Rising of the Shield Hero Discussion Thread

Status
Not open for further replies.
WWWWHHHHYYYYYY......

Ahem.

The Rising of the Shield Hero - Wikipedia

Naofumi Iwatani was summoned into a parallel world along with three other people to become the world's Heroes. Each of the heroes were respectively equipped with their own legendary equipment when summoned. Naofumi happened to receive the Legendary Shield, the sole defensive equipment, while the others received weapons capable of attacking. Unlike the other heroes who are fully supported by the kingdom and gain several strong allies each, Naofumi's luck turns to the worse after his single companion, later revealed to be none other than Princess Malty, betrays him, and leaves him devoid of all assistance and supplies after she falsely accuses him of sexually assaulting her.
Shunned by everyone from the King to peasants, Naofumi is forced to train as a hero alone while working to make ends meet, until he buys from a slave trader a young raccoon demi-human girl named Raphtalia and an egg that hatches into a bird creature whom he names "Filo", both quickly growing into adulthood and becoming powerful warriors under his care. As they little by little gain the trust and gratitude of the people with their heroic actions, Naofumi and his companions work hard to fulfill their mission as saviors of the world, while unraveling its deepest secrets.

The series is infamous for it's jerk ass lead, false rape accusation and general misogeny.
 
Last edited:
WWWWHHHHYYYYYY......

Ahem.

The Rising of the Shield Hero - Wikipedia



The series is infamous for it's jerk ass lead, false #metoo accusation and general misogeny.

*blink* Erm.

I agree on the jerk ass lead (which is part of the appeal: watching a jerk in a jerk world doing nice things), but misogyny ? #metoo accusation ? Where did you see that in the series ? It's only political commentators that tried to stuck those labels on Rising of the Shield Hero.

EDIT: I should precise i am only talking about the current state of the anime. I heard nasty things about the web novel, but i am not curious enough to read it.
 
Last edited:
*blink* Erm.

I agree on the jerk ass lead (which is part of the appeal: watching a jerk in a jerk world doing nice things), but misogyny ? #metoo accusation ? Where did you see that in the series ? It's only political commentators that tried to stuck those labels on Rising of the Shield Hero.

EDIT: I should precise i am only talking about the current state of the anime. I heard nasty things about the web novel, but i am not curious enough to read it.

First novel has a woman claim he tried to rape her. It's a huge plot point. 0_o
 
First novel has a woman claim he tried to rape her. It's a huge plot point. 0_o

So what ? A villain is doing a villainy thing, and it's used in the story to justify why the Shield Hero is incapable to trust anyone later on.
I am not sure if talking about #metoo is relevant here. And i don't see any misogyny in the anime so far ?

Sorry if i seems slow or something, because i might need an explanation here.
 
Last edited:
I think that #metoo has nothing to do with it purely for the reason that the Author is not a time traveler . Seriously this thing started in 2012. If you want to say "False rape accusation," say so. Because ", false #metoo accusation" is not something that can happen in the world before, #metoo

I will not make a moral assessment of the "False rape accusation" as a plot device because I did not see the anime and therefore cannot speak about this particular case.
 
Last edited:
Good summary of the series issues.

Why The Rising of the Shield Hero is the Most Controversial Anime This Season

Nothing really changes the fact that our hero is quite literally a slave master. Yet while this would seem to be a non-starter for a "hero," slave-owning heroes in fantasy tales are becoming a trope all their own in recent light novels, manga, and anime. That said there's usually an "excuse" to make this act more palatable.

But in The Rising of the Shield Hero, Naofumi doesn't buy Raphtalia for the sole purpose of freeing her–only for her to reject being freed. Nor is she is slave through some kind of magical mistake that neither he nor Raphtalia knows how to undo. No, Naofumi buys sickly child Raphtalia to be his sword–to be his disposable tool and fight for him in battle.

Yet, it gets more disturbing: when Raphtalia refuses to fight out of fear and her own past trauma–understandable given she's literally a young child–he compels her with the magical slave seal, leaving her writhing in pain until she complies. Beyond this clear physical abuse, he threatens to throw her away–i.e., give her back to the slave dealer–if she is unable to fight as he desires. So there's more than a bit of emotional abuse as well.​

Changed it just to 'false rape accusation' then....

I think that #metoo has nothing to do with it purely for the reason that the Author is not a time traveler . Seriously this thing started in 2012. If you want to say "False rape accusation," say so. Because ", false #metoo accusation" is not something that can happen in the world before, #metoo

I will not make a moral assessment of the "False rape accusation" as a plot device because I did not see the anime and therefore cannot speak about this particular case.
 
Last edited:
So what ? A villain is doing a villainy thing, and it's used in the story to justify why the Shield Hero is incapable to trust anyone later on.
I am not sure if talking about #metoo is relevant here. And i don't see any misogyny in the anime so far ?

Sorry if i seems slow or something, because i might need an explanation here.
The reason it's shitty is that false rape accusations are incredibly rare and yet a certain misogynistic paranoia drives some people to obsess over them which is often used to dismiss the concerns of the many honest accusers because "bitches lie". So a work that has a false rape accusation as a major part of its plot can feed those toxic and paranoid views.

I don't know about the quality of the work in question but the presence of a major false rape accusation is terrible, it's a super MRA-y premise.
 
After reading Richard Eisenbeis's article, i am firmly in the camp 'your mileage may vary greatly' and 'if i was the LN writer, i would have resolved differently the slavery subplot, because it was very clumsily badly handled'.
Won't stop me watching the anime for now, we will see if the truly awful parts that might be coming later are changed or not.

I don't know about the quality of the work in question but the presence of a major false rape accusation is terrible, it's a super MRA-y premise.

So you judge a series which doesn't have any sexist point of view in itself (as i said, for now) on the unrelated reactions of stupid and insane people on an unrelated topic ?
 
Last edited:
So you judge a series which doesn't have any sexist point of view in itself (as i said, for now) on the unrelated reactions of stupid and insane people on an unrelated topic ?
No, I judge the series for using a highly problematic premise that is completely unnecessary to write any kind of good story.

Furthermore, I literally said they weren't unrelated. That premise feeds the exact kind of mentality that leads to MRA thought, that women are just waiting to falsely accuse you of rape because they're evil lying bitches. The fact it was a single woman is irrelevant, people are quite adept at taking single instances and projecting them onto larger groups.

The author may not have anything worse in it but that doesn't make their choice of premise any less objectionable or irresponsible.
 
Last edited:
And i don't see any misogyny in the anime so far ?
So you judge a series which doesn't have any sexist point of view in itself
Man, the TVTropes page is kinda bad but what it points out:
One of his first concerns when the heroes are recruiting companions is that he'd like a cute, female companion to protect.
ultimately selects Raphtalia not because she's the best option for what he needed (a combat slave) but because she was female and he could fantasize about enslaving Myne AKA Malty who had backstabbed him not long before.
We learn in the first chapters that Melromarc is a matriarchy and any harm done on women, even attempting to harm one, is punishable by death. The only reason why Naofumi wasn't executed was because he was one of four heroes needed to deal with the Wave. This means that the men that Malty lied on in the past didn't have the immunity from execution that Naofumi did, and she most likely stole all their money and watched them die for her own amusement.
Shows you not seeing it is on you. This is all mostly things from the first episode.

We have:
  • A hero concerned about having a female companion for chauvinistic reasons
  • The false rape accusation
  • The fact that the fantasy kingdom is a matriarchy for some reason and that apparently means rape accusations lead to executions, making it appear like a strawman feminist construct
  • Him getting a female slave to fantasize enslaving his tormentor
On their own, some of these element may be innocuous, but taken as a whole, it's like this world and story have been created by someone with, if not misogynistic intent, dubious ideas at least.
 
No, I judge the series for using a highly problematic premise that is completely unnecessary to write any kind of good story.

Let just say that i completely disagree with you on principle. No premise, as problematic as it can be, can be deemed 'unnecessary to write a good story'. The true question (and i think you might agree with me) is if the author can write this problematic premise well.
Of course, it seems many are of the opinion that Rising of the Shield Hero is badly exploiting its premise.

I see the fun has already started/s

For now it's a civil disagreement, we will see if the world burns later. :p

Shows you not seeing it is on you. This is all mostly things from the first episode.

We have:
  • A hero concerned about having a female companion for chauvinistic reasons
  • The false rape accusation
  • The fact that the fantasy kingdom is a matriarchy for some reason and that apparently means rape accusations lead to executions, making it appear like a strawman feminist construct
  • Him getting a female slave to fantasize enslaving his tormentor
On their own, some of these element may be innocuous, but taken as a whole, it's like this world and story have been created by someone with, if not misogynistic intent, dubious ideas at least.

* A juvenile and immature man is having at the start juvenile and immature thoughts. He will lose them soon.
* The false rape accusation is a villain's action, the tvtropes page's speculations are irrelevant to the show (and they are also unfounded).
* Nothing to say about the kingdom itself, it might or might not be a product of values dissonance.
* Fantasizing of enslaving his tormentor ? Yeah, it's really bad and disgusting, but doesn't happen at all in the anime (apparently it's from the LN ?). It's also very soon after the treason, with Naofumi in a very bad place mentally and being at his worst. The only interest of showing this thought to the reader is how he will change for the better from there.
 
So what ? A villain is doing a villainy thing, and it's used in the story to justify why the Shield Hero is incapable to trust anyone later on.

But it's not just a villain doing a villainy thing, it's a very specific setup of the story's ideological worldview that just happens to coincide perfectly with an MRA way of viewing the world.

MRA's blowing false rape accusations out of proportion isn't just a thing they do because they believe wrong things, it's intentional propaganda designed to get men to distrust women by portraying a world where women who aren't subservient to their men are secret puppetmasters maliciously manipulating and toying with men for no other reason that they're evil hedonistic harpies.

And Shield Hero makes this literally true in its world. Thw critical detail is that the false rape accusation is the villainous action that lets you know the villain is a monster. Not, like, fucking blowing up a villain or killing someone the hero cares about. But a very specific gender portrayal that just happens to tap into the insecurities of a male geek audience.

And the fact that the character is just evil isn't a defence. It's the exact opposite of one. Because the character being just evil for obviously gender coded reasons and not at any point allowed to have some sympathetic traits tips the story's hand.

It's not immediately as bad as the original work, which makes it clear that it thinks being a seductress who makes false rape accusations is not only evil, but absolutely evil with no hope for redemption to the point where your mother can send you off to be raped tortured to death without being a fucking monster for it.
 
Last edited:
the tvtropes page's speculations are irrelevant to the show (and they are also unfounded).
It's not speculations, it's descriptive. Not sure what you mean by unfounded either.

You're also missing the forest of my arguments for its trees, which doesn't actually rebut it because, as I said, taken as a whole it paints a bad picture, so individually adressing each point is not really effective and missing the point (I even said some elements on their own would be innocuous).
 
You might be right. As i said, i will watch the series for now and see where it goes, how it encapsulate everything.

I actually like the concept of "an isekai gone really wrong, where the protag became a jerkass due to trauma but with enough character development and love came back to being a hero". So i would be pissed if it's another wasted opportunity to have a good story.
 
Honestly, the rape accusation isn't the defining problem. Myne is literally a princess. I'm pretty sure if you traveled back to the Middle Ages where the recognition of rape was... less, a princess accusing some luckless commoner of rape would probably still result in the getting the head chopped off. The claim that it's a matriarchy only comes from Myne herself in her effort to persuade him to fuck himself.

The bigger issues are that he's adamant in maintaining female slaves even past what's necessary, their determination to remain slaves even when they don't have to, and Myne's punishment. The rape accusation becomes part of the bigger issue, when taken in with all this, but it isn't really defining.

Edit: I meant to say is not the defining problem
 
Last edited:
The claim that it's a matriarchy only comes from Myne herself in her effort to persuade him to fuck himself.
Actually, yes, Melromac is matriachal kingdom. The Queen wasn't there because she had to stop her neighbours from bickering while, y'know, monsters popping up regularly. Myne can do what she can because her mom wasn't there to spank her.
The bigger issues are that he's adamant in maintaining female slaves even past what's necessary,
He kept male slaves too. Just sayin'
their determination to remain slaves even when they don't have to,
Shield Hero basically legendary folk hero for beastman and demihuman. Most of his slaves basically demihuman/ beastfolk that had been f***ed over by other humans, and basically scouted by slave trader and then resold to Shield Hero. Shield Hero depends on Slave Trader simply because he's best option available for him. And then became a habit
and Myne's punishment.
She tried to kill her sister, involved in coup attempt (three times), and in general being unproductive toward her own country. It's practically miracle she survived executor blade for so long.
Although if you just don't like the whole 'slavery', 'gratuitous torture' and/ or 'jerk(ish) protagonist' in principle, then I can't blame you.
 
If I have any sort of complaints about this, it's how it's very similar to a Betrayal fic in Pokemon.

Like, in a usual Betrayal Fic, Ash Ketchum gets betrayed by his friends, usually accused of a crime he didn't commit, thus causing him to fall from grace. Only for him to get good (possibly by ditching his old Pokemon) and beat them all later on.

Shield Hero is basically that, but toss in the Isekai and Gamer Fic tropes as well, and make Ash's Pokemon into Pokegirls.

I do like the characters, though. That said, the entire setting in of itself, as well as the antagonists, are... eh.

The entire reason why the Shield Hero gets shit is because the previous Shield Hero was the only one who thought enslaving Demi-Humans was a bad idea and fought with them. Kinda goes to show just how shallow and cartoonishly evil Melromac's high class are, especially when the King starts threatening Naofumi.

Also, as a side note, I don't really like how people are dropping the show over something that:
  • Happened in the first episode
  • Something that a villain did
  • Had been used in stories before
While I get the reason for the latter (times changed), this is kinda like Goblin Slayer all over again.
 
The Queen (who actually wears the pants in both the relationship and rule) was out of country because the King broke the treaty on summoning and their neighbors were basically about to incite world war.
 
Last edited:
Actually, yes, Melromac is matriachal kingdom. The Queen wasn't there because she had to stop her neighbours from bickering while, y'know, monsters popping up regularly. Myne can do what she can because her mom wasn't there to spank her.

He kept male slaves too. Just sayin'

Shield Hero basically legendary folk hero for beastman and demihuman. Most of his slaves basically demihuman/ beastfolk that had been f***ed over by other humans, and basically scouted by slave trader and then resold to Shield Hero. Shield Hero depends on Slave Trader simply because he's best option available for him. And then became a habit

She tried to kill her sister, involved in coup attempt (three times), and in general being unproductive toward her own country. It's practically miracle she survived executor blade for so long.
Although if you just don't like the whole 'slavery', 'gratuitous torture' and/ or 'jerk(ish) protagonist' in principle, then I can't blame you.
There is literally no possible way to ever justify writing your hero as a slave owner and calling it a good thing, because you are entirely responsible for the treatment of said demi-humans because of the fact that you're the goddamned author. If you set up your work such that it shows the main character to be justified in his taking of slaves, then that's incredibly fucked up.

Also, wow, "he kept male slaves too" as a response. Fucking hell.

As for the rape accusation, here's my thoughts. Would the exact same effect have been achieved if the accusation had been for attempted murder or intent to harm? Yeah? Then why the fuck make it rape?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top