Pointing out we're putting our hand in fire by getting ourselves in "future entanglements" according to Packrat isn't scaremongering.
Let's see.
@Briefvoice @Dwergar if you don't want to sabotage our character by committing a highly illegal activity that can kill us with no chance of concealing it, consider changing your vote to anything else. Packrat has shown he is willing to add options that are bad and will haunt us. If you want to improve our relationship with Ranca, drinking responsibly still does that because it means we spend our time with her instead of doing something else.
Badgering other players to change their votes for the absolutely best option that of course happens to be yours.
Implying other players who don't want to vote your way want to sabotage the quest/character instead.
Implying the other option is a trap meant to haunt us and screw us over.
Amplifying the risks of negative outcomes to make them seem like a certainty. We have ways of dealing with/mitigating the fallout even
if things go wrong.
Going as far as to state that your option does certain things better than the option that has it
written in plain text.
And that's, like, in 3 sentences, of which you have many more. I know you are enthusiastic about this quest, but could you tone it down just a bit, please? Deriding other players and their choices doesn't seem to serve your purpose.
When Chronologist raised the possibility of failure when jumping to New Theia with 3 warships to our name, you laughed him in the face, and he wasn't half as adamant about his opinion. Here we have a mirror situation, and an option with a bit of a risk attached, even though it is relatively manageable considering the layers of legal and extra-legal protections we have... but you are on the other side of the fence now, so it must be everyone else who are wrong.
Practice what you preach, man.