- Location
- barking
aka all wars cause holy shit did the skaven fight everyone
aka all wars cause holy shit did the skaven fight everyone
Chittertongue seems like he's not a bad choice when things are calmed down and diplomacy is a more common thing, but Andratse is really helpful in a crisis.Also one of the lose conditions is to not be a democracy. Having one person ALWAYS get elected seems to lead in the direction of not being a democracy if we are not careful. I for one don't mind Chittertongue getting elected, especially if it eventually switches back and Andratse is relected at times.
At least his schemes aren't aimed at backstabbing people, just trying to get the government to go in a more diplomatic direction than we've had so far (ignoring that "so far" is only a couple months).I don't mind someone else but chittertounge seems to old school skaven mindset (the schemes within schemes)
We know, but does he?Chittertongue is lying and saying she tortured the broodmothers when we know she revolted to save them. Pretty underhanded. Eek.
I think that's a bit too complicated, maybe it should be voting for each councilor and a "vice councilor" or something to assist them and fill in if the councilor is unavailable, and possibly head the council seat's eventual bureaucracy so the councilors can focus on making the right decisions or something.One of the functions of the Council is that all species are fairly represented, so if a Councillor is unable to participate or vote I'm in favor of allowing someone else to take their place.
However, the dissenters who say that the substitute shouldn't be directly designated by the absent councillor because it's undemocratic also have a point. Therefore, I propose that in every election to the Council, starting with the next one, each species designates one suplent for every Councillor they elect, with a suplent taking the place of said Councillor if the situation so requires. Baruk appointing his substitute should be thus interpreted as a one-time event, hopefully appeasing the critics.
[X] [Seconds] Allow them. Baruk can appoint someone to vote for him while he's gone, as can anyone.
-[X] From now on, each species will also elect a number of Suplent Councillors in the annual election, up to a maximum (and recommended amount) of the total number of their assigned Councillors, and with a pre-established order (as in, there will be a First Suplent, a Second Suplent, and up to the Fourteenth Suplent for the Skaven). If one or several of the Councillors are unable to assist to a meeting, their places will be filled with Suplents of their corresponding species, in the pre-assigned order: thus, if, for example, two Skaven were absent, then their places would be filled by the Skaven First and Second Suplents. (If, say, the First Suplent was also unavailable, the places would be filled by the Second and Third Suplents, and so on).
Secretaries is better than the vice councilor thing I was thinking of, and if they're important to vote for then the prospective councilor can run with their secretary on the ballot too.I mean, is not their elected representative representing their will when he appoints his second? Why complicate things. Each councilor should essentially have a secretary (in the government sense as head of staff) who works with them and is ready to step in for them at a moment's notice. If you have elections for seconds then there is a reasonable chance we will get a second who isn't loyal to the councilor and thinks they can get a promotion the old Skaven way.
Honestly one could make an argument we'd be more justified than Rome with "defensive" wars taking a lot of territory.Heck, even his assertion that we should only fight defensive wars isn't wrong headed, it's ignorant of how many enemies we inherited from Rictus.
this makes him a threat cause when we need untiy cause we are fighting the whole darklands he wants division
We are no more fighting the whole darklands than Rome was fighting the whole world.this makes him a threat cause when we need untiy cause we are fighting the whole darklands he wants division
I mean, is not their elected representative representing their will when he appoints his second? Why complicate things. Each councilor should essentially have a secretary (in the government sense as head of staff) who works with them and is ready to step in for them at a moment's notice. If you have elections for seconds then there is a reasonable chance we will get a second who isn't loyal to the councilor and thinks they can get a promotion the old Skaven way.
[X] [Seconds] Allow them. Baruk can appoint someone to vote for him while he's gone, as can anyone.
-[X] From now on, any candidate to Councillor must designate a Secretary of their choice prior to the election. Each Councillor's Secretary will help them with their duties and take their place in the Council if they're absent or otherwise temporarily unable to attend.
I would think all skaven are raised that way its part of their whole thing
People can lie while they're drunk. IMO, Chittertongue is a duplicitous asshole and more than a bit of a demagogue. That's dangerous for many reasons.
That said, he's also loyal to the cause, so if he wins an election, he wins an election and we work with him. Though that's unlikely in the immediate term. Right now he's successfully coalition-built...but only with people who already didn't vote for Andratse the first time around, so he hasn't cut into her slim majority at all, just unified the opposition.
There is literally nothing in the framing of the scene to remotely support him lying here.
If he had any control when drunk, he would be openly discussing him plans. This is a obvious scene of him drunk beyond his capacity to hold it together.
The scene is a obvious twist of typical skaven dynamics. Where the underling plans to overthrown the overlord only like... he has reasonable reasons for doing so, and his 'evil goals' are 'let's be friends'. It's taking a typical story-beat and twisting it. There isn't even any reason to lie about that to humans, because like.... this broodmother is a distant thing for them. If the framing was about using that as a half-truth, we'd have a scene of them reacting in horror showing how his lies worked. Instead, it's a bunch of drunk people going 'right on mate' to another drunk.
So long as chittertail remains within the legitimate democratic process with his scheming, I see no reason to really worry.
Even if he *does* underestimate the enemies we have, our system should allow us to correct that should the need arise
Next thing.
So, congrats on your first Natural 1!
Unrelatedly (actually unrelatedly), I was thinking about introducing a new mechanic: Twists of the Tail.
When a roll winds up 1 or 2 from a DC, whether it's the minimum or the next tier up, I can give you the option to have it succeed but there will be a twist, some other consequence whether neutral or mildly negative, added to it.
You have three different rolls where it's that close: Manling Divisions, Send Diplomats North, and What's Mine Is Mine.
So I was thinking I'd give you all three Twists of the Tail so that you got an idea of what it's like, and in the future if there's more than one roll like that maybe you'll get to vote on which one you Twist the Tail for?
Kinda a provisional mechanic, but I don't want to give nothing for "nearly to the next DC category" but neither do I just want to give stuff away... and Twists of the Tail give me a chance to do fuckey stuff.
We should likewise keep to the bounds of the democratic process...but that's not quite the same thing as 'not worrying about it', IMO. Chittertongue wouldn't be the worst possible replacement for Andratse, but he wouldn't be the best either and establishing a precedent that accusing political opponents of malfeasance in unverifiable ways is a good way to get elected is a bad precedent to set.
If he wins, he wins and Andratse supports him, but that doesn't mean we shouldn't try and keep him from winning.