Something that genuinely scares me in real life, and bothers me in fiction: people automatically taking the side of the powerful.

Yes, the kid made a stupid mistake that got him killed. The god also made a stupid mistake, and it will also get him killed. But the kid was just young and dumb, like many teenage boys; the god was a monstrous child-killer. Failing to back down when a god picks a fight with you is not evil, unlike beheading a child.

But because the god is powerful and well-connected and ensconced in a social system that, ninety-nine times in a hundred, would've let him get away with it, we have people here insulting the kid he murdered. Acting like, because the god's monstrousness is tacitly sanctioned by his peers, it should be treated as a natural force and not as the evil that it is.

These characters are barely even characters. One doesn't even have a name. But people automatically act like the powerful one is their countryman, and the weak one is a foreigner.
I don't particularly approve of the tendency either, but I can certainly see what it has going for it from a natural-selection perspective. Loudly and publicly proclaiming that the insane asshole who goes around randomly murdering people with no apparent consequences actually isn't such a bad guy, for... some reason, well, if you're in a situation where random consequence-free murders are actually happening, metabolically it's pretty cheap to try, and if the asshole in question isn't completely out of touch with the concepts of reciprocity and incentives, it might make you or your family less likely to be the next target, meaning you get to pass on your genes and memes when somebody braver doesn't.

Getting an angry mob together to inflict some appropriate consequences is most likely far better for the health of society as a whole than allowing bad actors to continue causing harm indiscriminately, but it's also a lot more work and personal risk. Living systems operate on more than one scale, and to the extent that they reproduce with variations, natural selection applies to all of those scales. Whenever people are in a position where they've got to choose between their personal survival (by appeasing a rampaging monster) and that of their society (by pursuing justice), yeah, that's a scary situation.
 
Long as you're here, why not criticise my writing?

And maybe tell me whether it'd be a good idea to add more Charms, while you're at it. @Crumplepunch has some good homebrew that I'd like to rip off, but the set is already larger than the canon one and I'm not sure about expanding it further.

What kind of non-mechanics feedback are you looking for? The work you've done deserves attention, infinitely more than the inane argument it got buried under, but I haven't got a clue about 3E's crunch. I can't promise it'll be much use but I'll try to give you some kind of response.
 
Seems like you're just pushing your view of the setting as the only "True" interpretation despite there being things that certainly support alternative views.
The issue is that your "alternative view" is that of an utterly horrible person. You're not just "acknowledging" that horrible shit happens in Exalted, you're actually arguing in favor of said horrible shit and dismissing the concept of trying to make the horrible shit less horrible and/or shit as childish idiocy.

You are arguing that in a scenario where a wealthy drunk asshole fucking with poor people for shiggles decides to murder a teenager for backtalk, the teenager is the bad guy and the wealthy asshole is just exercising his rights. This is such a profoundly repugnant stance that I literally cannot further explain it without directly referencing current American politics and/or fascist doctrine, which would likely get me infracted.

Just... Jesus Christ, dude. Jesus Christ.
 
- Vilji, the Beast Atop the Gilded Summit. A twisted ancestor-spirit that was a brilliant scholar in life, and became revered by his people for the many ways he improved their lives (via agriculture, sewage, etc). However, his homeland was eventually crushed and enslaved by a foreign power, and though the memory of him endured, the actual nature of his greatness was lost over time, and his countrymen filled in the void in their knowledge with the hatred and outrage they felt over their bondage. Being worshiped as a thunderous warrior who would bathe the fields in the blood of his people's oppressors did horrific things to the undead sage as he languished in the Underworld ruins of their old homeland, desperately meditating to try and maintain what sanity remained to him.

Then, one of his descendants awakened as one of the Swords of Heaven, and led a great uprising that saw them all freed from their shackles - and, humble woman that she was, the Solar liberator bade her kin to sing songs of gratitude to Vilji, the Lord-Upon-The-Mountain, avenger of their ancestors' disgrace! She led them in a great procession to the peaks of their ancestral homelands, lighting great bonfires each night in Vilji's honor.

Vilji the Sage drowned in the flood of his peoples' prayers, and what emerged to meet them at the conclusion of their pilgrimage was a ragged, twisted horror - a monstrous thing of wrathful, vengeful prayer, wearing the shreds of Vilji-That-Was like an anchorite's rags. So Vilji's name spread among the lands near the reborn nation as a bringer of death and judgment, its ivory claws thick with the blood and viscera of those who dared defy its peoples' primacy, the serene blue of its monastic robes blackened by hate. The Beast Atop the Gilded Summit has no face, only a twisted ruin where its golden bones tore through the Sage's visage and blossomed into an osseous crown-headdress, on which the Sun-Eaters (as its people now call themselves) hang prayer strips praising their ancestor's ruthlessness in 'protecting' them.
This is cool, but I don't think I can use him as-is. Vilji seems too much like a geist, rather than a ghost; so he while he could be possessing and empowering a Ghost-Blooded leader of the cult to make them a not!Sin-Eater, be a threat the cult needs to soothe or appease, be a monster the cult sealed inside a Memento, be one of the cult's Contacts or Allies, or even have the mild-mannered Vilji the Sage be a secret Reaper who becomes the Lord-Upon-The-Mountain when he dons his Deathmask, but as is I don't think Vilji could be an active, central participant in the cult unless I want to make the cult inherently unstable.

Which I could do, but its not where I want to go with this example krewe. I'm definitely going to try and use him somehow, though, because he fits in nicely with the vague idea I have for an overall theme and goals for the krewe.

Edit: Also, holy shit, everyone needs to chill the fuck out, geez. I am not going to be happy if I spend hours and hours on this post only for the thread to get locked right in the middle of it.
 
Last edited:
Gods, by and large have little to no empathy for mortals. There's a reason that Immaculates have to routinely beat the shit out of them to keep them behaving.

Humans are literally made in this place to be squishy prayer engines. Gods aren't adults in this analogy, they are the apathetic staff at a collapsing KFC franchise and humans are particularly bright factory farm chickens.

Setting aside canoncity for a second (because let's not pretend that canon isn't a fucking mess or that 90% of people aren't working off their own headspace):

A. Acting like everyone in setting has read the handbook is dumb as fuck and counterproductive to cultivating a, like, sense of mysticism and mystery about the world which is Important for something like Exalted that seems to pride itself on shit like mysticism and mystery and getting to go dick around with both.

B. Acting like the Gods are weird sociopaths with no connection to human values is actively poisonous to doing anything with them ever.

Yeah yeah I'm gonna elaborate on both :V. It's not me just dropping in for a hot take or w/e.

From a Watsonian perspective it's important to note that many, if not most Gods, are not going to be some super well informed spirit who was there at the very beginning for the Primordial War and Laughs At These Silly Peasant Superstitions. I mean for one, iirc, you can absolutely get Gods that follow the Immaculate line which kinda speaks for itself. For another Creation's been through multiple apocalypses and Heaven hasn't been exempt from any of them. The War in Heaven likely had a monstrous death toll in terms of divine beings 'cause even if the Gods were bound by geas the Primordials were not above venting frustration and anger on their unruly slaves. The Three Spheres Cataclysm (per Games of Divinity, y'know the superior one that doesn't have it as some weird continent destroying thing) fucked with the setting's fundamental metaphysics, making the strong stronger and the weak weaker and chaining the weak to the strong; burning a horrifically unknown amount of Stuff to ash in the process and removing it from all memory.

And the Twin Troubles are...well I mean you had gods getting butchered by rakshasa and rising dead and Gods contracting the plague and dying in such massive numbers that Heaven straight up shut its doors and enacted a quarantine of Creation. Beyond that? The way the Jade Pleasure Dome itself works is that the more powerful, potent, and best informed Gods are by and large also the ones jockeying the hardest for seats and increasingly indifferent to anything that doesn't serve that purpose 'cause divine addiction is no laughing matter yo.

Plenty of Gods aren't going to remember the Why of humanity and the original design docs aren't exactly around for anyone to take a peek at. Plenty of Gods are either Terrestrial and thus very plausibly have close ties with mankind (see: Forks or all the other cities where gods shouldn't be intervening on behalf of personal stakes but Absolutely Do) or Celestials who have a finite amount of brainspace and a limited window on their own world. Fuck, plenty of Gods should be drawn from the ranks of mortals themselves and god-blooded being welcomed in by a parent is a not-uncommon Thing 'cause yaaaay nepotism.

From a purely mechanical standpoint? In terms of writing mechanics I mean: it's damn hard to have an argument about the setting organically IC if you-the-GM-writer-whatever insist that everyone's read the same manual with maybe a different bit of flavor. Clashes of religion and cultural practices are fantastic fodder for conflict and excising that is clunky as fuck, for god's sake give me the Immaculate being forced to deal with syncretism and blending religion as you move farther from their center of influence. Let there be IC arguments over rites and ritual and relative importance. Similarly if you insist that your characters are so far above Conventional Morality that they can't be held accountable or interacted with in a meaningful manner besides rolling over and doing whatever the hell they want uh...

Shit why are they even there in the first place?

This is, ofc, setting aside the point that "A god fucked over my family, I'm going to fuck his face" is a damn fine seed for a conflict/character/story in and of itself because...dunno what the argument you and others are making even is? "Assholes gonna asshole, remember kids don't stand up to the bullies because they're bigger than you".

The Primordials are nothing, they're irrelevant, they're a footnote. A footnote in a rotten old book that decayed mostly to dust a thousand years ago. They don't mean anything. Nothing they did means anything. They were assholes who thought they were above consequences.

Thaaat's...going a bit far I think. The Yozi work as the living relics of a ruined age, beautiful and awful, and while they themselves should never be able to break free, their 3CD's and below or their Deathlords (in the case of the Neverborn) do draw from them and should matter.

No, the Exalted matter. Regular mortals? They're at the bottom of the food chain and don't matter. The only thing notable about them is that they hold the potential for Exaltation and there's a very limited supply of those.

This is aggressively dumb and straight up that fucking...god Celestial Compass: Yu-Shan shit where "The gods would treat a beggar more kindly than a DB because at least they could get a real Exaltation".

Come off it, like are you even sounding that out in your head. "I'm going to fill my setting with 99% people who don't matter and thus their desires and drives have no stakes and make the Entire Story about a handful of dudes whose sole reason for being is getting Swoler".

Isn't that Xianxia or w/e?

I think you've managed to make Exalted xianxia.

Yes, but when you get down to it, basically nothing within the Exalted universe could be considered moral. It is a slowly collapsing ant-heap of shitty decisions and perverse incentives where even the greatest sources of potential good are likely to routinely go insane and ruin everything.

"Yes but what if nothing matters" isn't an argument, it's basically acknowledging that you don't have anything else to put forward.

The most moral being in the universe turned away in disgust and surrendered to an eternity of solipsistic addiction and cosmic-self loathing over the shithole Creation became. And it's only gotten unambiguously worse since then.

since when is the Sun the most moral being in the universe was there not a discussion ten pages ago about why that was a bad idea and didn't really work well
 
Last edited:
The issue is that your "alternative view" is that of an utterly horrible person. You're not just "acknowledging" that horrible shit happens in Exalted, you're actually arguing in favor of said horrible shit and dismissing the concept of trying to make the horrible shit less horrible and/or shit as childish idiocy.

You are arguing that in a scenario where a wealthy drunk asshole fucking with poor people for shiggles decides to murder a teenager for backtalk, the teenager is the bad guy and the wealthy asshole is just exercising his rights. This is such a profoundly repugnant stance that I literally cannot further explain it without directly referencing current American politics and/or fascist doctrine, which would likely get me infracted.

Just... Jesus Christ, dude. Jesus Christ.
Also, to be very clear: My argument isn't that Exalted is roses and sunshine, either! It's a brutal, cynical setting precisely for the reasons I was saying that it's also, fundamentally, a hopeful one: Creation is our world, full of magic and epic fantasy wuxia kung fu fun. When you take away the magic from Creation, you have a brutally down-to-earth realistic iron age world in the wake of it's version of the Bronze Age Collapse. People in Creation are just that, people. Be they Exalt or god or mortal. The horrors in Creation are plucked right from our own history, as are it's virtues. Our world got better, though. It's got a long way to go, but it's so, so so much better than it was. Creation has that same hope and potential, and just like in our world, the guy selling people into slavery, or stabbing children for talking back, that guy is wicked, and it's not the fault of the victim for not placating him.

Morality not being written into the stars above and the stone below doesn't mean morality doesn't exist at all, any more than it does in the real world.
 
That may well be, but you know well as I that:

a): Exalted, as a game is not infallible.
b): Unexamined cynicism is useless.

Yes but that's kind of the point here isn't it? If you want to right wrongs you need to seek out power-but by acquiring that power you will likely need to do cruel or callous things, and after you acquire that power it is always tempting to use that power in ways which you can convince yourself are just but in reality aren't.

So in the end maybe going "okay a bad thing happened to me but I will let it go" isn't always a bad thing.

It means nothing gets better but things can always be worse.
 
What kind of non-mechanics feedback are you looking for? The work you've done deserves attention, infinitely more than the inane argument it got buried under, but I haven't got a clue about 3E's crunch. I can't promise it'll be much use but I'll try to give you some kind of response.

Do the abilities granted feel exciting? Do you want them for your PC?

Is there anything missing? Is there some character concept that these Charms fail to cover?

Does the set, as a whole, evoke the themes of the Dragon-Blooded as you understand them? Do you think taking them would give you a suitable Dragon-Blood-y Dragon-Blood?

Could the set use more Charms? Should I add stuff from A Clutch of Dragons?

This is, ofc, setting aside the point that "A god fucked over my family, I'm going to fuck his face" is a damn fine seed for a conflict/character/story in and of itself...

I'm glad that, under the argument, the basic story concept is being received well.
 
Yes but that's kind of the point here isn't it? If you want to right wrongs you need to seek out power-but by acquiring that power you will likely need to do cruel or callous things, and after you acquire that power it is always tempting to use that power in ways which you can convince yourself are just but in reality aren't.

So in the end maybe going "okay a bad thing happened to me but I will let it go" isn't always a bad thing.

It means nothing gets better but things can always be worse.
Okay, actually, we are Grown People With Education, let's cut this down so we're not arguing past each other- what are you arguing right now, and what is the point you want to make? It'd be pointless to argue if we didn't know the other's point, yeah? :V
 
Okay, actually, we are Grown People With Education, let's cut this down so we're not arguing past each other- what are you arguing right now, and what is the point you want to make? It'd be pointless to argue if we didn't know the other's point, yeah? :V

I'm mostly arguing that:
1. At least in Creation it is likiely that most people are going to agree that deciding to get into a fight with a god means you deserve what you get;
2. As much as fixing this injustice might be the moral thing to do it can and often will end up making things worse.
 
I'm mostly arguing that:
1. At least in Creation it is likiely that most people are going to agree that deciding to get into a fight with a god means you deserve what you get;
2. As much as fixing this injustice might be the moral thing to do it can and often will end up making things worse.
I agree! That is definitely something people in Creation will agree with; we need only look at the beliefs of the Hellenes with regards to hubris and nemesis. Zeus struck down Bellerophon for flying close to Olympos on the Pegasus, after all. But we're not in Creation - at least I don't think so :V - we can, and should, look at that God and go, "Man, what a fucking dick."

The real problem lies in subclause 2 of your argument; this dude's aspirations of deicide are likely an exception to his society. To most people, the brother committed hubris and was punished as appropriate, there is an entire society, culture and series of beliefs that all allow - and indeed, encourage - the God to act like this.

What are you gonna do about it, punk?
 
What's your point? That solars are forever unbeatable?
yes, that is exactly kaiya's point, she is making this argument specifically to ensure you that the solars who got murderstabbed by the dragon-blooded, who then proceeded to rule uncontested by the great solars for a thousand years

are undefeatable

you have read directly to the core of her posts
 
Words like "idiot, suicidal, stupid, deathwish" all condemn the child, not the god. And reacting with "Well you have to be practical, these thing happen" about a god who murdered a child carries a tone of "Well, stupid kid, fuck him". It's creepy, and implies that you are siding with the god over the child. 'Cause, here's the thing. The god isn't a force of nature. He's a magical asshole with superpowers. And "playing with fire" also has a tone of victim blaming!

Like, jesus, stop going all GREY PRACTICAL MORALITY DOESN'T EXIST and look at what actually is going on, and maybe, like, have feelings? Instead of coldly condemning a child for doing a childish thing and dying brutally for it as your immediate instinctive reaction?
I suppose that's where our fundamentally different views of Exalted come into play because to me from the perspective of a Mortal the God may as well be a 'force of nature' for all intents and purposes. Oh, it's better in some respects as they can try to appease, ie bribe them, him and worse in others as but forcing or trying to punish him? Haha, no. Not unless they manage persuade another 'force of nature' to assist them which just brings a different list of issues to the table. So I find the "playing with fire" comparison to be an apt one.

Isn't that Xianxia or w/e?

I think you've managed to make Exalted xianxia.
To be fair that's really, really easy to do.

Why don't mortals matter?

I suppose in a sense that ties into the above with me viewing Exalted as Xianxia in several regards? To be blunt Mortals as a whole only matter so much in that they are a resource because that's what Mankind was made to be by the Primordials. Oh, they may be under the yoke of the Exalted & Gods now but that fundamental principle hasn't changed. It's because Mortals, the vast majority, simply can't compete lacking the necessary power and even for the Heroic Mortals who can they can only go far before they hit the limit of their ability.
 
I suppose in a sense that ties into the above with me viewing Exalted as Xianxia in several regards? To be blunt Mortals as a whole only matter so much in that they are a resource because that's what Mankind was made to be by the Primordials. Oh, they may be under the yoke of the Exalted & Gods now but that fundamental principle hasn't changed. It's because Mortals, the vast majority, simply can't compete lacking the necessary power and even for the Heroic Mortals who can they can only go far before they hit the limit of their ability.
Why does that make them not matter?
 
I agree! That is definitely something people in Creation will agree with; we need only look at the beliefs of the Hellenes with regards to hubris and nemesis. Zeus struck down Bellerophon for flying close to Olympos on the Pegasus, after all. But we're not in Creation - at least I don't think so :V - we can, and should, look at that God and go, "Man, what a fucking dick."

The real problem lies in subclause 2 of your argument; this dude's aspirations of deicide are likely an exception to his society. To most people, the brother committed hubris and was punished as appropriate, there is an entire society, culture and series of beliefs that all allow - and indeed, encourage - the God to act like this.

What are you gonna do about it, punk?

The Realm gets a lot of flak and deserves 90% of it, but there's one thing it does very right: it sends Immaculate Monks to answer that question. It doesn't let the gods stand above the law.
 
The Realm gets a lot of flak and deserves 90% of it, but there's one thing it does very right: it sends Immaculate Monks to answer that question. It doesn't let the gods stand above the law.
That's another way it was a dumb decision to kill the kid:

"Oh Master Immaculate, we have saved and scraped to bring this tithe to your temple. Our son was murdered cruelly by a wicked god, and we have no path to recompense. Please take pity on us, and avenge our child."

I really don't see most Immaculate Monks turning down a heartfelt plea for vengeance against a rogue spirit. Not every family could make such a journey, depending on location, and not every monk would be willing to take the journey, or necessarily capable of spirit killed (*angry muttering about Ex3 neutering the Dragonblooded capacity to spirit kill*), but it's not exactly out of the realm of imagining, particularly if murder is your go-to response to being challenged.
 
I honestly wish Exalted considered what spirit killing should be, so it could decide if it should be an epic feat or the basic measure of an Exalt; the current in-between state is annoying.
 
That's another way it was a dumb decision to kill the kid:

"Oh Master Immaculate, we have saved and scraped to bring this tithe to your temple. Our son was murdered cruelly by a wicked god, and we have no path to recompense. Please take pity on us, and avenge our child."

I really don't see most Immaculate Monks turning down a heartfelt plea for vengeance against a rogue spirit. Not every family could make such a journey, depending on location, and not every monk would be willing to take the journey, or necessarily capable of spirit killed (*angry muttering about Ex3 neutering the Dragonblooded capacity to spirit kill*), but it's not exactly out of the realm of imagining, particularly if murder is your go-to response to being challenged.
tbf, it was a Celestial God, so while they could have sent someone out to grab some monks while Yukgo-Vefar was dicking around in the village for a while, generally being an asshole, after the fact he could have avoided Immaculate repercussions just by returning to Heaven.
 
tbf, it was a Celestial God, so while they could have sent someone out to grab some monks while Yukgo-Vefar was dicking around in the village for a while, generally being an asshole, after the fact he could have avoided Immaculate repercussions just by returning to Heaven.
Ah, I missed that, yes. That would put a damper on it.
 
Back
Top