- Location
- Somewhere in the stacks
- Pronouns
- She/Her
I don't give money to crypto-fascists if I can help it. Hard pass.
Well, that is pretty interesting. I do find myself agreeing with the article in many ways.Here's a good one. 'What's Racist About Telling the Truth?' — When 'Historical Accuracy' is Used to Deny Agency | Robert W. Guthrie
Basically they make some pretty absolute statements and then try to defend them on "historical accuracy" that actually isn't, especially since the premise, a blacksmith's son becoming a knight, was so vanishingly rare historically that you may as well be writing the story about a person of color or a woman knight.
I believe buying the game preowned from GameStop means that money doesn't go to the developer(unless it does then I don't know, maybe find some second hand store?).I find it fun enough that I'd recommend people play. Now of course the issue is how to do so without giving money to an asshole. I certainly don't know anything about that, and I'm sure all of us law abiding internet denizens here don't either. Its unfortunate, but such is life that we can't acquire games without paying for them. C'est la vie![]()
Buying used games is p much without purpose unless you're a collector. The only reason to spend money on something is to compensate its creators, and buying used doesn't do that. Of course, in this case, good people SHOULDN'T give money to these creators... but there's also no reason to give it to GameStop.I believe buying the game preowned from GameStop means that money doesn't go to the developer(unless it does then I don't know, maybe find some second hand store?).
Yeah but at that point you may as well make the main character about a person of color or a female knight with how vanishingly rare those circumstances are, so the whole defense is after the fact. Just like how in BF1 Dice couldn't be assed to make a more appropriate changes to the shooting meta game to emphasize bolt-actions instead of rare or unavailable semi-automatics and automatics but couldn't give us playable female character models despite already having assets to work with in the game. The "historical accuracy" is being used as a dishonest means of deflecting from representing women or people of color, it's a political decision.Well, that is pretty interesting. I do find myself agreeing with the article in many ways.
About the blacksnith's son becoming a knight:
I am putting this in a spoiler tag, since the game is barely out. Anyways, that is actually a very big plot point. Many characters in the game, even the ones that train you wonder exactly why they are training this peasant.
Many characters do express disbelief about Henry's eventual advancement. Some of them even express frustration if you do fuck up enough, and it is set to forshadow a plot twist sometime later.
Anyways, what I am trying to say, is that the social advancement Henry gets serves a narrative purpose.
Anyways, thanks for providing the article. I still feel compelled to defend the game on it's story and merits. Though the issue of the developer and how he handled the inquiry really grates on my nerves.
I have no counterargument against the misrepresentation of people of color. That I do not disagree on.Yeah but at that point you may as well make the main character about a person of color or a female knight with how vanishingly rare those circumstances are, so the whole defense is after the fact. Just like how in BF1 Dice couldn't be assed to make a more appropriate changes to the shooting meta game to emphasize bolt-actions instead of rare or unavailable semi-automatics and automatics but couldn't give us playable female character models despite already having assets to work with in the game. The "historical accuracy" is being used as a dishonest means of deflecting from representing women or people of color, it's a political decision.
And it's not hard to figure out that political message with a buff in the game called "Alpha Male" for sleeping at a brothel
I think you're missing the forest for the trees here, because a peasant becoming an Imperial Knight in the HRE where birthright determined station was about as rare as a landed nobleman's daughter taking up arms and armor and doing the same, they both could happen but to choose to make the story about one and not the other and claim "historical accuracy" is not apolitical. They're sending a political message that if you're a hard man you can pull yourself up by your bootstraps and using "historical accuracy" and "established character" to justify it, it's a conscientious decision.I have no counterargument against the misrepresentation of people of color. That I do not disagree on.
I also agree with you that I do wish the could have had a Character creation system in the game. The fact that it doesn't, makes the story about an already established character with established familial history. Having the option of creating a character, I feel would force the game to change its story. One of the advantages of having a pre-determined character, is that the story is a more personal one overall. At least that was my impression before I heard about all this drama with the developer.
However when it comes to representation of women in the middle ages, I think I would have to disagree on that. Not because you can't play as them, but because I've seen at least three very prominent woman in the game in which you interact with. All three stood out to me while I was playing the game, and I feel each of them stood out to me because of their past and present actions, and how characters within the game treat and acknowledge said actions.
Well, I've played for a bit, but I've never been knighted or ever even became an Imperial knight. The most Henry's been is just a guy in service of a very minor lord. A minor lord that had his Castle and village razed that is. I haven't finished the game yet, so I dunno how Henry finishes or how he ends up.I think you're missing the forest for the trees here, because a peasant becoming an Imperial Knight in the HRE where birthright determined station was about as rare as a landed nobleman's daughter taking up arms and armor and doing the same. They're sending a political message that if you're a hard man you can pull yourself up by your bootstraps and using "historical accuracy" and "established character" to justify it, it's a conscientious decision.
You can also buy it from a merchant for about 150 coin or so at most. Not that expensive after some hours in if you sell all the loot you get from your enemies.You have to craft a saving potion to save your game. You apparently only get three for several hours then you need to farm for materials to make a saving potion.
While I admit I have yet to finish the game, I am more than halfway through it and have yet to actually become a knight. You are made a squire/man-at-arms, and join a lord's garrison. That's it. And even then people comment on your upwards social mobility.I think you're missing the forest for the trees here, because a peasant becoming an Imperial Knight in the HRE where birthright determined station was about as rare as a landed nobleman's daughter taking up arms and armor and doing the same. They're sending a political message that if you're a hard man you can pull yourself up by your bootstraps and using "historical accuracy" and "established character" to justify it, it's a conscientious decision.
You have to craft a saving potion to save your game. You apparently only get three for several hours then you need to farm for materials to make a saving potion.
And considering the context (a land in political instability and beset by war), is this seriously that big of a deal, on the same level as playing a female warrior (btw, they originally planned to add a female storyline back during the kickstarter, but the stretchgoal was not reached), or a person of color?
Well, speak for yourself, I liked him, and I was, still am, interested in his story.I also really have to underline like: yes, in theory writing a defined character has quite a number of advantages in terms of writing a story... but the character they wrote is basically just some generic putz, and his motive is... seeking revenge for the burning of his starter town which is RPG Fill In The Blanks shit.
This isn't GERALT OF RIVIA, this is Dudeman Czechson, son of nobody with the personality of nothing.
You know that not all of them died right? Many of the denizens of the starter town survived and you meet them afterwards as part of the main story and sidequests. Some of them I even mentioned before earlier today.And every bit of that is so utterly ROTE. It's no different to like, the start of a Tales game or something. All these people might as well be named Deadmeat.
Again, you're missing the point, this wasn't an established character and it could've been whoever they wanted it to be, like they could've made the character the son of a landed noble or an unlanded noble from a landed noble's retinue. Because that would've been historically accurate. But they didn't, they used a generic fantasy starter character background and then claimed "historical accuracy" only when they felt it was convenient. This kind of undermines the selling point of the game.Well, speak for yourself, I liked him, and I was, still am, interested in his story.
Yes, he isn't a badass that can do a million and one things... and he needs to grow into his role a bit.
It's true he isn't a Geralt of the Witcher, or an Alloy of Horizon, but nevertheless I really like his story.There is a part where you return to said starter town to bury your parents. I found it highly emotional to come back to the town that was just an hour before full with life. Finding the corpse of his old girlfriend and take her ring as a memento, and just seeing him almost unable to burry them with it was pretty emotional.
This literally doesn't matter to the point we're attempting to get across.You know that not all of them died right? Many of the denizens of the starter town survived and you meet them afterwards as part of the main story and sidequests. Some of them I even mentioned before earlier today.
Ok, you are right on that. I agree, it could have been whomever they wanted, and they went with Henry the son of the blacksmith.Again, you're missing the point, this wasn't an established character and it could've been whoever they wanted it to be, like they could've made the character the son of a landed noble or an unlanded noble from a landed noble's retinue. Because that would've been historically accurate. But they didn't, they used a generic fantasy starter character background and then claimed "historical accuracy" only when they felt it was convenient. This kind of undermines the selling point of the game.
Again, you're missing the point, this wasn't an established character and it could've been whoever they wanted it to be, like they could've made the character the son of a landed noble or an unlanded noble from a landed noble's retinue. Because that would've been historically accurate. But they didn't, they used a generic fantasy starter character background and then claimed "historical accuracy" only when they felt it was convenient. This kind of undermines the selling point of the game.
This literally doesn't matter to the point we're attempting to get across.
It's no different to like, the start of a Tales game or something.
I'm not attacking it (well, I'll attack a lot of it, quality uh, VARIES, with Tales), I'm underlining that KC is bereft is creativity. And hell, even within such a generic start as Destroyed Hometown, Berseria manages to make you feel more for Velvet in an hour than most will likely feel for Henry in the whole game.