Let's Play Every Final Fantasy Game In Order Of Release [Now Finished: Final Fantasy Tactics]

The thing is, Dycedarg is old. Probably in his 30's to 40's

Yet again I feel my ancient bones turning into dust.

The way I see it, the sheer age gap between him and Ramza is so much like an unbridgeable chasm that worrying about his youngest half-brother's shenanigans is just so far away from his usual set of responsibilities. He literally sent Ramza and Alma packing to schools the moment he got the opportunity. He doesn't get Ramza the way Zalbaag does. Teenage life for him is way different from his own blood brother and half-siblings especially with the Fifty Years War context.

This is pretty accurate to the profiles, yeah. Specifically Alma's, which states she and Ramza are closer to each other than to their older brothers, because Ramza and Alma are relatively close in age, compared to the older adults of Dycedarg and Zalbaag. If anything, Zalbaag being close to Ramza is a bit unexpected, due to the age gap.
 
I'm not sure if this will be significant in any way, but a few of the names here in English are slightly different to the Japanese. For example, "Tetra" in Japanese is ティータ, which would be transliterated as "Tiita" or "Tieta". Similarly, Ondoria is オムドリア, which is "Omdoria".

I think this is just another Terra/Tina change, to make the names sound better in English. Not very important, but just a minor trivia note.
Oh, I misspelled it too - her WotL name isn't Tetra, it's Tietra.

Incidentally, Zalbaag has the title of 聖騎士 ("sei-kishi"), which is often translated directly as "holy knight". I'm curious what FFT has translated it as, because we already have a Holy Knight Job which is written in katakana.
Zalbaag's WotL title is Knight Devout, which seems to be a decent compromise for another variation on 'holy knight' when we already have a Holy Knight.

Unrelated to all of this, something I've noticed with the dialogue (at least in Japanese) is how characters talk. In the story cutscenes between battles, the characters talk like, well, they're talking to each other. It's in the usual slightly archaic and pompous tone that fits the characters (Barbaneth talks like a lordly old man, the Akademy knight earlier talks like a pompous instructor), but they're still conversing as per normal.

During battles, the dialogue suddenly becomes noticeably hammier. The characters are no longer just talking to each other, they appear to be talking to an audience. Shorter, more impactful sentences, repeating information to make sure the audience gets it, and using more theatrical phrasing.

This brings to mind my earlier guess about Arazlam's narration sounding like he's narrating a stage play. I don't know if I'm overthinking it, but the dialogue sounds as though it's presented as a theatre stage production. However, this seems to apply only to the battle scene dialogue, at least for now, so I don't know how long this will last. And I might also be biased due to the whole "Majestic Theatre Troupe of the Prima Vista" thing from the FFXIV Ivalice raids.
That's genuinely fascinating. I can't quite say that the EN script has the same vibe, character speech seems consistent between outside battle and battle, but I'll keep an eye on it going forward to see if the difference is rendered somehow.
 
Last edited:
There better not be a fucking time-sensitive hidden mechanic or plot trigger or I will throttle someone over at Square.
I have not played the game, and I haven't seen anything about this in the spoiler thread either, so having made that clear I feel free to make the appropriate joke:

There aren't any until after you clear this flashback. Have fun handling Delita's timed schemes!
 
I think the Dead Men started as normal peasants that got elevated to a Knight Order because the nobles had no choices about it.

That is, they were called the Dead Men/Corpse Brigade because they were dead men walking. They got all the dangerous shit jobs but, under Wiegraf's stellar leadership, managed to survive and succeed until they had accrued so much merits, the nobles had to reward them to not lose face.

And seeing as coin was scarce...
 
Last edited:
Is there any particular reason it couldn't have been regular soldiers/conscripts, but with Knight/Noble leadership? The knight orders read as almost entirely nobles, but you can't actually fight such a ruinous war with just nobility, you need the chaff and peasants somewhere.
 
That's genuinely fascinating. I can't quite say that the EN script has the same vibe, character speech seems consistent between outside battle and battle, but I'll keep an eye on it going forward to see if the difference is rendered somehow.

I honestly don't know if I'm overthinking it. For all I know, the difference could simply be due to shorter dialogue boxes in the battle scenes, and longer ones outside, and the script works around these technical limitations.

Or it's entirely a coincidence, and later dialogue will settle into a singular style.

But for now, I want to think the game is presenting itself as a stage play, just like FFV was a Saturday Morning Cartoon, or FFVI was an opera. It just feels like a fitting theme.

I think the Dead Men started as normal peasants that got elevated to a Knight Order because the nobles had no choices about it.

That is, they were called the Dead Men/Corpse Brigade because they were dead men walking. They got all the dangerous shit jobs but managed to survive and succeed until they had accrued so much merits, the nobles had to reward them to not lose face.

For further potential context, the word for "corpse" or "dead men" is 骸, "mukuro". Which directly translates to "corpse", or "husk" of something that was once living. This is unchanged between the "Dead Men" and the "Corpse Brigade".

In fact, the only change between the two is in the name of the organization type; the Dead Men are 骸騎士団, and the Corpse Brigade are 骸旅団. 騎士団 is, as mentioned, "knight order", and 旅団 is literally "brigade", as in the specific military unit. So the change is Wiegraf (presumably) going "we are no longer a knight order, we are now just a brigade", and swapping the relevant part of the name.

I'm kind of curious if there will be a future dialogue or profile part which explains why Wiegraf would name his units that way. It could be the "dead men walking" idea, but going from that to the "corpse" kanji is a little far. Technically plausible, but the sort of thing Wiegraf would have to explain to everyone who asks, rather than being self-evident.
 
Is there any particular reason it couldn't have been regular soldiers/conscripts, but with Knight/Noble leadership? The knight orders read as almost entirely nobles, but you can't actually fight such a ruinous war with just nobility, you need the chaff and peasants somewhere.
Most soldiers where semi professionals(not nobles), corpse brigade reads to me as drawing from this middle class or as a risky peasant squad that gained prestige and experience as a result of wiegrafs leadership and are now uh deeply unhappy. Interesting to note they don't all seem to be on the same page though.
I honestly don't know if I'm overthinking it. For all I know, the difference could simply be due to shorter dialogue boxes in the battle scenes, and longer ones outside, and the script works around these technical limitations.

Or it's entirely a coincidence, and later dialogue will be settle into a singular style.

But for now, I want to think the game is presenting itself as a stage play, just like FFV was a Saturday Morning Cartoon, or FFVI was an opera. It just feels like a fitting theme.



For further potential context, the word for "corpse" or "dead men" is 骸, "mukuro". Which directly translates to "corpse", or "husk" of something that was once living. This is unchanged between the "Dead Men" and the "Corpse Brigade".

In fact, the only change between the two is in the name of the organization type; the Dead Men are 骸騎士団, and the Corpse Brigade are 骸旅団. 騎士団 is, as mentioned, "knight order", and 旅団 is literally "brigade", as in the specific military unit. So the change is Wiegraf (presumably) going "we are no longer a knight order, we are now just a brigade", and swapping the relevant part of the name.

I'm kind of curious if there will be a future dialogue or profile part which explains why Wiegraf would name his units that way. It could be the "dead men walking" idea, but going from that to the "corpse" kanji is a little far. Technically plausible, but the sort of thing Wiegraf would have to explain to everyone who asks, rather than being self-evident.
I believe its actually a nickmame emanating from their tactics if I recall having to do with playing dead but its been years so my memory might be wrong. Brigade naming is prob a tactic political signal of open revolt.
 
Last edited:
Most soldiers where semi professionals(not nobles), corpse brigade reads to me as drawing from this middle class or as a risky peasant squad that gained prestige and experience as a result of wiegrafs leadership and are now uh deeply unhappy. Interesting to note they don't all seem to be on the same page though.

According to Delita, the Dead Men were assembled from 義勇兵, "giyuu-hei", which translates to "volunteer soldiers". I don't know how much this implies unpaid volunteers, but given the talk about the Dead Men being abandoned after the war, and turning into the Corpse Brigade, I'm assuming the volunteer part is for "do you want to join this Order", rather than "do you volunteer your time for charity".

If it helps, the first two kanji, 義勇, means "loyal and courageous", and other such heroic and righteous meanings. The last kanji just means "soldier", so the literal translation of 義勇兵 is "loyal and heroic soldiers". Possibly it's the default assumption that anyone who volunteers to be a soldier is heroic.

The source for these volunteer soldiers are 平民, "heimin", which just means "common people" or "common citizens" or "commoners". It's used in contrast to "aristocracy" (貴族) or "high-class" (高級), so I don't know how much of it applies to medieval concepts of the middle class; current uses of 平民 includes stuff from McDonald's to Starbucks, so certainly middle class-ish. If I were translating FFT, I'd use "commoners", so "peasantry" as the WotL translation puts it would also fit. What they are not is minor nobility knights, as 騎士団 would imply.

Meanwhile, back during the infodump Rumours about the 50 Years War, the term used for the returning soldiers is 職業軍人, "shokugyou gunjin". The 軍人 part just means "member of the armed forces", so it's usually synonymous with "soldier" 兵士. 職業 means "profession" or "occupation" or "job", so the whole phrase can be translated as "professional soldiers". Who weren't paid after the end of the war, leading to unrest, so on and so forth.

Thus, depending on how far we want to take the generalizations in the narration, we have the "professional soldiers" of the war, amongst whom were the soldiers who "volunteered for the Dead Men". As a subset of the whole, these volunteer soldiers were also professional soldiers.

I'm just a little hesitant, because we've seen how misleading the generalizations can be; Arazlam's narration, outside of the Rumours infodumps, implied only knights were left without monetary support after the war. We had to go to the Rumours side content to get more accurate lore, and I'm wary about even more granular and specific lore coming up in the future which would contradict our assumptions.

Also the Rumours about the Corpse Brigade in particular isn't helpful: they're just described as largely "former mercenaries" (元傭兵) and "criminals" (犯罪者). Basic labels, no indication of prior history.
 
I'm a little surprised the WotL translation kept the name Wiegraf when I'm pretty sure it's meant to be Wiglaf. The name means 'battle-remainder' which is fitting for the head of the Corpse Brigade, and is most known for being the name of Beowulf's second-in-command who survived him
 
According to Delita, the Dead Men were assembled from 義勇兵, "giyuu-hei", which translates to "volunteer soldiers". I don't know how much this implies unpaid volunteers, but given the talk about the Dead Men being abandoned after the war, and turning into the Corpse Brigade, I'm assuming the volunteer part is for "do you want to join this Order", rather than "do you volunteer your time for charity".

If it helps, the first two kanji, 義勇, means "loyal and courageous", and other such heroic and righteous meanings. The last kanji just means "soldier", so the literal translation of 義勇兵 is "loyal and heroic soldiers". Possibly it's the default assumption that anyone who volunteers to be a soldier is heroic.

The source for these volunteer soldiers are 平民, "heimin", which just means "common people" or "common citizens" or "commoners". It's used in contrast to "aristocracy" (貴族) or "high-class" (高級), so I don't know how much of it applies to medieval concepts of the middle class; current uses of 平民 includes stuff from McDonald's to Starbucks, so certainly middle class-ish. If I were translating FFT, I'd use "commoners", so "peasantry" as the WotL translation puts it would also fit. What they are not is minor nobility knights, as 騎士団 would imply.

Meanwhile, back during the infodump Rumours about the 50 Years War, the term used for the returning soldiers is 職業軍人, "shokugyou gunjin". The 軍人 part just means "member of the armed forces", so it's usually synonymous with "soldier" 兵士. 職業 means "profession" or "occupation" or "job", so the whole phrase can be translated as "professional soldiers". Who weren't paid after the end of the war, leading to unrest, so on and so forth.

Thus, depending on how far we want to take the generalizations in the narration, we have the "professional soldiers" of the war, amongst whom were the soldiers who "volunteered for the Dead Men". As a subset of the whole, these volunteer soldiers were also professional soldiers.

I'm just a little hesitant, because we've seen how misleading the generalizations can be; Arazlam's narration, outside of the Rumours infodumps, implied only knights were left without monetary support after the war. We had to go to the Rumours side content to get more accurate lore, and I'm wary about even more granular and specific lore coming up in the future which would contradict our assumptions.

Also the Rumours about the Corpse Brigade in particular isn't helpful: they're just described as largely "former mercenaries" (元傭兵) and "criminals" (犯罪者). Basic labels, no indication of prior history.
Okay so on the subject of training I'm trying to empathize that in medieval history there where like elite professional nobles and then those who where like uh had enough wealth to afford gear and practice to go to war which is basically as close to middle class as you can get by medieval standards, but not like noble levels of training. The peasant levy was viewed as a act of desperation(not least due to food req).
The corpse brigade reads to me as a group that started as a sort of peasant levi "suicide squad" that levelled up as the members got more experience(equipment seems more centralized then actual medieval times) tho it could also draw from those semi professionals as well, but the complaints about wages reads like these where non-standard additions that gained increased status and where then summarily thrown to the curb(and gee throwing a bunch of armed men under the bus sure is a all time good decision), also that there simply would be too few men to put down a revolt for the nobles to do anything if these where standards soldiers(as in the nobles would be committing suicide if they did this, soldier wage coups are infamous).
Heres a post discussing it.
 
Okay so on the subject of training I'm trying to empathize that in medieval history there where like elite professional nobles and then those who where like uh had enough wealth to afford gear and practice to go to war which is basically as close to middle class as you can get by medieval standards, but not like noble levels of training. The peasant levy was viewed as a act of desperation(not least due to food req).
This varies heavily depending on time period and area, since even medieval Europe is roughly a thousand years over an entire continent. The cutoff is debatable, but a quick look suggests that the consensus is between 1400 and 1450. The historical War(s) of the Roses that the game seems to be taking specific and careful inspiration from was shortly after this period, from 1455 to 1487, so we can have a more specific idea of what English armies were like during this period. From another quick Google:

"By the late 15th century, however, English armies were somewhat backward by wider European standards; the Wars of the Roses were fought by inexperienced soldiers, often with outdated weapons, allowing the European forces which intervened in the conflict to have a decisive effect on the outcomes of battles."

This source doesn't go much into the Wars of the Roses, since that page was a quick overlook of the history of English warfare, but it may be worth noting. Possible foreshadowing, or were the devs not that dedicated to ripping off the Wars of the Roses historical accuracy? My first guess is that it probably doesn't mean much, with how much detail has to be changed anyway from England to Ivalice. I'd be curious to hear from anyone who could look into the state of contemporary English armies more closely than I did.
 
Okay so remember when I said arrows travel in a straight line?

Look at this range pattern for Archer Hadrian..

It has gaps.

IT CANNOT FIRE IN CLOSE RANGE BECAUSE HE'S TOO HIGH UP and can't see straight down.

Could you not straight-line this guy with an arrow by shooting the square behind him that you have selected? That minimum targeting range isn't just because of your archer's elevation; you get the same thing on flat ground (or nearly flat, like the tiles between the archer and the edge of the map).
 
Omnicron, Inside the Spoiler box here is a bit of Mechanics that isn't actually touched on anywhere in the game, as far as I'm aware, but was implemented as an anti-frustration measure.

Everytime somebody in your party gains JP for a Job, everyone else in your party gains approximately 25% of that JP for the same job even if they haven't unlocked it yet. It's not something you'll have noticed during normal gameplay, but say you start as a Physical Build Ramza and then pivot to a Magic Build and wonder why he's starting at class level 3 in Black Mage

This is what's commonly referred to as Spill Over JP
 
This varies heavily depending on time period and area, since even medieval Europe is roughly a thousand years over an entire continent. The cutoff is debatable, but a quick look suggests that the consensus is between 1400 and 1450. The historical War(s) of the Roses that the game seems to be taking specific and careful inspiration from was shortly after this period, from 1455 to 1487, so we can have a more specific idea of what English armies were like during this period. From another quick Google:

"By the late 15th century, however, English armies were somewhat backward by wider European standards; the Wars of the Roses were fought by inexperienced soldiers, often with outdated weapons, allowing the European forces which intervened in the conflict to have a decisive effect on the outcomes of battles."

This source doesn't go much into the Wars of the Roses, since that page was a quick overlook of the history of English warfare, but it may be worth noting. Possible foreshadowing, or were the devs not that dedicated to ripping off the Wars of the Roses historical accuracy? My first guess is that it probably doesn't mean much, with how much detail has to be changed anyway from England to Ivalice. I'd be curious to hear from anyone who could look into the state of contemporary English armies more closely than I did.
Some time spent indulging my autism later and it seems we are both kinda right as the 15th century is where European armies enter into the process of increasingly professionalizing mind, but also you see the origins of early modern mercenary armies alongside the use of semi professionals and even semi professional feudal levies(!) was used by the french(can't confirm anything about the Brits) so its really a mix. Unless your the Ottomans of course!
Also i will note that i'm not completly sold on that war of rosses mention given how effective longbowmen where aiasnt the french but war of the roses warfare wasn't as intense as the hundred war(s) so its hard to find stuff in a jiff.
old.reddit.com

If "feudal society" never existed how were armies raised during Middle Ages?

So, reading about the whole "Feudalism never existed" debate (which I find convincing and agree that "feudal society" is construct) how do new...
old.reddit.com

High and Late Medieval Europe 1000-1450

In the Late Medieval Age in Europe, conscripts ceased to be conscripted serfs and paesants from villages and what not, as they were deemed...
old.reddit.com

What would a Lancastrian Army in the war of the roses have looked like? How would it have been broken down? Where would the men have come from?

Hello. I'm a big nerd and like painting model soldiers. Soon I'm getting some mounted men at arms and some footsoldier models which are based on...
Additionally at a glance one can kinda almost compare Wiegrafs revolt to the hussites.
It also occurs to me that Ramza an Alma's mother might have been a camp follower.
 
Last edited:
No wonder Delita turned out like he did with how things are going so far.

Yeah, you can't really blame him. You must blame yourself or God.

Fallout: A Post Nuclear Role Playing Game came out the same years as FFT, after all.

"Oops, you took so long grinding that the king has fucking died/was revealed to be dead before you were in a position to do anything about the aftermath, enjoy being on the wrong side of a coup" is one way to end the game, I suppose.

Maybe the Dead Men received some sort of temporary or low-status promotion to knighthood for the duration of the war? I'm honestly not sure if this is actually important, or if the FFT writers just wanted to have Wiegraf command an official "Corpse Knight Order" before his current command of the illegal "Corpse Brigade".

My assumption is that while they were largely composed of common soldiers, their commanders were proper knights. You can't allow commoners to strategize on account of them not being learned in poetry. So you have a proper knightly order of five knights and 500 men in retinue.

I'm kind of curious if there will be a future dialogue or profile part which explains why Wiegraf would name his units that way. It could be the "dead men walking" idea, but going from that to the "corpse" kanji is a little far. Technically plausible, but the sort of thing Wiegraf would have to explain to everyone who asks, rather than being self-evident.

Please be necromancers, we need more necromancers, especially in tactic games. I went with full Chaotic route in Tactics Ogre solely because it's required to recruit the one named necromancer in the game.

Others may fight for justice peace and freedom, I fight for cute necromancer girls.
 
According to Delita, the Dead Men were assembled from 義勇兵, "giyuu-hei", which translates to "volunteer soldiers". I don't know how much this implies unpaid volunteers, but given the talk about the Dead Men being abandoned after the war, and turning into the Corpse Brigade, I'm assuming the volunteer part is for "do you want to join this Order", rather than "do you volunteer your time for charity".

If it helps, the first two kanji, 義勇, means "loyal and courageous", and other such heroic and righteous meanings. The last kanji just means "soldier", so the literal translation of 義勇兵 is "loyal and heroic soldiers". Possibly it's the default assumption that anyone who volunteers to be a soldier is heroic.

The source for these volunteer soldiers are 平民, "heimin", which just means "common people" or "common citizens" or "commoners". It's used in contrast to "aristocracy" (貴族) or "high-class" (高級), so I don't know how much of it applies to medieval concepts of the middle class; current uses of 平民 includes stuff from McDonald's to Starbucks, so certainly middle class-ish. If I were translating FFT, I'd use "commoners", so "peasantry" as the WotL translation puts it would also fit. What they are not is minor nobility knights, as 騎士団 would imply.

Yeah, it seems likely that the Dead Men were recruited from the common soldiers, who volunteered to join this band of war crimes professionals, but in the sense of 'do you want to sign up for this dirty dangerous job', not in the sense of 'do you want to do this job for no pay'. If you were a knight, you might get assigned to them as a punishment - which I'm drawing from what happened to Gustav (IIRC that's the name?), so far as I can tell.

There was not really such a thing as a 'warrior middle class' in medieval Europe, at least not in England (though War of the Roses is pushing into Early Modern); you had sorta-professional soldiers who were commoner (and landless knight) men-at-arms kept by the nobility, whose job was to be, as the name suggests, men at arms (this was a very small population, perhaps ten per noble if the noble was very prosperous) and who did things like guard your castle and enforce your will on your peasants; you had the nobility, whose job definitionally included being a soldier and commander; and you had the rest of the population, who (in England) might have been required to train with the longbow on the regular, but were otherwise untrained. You can see this set-up reflected in the retinues of the men who fought in the War of the Roses - you'll see lots of nobles who arrive with 5 men-at-arms and 50 longbowmen, for example, and that ratio is pretty consistent. Because, you know, every peasant was ostensibly trained as a longbowman, so your peasant levy would be longbowmen, and men-at-arms are expensive.

You don't see professional armies in England until the English Civil War, roughly 150 years after the period we're in during the War of the Roses. Until then, the system of tiny quantities of men-at-arms and a peasant levy to support them was what was in place. Other European powers started the process earlier; France was professionalising towards the end of the 1400s, roughly simultaneous with the War of the Roses, for example, and it's likely the English drew inspiration for their professional armies from teh ones that already existed and were in use on continental Europe.

The middle class is the merchant class, in a medieval context, and they were not a warrior category. And, of course, there were really only three class categories you could fit into in the medieval period: 'royalty', 'noble', and 'commoner'.
 
You can see this set-up reflected in the retinues of the men who fought in the War of the Roses - you'll see lots of nobles who arrive with 5 men-at-arms and 50 longbowmen, for example, and that ratio is pretty consistent. Because, you know, every peasant was ostensibly trained as a longbowman, so your peasant levy would be longbowmen, and men-at-arms are expensive.

So, what you're saying is that fielding exactly 5 people in a battle is actually realistic (your 50 bowmen have died of dysentery offscreen).
 
So, what you're saying is that fielding exactly 5 people in a battle is actually realistic (your 50 bowmen have died of dysentery offscreen).

You joke, but a lot of medieval warfare was pretty small scale! 5 people is pushing it, but a lot of fights would have had less than a thousand - sometimes less than a hundred - people between all parties involved. Of course, most of those fights are border squabbles between minor barons (who were ostensibly part of the same kingdom, too) and the like, but that was the majority of combat in the era, so...
 
Yeah, it seems likely that the Dead Men were recruited from the common soldiers, who volunteered to join this band of war crimes professionals, but in the sense of 'do you want to sign up for this dirty dangerous job', not in the sense of 'do you want to do this job for no pay'. If you were a knight, you might get assigned to them as a punishment - which I'm drawing from what happened to Gustav (IIRC that's the name?), so far as I can tell.

There was not really such a thing as a 'warrior middle class' in medieval Europe, at least not in England (though War of the Roses is pushing into Early Modern); you had sorta-professional soldiers who were commoner (and landless knight) men-at-arms kept by the nobility, whose job was to be, as the name suggests, men at arms (this was a very small population, perhaps ten per noble if the noble was very prosperous) and who did things like guard your castle and enforce your will on your peasants; you had the nobility, whose job definitionally included being a soldier and commander; and you had the rest of the population, who (in England) might have been required to train with the longbow on the regular, but were otherwise untrained. You can see this set-up reflected in the retinues of the men who fought in the War of the Roses - you'll see lots of nobles who arrive with 5 men-at-arms and 50 longbowmen, for example, and that ratio is pretty consistent. Because, you know, every peasant was ostensibly trained as a longbowman, so your peasant levy would be longbowmen, and men-at-arms are expensive.

You don't see professional armies in England until the English Civil War, roughly 150 years after the period we're in during the War of the Roses. Until then, the system of tiny quantities of men-at-arms and a peasant levy to support them was what was in place. Other European powers started the process earlier; France was professionalising towards the end of the 1400s, roughly simultaneous with the War of the Roses, for example, and it's likely the English drew inspiration for their professional armies from teh ones that already existed and were in use on continental Europe.

The middle class is the merchant class, in a medieval context, and they were not a warrior category. And, of course, there were really only three class categories you could fit into in the medieval period: 'royalty', 'noble', and 'commoner'.
Not really the sources I mention go into the fact that this was part of period of transition the feudal levies was used into the hundred year war by the french as I have mentioned previously. That being said levies aren't poorly equipped peasant but actual semi professionals who knew their craft somewhat, the levies was basically a way to force people to show up and had largely fallen out of use by the hundred years war replaced by flat pay recruitment. Additionally during this period you see the origins of mercenary system that would dominate 16-17th century warfare. Pay scales are hard to rate but soldier prob were payed more then your average peasant, which in the medieval payscale a notable step up. Of course the list in my source has men at arms at half a nobles pay but keep in mind men at arms are like basically a knight in function if not status.
So, what you're saying is that fielding exactly 5 people in a battle is actually realistic (your 50 bowmen have died of dysentery offscreen).
The biggest source of premodern casualties was disease which was why good logistics were crucial.
old.reddit.com

What exactly was a man-at-arms?

Hi guys, title says it all; What exactly was a man-at-arms and how would he have fought? Apologies for the amateur-level question of something...
old.reddit.com

How costly was it to maintain an army in the Middle Ages during the time of the Hundred Years War?

If it is possible to depict the cost in current US dollars, how costly would it be to maintain the army which Edward the Black Prince used (about...
 
Last edited:
Oh. I just got here. Pretty early in, huh? I just saw the last screen-shot was in Dorter.

Now I'm wondering if he's gonna use the level down trick once he gets to Zeclause Desert.
 
Last edited:
Now I'm wondering if he's gonna use the level down trick once he gets to Zeclause Desert.


Probably not, even understanding the point of it requires knowing detailed complicated information that you can't really get in game.

Since Omi is doing an intentionally blind playthrough (as evidenced by all the classic first-time-players mistakes) he's not going to do a power up method that literally requires twice as much grinding for only slightly better stats.

There's much easier ways to power up for larger effect, like 'learn move +1 for everyone' or 'buy 50 hi potions'.
 
Probably not, even understanding the point of it requires knowing detailed complicated information that you can't really get in game.

Since Omi is doing an intentionally blind playthrough (as evidenced by all the classic first-time-players mistakes) he's not going to do a power up method that literally requires twice as much grinding for only slightly better stats.

There's much easier ways to power up for larger effect, like 'learn move +1 for everyone' or 'buy 50 hi potions'.

The big thing that the level-down method provides though is just having the lower level characters in the first place. It's a game from that era where Square decided to start making the enemy's scale with you. So, lowering your party level while still having powerful gear and getting to keep the JP you earned on the characters will give you a much easier time, especially with random encounters.

Also, it requires a lot of grinding for maximum effect, but it's actually not all that bad if you just go with Chemists during the Lv. down phase. Chemists have the 2nd lowest growth rate (unless you are playing the PSP version and have the Onion knight with zero jobs mastered,) so it's equally as viable for the level-down trick.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top