You Are: A sector admiral of a strained imperium.

We need all the ships we can and I don't want our PC to go below 100. Also with the Governor's nephew and a Viscountess with us, we should be covered on the political angle. We need all the ships we can for this attack with the planetary defenses. I have no doubt that the Battleships at Imhotep will either race back or attack the sector capital. Either way we need a lot of ships to deal with them. If we get those ships, we don't have PC for a Share and we are spending wealth on getting everything ready. It is go big or go home. Also as it said in the update, if we do well we can get a Share for less, probably as a reward for a good job.
like I said before we will make up the PC during the turn, and we won't need it for the turn given the PC bonus does not effect NASP worlds or anyone outside of the imperium.
 
@Gunman @Packrat Can we even buy Marines straight up or request sector budget increases at this time?

Also, Gunman, I would seriously consider buying Veterans for the Sword as well as transferring crew from the Endeavor, and specify how many crew levels you are transferring.
 
But otherwise
[X] Gunman
[X] Chuang Mu

I fixed it.

@Gunman I am going to have to I think, things have rather exploded in activity over the last couple of updates.

Two to four hours would be best. 8 hours wouldn't work because you often update daily. It hasn't been an hour yet and there are six votes and we're about to move to a second new page since the update.

Your plan is the one wasting PC on the Sector Budget.

Not wanting to run a deficit in our Sector Budget isn't a waste. I don't want to spend 11 wealth a quarter on a navy ship plus 4 more on our lifestyle. Not when there is so much more we can spend Wealth on like mercenaries, intelligence operations, private ships and more.
 
I must say, I am concerned at the lack of marines...

@Packrat: Could we requisition the two strike cruisers and just transfer over the crews of the Hawk and Harpy to each?

Fate Wants To Make Us Poor

Why the heck are you spending on sector budget when only a few days ago you were arguing against my investing in sector budget because it might be cheaper once we have Share?

I'm pretty sure we're getting Share if we win this next fight. Why not wait until then to raise the sector budget?

Two ships at -3 crew rating is just asking for them to die to battleships. The only reason to take the Sword is because we can strip ships to make her capable without reducing their effectiveness too far. We can't do that with a bunch of terribly crewed vessels weighing us down.

We can strip crews from other ships or spend wealth to give them better crew ratings.

I'm not sure if it's worth it, but we can do it.

(Also, if we requisition all 3 ships, the Strike Cruisers only cost 25 PC each - not sure if it's worth getting, but that IS really cheap for a pair of really nippy ships.)

fasquardon
 
Why the heck are you spending on sector budget when only a few days ago you were arguing against my investing in sector budget because it might be cheaper once we have Share?

I'm pretty sure we're getting Share if we win this next fight. Why not wait until then to raise the sector budget?
Vote for my plan then, I am not increasing the budget and we get a share.
must say, I am concerned at the lack of marines...

@Packrat: Could we requisition the two strike cruisers and just transfer over the crews of the Hawk and Harpy to each?
ummm why would we want more crappy light cruisers that are just slightly faster and with 1 more point of marines instead of a capital ship? I mean... what?
 
Personally, I want the strike cruisers. That'd give us a fleet of the following, if I'm not mistaken:

1 BC
4 CA
3 CL
1 FL Corvette
4(?) Patrol Cutters

Which I think gives us the guns, communication, and flexibility we need to fight these assholes.
 
@Gunman
These ships will begin with crews at Useless (-3) grade and 100% Readiness but you can transfer the crew from one of your light cruisers to a strike cruiser at the cost of one crew grade. For the battlecruiser, you would need to strip two crew grade levels from a heavy cruiser, three from a light cruiser or four from a corvette for each crew level up.

For example you could reduce the Endeavour from Elite (+3) to Mediocre (-1) crew in order to give the battlecruiser a Mediocre (-1) crew.

All ships will have no marines, you can also spend 3 Wealth per strike cruiser or 8 for the battlecruiser to up crew grade by one level through hiring veterans.

You didn't specify how many crew levels you're transferring. Also, I'm reading @Packrat here as saying that we can buy one level of experience for the BC with 8 Wealth, not that we can buy Marines with it. Only way to get Marines is to strip our command HQ.
 
Could we just send a false transmission, that Chuang Mu is falling?

The NASP ships don't have FTL comms
They need couriers to know what's going on.

So. Fake it. We have some NASP civilian ships.


Then go raid another wealthy and unprepared target instead.
 
@fasquardon You will get an option to rush up marine reinforcements at the end of the strategic turn, but there is nowhere training marines in your sector and the mercenaries who were hanging out of Illam are now all dead or in NASP prisoner of war camps on Imhotep.

Right now you have the marines on your ships and the small number you could get from stripping your fleet command headquarters, you already tapped out your reserves to bring the Cirrus up to full strength ahead of your raid.

Also you absolutely can just transfer a light cruiser crew (and marines) onto a strike cruiser. They lose one crew grade in the process, the light cruiser gets the rookies who were forming the caretaker crew for the strike cruiser and drops to Useless (-3)

Edit: @CrackedCosmonaut you do not have NASP codes so it would be difficult but you do have something better than their civilian ships, you have a captured attack skiff. You could certainly look at performing shenanigans there especially if you put Captain Sones or one of your two crazy Subterfuge corvette commanders on the job.
 
Last edited:
Two ships at -3 crew rating is just asking for them to die to battleships. The only reason to take the Sword is because we can strip ships to make her capable without reducing their effectiveness too far. We can't do that with a bunch of terribly crewed vessels weighing us down.
Say it with me, multi-attack bonus. Also if they are attacking the weaker ships, they aren't attacking our heavy hitters. So while losing them might hurt a bit, it gives us more leeway in how much damage we can absorb as a fleet. You send your pawns out first in chess.

like I said before we will make up the PC during the turn, and we won't need it for the turn given the PC bonus does not effect NASP worlds or anyone outside of the imperium.
I would rather keep our PC above 100 at all times. Plus if the battle goes well the Share will cost less. We can easily get one when we return. Also another reason for committing all the forces we can get to the attack. In chess you have lesser pieces. Even in strategy games you have expendable units. We can't expect 100% victory. I would rather losses be absorbed by expendable ships rather than our Capital or other key ships.

Not wanting to run a deficit in our Sector Budget isn't a waste. I don't want to spend 11 wealth a quarter on a navy ship plus 4 more on our lifestyle. Not when there is so much more we can spend Wealth on like mercenaries, intelligence operations, private ships and more.
Again the Sector Budget is a waste of time/resources. Either things heat up and we keep making bank off the fighting. Or things cool down and we can reduce the number of ships under our command. The payback time just isn't worth while. Taking prizes/raiding is a far more efficient use of our wealth/PC. Getting more ships with PC to raid/capture is far more cost effective than investing it. Even if things cool down we can sell off our ships to another sector.

@Gunman


You didn't specify how many crew levels you're transferring. Also, I'm reading @Packrat here as saying that we can buy one level of experience for the BC with 8 Wealth, not that we can buy Marines with it. Only way to get Marines is to strip our command HQ.
That is how I read it and we don't want to strip Command HQ in case of an attack.

[X] Plan: Prepared
-[] Wait A Week. If you wait a week, you will be able to expedite repairs on your ships and bring into service one or more of the captured vessels finishing refit above Ilam.
-[] Battlecruiser +2 Strike Cruisers (105 Political Capital, +5 sector budget)
-[] Spend 14 Wealth to upgrade crew on Battlecruiser and Cruisers
-[] Refit both cruisers (-6 Wealth, both cruisers raise to 65% Readiness)
-[] Transfer command to Battlecrusier, give XO command of Endeavor
-[] Transfer Ranca into the command of one of the cruisers and give our fleet corvette to Wison so she gets a shot at looking good for the news vids.
-[] Order cutters to watch fleet at Imhotep to determine if they make a move to return or attack Sector Capital, rush ahead to give warning
-[] Speak with Viscountess about command of the fleet and disposition
-[] Do not Request a Share.
-[] Chuang Mu
 
Personally, I want the strike cruisers. That'd give us a fleet of the following, if I'm not mistaken:

1 BC
4 CA
3 CL
1 FL Corvette
4(?) Patrol Cutters

Which I think gives us the guns, communication, and flexibility we need to fight these assholes.

No, we don't. They have -3 crews and no marines. So their special ability (marines) is useless, and they have no Firepower bonus after crew quality, so it's straight Tactics of captain + 3d6. A BB will utterly shred them, a CL can hurt them, and even an attack skiffs is a threat.
 
We should wait until after the crisis is over to get a share; there's no point in blowing PC on it when we've got wealth to burn and we can just out and out buy it once this is over. Getting a share now doesn't appreciably help us for the fight ahead.
 
No, we don't. They have -3 crews and no marines. So their special ability (marines) is useless, and they have no Firepower bonus after crew quality, so it's straight Tactics of captain + 3d6. A BB will utterly shred them, a CL can hurt them, and even an attack skiffs is a threat.

Yeah and every turn the BB is shredding them is a turn we're shredding the BB. Sacrifices have to be made in war.
 
ummm why would we want more crappy light cruisers that are just slightly faster and with 1 more point of marines instead of a capital ship? I mean... what?

Because they are fast enough that they don't hold back the battleship. Those things are as fast as patrol cutters.

Also, if we transfer all the crews from our 3 light cruisers, we can get 2 cruisers at 100% readiness and better veterancy levels than our cruisers.

I think this way is much more effective than wasting wealth on refitting the two light cruisers up to 65%.

(Though IMO, we shouldn't reduce the light cruisers below mediocre - but if we do that, we can still have 2 strike cruisers at mediocre and with actual marines on board and 100% readiness.)

fasquardon
 
Yeah and every turn the BB is shredding them is a turn we're shredding the BB. Sacrifices have to be made in war.
Exactly. Also there is the possibility of using them to grapple a Capital Ship and then have the crew use escape pods and then explode it to cripple the Capital Ship. Having more pieces to use and options to take is never a bad thing, especially when there is so much riding on the line in this battle. People wanted a battle so time to step up and commit 100% to it. No half measures.

Start voting people. ;p
[X] Plan: Prepared
-[] Wait A Week. If you wait a week, you will be able to expedite repairs on your ships and bring into service one or more of the captured vessels finishing refit above Ilam.
-[] Battlecruiser +2 Strike Cruisers (105 Political Capital, +5 sector budget)
-[] Spend 14 Wealth to upgrade crew on Battlecruiser and Cruisers
-[] Refit both cruisers (-6 Wealth, both cruisers raise to 65% Readiness)
-[] Transfer command to Battlecrusier, give XO command of Endeavor
-[] Transfer Ranca into the command of one of the cruisers and give our fleet corvette to Wison so she gets a shot at looking good for the news vids.
-[] Order cutters to watch fleet at Imhotep to determine if they make a move to return or attack Sector Capital, rush ahead to give warning
-[] Speak with Viscountess about command of the fleet and disposition
-[] Do not Request a Share.
-[] Chuang Mu
 
Say it with me, multi-attack bonus.

Which will still leave the ships at a gross negative, with zero marines leaving them hilariously vulnerable to boarding. Our HC core is enough, going for more, especially with the weaknesses it imparts, is not clever.

@san, we don't need a Share right now, not when we can get one granted to us when we get back for less. Getting a Share now is premature in the extreme, and pushes us far below our safe PC threshold. More importantly, sector budget is vastly important and it wasn't Gunman who was arguing against increasing it. One of the largest parts of the last few days of arguing re: PC has been Gunman, myself and others trying to moderate economic insanity by sticking to our guns on PC expenditure for sector budget. We cannot assume that we'll be able to keep on raking in prize money, not when the NASP does have major reinforcements due to arrive next strategic turn. Also, maintaining a balanced budget in the middle of a crisis, and then proceeding to win whilst doing so, will play rather well with the bean counters back at Fleet Command.

Having more pieces to use and options to take is never a bad thing

:facepalm: I see someone is willfully ignoring the existence of the KISS principle and the extremely good reasons for it being so prevalent and respected.
 
Exactly. Also there is the possibility of using them to grapple a Capital Ship and then have the crew use escape pods and then explode it to cripple the Capital Ship. Having more pieces to use and options to take is never a bad thing, especially when there is so much riding on the line in this battle. People wanted a battle so time to step up and commit 100% to it. No half measures.

Start voting people. ;p

What crew levels does this plan leave us at, on a ship-by-ship basis?
 
I fixed my plan. 2 levels of marines will go to our BC and we don't end up spending 40 wealth.

[X] Fate Wants To Make Us Poor
[X] Wait A Week. If you wait a week, you will be able to expedite repairs on your ships and bring into service one or more of the captured vessels finishing refit above Ilam.
[X] Battlecruiser (-55 Political Capital, +3 sector budget)
[X] Reduce crew from the Endeavor and transfer to the Sword of Democracy. Transfer two levels including two levels of Marines.
[X] Make Sones captain of the Endeavor and Phardson the XO because the Peregrin is at 50% Readiness.
[X] Make Adald XO of the Sword of Democracy.
[X] Refit both cruisers (-6 Wealth, both cruisers raise to 65% Readiness)
[X] Spend 110 Political Capital on Sector Budget
[X] Do not Request a Share.
[X] Chuang Mu


6 Wealth, 165 Political Capital. This update is trying to squeeze money and capital out of us and we have to be aware of that. Attacking Chuang Mu will fix that. The 110 PC is needed to eliminate our sector budget deficit with the addition of a battlecruiser.
 
Last edited:
Yeah and every turn the BB is shredding them is a turn we're shredding the BB. Sacrifices have to be made in war.

... The BB is likely going to over-roll them by 15 just by bonus. That's enough to blow them up in ONE SHOT if they roll above average or the strike cruiser rolls low. You're literally advocating for us to spend 50 PC for two ships that will get oneshotted if the capitals aim at them at all, and can't hit the BBs even with multi-attack bonii!
 
Back
Top