- Location
- Usa
The funniest "Mass Effect is not ready for humanity" did I've read is Pencils down, death rays up. But Mass Effect: Glorious Shotgun Princess is also very good.
That only means that your RCS is grievously underpowered for combat, and maybe your engineers need being shot in the face.You won't dodge anything much better than a thrown brick with rcs providing a small fraction of a g.
I'm a bit confused by this. If you get up to a velocity v, then increase your mass, m, your momentum, p=mv , obviously goes up. The mass effect violates conservation of momentum quite readily.Once the rocket is up to speed, changing it's mass should not change it's momentum. Nor should increasing it's mass be able to affect it's final momentum.
The issue is that, from what we've seen and been told, Citadel VI are actually worse than modern AIs, probably being less complex than a friggin' chat bot.Awful lot of people assuming all the weapons are dumb because of the Citadel aversion to AI, but VIs are completely legal and virtually omnipresent. In fact, most of the modern militaries of the ME universe use extensive VI support across the board, and it is a noteworthy hallmark of the Systems Alliance military doctrine. Sure, VIs are not as smart or adaptive as AIs, but they can be significantly more of both than dumb weapons.
How many seconds, though? ME-verse cruisers apparently tend to be around 700 meters long, and they're not super-narrow dowel ships. Say maybe 100 meters displacement to dodge? If you've got 5 seconds warning, that calls for over a quarter-g of lateral acceleration.When you're talking bullet flight times measured in seconds, you only need to be able to move 1/2 the cross section of the ship to dodge a single bullet. Which as their main guns seem to have a fire rate measured in seconds rather than fractions of a second, makes detecting the bullet harder than dodging it.
Depends on whether you've elected to take a combat doctrine that relies on RCS-based dodging, doesn't that?That only means that your RCS is grievously underpowered for combat, and maybe your engineers need being shot in the face.
At the same rate of progress, by 2175 or whenever canon ME happens, there shouldn't have been any piloted fighters at all. That the Citadel species were using them shows that they are in that respect at least not really any more advanced than 21st century earth-type humans... And makes one wonder why.
but that would be gasp changing something of the Protheans. We can't possibly do better than them, they are beyond compare, their tech is unknowable eldrich magic, the best we poor poor mortals can do is copy what they did and hope it works.And all that crap about how nobody ever rams at FTL because of "safety interlocks from the Protheans everyone based everything on". Bull-crap. Someone would engineer out the controls from first principles, not just blindly copy a prothean design, so of course you have FTL kinect kill vehicles.
For that matter, look at Liara's dad, Matriarch Aethyta. She suggested that the Asari start work on building their own Mass Relays and got effectively laughed right off Thessia. The only time the Republic wanted to talk to her after that was to have her keep an eye on her daughter the Shadow Broker.Look no further than Laira's problem, she did research and came to a conclusion that fit the research. Yet, she was laughed at for the mere fact of advocating for the Protheans of losing a war.
That's a 5mph or 8kmh collusion, which would be jarring but hardly the end of the world for humans.How many seconds, though? ME-verse cruisers apparently tend to be around 700 meters long, and they're not super-narrow dowel ships. Say maybe 100 meters displacement to dodge? If you've got 5 seconds warning, that calls for over a quarter-g of lateral acceleration.
At the same rate of progress, by 2175 or whenever canon ME happens, there shouldn't have been any piloted fighters at all. That the Citadel species were using them shows that they are in that respect at least not really any more advanced than 21st century earth-type humans... And makes one wonder why.
...What collision?That's a 5mph or 8kmh collusion, which would be jarring but hardly the end of the world for humans.
That's a vastly different sort of "not ready", though. "Humans have magic bullshit" is not the same as "Humans are actually upteched".The funniest "Mass Effect is not ready for humanity" did I've read is Pencils down, death rays up. But Mass Effect: Glorious Shotgun Princess is also very good.
What is that? I've never heard of that, unless it's the one where SKYNET evolves a conscience and makes peace with humanity....Isn't that effectively what the Good Skynet mini-series is though?
No, if you were in the range of a cruise missile, it wouldn't do what you're saying it does. That's where I was coming from to begin with. Cruise missiles don't have the situational awareness, agility, or other countermeasures to defend themselves against intercepting aircraft. You obviously could give them those capabilities assuming you've got smart enough control systems (which you probably do), but you'd be adding expensive sensors and other features that most missiles don't have or need.
This is false. The V1/V2 "cruise missiles" did not have these things, "as cheap as you can make it" cruise missiles do not have these things, but all modern cruise missiles do have course correction capability and some have satellite uplinks that might allow you to fake anti-intercept capability. The original Tomahawk missile was actually designed with terrain following capabilities similar/based off the B-1 bomber. Relative agility is quite low.Current cruise missiles don't have those things, yes, because as said they don't need them as the first thing, and because they're based for the most part on tech that was cutting edge in the 80s. Back then it cost millions of dollars per unit to have a computer that could do terrain following by image recognition from a camera at low altitudes and high speeds.
The SR-71 and X-15 would beg to differ.The acceleration needed to send that large a missile hurtling at hypersonic velocities would kill the pilot, unless some sort of inertial dampeners were involved.
You are referring to the same US State Department that issued an updating "deck of 52" bounties during the Iraq conflicts that included different amounts for alive vs dead, some of which were only listed as dead? And paid out on those bounties?Did you deliberately ignore the part where the source is the US State Department?
There's a world of difference between a private citizen calling for something like this and a government doing it.
Also, they are offering the bounty for information leading to capture or death.
Information. They want to grab him, not have you go out and do it.
Again a very different thing.
Going out, maybe. Going in? Explosive delta-v is very definitely an option. Lethal delta-v is even easier.Going fast, in or out of atmosphere, doesn't cause or require you to experience high g-forces.
For a basic land attack cruise missile, yeah. For a cruise missile that also notices when it's being intercepted by a fighter and dodges the attack you need a sensor, most likely a radar, that lets it see that fighter coming. I don't think model shops offer tactical radars like that off the shelf!
1) Radar and LIDAR are, by definition, Line-of-Sight systems - if you have a clear, unobstructed line to the target, you CAN see it. Your only limitations are signal fade, time to live on your pulses, signal absorption/deflection, and receiver resolution; the second can be overcome with sufficient programming skills.Doesn't look like they've got enough range for the job (their 'long range' offering I saw on that page is 300 meters) but that may make the point that it's closer than I think. (EDIT: Maybe 320m or even 600m depending on which part of the product page is accurate. Still not enough warning for an air-to-air threat sensor.)
You are referring to the same US State Department that issued an updating "deck of 52" bounties during the Iraq conflicts that included different amounts for alive vs dead, some of which were only listed as dead? And paid out on those bounties?
I fail to see how this is related at all. The original point was wealthy individuals posting bounties, and you've just brought up yet another case of the government doing it.
Regardless, I think we've wandered far enough off the threads topic to kill this divergence anyway, I think we'll just have to end of 'we do not agree'.
What is that? I've never heard of that, unless it's the one where SKYNET evolves a conscience and makes peace with humanity....
Link?
And so it was answered.What is this "good skynet mini-series; and why have I not ever heard of it before?
So, uh, yeah... did you really mean to say that you cannot recommend this book? The context suggests that you were recommending it...If you want a stunning portrayal of how Z-G combat might work, I cannot recommend the book "Footfall", by Larry Niven and Jerry Pournell. The Archangel was an Orion-Drive, a pulsed nuclear rocket that had atom bombs as the motive force. A 10m thick slab of iron was the "engine bell", and between that and "The Brick", which was the command center and main body of the ship, was the mother of all shock absorbers.
Like a lot of "hard" sci-fi authors, I think that his short form stuff holds up a lot better. Give him enough word count to play with and at some point you realize he got lost playing with extrapolations. Not that there's anything wrong with that (Zummers said, looking around for lizards), but like you said, acquired taste.Larry Niven is... an acquired taste. Either you love his style of Science Fiction, or you absolutely hate it. Personally, I find it alternates between boring and horrible.