yes, this is bad for their souls, but it is also a violation of the natural order which is the greater crime. (But you are a demon who stole power from the gods possessing someone who refused to abide by the natural order so that is par for the course.)
This is not actually supported by the Immaculate texts, and Dragonblooded lack native psyche magic like the Solars get. You're supposed to obey the Dragonblooded because it's a good choice to make that brings you closer to nirvana, not because obediance is a good thing in and of itself. A Dragonblooded ripping out the minds of mortals with Sorcery and enslaving them to his will is very likely to get an angry visit from the Immaculates if found out, because that kind of shit is exactly what you're not supposed to be doing, and violates the Exalted responsibility to look after the well-being of those beneath you. Abuses happen, and Dragonblooded get away with them, and when they are punished, it's often with a light hand. But that doesn't make the Immaculate Faith an evil demon religion for brainwashing the peasantry, and acting like it is such is missing the point of the really complex, cool setting that is Exalted as much as @Exthalion 's ridiculous strawman accused me of doing.the immaculates saying "anathema don't have the right to do this to you" is backed up by the fact that the very next thing they will say is "because that's the right of the Dragon Blooded host, thank you very much."
I'm not actually indignant. Just mildly irritated by the continued pointless digression. But, yeah, no, I don't actually agree that Immaculates don't give a shit about the peasants. Certainly some don't, but plenty do just care about people, because caring about the welfare of your inferiors is, in fact, a foundational part of the Immaculate Texts. This overfocus on cynical real politic and making everyone in the setting a heartless asshole because of an overfocus on certain cynical bits of text is one of the most tiring parts of discussing Exalted.
It doesn't matter that rights aren't an in-setting thing. They're an out of setting thing, and my point stands: You are a horrifying monster bloated on power you should never have had if you're the sort of person using Memory-Reweaving Discipline to get your way by violating people's right to make their own decisions and have their own mind, and the monster you are is very much like the vision of horror the Immaculates preach to Creation, empty philosophical diversions aside.
I never once said that they would. This was never an IC discussion. You made it one. Which is why I'm getting increasingly annoyed with your continued insistence on irrelevancies about Creation IC. There is nothing you can possibly teach me about Creation IC. If I don't already run the game with it in mind, it's because I found it annoying or poorly suited to my purposes and discarded it. This whole thing started from someone declaring magic used which forces one to fall head over heels in love to be just another form of social magic and thus not evil.I have never disputed this, and your continued assertion of it makes me suspect you aren't reading for more than the first objectional if misinterprited point I make in each post.
You remain free to make out of character judgments of people in setting. You may even be right. But I don't care if you are right because that has nothing to do with this discussion. Characters will not use your moral reasoning because it doesn't exist in setting. How people behave in setting, including player characters, will require other moral frameworks. If you care about the characters making sense given the backgrounds they would have had.
The Immaculate order is well-known for criticising and protesting abuse of mortals by Dynasts, going so far as to have their monks protest the local rulers if polite words don't work. "The Solars don't get to abuse you, we do" really doesn't fit into their philosophy, at all.the immaculates saying "anathema don't have the right to do this to you" is backed up by the fact that the very next thing they will say is "because that's the right of the Dragon Blooded host, thank you very much."
I never once said that they would. This was never an IC discussion. You made it one. Which is why I'm getting increasingly annoyed with your continued insistence on irrelevancies about Creation IC. There is nothing you can possibly teach me about Creation IC. If I don't already run the game with it in mind, it's because I found it annoying or poorly suited to my purposes and discarded it. This whole thing started from someone declaring magic used which forces one to fall head over heels in love to be just another form of social magic and thus not evil.
I don't care, not the slightest bit, not one iota, about IC reactions to Threefold Binding or the varied moral frameworks of Creation. Stop telling me about IC reactions. Stop acting like I don't know that Creation isn't a morally-neutral setting, metaphysics-wise. Stop lecturing me on how I'm not reading your posts while you refuse to read and continue to windmill-tilt at mine.
And if you do this, you're exactly the monster the Immaculates say you are, because you don't have the right. No one could ever have that right.
I made no IC claim. You keep acting like I do. I used a metaphor to communicate the idea that hey, this is a nasty power. I then said, many times, that we're not talking IC. Stop. Talking. About. IC. We are not talking about IC. We have never been talking IC. I'm not and have never been talking IC. Is that clear enough? Because this was never about IC claims. At any point, in the entire discussion. At all. Period. Full stop.Again, you made it about IC when you blended your OOC criticism of TBotH and MRD with the Immaculate condemnation of Solars.
I have never been engaging with your OOC criticism. Several times I have stated I don't care about the morality of such magic for the purpose of this discussion. In the same sentence, you brought rights talk into Immaculate doctrine. That is what I have always been objecting to.
So it was entirely appropriate to reply to you with IC logic when you made an IC claim.
That is all I wanted, for this to drop.Right, so given that this debate has veered from "morality in Exalted" to "You said that I said that you said that I did this," and therefore off topic, I'm going to ask that @Exthalion and @Kaiya drop this line of discussion or take it to the PMs.
That, or if it does exist, it's probably stuff along the lines of "might makes right" or "the winner is justice," and most people these days, myself included, would be unhappy with considering those to be morality.
There's no reason it couldn't either. What I don't get is why people automatically assume that any objective moral code has to be Western-based in nature or even that it had to be human-centric in the first place.This is what I'm arguing against.
I actually don't particularly believe in objective morality. But if there is an objective moral code, there's no sane reason to expect anything as petty as victory to have any effect on it.
To be clear, I don't hold that objective morality actually exists. But the lack of magical rules telling us what is capital G good doesn't change what generally results in pleasant things and what generally results in unpleasant things.For what it's worth, I'm not assuming that. I could totally see a moral system where all of human existence is objectively wrong.
I just think that it's silly to act like Exalted's lack of credible moral authorities and punishment for the wicked has any affect at all on whether objective morality holds in it.
I could totally see a moral system where all of human existence is objectively wrong.
#manusnephandi
*agreeing Midnight Caste noises*I could totally see a moral system where all of human existence is objectively wrong.
>dislike: dog and furry animalMy Zenith (that I'll never get to play since nobody want a giant skeleton dating plot in their campaign)
![]()
>dislike: dog and furry animal
Objectively the worst character.![]()
apropos of literally nothing
hot take: thorns would be massively improved if you just made it a weird colonial holding and the mask of winter's personal petri dish. so it's undergoing a necromantic renaissance and for all that it's mega-haunted is super vibrant and alive (lol), which makes it a super nice contrast to @ManusDomini 's lookshy.
just think of all the fucky fun shit you could have
-a skinless minotaur and a centuries dead philosopher having an ideological screaming match outside a tea shop at three in the morning
-long lost fashions, schools of thought, and architectural styles dating back to the contagion all being thrown together and sloshed around, it's so dated it wraps back around to new and in vogue
-the mask's personal police force keep mass abducting people and dumping them back onto the streets more-or-less-intact except they're varied monsters of the night.
-relatedly: this is why half the bureaucracy are now blood-drinking bat-ghoul monsters and the captain of the civil guard is literally a possessed suit of armor a la alphonse elric
-the entire city's had to make the switch to nocturnal mode because that's when most of the ghosts and monsters are out and about and they buy shit too
it'd actually be a place you probably had a reason to visit![]()