Revolt-Revolution, Yes-Yes! (CK2 Skaven Post-Revolution Quest)

Voted best in category in the Users' Choice awards.
[X] [Seconds] Allow them. Baruk can appoint someone to vote for him while he's gone, as can anyone.
-[X] From now on, any candidate to Councillor must designate a Secretary of their choice prior to the election. Each Councillor's Secretary will help them with their duties and take their place in the Council if they're absent or otherwise temporarily unable to attend.

[X] [Meta] Stewardship, Learning, Intrigue, update first.
Also one of the lose conditions is to not be a democracy. Having one person ALWAYS get elected seems to lead in the direction of not being a democracy if we are not careful. I for one don't mind Chittertongue getting elected, especially if it eventually switches back and Andratse is relected at times.
Chittertongue seems like he's not a bad choice when things are calmed down and diplomacy is a more common thing, but Andratse is really helpful in a crisis.
I don't mind someone else but chittertounge seems to old school skaven mindset (the schemes within schemes)
At least his schemes aren't aimed at backstabbing people, just trying to get the government to go in a more diplomatic direction than we've had so far (ignoring that "so far" is only a couple months).
Chittertongue is lying and saying she tortured the broodmothers when we know she revolted to save them. Pretty underhanded. Eek.
We know, but does he?
One of the functions of the Council is that all species are fairly represented, so if a Councillor is unable to participate or vote I'm in favor of allowing someone else to take their place.

However, the dissenters who say that the substitute shouldn't be directly designated by the absent councillor because it's undemocratic also have a point. Therefore, I propose that in every election to the Council, starting with the next one, each species designates one suplent for every Councillor they elect, with a suplent taking the place of said Councillor if the situation so requires. Baruk appointing his substitute should be thus interpreted as a one-time event, hopefully appeasing the critics.

[X] [Seconds] Allow them. Baruk can appoint someone to vote for him while he's gone, as can anyone.
-[X] From now on, each species will also elect a number of Suplent Councillors in the annual election, up to a maximum (and recommended amount) of the total number of their assigned Councillors, and with a pre-established order (as in, there will be a First Suplent, a Second Suplent, and up to the Fourteenth Suplent for the Skaven). If one or several of the Councillors are unable to assist to a meeting, their places will be filled with Suplents of their corresponding species, in the pre-assigned order: thus, if, for example, two Skaven were absent, then their places would be filled by the Skaven First and Second Suplents. (If, say, the First Suplent was also unavailable, the places would be filled by the Second and Third Suplents, and so on).
I think that's a bit too complicated, maybe it should be voting for each councilor and a "vice councilor" or something to assist them and fill in if the councilor is unavailable, and possibly head the council seat's eventual bureaucracy so the councilors can focus on making the right decisions or something.
I mean, is not their elected representative representing their will when he appoints his second? Why complicate things. Each councilor should essentially have a secretary (in the government sense as head of staff) who works with them and is ready to step in for them at a moment's notice. If you have elections for seconds then there is a reasonable chance we will get a second who isn't loyal to the councilor and thinks they can get a promotion the old Skaven way.
Secretaries is better than the vice councilor thing I was thinking of, and if they're important to vote for then the prospective councilor can run with their secretary on the ballot too.
Heck, even his assertion that we should only fight defensive wars isn't wrong headed, it's ignorant of how many enemies we inherited from Rictus.
Honestly one could make an argument we'd be more justified than Rome with "defensive" wars taking a lot of territory.
 
Last edited:
[X] [Seconds] Allow them. Baruk can appoint someone to vote for him while he's gone, as can anyone.
[X] [Meta] Stewardship, Learning, Intrigue, update first.
 
I have a bit of trouble reconciling the presented images of Chittertounge as both a malicious liar and schemer, but also too naive and idealistic for offensive wars. Potential resolutions include 'he thinks he is justified because the alternative would be worse for everyone.' and 'he acts this way due to bad information'. Both of which can be worked with.

this makes him a threat cause when we need untiy cause we are fighting the whole darklands he wants division
We are no more fighting the whole darklands than Rome was fighting the whole world.

Which doesn't make unnecessary division a non-problem, but it means that hypothetical scheming isn't a lethal dagger to the back with total disregard for anything but personal advancement.
 
Last edited:
I mean, is not their elected representative representing their will when he appoints his second? Why complicate things. Each councilor should essentially have a secretary (in the government sense as head of staff) who works with them and is ready to step in for them at a moment's notice. If you have elections for seconds then there is a reasonable chance we will get a second who isn't loyal to the councilor and thinks they can get a promotion the old Skaven way.

As the update says, there are some who question the fairness of a direct appointing. However, If you think my idea is overcomplicating things, I'll instead propose that, as @GuestLurker suggested, all Councillor candidates should run for election alongside a Secretary who would help them in their Council duties and substitute them whenever they're absent. This would both be relatively simple, appease most of the dissenters and allow the Councillors to choose someone they trust (avoiding Skaven style murder-promotion attempts).

EDIT:

[X] [Seconds] Allow them. Baruk can appoint someone to vote for him while he's gone, as can anyone.
-[X] From now on, any candidate to Councillor must designate a Secretary of their choice prior to the election. Each Councillor's Secretary will help them with their duties and take their place in the Council if they're absent or otherwise temporarily unable to attend.
 
Last edited:
[X] [Seconds] Allow them. Baruk can appoint someone to vote for him while he's gone, as can anyone.
[X] [Meta] Stewardship, Learning, Intrigue, update first.
 
[X] [Seconds] Allow them. Baruk can appoint someone to vote for him while he's gone, as can anyone.
-[X] From now on, any candidate to Councillor must designate a Secretary of their choice prior to the election. Each Councillor's Secretary will help them with their duties and take their place in the Council if they're absent or otherwise temporarily unable to attend.

I feel like this is a good idea, but way beyond the scope of this vote. I don't think we have a formal set of rules involving candidate selection and voting at all...like, I don't think we have set terms of office yet, never mind rules for voting, so this is very much putting the cart before the horse.
 
Last edited:
Chittertongue like

Very much just wants people to thank him and think he's useful, but feels alienated from skaven society and finds comfort with people of other species. This is probably not something that Andratse could understand easily. It is, however, extremely important to note. Chittertongue's need to understand and know about people is a good thing, and it is undeniably useful. If Andratse and he has a chance to get to know one another then I think they'd make useful allies of one another.

He's also not entirely wrong about how Andratse's move from Broodguard to Council leader looks. I don't doubt that his drunken assertions are related to how he actually feels. Similarly, I don't doubt that the Broodguard has a history. They were part of the last regime, and they were part of the machine that kept the Broodmothers being what they are. Andratse's current self is directly shaped by that.

We saw her flashback. She was trained to be a skaven supremacist. The fact that she isn't is a miracle, and part of why I was happy she won.
 
[X] [Seconds] Allow them. Baruk can appoint someone to vote for him while he's gone, as can anyone.
-[X] From now on, any candidate to Councillor must designate a Secretary of their choice prior to the election. Each Councillor's Secretary will help them with their duties and take their place in the Council if they're absent or otherwise temporarily unable to attend.

[X] [Meta] Stewardship, Learning, Intrigue, update first

Do hope we can avoid conflict with Skitter, perfer not having divison at this time, with everything in a sorry state
 
People can lie while they're drunk. IMO, Chittertongue is a duplicitous asshole and more than a bit of a demagogue. That's dangerous for many reasons.

That said, he's also loyal to the cause, so if he wins an election, he wins an election and we work with him. Though that's unlikely in the immediate term. Right now he's successfully coalition-built...but only with people who already didn't vote for Andratse the first time around, so he hasn't cut into her slim majority at all, just unified the opposition.

There is literally nothing in the framing of the scene to remotely support him lying here.

If he had any control when drunk, he wouldn't be openly discussing him plans. This is a obvious scene of him drunk beyond his capacity to hold it together.

The scene is a obvious twist of typical skaven dynamics. Where the underling plans to overthrown the overlord only like... he has reasonable reasons for doing so, and his 'evil goals' are 'let's be friends'. It's taking a typical story-beat and twisting it. There isn't even any reason to lie about that to humans, because like.... this broodmother is a distant thing for them. If the framing was about using that as a half-truth, we'd have a scene of them reacting in horror showing how his lies worked. Instead, it's a bunch of drunk people going 'right on mate' to another drunk.
 
Last edited:
Honestly I think Chittertongue will be a great leader. He's going to be our best shot at a positive Skaven face to deal with the Boarder Prices, merchants, Pigbarter, and Cathay.

He's just not the leader we need RIGHT NOW. Once we are able to defend ourselves and are dealing with frieldlyish nations, he's nearly ideal.

I want him to unite various factions behind him and pull off his GLORIOUS plan to overthrough Adratse via democratic vote...

And for Adratse to go "Congradulations" and get back to work.

His plan is basically diplomacy and democracy so far. Maybe if he rolls 13 and does something particuarly skaven that may change, but so far his plan is to work within the system.
 
Last edited:
I disagee on him being a good leader a good diplomat sure but his arrogant (till proven other wise I will use his char sheet as a basis for him) and that likely wont end well (also his sheet says he wanted sought to achieve great status so not sure I trust everything he says even without him being a schemer)
 
There is literally nothing in the framing of the scene to remotely support him lying here.

If he had any control when drunk, he would be openly discussing him plans. This is a obvious scene of him drunk beyond his capacity to hold it together.

The scene is a obvious twist of typical skaven dynamics. Where the underling plans to overthrown the overlord only like... he has reasonable reasons for doing so, and his 'evil goals' are 'let's be friends'. It's taking a typical story-beat and twisting it. There isn't even any reason to lie about that to humans, because like.... this broodmother is a distant thing for them. If the framing was about using that as a half-truth, we'd have a scene of them reacting in horror showing how his lies worked. Instead, it's a bunch of drunk people going 'right on mate' to another drunk.

That's not the vibe I got from either him or the scene, but I do agree that it's definitely not clear that he's lying, I was just stating my own opinion that he was capable of doing so even while drunk and struck me as the sort to say that kind of thing to run down a political opponent regardless of its truth. Like, to me, Chittertongue seems like the kind of guy who says whatever he thinks will provoke the response he's looking for without even considering whether it's true or not.

And yeah, it's not the best argument for the audience...but the phrasing was calculated to still appeal to them and he was drunk, plus there's little other bad stuff to say about Andratse, so if he wants to badmouth her his options are limited.
 
So long as chittertail remains within the legitimate democratic process with his scheming, I see no reason to really worry.
Even if he *does* underestimate the enemies we have, our system should allow us to correct that should the need arise
 
So long as chittertail remains within the legitimate democratic process with his scheming, I see no reason to really worry.
Even if he *does* underestimate the enemies we have, our system should allow us to correct that should the need arise

We should likewise keep to the bounds of the democratic process...but that's not quite the same thing as 'not worrying about it', IMO. Chittertongue wouldn't be the worst possible replacement for Andratse, but he wouldn't be the best either and establishing a precedent that accusing political opponents of malfeasance in unverifiable ways is a good way to get elected is a bad precedent to set.

If he wins, he wins and Andratse supports him, but that doesn't mean we shouldn't try and keep him from winning.
 
[X] [Seconds] Allow them. Baruk can appoint someone to vote for him while he's gone, as can anyone.

[X] [Meta] Stewardship, Learning, Intrigue, update first.
 
Futher Mechanical Tidbits: Food
I was randomly out of nowhere inspired actually to finish creating mechanics for your food situation.

It will not be long and complicated, so here it is. You have two categories, both of which sorta already exist but I'm just formalizing it all.

The second category is "Stores" or I used "Surplus" but I'll change it, and that just represents how much you have right at this moment if all sources of food were cut off, or at least severely curtailed: how long could you keep going?

The first category goes like... this.


STARVING (-5, and beyond)
Substantial deficit (-4)
Moderate deficit (-3)
Modest Deficit (-2)
Slight deficit (-1)
SUBSISTENCE (0)
Slight surplus (+1)
Modest Surplus (+2)
Moderate Surplus (+3)
Solid Surplus (+4)
ABUNDANCE (+5, beyond)

Essentially the bigger the surplus, the more you add to "Stores" and if it's negative slowly the more you take from "Stores." Surplus is 100% relative, though starving is starving.

But for instance, at the moment everyone is eating about as much, relative to their species needs, as peasants in a lean but not disastrous year, the kind of year that tugs at the body but you know you can survive as long as you don't chain too many of them together.

This isn't great, but compared to how almost all of them were eating before, it's led to them gaining weight, putting on strength/etc.

(The exception is Ogres, who are not eating as well as they want, but are eating better than that because who's going to stop them?)

If you got up to a Moderate or Solid Surplus and decided, as you probably should, that everyone should eat better... maybe not great, but at least well enough to equal a peasant on a pretty okay year... or even on a good year, if you're ambitious, then that will knock down your Surplus by a number of points, more depending on how much more you do.

Yet at the same time, other than preparing for disaster and siege, surplus is for using, one way or another: Exporting food is something that you will not be doing under basically any circumstances short of "You're at the center of a large empire and so the 'exporting' is just moving it from one part of the Empire to the other" or other such things.

So grow your crops, account for population growth... survive. Don't starve.

You can do it!

Also, don't worry about variety and quality of food yet... that's for later. At the moment and for quite a while just getting everyone food of at least some value and some variety will be more than enough.
 
Last edited:
Cool. So given we're listed at Subsistence level, well, it could be much worse. Hopefully with some good rolls on the mushroom farming, we can start building up that surplus.
 
[X] [Seconds] Allow them. Baruk can appoint someone to vote for him while he's gone, as can anyone.
[X] [Meta] Stewardship, Learning, Intrigue, update first.
 
Next thing.

So, congrats on your first Natural 1!

Unrelatedly (actually unrelatedly), I was thinking about introducing a new mechanic: Twists of the Tail.

When a roll winds up 1 or 2 from a DC, whether it's the minimum or the next tier up, I can give you the option to have it succeed but there will be a twist, some other consequence whether neutral or mildly negative, added to it.

You have three different rolls where it's that close: Manling Divisions, Send Diplomats North, and What's Mine Is Mine.

So I was thinking I'd give you all three Twists of the Tail so that you got an idea of what it's like, and in the future if there's more than one roll like that maybe you'll get to vote on which one you Twist the Tail for?

Kinda a provisional mechanic, but I don't want to give nothing for "nearly to the next DC category" but neither do I just want to give stuff away... and Twists of the Tail give me a chance to do fuckey stuff.

What happens if Adratse loses a future election and the new Council Leader is from a race without a tail? Do we still get to keep the Twist of the Tail option?
 
We should likewise keep to the bounds of the democratic process...but that's not quite the same thing as 'not worrying about it', IMO. Chittertongue wouldn't be the worst possible replacement for Andratse, but he wouldn't be the best either and establishing a precedent that accusing political opponents of malfeasance in unverifiable ways is a good way to get elected is a bad precedent to set.

If he wins, he wins and Andratse supports him, but that doesn't mean we shouldn't try and keep him from winning.

I do not think we should worry about the opposition either, but at the same time I think we need a more formal party system or something that allows groups of like-minded individuals to exist under the light of day as it were. One of the greater dangers to the republic right now is what we do not know how to manage a peaceful transition of power. That has always been the great weakness of early republicanism, or indeed latter day nascent democracies. We the players I think should want Chittertongue to eventually win and do do so peacefully
 
I'd rather avoid party politics. I recommend a standing order of inheritance determined during the elections, generally whoever came in second for a position.
 
Back
Top