There Goes the Neighbourhood (Stellaris Quest)

[X] The status quo was supported by the intellectual classes and optimists, who believed that advancing technology and its application was the key solution to the problems of resource scarcity and its application. This was in many ways the continuation of the general policy and belief of the 20th and early 21st centuries, a promise which it had been unable to fulfil before dire need resulted in global conflict. To this mode of thought the problems of the world were simply awaiting a future solution.
 
[X] The status quo was supported by the intellectual classes and optimists, who believed that advancing technology and its application was the key solution to the problems of resource scarcity and its application. This was in many ways the continuation of the general policy and belief of the 20th and early 21st centuries, a promise which it had been unable to fulfil before dire need resulted in global conflict. To this mode of thought the problems of the world were simply awaiting a future solution.

I do no think that a cultural mouvement around empathy can solve humanity issues, more ressources and tools are needed.
 
I do no think that a cultural mouvement around empathy can solve humanity issues...
Neither do I. But it helps, and won't stop us from getting more resources and better tools.

Also, frigging magic psionics! Shields to make the best possible dark matter shields possible for materialists look feeble! Jump-drives that laugh at their materialist cousins! Precognitive targeting computers! Those are all totally things in Stellaris.

Just putting that out there.
 
[X] The Unity Movement emerged first and strongest from those areas most ravaged by conflict, but quickly spread worldwide. It held that the cause of the Resource Wars was not necessarily the lack of resources themselves, but instead the failure of empathy and the common bonds of mankind. There had been enough to go around - but selfishness and a lack of perspective made violence inevitable. As one leader of the movement said, it was "half philosophy, half religion, and all common decency".
 
So, the Materialists here are the ones who actually read as being more dogmatic. Praise the science, keep your eyes skyward in optimism, and hope desperately that progress comes to you soon enough to see it?

Spiritualism here looks more appealing in terms of the kind of culture I'd actually like to live in; focus the culture on empathy and philosophical moralism. Both of these things are fantastic if you want a people to be antithetical to the conditions necessary for crimes of desperation, and neither of them are inherently against technological advancement.

[X] The Unity movement
 
[X] The Unity Movement emerged first and strongest from those areas most ravaged by conflict, but quickly spread worldwide. It held that the cause of the Resource Wars was not necessarily the lack of resources themselves, but instead the failure of empathy and the common bonds of mankind. There had been enough to go around - but selfishness and a lack of perspective made violence inevitable. As one leader of the movement said, it was "half philosophy, half religion, and all common decency".
 
[X] The status quo was supported by the intellectual classes and optimists, who believed that advancing technology and its application was the key solution to the problems of resource scarcity and its application. This was in many ways the continuation of the general policy and belief of the 20th and early 21st centuries, a promise which it had been unable to fulfil before dire need resulted in global conflict. To this mode of thought the problems of the world were simply awaiting a future solution.
 
Tho i find curious the idea that if materialism wins,it would mean current culture managed to have a degree of continuity on the public eye

Some omakes based on how the hell did the nations manage to survive the resource scarcity would be interesting
 
[X] The status quo was supported by the intellectual classes and optimists, who believed that advancing technology and its application was the key solution to the problems of resource scarcity and its application. This was in many ways the continuation of the general policy and belief of the 20th and early 21st centuries, a promise which it had been unable to fulfil before dire need resulted in global conflict. To this mode of thought the problems of the world were simply awaiting a future solution.
 
[X] The status quo was supported by the intellectual classes and optimists, who believed that advancing technology and its application was the key solution to the problems of resource scarcity and its application. This was in many ways the continuation of the general policy and belief of the 20th and early 21st centuries, a promise which it had been unable to fulfil before dire need resulted in global conflict. To this mode of thought the problems of the world were simply awaiting a future solution.
 
[X] The Unity Movement emerged first and strongest from those areas most ravaged by conflict, but quickly spread worldwide. It held that the cause of the Resource Wars was not necessarily the lack of resources themselves, but instead the failure of empathy and the common bonds of mankind. There had been enough to go around - but selfishness and a lack of perspective made violence inevitable. As one leader of the movement said, it was "half philosophy, half religion, and all common decency".
 
[X] The status quo was supported by the intellectual classes and optimists, who believed that advancing technology and its application was the key solution to the problems of resource scarcity and its application. This was in many ways the continuation of the general policy and belief of the 20th and early 21st centuries, a promise which it had been unable to fulfil before dire need resulted in global conflict. To this mode of thought the problems of the world were simply awaiting a future solution

Remember people, all psionics draw their power from somewhere, I really don't want to destroy the galaxy by drawing too much out of a black hole.
 
[X] The status quo was supported by the intellectual classes and optimists, who believed that advancing technology and its application was the key solution to the problems of resource scarcity and its application. This was in many ways the continuation of the general policy and belief of the 20th and early 21st centuries, a promise which it had been unable to fulfil before dire need resulted in global conflict. To this mode of thought the problems of the world were simply awaiting a future solution

Sad that democracy won, Oligarchical Materialism is funny
 
[X] The Unity Movement emerged first and strongest from those areas most ravaged by conflict, but quickly spread worldwide. It held that the cause of the Resource Wars was not necessarily the lack of resources themselves, but instead the failure of empathy and the common bonds of mankind. There had been enough to go around - but selfishness and a lack of perspective made violence inevitable. As one leader of the movement said, it was "half philosophy, half religion, and all common decency".
 
[X] The Unity Movement emerged first and strongest from those areas most ravaged by conflict, but quickly spread worldwide. It held that the cause of the Resource Wars was not necessarily the lack of resources themselves, but instead the failure of empathy and the common bonds of mankind. There had been enough to go around - but selfishness and a lack of perspective made violence inevitable. As one leader of the movement said, it was "half philosophy, half religion, and all common decency".
 
[x] The status quo was supported by the intellectual classes and optimists, who believed that advancing technology and its application was the key solution to the problems of resource scarcity and its application. This was in many ways the continuation of the general policy and belief of the 20th and early 21st centuries, a promise which it had been unable to fulfil before dire need resulted in global conflict. To this mode of thought the problems of the world were simply awaiting a future solution.
 
[X] The Unity Movement emerged first and strongest from those areas most ravaged by conflict, but quickly spread worldwide. It held that the cause of the Resource Wars was not necessarily the lack of resources themselves, but instead the failure of empathy and the common bonds of mankind. There had been enough to go around - but selfishness and a lack of perspective made violence inevitable. As one leader of the movement said, it was "half philosophy, half religion, and all common decency".
 
The Shape of Things to Come: Rejecting Warfare
The Unity Movement presented good ideas and had the potential to weave itself into the social fabric but its influence eventually ebbed with the times. Its philosophy and calls to empathy became a point of conversation, an interesting titbit about some person or other, but ultimately no more important than the party they voted for. Instead life continued as it had before, with promises in the future of limitless power or flying cars, and the conviction that one day mankind would find a way if it just kept looking.

While the Resource Wars had defined the latter half of the 21st century, it had become uncomfortably apparent to all parties that a repeat was nearly inevitable by the early 2120s. Despite all the reclamation and efficiency initiatives, all the sustainable efforts to conserve and recycle what remained, the population was simply too large and the mistakes made early on in industrial history too great.

[ ] Increased militarisation was inevitable as a result of the shortages, as even those who did not wish to fight needed to be a great enough obstacle to dissuade any opportunism. When the pinch came, leaders inevitably were required to use their resources. It was a clean war, as wars go, with minimal casualties. Then there was another. And another. Even if the loss of life was vanishingly small compared to history, some were left prosperous and others destitute. In this way the peoples of Earth learned the hard truth: when it came down to it mercy could only be offered by the strong.

[X] The increasing shortages and failures of infrastructure for lack of material laid bare the devastating consequences of strife. Military expenditures were diverted to shoring up desperately needed utilities, with the world breathing a sigh of relief as it backed down from the industrial warfare that could cause so much misery and cost so many resources. As nations all struggled to get by they could not afford the upkeep of a strong military, and over time warfare and its waste took root in the public consciousness as one of the great setbacks in human development.

[ ] Faced with a descent back to the darkest days of the prior century, massive efforts were undertaken to develop solutions that would enable humanity to maintain its quality of life. Destructive mining methods were used without hesitation if it meant preventing a backslide into barbarism, the seas were seeded with genetically modified algae, and the first nuclear rocket launched thousands of tons to prospect the asteroid belt. When needs must what needs must be done. Slowly but surely under the twin thrusts of innovation and necessity humanity reversed its downward spiral.
 
Last edited:
[X] Faced with a descent back to the darkest days of the prior century, massive efforts were undertaken to develop solutions that would enable humanity to maintain its quality of life. Destructive mining methods were used without hesitation if it meant preventing a backslide into barbarism, the seas were seeded with genetically modified algae, and the first nuclear rocket launched thousands of tons to prospect the asteroid belt. But when needs must, what needs must be done. Slowly but surely under the twin thrusts of innovation and necessity, humanity reversed its downward spiral.

SCIENCE
 
[X] Faced with a descent back to the darkest days of the prior century, massive efforts were undertaken to develop solutions that would enable humanity to maintain its quality of life. Destructive mining methods were used without hesitation if it meant preventing a backslide into barbarism, the seas were seeded with genetically modified algae, and the first nuclear rocket launched thousands of tons to prospect the asteroid belt. But when needs must, what needs must be done. Slowly but surely under the twin thrusts of innovation and necessity, humanity reversed its downward spiral.
 
[X] The increasing shortages and failures of infrastructure for lack of material laid bare the devastating consequences of strife. Military expenditures were diverted to shoring up desperately needed utilities, with the world breathing a sigh of relief as it backed down from the industrial warfare that could cause so much misery and cost so many resources. As nations all struggled to get by they could not afford the upkeep of a strong military, and over time warfare and its waste took root in the public consciousness as one of the great setbacks in human development.
 
Like many fanatic variants of the ethic axis, they are usually societies you wouldn't want to actually live in.

I agree, I just usually play democracies of mad scientists in stellaris.
Thoses that breed xenomorphs and use them to introduce primitives to the wonder of direct democratic mad technocracy.
 
Last edited:
[x] Increased militarisation was inevitable as a result of the shortages, as even those who did not wish to fight needed to be a great enough obstacle to dissuade any opportunism. When the pinch came, leaders inevitably were required to use their resources. It was a clean war, as wars go, with minimal casualties. Then there was another. And another. Even if the loss of life was vanishingly small compared to history, some were left prosperous and others destitute. In this way the peoples of Earth learned the hard truth: when it came down to it mercy could only be offered by the strong.


View: https://youtu.be/-WK6pA3tqDA

i always been on the opinion that is necesary to be paranoid and be ready to excert contudent violence at any given moment
world is cruel and random,only way to protect yourself is to able to fight back equally pound by pound

Be it through self defense at individual level
And by being a military proactive force at state level

Like many fanatic variants of the ethic axis, they are usually societies you wouldn't want to actually live in.

the "i fucking love science" cringy fanboy gang variety

or the "fallout 4 amoral scientifici progress fanatic" gang?
 
Last edited:
Back
Top