- Location
- Greece
Not quite the same thing, as all the good writing came from GRRM and all the bad writing from DnD
(Also, sorry if I accidentally pinged you on the wrong thread before making my reply here.)
Oh he did a lot in the End Times. It's all backended. It's just that a lot of it felt unearned and lots of things came out of nowhere to save his ass. There were so many opportunities for the heroes to win that were foiled by narrative convenience, so it felt cheap. No matter what happened, Archaon always won.Isn't the problem of Archaon in Fantasy at least pre-Storm of Chaos bascially he never did anything of importance?
I know the memes around Abbadon in 40k but I had the impression reading the background he gets to do more than Archaon ever did and so do not feel completely like Orcus on his throne.
I have trouble remembering what Archaon in End Times ever did personnaly except going to Middenheim.
I have heard of people who know both Abaddon and Archaon to say that Abaddon is a bigger disgrace than Archaon though. I'm not sure he's the best example.
Its one of those reasons the death of 1d4chan is very mixed event in my mind. It held a lot of useful information about old school tabletop stuff and some of its original content was funny or interesting but it was also a complete dumpster of old 4chan style bigotry and it frequently had stuff that was just flatly incorrect but treated as gospel.
You know it's still around, right?Its one of those reasons the death of 1d4chan is very mixed event in my mind. It held a lot of useful information about old school tabletop stuff and some of its original content was funny or interesting but it was also a complete dumpster of old 4chan style bigotry and it frequently had stuff that was just flatly incorrect but treated as gospel.
Abaddon has the disadvantage of actually having done things - failing at most of them objectively outside of authorial fiat - whereas Archaon was more or less ISO Standard Dark Lord version 528c until the End Times built him up: a cardboard cutout propped up at the edge of the setting to look menacing, provide an easily written threat... but he never really had much of a character.Oh he did a lot in the End Times. It's all backended. It's just that a lot of it felt unearned and lots of things came out of nowhere to save his ass. There were so many opportunities for the heroes to win that were foiled by narrative convenience, so it felt cheap. No matter what happened, Archaon always won.
I have heard of people who know both Abaddon and Archaon to say that Abaddon is a bigger disgrace than Archaon though. I'm not sure he's the best example.
Chaos sort of has the inherent disadvantage of a lot of their characters being immortal, while GW tries to give a lot of the other factions the "slowly dying out" trope. This should make chaos seem scarier, but what it actually does is make it so that GW can't really kill off the major characters of other factions very easily, while they can feed chaos characters into the woodchipper to hype up other factions. After all, they respawn so it doesn't really hurt them, does it?Abaddon has the disadvantage of actually having done things - failing at most of them objectively outside of authorial fiat - whereas Archaon was more or less ISO Standard Dark Lord version 528c until the End Times built him up: a cardboard cutout propped up at the edge of the setting to look menacing, provide an easily written threat... but he never really had much of a character.
Also, with regard to the memes, Abaddon also had the disadvantage of having a model that was notoriously prone to having its arms fall off: so "failbaddon the [h]armless" was, on the balance, a very, very, easy joke to make.
Thinking about it further, GW has never done much to actually justify precisely why the Chaos is going to inevitably win, has it? They say it a lot. They write the lore that way. But how much have they actually done to make the playerbase feel that chaos is a serious-business, world ending threat that cannot be held back, only lost against more slowly?
For my part, it feels like precious little, and I'd be a lot less ... irked ... with how much Chaos has won over the years if even half of it felt justified.
That's part of what I like so about Stormcast Eternals (yes I'm a Stormcast fan now).Chaos sort of has the inherent disadvantage of a lot of their characters being immortal, while GW tries to give a lot of the other factions the "slowly dying out" trope. This should make chaos seem scarier, but what it actually does is make it so that GW can't really kill off the major characters of other factions very easily, while they can feed chaos characters into the woodchipper to hype up other factions. After all, they respawn so it doesn't really hurt them, does it?
(It does).
Abaddon is hampered by his memetic status: ie he mounted twelve invasions to invade the Imperium and failed every time. Except the lore has always be clear only one of them had the objective to end the Imperium (the first), the other were after specific objectives he tended to get.
He is also used to do things like the Pandorax campaign where he tends to lose of course but never so completely as to be ridiculous.
The Failabaddon thing is mainly 1d4chan
I mean they changed the lore to go "Akshully, abbadon wasn't trying to win the way we used to say he was, he was trying to win in these other ways that he totally succeeded". It was super lame retcon, and abaddon is just an uninteresting villain because of them twisting the narrative to make him not as, well, bad at being a warlord as he used to be. Also they retconned out others leading the numbered black crusades. Was a time that I believe about 4 of them were led by not abaddon.
Being generic is fine if you execute it well. Not everything needs to be non-generic and I'm a bit tired of people using it constantly as a bad thing. Yeah it can be exhausting sometimes, and you have to execute it pretty well so that it doesn't feel boring and samey, but Archaon isn't the sole focus of AoS like he was supposedly the focus of the End Times (heavy quotations on supposedly). He's just a major player, and he does a good job at it. His first scene in Realmgate Wars is an absolutely excellent demonstration of what you can do with a Dark Lord type character, even if he doesn't really break the mold much.Actually there was an interesting tidbit in the 3rd Chaos Space Marine codex where they said "Black Crusade" was a term used by the Imperium and not Chaos and the Black Crusades of Abaddon covered anything from huge invasions to lightning raids led by himself in person.
There was a time where GW was able to juggle in-character information well. But to return to the subject the main sin of Archaon is being generic. You can laugh all you want at Abbadon "daddy issues" but at least the Black Legion complicated relationship with Horus legacy is a character trait.
Age of Sigmar tried to give one to Archaon in that from what I understand he hates even the Chaos Gods and wants to kill them too. He still lacks a motive to want and destroy the cosmos but behind the inefficient storytelling you kinda get he is motivated by nihilism.
He would still have been more interesting IMHO if he fought for ultimate freedom because only in Chaos can you be free of all fetters, including sanity, loyalty and flesh.
Yeah....there's a lot of ways they could have done that. *with proper buildup*. Which they didn't do of course.Personally I agree that there should have been some build up, from the sound of things they went full bore into the "Everything is screwed!" feel which from my experience can really sap reader investment.
Also I know why the Lizardmen were written to just give up at the start, it's because the writers had set them up as the Big Good faction that opposed Chaos but didn't want to spend the time justifying why such a powerful group would lose. So they just had them decide to run from the very start.
Page 281Gelt opened his eyes with a start. Even in the darkness, he could make out the bowed timbers overhead, and the barrels stacked against the far wall. The last Gelt knew, he'd been flying over the village of Harkar. Now he was in a cellar of some kind, though how he'd come to be there – or how long he'd been held there – he had no idea.
His weapons were gone, and his hands bound. The former presented a problem, but the latter was little obstacle. Gelt closed his eyes, and sought the proper transmutation cantrip that would turn the rope to dust.
'Good evening, your eminence.' The voice was rich, and delivered each syllable with languorous precision.
Abandoning his attempt at freedom, Gelt turned his attention to the predatory figure who loomed suddenly out of the darkness.
'I really must apologise for inconveniencing you like this,' the vampire said mockingly. 'It is a squalid venue for a meeting between men such as Vlad von Carstein and the great Balthasar Gelt, Cager of Sylvania.'
Gelt's heart was gripped by sudden fear, so much so that he quite forgot his annoyance at the title that had caused him so much grief of late. With an effort, he suppressed his horror and stared at his captor with more defiance than he felt. 'If you're going to kill me, I'll thank you to be about the matter. Otherwise, I have many demands on my time.'
Vlad laughed. It was a strangely warm sound, Gelt thought, for so cold-hearted a fiend. 'Be not so hasty, my good man. You labour under a misunderstanding; we need not be enemies. In fact, I very much hope that we can be allies.'
With a flourish, the vampire seated himself on a cask opposite Gelt, reached forward and slit the wizard's bonds with a swipe of a talon. Gelt didn't move, not wanting to concede anything.
'Allies,' Gelt said flatly, scarcely able to contain his disbelief. 'Vlad von Carstein wishes an alliance with the Empire?'
'Is that so very hard to believe?' asked Vlad, with a wave of his hand. The vampire was smiling, Gelt noted, enjoying his performance for an audience of one. 'Surely you must know by now that the End Times are upon us? In so bleak an hour, old enmities must be put aside. In any case, I don't propose to ally myself to the Empire as a whole – not yet. I don't believe your people are ready to accept my aid. Though they will in time, whether they wish it or not.'
Gelt snorted. 'And you esteem me to be more easily manipulated?'
Vlad wagged an admonishing finger. 'Oh, I know that you are.'
'Explain yourself,' Gelt bristled.
'The wall around Sylvania? You don't seriously expect me to believe that was entirely your idea, do you? As for this grand work in the north, I know all about your meeting with Neferata's little ingenue, and the scroll she gave you.'
Gelt started at these revelations. 'The courtesan was a vampire?'
Vlad continued as if the wizard had not spoken. 'There has been war between the forces of Chaos and undeath for many years now, and you, my friend, have unwittingly served both sides. I offer you the opportunity to choose a side, and take control of your fate.'
'And if I choose not to accept your generosity?' Gelt asked. Despite everything, the wizard found the vampire's words compelling, and had to remind himself that the creature before him was not to be trusted.
Vlad stood up sharply and, with a sweeping bow, gestured to the cellar door. 'Then leave. You will find your steed and belongings waiting in the stable. No one will stop you. In any case, you need not make a decision now. The offer will remain open indefinitely.'
Gelt rose to his feet, ignoring the painful protests from joints too long unused, and walked to the exit as imperiously as he could manage. He still felt that the vampire was toying with him but, if he were, there was nothing for it but to walk into the jaws of the trap. He was a pace from the door when Vlad spoke again.
'Before you depart, allow me to present you with a gift. A gesture of good faith.'
Despite himself, Gelt turned to face the vampire once more, and made a clumsy catch of the hide-bound tome thrown towards him.
'The Revelations Necris,' Vlad explained as Gelt turned the book over in his hands. 'A copy, naturally. Small-minded fools consider it a... heretical work, but I think you will find its contents of interest.'
'Really?' Gelt asked. The tome was warm to the touch, he noted. The sensation filled him with revulsion, but also sparked a feeling of something he could not quite identify. 'How do you know I won't simply burn it?'
Vlad took a step forward, his eyes intense. 'Because you've already taken your first steps beyond the foolish confines of your own order. Do not try to deny it; the signs are plain upon you.' He shrugged. 'In any case, I no longer need the knowledge contained within. Burn the book if you wish, and remain forever ignorant of your potential. Or use it to protect your realm; I leave the choice in your hands. As I told you before, I am not your enemy."
I kid you not, but Insomnia is mentioned so often with Gelt it feels like the author is trying to plant the idea that sleepnessness is turning him delirious to justify his actions and mistakes.Interesting, previously in canon there's been two Liber Necrises and a Grimoire Necris, but Revelations Necris seems to be a new invention for the End Times. I wonder where it originates, most books of necromancy mentioned in canon have their descent from Nagash explicitly laid out.
Gelt's doing his best to swallow the idiot ball whole, I see. "I touched the bad magic and now doing it some more seems like a really good idea! This surely requires absolutely no introspection on my part."