I was sorta cribbing off the round of the T-Gewehr. I'm willing to edit as necessary. It might be worth it to template out a range of options for people to pick from.
Or we could try to imitate the French and get a tiny 37mm cannon.
That's what I figured, but I was concerned about it being slightly too advanced for our present technology.
I love those tiny 37's. If my 25mm goes through I hope what ends up getting designed is something between those and a bolt action version of an L-39 Lahti. Bolt action might be too weak for it though so maybe 37mm style sliding block or riff off of Kapan's pseudo interrupted screw.
[ ] 37x136mm Roc
-[ ] 650g bullet
-[ ] 1200 m/s muzzle velocity
-[ ] Designed for use in bolt action
-[ ] AP, HE, or APHE
Do current propellent's let us hit this kind of velocity? I think you're heavily overestimating our current ability. I was looking at some 20mm's of WW1 to get a ballpark for my 25mm and it seemed that none of them could even push past around 850 m/s. Pom-Pom's were 37mm and they only do 550 m/s, French semi-auto Puteaux's could only do 600 m/s, and Russia's 37mm trench gun is even worse at only 440 m/s. Even amongst WW2 era 37mm's from the US, Czechoslovakia, Sweden, Germany, and Japan I don't see any velocities above 890 m/s with 760 m/s or so being more common.
Yes we are.
It's vote by block.wait did you make THREE plans?
Or are we trying to make three bullets to test?
Sure you are.@N.Now we are testing these rounds before adopting them, right?
That's by plan instead of by block.
Let's see if I've got the block voting set up right.
[X] 7.92×107mm PaP
-[X] 225 gr bullet
-[X] 1,275 m/s muzzle velocity
-[X] Rimless cartridge
Those aren't grams. Those are grains. A British unit commonly used for bullets and gunpowder. It's approximately 64.8 milligrams. In other words, that's a 14.57 gram bullet.That's wonky. I mean, setting aside that we use metric system and 7.92 is really not up our country's alley, something is very wrong about the bullet mass.