- Location
- East Coast
I'm fairly sure the only possible explanation for that is 'I've been playing too much EU4 lately and think that it's a good political simulator'
For late 20th-century politics, no less.
I'm fairly sure the only possible explanation for that is 'I've been playing too much EU4 lately and think that it's a good political simulator'
Monarchist Portugal. In a personal union. With the Portuguese King set to appoint Bolsonaro as PM.
Because that which you in your ignorance call God was in truth merely the greatest sinner of all.
Monarchist Portugal. In a personal union. With the Portuguese King set to appoint Bolsonaro as PM.
Fuck no! What the fuck is wrong with the fucking writer?
Beyond the obvious, I mean.
I'm fairly sure the only possible explanation for that is 'I've been playing too much EU4 lately and think that it's a good political simulator'
I don't follow.The place that goes ballistic when you propose any tiny divergence from OTL as ASB?
That or a deliberate attempt to make as many people cringe as possible. I think every foreign country update has been a joke.
Keeping a hold on realism isn't a bad thing persay, but what I'm wondering is how Buggs Bunny Belarus got past the censors, so to speak.
I'm shocked they got away with obvious current affairs being shoved into the TL.Monarchist Portugal. In a personal union. With the Portuguese King set to appoint Bolsonaro as PM.
I'm shocked they got away with obvious current affairs being shoved into the TL.
I can't think of any timeline on AH.com which hasn't had at least one or two people declaim it as implausible and/or ASB. Queen Nixon has certainly had a parade of people point out its various insanities, although that never stopped the author pushing the frontier of the bullshit envelope.There are no censors for something like that. AH.com has long been host to wide range of TLs. You may face criticism for a badly-written improbable TL, but that doesn't mean you have to stop writing it.
I can't think of any timeline on AH.com which hasn't had at least one or two people declaim it as implausible and/or ASB. Queen Nixon has certainly had a parade of people point out its various insanities, although that never stopped the author pushing the frontier of the bullshit envelope.
He was average height for the time, but surrounded himself with large bodyguards, leading to that image, which the British ran with for propaganda reasonsThat's just British propaganda and bad unit conversion, plus a habit of being around especially tall troops. He wasn't small.
He was average height for the time, but surrounded himself with large bodyguards, leading to that image, which the British ran with for propaganda reasons
I might need to clear this up. The U.S. in the aftermath of WW3 has its own version of the Marshall Plan. Taking advantage of their position compared to the rest of Europe, there was an incentive put into place for war torn countries not to put any limits on foreign media, which would end up getting the U.S. a wave of unlimited access to a new market, Eastern Europe. Some scream cultural imperialism, but to the negotiators, this is just helping domestic business. It's a two way street though, as a new class of Eastern European animators and influences America in turn. Hence "Disney's Baba Yaga". I had the idea that "Mickey Mouse Pirogi" become a popular cafeteria food but that seemed like too much of a tangent. Anyways, since native entertainment studios couldn't match American ones in many cases, Eastern Europe sees a lot more American cartoons on TV. Kids in Belarus, as an example, took a liking to Bugs Bunny. Hence the joke TTL that Belarus is gonna add Bugs Bunny to the flag.Keeping a hold on realism isn't a bad thing per se, but what I'm wondering is how Bugs Bunny Belarus got past the censors, so to speak.
To begin with how did the complete shift in NATO's strategic warfighting, build up of troops and aggressor infrastructure, and the idelogical movement explaining away the Soviets as an enemy safe to knock around go so unnoticed in Moscow that we're able to jump them in a non-nuclear non-total war?
The new NATO war machines were built from an alloy of narrativium and handwavium.To begin with how did the complete shift in NATO's strategic warfighting, build up of troops and aggressor infrastructure, and the idelogical movement explaining away the Soviets as an enemy safe to knock around go so unnoticed in Moscow that we're able to jump them in a non-nuclear non-total war?